September 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

(originally posted on SIOANetwork.com)

Introduction

As the 8^th anniversary of the greatest atrocity against innocent Americans, the most miserable and appalling crime and attack ever to occur on our soil approaches it is important to honor our innocent dead and to come to a greater understanding of that event so that we might comprehend our world and our place in it more effectively.

A Politically Incorrect Definition of 9/11 (The Truth)

The Unpleasant Nature of our World in Clear Logic

9/11 was jihad against the unbelievers of the United States. Every participant in 9/11 was a Muslim, a “devout Muslim”.

Every participant explained his actions of the murder of American innocents in an Islamic doctrinal context.

Islam is at war with all unbelievers (kafirs) everywhere and forever as per the directives of Allah and Mohammed in the Islamic doctrine. All Muslims “submit to” and are “slaves of” Allah and Mohammed, his prophet. Allah and Mohammed are found only in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). The doctrine of Islam commands all Muslims to participate in jihad against the unbeliever until the world is ruled by Islam. This is the purpose of Islam.

The existence of kafirs (unbelievers) is an affront to Allah and Mohammed. All Muslims are commanded to participate in jihad or support those who do. Non-participation is apostasy. Apostasy is not tolerated. Jihad is the central concept of Islamic doctrine other than voluntary and forced submission. Islam means “submission”.

The Koran discusses the kafir more than it discusses how to be a good Muslim. Islam is a totalitarian political ideology at war with the United States and all non-Muslim countries, cultures, and religions.

A Politically Correct Version of 9/11 (A Lie)

A False Fantasy of Reality Now Entirely Discredited

The attacks of 9/11 were perpetrated by people who happened to be Islamic. These criminals and terrorists misunderstood the peaceful nature of the doctrine of Islam. 9/11 began a war against “terror” as we were attacked by “terrorists”. These terrible people “hijacked” the “religion of peace”. Islam and its adherents are fully compatible with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The perpetrators/terrorists of 9/11 have given the “religion of peace” a bad name because they misunderstood the concept of perpetual, universal jihad to mean actual universal, perpetual jihad rather than an inner struggle. (It is not relevant of course that the entire history of Islam from Year One is a history of brutality, conquest, and jihad.)

Islam is a “religion of peace”. The many millions of ultra-violent killers and haters across the world who claim to be Muslim are confused about the doctrine of Islam. Signs, and speeches supporting jihad and violent events jihad are all misunderstood and perpetrated by confused people who happen to be Muslim. Jihad has nothing to do with Islam. 9/11 was a blip, an aberration in a long history of Islamic contributions to America and to liberty and decency.

9/11 and Islam are entirely unrelated.

========================

You must decide the truth of 9/11, and the nature of our current world.

You must decide if the doctrine of Islam is to be believed, the words and commands of Allah and Mohammed that all Muslims are required to follow forever or if the ignorant, multiculturalist, politically correct fools who know nothing of Islam, jihad, or Islam doctrine and history are correct.

You must decide if the Islamic world is driven by the doctrine of Islam which states clearly that Islam is a totalitarian political doctrine of brutality, misogyny, war, barbarism, and intolerance or if it is a misunderstood “religion of peace”. We have clear evidence, attacks, threats, rhetoric, doctrine, and a world of universal jihad war that show that this is all so.

The truth of 9/11 is foundationally about the doctrine of Islam. There is no context without the doctrine of Islam in which 9/11, previous and subsequent terror/jihad attacks against Americans and unbelievers around the world make any sense. The context of 9/11 is Islamic doctrine; the context of universal jihad against the kafir unbelievers is the doctrine of Islam.

More importantly, the criminals and killers who do these atrocities tell us in no uncertain terms that they are committing jihad because they are commanded to do so by Allah and Mohammed (as they are found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith). To the jihadists these actions of cruelty, barbarism and violence are not “atrocities” but are rather “fighting in Allah’s cause” as stated in the Koran over 150 times. This is jihad and it is central to the doctrine of Islam, and because of this it is the central responsibility for all Muslims everywhere forever.

We live in a world of war. If 9/11, London, Beslan, Madrid, Bali, USSCole, Paris, Israel, Iraq, Pakistan, and the tens of the thousands of jihad events of barbarism and brutality since are not enough for you to understand the truth, you are not paying quite enough attention – or, worse, you simply choose not to believe the ugly truth. Perhaps you believe as multiculturalists do that if you prefer the world to be tolerant, and if we ourselves are tolerant and nice, then the world itself will be tolerant and nice. The world has never, ever worked in this way.

This is why multiculturalism is a failed concept and must be destroyed.

Political correctness and multiculturalism encourage Americans to believe the entirely false politically correct explanation of 9/11 and other fake things. We use multiculturalism and politically correct speech and thought to prettify ugly things because we hate ugly things and we don’t want to offend anybody. Saying that Muslims perpetrated 9/11 and thousands of other atrocities is the truth, but it is also offensive to Muslims for some reason, so we avoid saying this – we avoid speaking the truth.

We must abandon multiculturalism and its political correctness ally. These are false concepts bereft of truth and value. They are remnants of a fantasy that 9/11, Madrid, Beslan, London, Paris, Bali, etc., have destroyed.

These are failed concepts that belong in the garbage bin of dialectic and discourse and should never again sully our ability to think about, talk about, and understand what is true.

We must discredit and destroy multiculturalism and political correctness to honor our innocent dead of 9/11 and other Islamic jihad atrocities. We must speak the truth about this existential war that is being waged against us, we must identify the enemy, his ideology and fake religion of peace.

We must honor our innocent dead of 9/11 by opposing the oldest, and now resurgent, totalitarianism in the world, Islam. If we do not do this, our honored dead are forgotten, and our freedoms, culture, and country are all lost.

Mourn the dead of 9/11 and remember why they died; they died because an ideology of brutality and cruelty saw them as less than human, kafirs, and their existence was an affront to Allah and Mohammed.

Multiculturalism and political correctness must be destroyed so that we can discuss the war, and respond. If we do not respond we have turned our backs on our history, our honored dead, and the heroes of the present and past who gave their all so that we could live in freedom, equality and tolerance.

September 8th, 2009 by admin

9/11 Memorial Service and Film

Friday, 9/11/09
6.30 – 9.30pm
Franklin Tabernacle Church
4150 Clovercroft Road
Franklin, TN

Memorial Service, Pastor Joshua Johnian
Film: “9/11″
Admission: None

Directions

65 South to exit 65 (Highway 96E Murfreesboro)
.7 miles on Hwy96
Left on Clovercroft Road
2.5 miles
Turn left onto one lane entrance road, follow around to Clovercroft chapel.
An ACT volunteer will direct you with a sign and light to the chapel.

Brutal war upon the kafirs of America

Your email:

 

August 19th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

When the most important book of the twentieth century was released in 1925 while its author sat in prison with his cronies for an attempted coup against the German government, few could foresee its horrific impact. Mein Kampf set out, in rambling hate-based prose, a program of war, hatred, mass murder, and global conquest. Over the years purchases of the book made Adolf Hitler a wealthy man, but few in the country read the book though most households owned at least one copy. Fewer outside of Germany read the book. Those whose lives would be directly affected by the implementation of the plans described in the book did not read it; and those who should have read it who were put most at risk by it did not read it.

The same scenario is repeated with the Sira of Mohammed. Those who most need to read it (non-Muslims), those most at risk from its message will not, in the main, read it; while those who have read it are those who embrace its themes and message of hate, intolerance, war, and conquest.

The most influential book of the 20th century went mainly unread with disastrous consequences. One of the most influential books in human history, the Sira of Mohammed, is widely known among Muslims though the West is almost entirely ignorant of its contents, and its profound importance for both Muslims and non-believers. Worse still most in the west are ignorant of its existence.

We know what a world looks like when the ideology espoused in Mein Kampf is implemented. The Sira of Mohammed, Mohammed’s biography, tells the story of what the world will look like when Islam is triumphant. The differences between a victory of Nazism and a global conquest of Mohammedanism are difficult to determine as the differences are so minuscule.

We know what the world looked like when Nazism was rising, global warfare and unparalleled suffering. We know from the history of Islam what the world looks like when Islam is rising- jihad, barbarism, hatred, war, conquest, enslavement, and a brutal endless war of elimination of all non-Muslim cultures and political systems.

Had the world paid attention to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, as it is not now doing with the Sira of Mohammed, perhaps WW2 could have been avoided. When we know nothing of Mohammed’s life and his ideology of endless jihad against all unbelievers everywhere and forever we cannot defend ourselves against this growing threat. The threat of Islam originates in the doctrine of Islam of which the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) is one part of a trilogy of doctrinal texts which also includes Koran and Hadith. We are as ignorant (and more) as the clueless of 1933.

One who has read both Mein Kampf and the Sira can make a valid comparison. One who knows the history of WW2, and the Holocaust as well as Islamic history and doctrine, can place these books into an historical and political context. With this understanding of history and doctrine one can know with a reasonable certainty what the future will look like. One can know because just as Mein Kampf made certain promises and laid out certain plans, the Sira of Mohammed also makes promises and plans.

The Sira is not difficult to read. Anyone can read it. In fact recently a 12 year old was asked to read it. The child felt compelled to stop reading because “Mohammed was killing too many people”. The message of hate, violence, intolerance, and cruelty is clear to a 12-year-old but somehow eludes our political, academic, and religious leadership across the West. It eludes them most likely because they have not read it and do not know it exists.

Our lack of understanding of Islam and its foundational concepts of conquest and jihad is indicative of a societal-wide moral, intellectual, and ethical failure that for our own survival, must be swiftly reversed.

When one reads the doctrine of Islam the world shifts, changes. Knowledge of the doctrine brings events into focus in a way that previously was impossible. Just as Mein Kampf is the guide to WW2 before WW2 began, the doctrine of Islam is the guide to present day events and into the future. This is not prophecy, this is a firm understanding of the doctrine and guiding principles of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to our existence. We can know the future when we apply the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith) to present and past events involving Islam and adherents of Islam. This is applied theology and political science.

Knowledge of the Sira of Mohammed opens doors. It opens doors to a world of conflict and war and horror that we would prefer did not exist. There is no avoiding this foundational reality of our world.

When one knows Sira, closely held beliefs of the nature of the human world, how people behave and interact, and most importantly our previous understanding of the “religion of peace” are all shattered.

Learning Islamic doctrine forces us to rethink important concepts of the structure of existence, ideas that make life livable and pleasant, and paints a portrait of the ongoing failure and destruction of the human potential of peaceful co-existence and tolerance.

The doctrine of Islam is clear – there is no peaceful co-existence for Islam with unbelievers. Because non-Muslims have the gall and effrontery to not accept Allah and Mohammed, because we are Christian, Jew, Hindu, atheist, Buddhist, etc., we are seen by Allah and Mohammed as having rejected Koran, Sira, and Hadith – for this we are all kafirs and we must be made to submit. If we do not submit there is nothing that Islam will not do to make us do so. There are no taboos for Islam where kafirs are concerned. This is a fundamental lesson of the Sira of Mohammed.

The Sira, like the Koran and Hadith, is a wake up call for all kafirs (unbelievers). We learn from the Sira all about Islam, all about Mohammed, but we also learn about our own cultures. The lessons are painful and they are immutable.

• We are at war.
  Islam is at war with kafirs everywhere and forever until Islam is defeated or triumphant. The triumph of Islam is the defeat of individual freedoms, women’s rights, gay rights, religious tolerance, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc., etc. The triumph of Islam is a total shift of humanity from reaching for freedom and tolerance to an embrace of submission, enslavement, and intellectual and spiritual deadness from which recovery is unfortunately unlikely.
• We do not live in a “post-historical” world.
  In fact, history haunts us like a hunter. It pursues us until we stand and defend or surrender. This is not the world of the “end of history” of Frances Fukiyama, Bill Clinton, and other multiculturalist fantasists. Islam overturns all of these utopian concepts and crushes them under the boot of endless jihad and dhimmitude.
• We are not “post-modern”.
  We are pursued by forces of 7th century Arabia. They are well-trained; their doctrine of war has been successful for them for 1400 years. We are late in responding. Americans consider themselves forward thinking and not “mired” in issues of the past. We think we are above all of “that”. We are wrong. Our arrogance as to the ascension of our concepts is so strong that in foreign policy matters we simply only have to “reset” and we are on a totally new path, a path without a past – a path outside of context. With Islam there is no “reset”. We live outside of context in a bubble, a bubble that is being deflated rapidly by the rise of Islam.
• Our world is a world of conflict.
  War pursues us because the doctrine of Islam commands that it be so. The forces of Islam are flush with oil wealth transferred to them by us to them in our ignorance of their doctrine. We did this because we did not know their doctrine. We have empowered our enemies because we did not know their doctrine and now the time of reckoning approaches. We are not ready. We are not ready because we know nothing of the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith). If we do not know why and how our enemy fights us, we cannot hope to oppose him successfully. Everything we need to know about Islam is in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Knowledge of the doctrine of Islam is now a survival imperative; it is the patriotic duty of all lovers of freedom in the West to educate themselves and others about the doctrine of Islam. Ignorance of Islam is a moral, intellectual, ethical, and patriotic failure.
• Multiculturalism is wrong.
  In fact, multiculturalism is used by our enemies to immobilize us, keep us confused and unable to respond. Multiculturalism is wrong because the doctrine of Islam demonstrates that it is wrong. Islam is intolerant, we are tolerant; Islam is misogynist, we embrace equality between the sexes; Islam is about aggressive war, we are not. Islam denies the value of the individual, we believe that the empowered individual is the foundation of a healthy society and culture; Islam believes that only Islam is valid, we believe in religious pluralism and tolerance; Islam will not be analysed, criticized, satirized – we believe in humor, criticism and open debate. We believe that open debate is the foundation of intellectual honesty and truth. In Islam debate is not allowed. We do not believe in slavery, Islam strongly believes in slavery and dhimmitude of the unbeliever. The list is extensive. Multiculturalism’s core idea that all cultures are equal is destroyed by the existence and message of the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Truth is this: some cultures are superior in relation to others. Not all cultures are the same. This means that multiculturalism is a fraud and a failed utopian concept that must be delegitimized and destroyed. The product of Islam is jihad. The products of Western culture that enhance the value of existence, empower individuals, and create opportunity and wealth are too numerous to mention here. We do not war against others because they do not believe what we believe. Some cultures are better than others. Multiculturalism is dead, the only problem is that few have noticed its demise.

In Islam the model of the life of Mohammed (Sira) and the things that he said and did according  to his friends (Hadith) are the perfect model of behavior for all Muslims to follow in perpetuity. If Mohammed had been a nice fellow this would be a boon for all humanity, but it is not so. Mohammed was not a nice fellow. In Islam it is said that what Mohammed did is considered “Sunna” that means acceptable and good; what Mohammed disallowed is “haram” or forbidden.

Had Mohammed been a humanitarian this article would not be so lengthy. The Sira and Hadith dictate what is Sunna. Foundationally, jihad is Sunna. This means that anything done to the kafir if it advances the cause of Allah/Islam is Sunna. This includes every negative thing one can imagine. There are no taboos for the kafir.

When one reads the Sira one sees that we in the West are in serious trouble. It is interesting to note that “year one” of the Islamic calendar is not the year in which Mohammed received his first “revelations” from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Rather, it is the year in which Mohammed emigrated from Mecca to Medina. In Mecca Mohammed was an argumentative and disruptive but non-violent “preacher” – he got 150 converts in 9 years. When he went to Medina as an immigrant Mohammed became a warlord. When he was finished there were no enemies left, he was the ruler of all Arabia. All of his opponents had been slaughtered in battle or by assassination or had converted (submitted) to the “religion of peace”.

“Year one” of the Islamic calendar shows definitively that Islam is not a religion only, but a political ideology of conquest and barbarism, totalitarianism and cruelty fronted by a fake “religion of peace”.

“Year one” is a designation of a political event in Mohammed’s life not a religious one. The so-called “religion of peace” is a clever front for a political totalitarian ideology of control, control of Muslims and non-Muslims. Islam’s understanding of control of humans is without peer.

The world’s great cycles of history turn on knowledge, ignorance, and anti-knowledge. Our culture of multicultural ignorance is one of anti-knowledge. Ignorance empowers Islam. Islam is our enemy, it says so in the Sira of Mohammed.

Multiculturalism says that Islam is equal in value and import to our Western cultures of freedom and tolerance and inclusiveness. Multiculturalism empowers our existential enemy.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed so that we can discuss, debate, and condemn evil where necessary. We refuse to learn from doctrine and we ignore the history of jihad at our peril.

The fate of humanity will be decided upon our understanding of the doctrine of our enemies. They know us well, we know little to nothing of them. The old saying, “You may not believe in the devil, but he believes in you” is applicable here. You may not care about Islamic doctrine but it cares very much about you. The majority of Islamic doctrine is about the kafir, us.

Islam is a doctrine whose purpose is the conquest and annihilation of the unbeliever everywhere. We ignore it because we have difficulty accepting that it can be real; we have difficulty letting go of our concepts that we live outside of war and outside of history. We are all too enlightened for all that.

Our enemies do not see the world as we do.

Some in the multicultural West are so ignorant of history that they find the concept of “enemy” excessive and difficult to accept. Such people are outside of history because they are ignorant of history and of human nature. Such people believe that if we are “tolerant” and show how “nice” we are to our enemies that they will love us, and stop hating us.

Our enemies are pleased that we are “tolerant” and “nice” because this makes their mission of conquest all the easier.

These are the bubble people, those who live on  wishful thinking and ignorance. This ideology of ignorance has infected our leadership and institutions to such an extent that when scholars quote the Sira of Mohammed they are excoriated as “bigots”. This discussion of Islamic doctrine is not a matter of opinion. If you do not like the discussion you must take the matter up with Mohammed and make your complaints to him as the messengers (those who discuss doctrine) are only repeating his lines and his example to show the dire nature of our situation. The scholars of the doctrine of Islam bring a message of dire warning.

The fate of humanity turns on the pages of unread books. Mein Kampf was on most every shelf in Germany but few read it; few abroad read it. In the pages of that book was laid out the plan for conquest and murder that would become the 2nd World War.

The Sira of Mohammed is unread widely in the West. It is not difficult to read. The Sira is a plan for domination of all unbelievers everywhere. It is a book of cruelty and violence that often surpasses Mein Kampf in horrors as the stories are (supposedly) an historical record of atrocities while Mein Kampf was essentially a twisted “wish list” of domination and barbarism.

We in the West must study the doctrine of Islam – it is not difficult. We must acknowledge the truth about the “religion of peace” and we must accept unpleasant realities though they shatter our illusions. We must acknowledge that we are at war.

Mohammed’s life is not the kind of life that any decent person anywhere on this planet would want to emulate. His life and actions are the model for all Muslims to aspire to forever. This model of cruelty, hate, intolerance, rape, torture, murder, war, pedophilia, theft, deceit, enslavement, conquest, and misogyny is the model for all Islam forever. “We have a litttle problem” is the most profound  understatement of the millennium.

August 12th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

A stunning case of an honor killing avoided… or only delayed is now underway in Florida. A 17-year old girl from Ohio converted from Islam to Christianity. Her father vowed to kill her for leaving Islam. The girl fled. She is now in Florida. Read the story here.

Depending on the actions of authorities in Florida and in the American government this promised honor killing will be prevented, or only delayed. A return to her family for this girl is a literal death sentence.

It is the foundation of any civilized society that the innocent are protected, and provided succor. Those who have the means render aid and comfort to those who require help; we provide assistance to those who have not the means to help themselves. This is the core of our Judeo-Christian concept of American democracy. This is our moral and ethical foundation which so many have apparently forgotten. Unfortunately, Islam does not share these concepts.

It is our responsibility to “circle our wagons” around this young woman who has left Islam, the fake “religion of peace”. In Islamic doctrine leaving Islam is a death sentence. This is not theoretical. This is reality. If you leave Islam anyone in the umma of Islam can kill you; it is in the Koran and is commanded thus for all Muslims, those who ”submit to Allah and Mohammed”.

Because the Sira of Mohammed (Mohammed’s biography), the Hadith, and the Koran all say that leaving Islam is punishable by death and that ties to Islam override all ties of friendship and kinship we therefore see these abysmal, anti-human, horrific, barbaric “honor killings” again and again.

The so-called “religion of peace” is something like the Hotel California, you can enter but you can never leave – but it’s much, much worse. 

The killing of female family members is very much a part of Islam. This is no “religion of peace“, it is a lie.

“The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used not to kill the children, so thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside.” — Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4457

Khadir, or Khidr, figures in sura 18 of the Qur’an. He is traveling with Moses, and: “Then they proceeded: until, when they met a young man, he [Khadir] slew him. Moses said: “Hast thou slain an innocent person who had slain none? Truly a foul (unheard of) thing hast thou done!” Khadir replies: “As for the youth, his parents were people of Faith, and we feared that he would grieve them by obstinate rebellion and ingratitude (to Allah and man). So we desired that their Lord would give them in exchange (a son) better in purity (of conduct) and closer in affection….” (18:74, 18:80-81). (source)

This case could and should be a test case, a precedent in opposing the barbarism that is Islam. This insanity must be stopped, and this case is the way that it will be done.

We must succor this innocent victim of Islam, circle our wagons around her and protect her from her own father who has vowed to kill her because she has “dishonored” him and the Umma (the global  community of Islam) and offended Allah and Mohammed by leaving  Islam. Islam is the great collective; personal choices are entirely verbotten; one only does what is allowed, and doesn’t do what is forbidden. Leaving Islam is strictly forbidden.  Islam as a collective is anti-individual. In Islam the individual “submits” to the doctrine and to the Umma, the world-wide “family/community” of Islam.

Islam is for the person who can’t stand to have to make choices, can’t stand to have to exercise moral sense, and wants, wants, wants, to be part of a faith that is collectivist. You are part of the Army of Islam, and once in, you can’t get out. You must owe your loyalty only to Islam and to fellow Muslims, never — in the slightest way — to non-Muslims or to any legal or political institutions or social arrangements that are the product of non-Muslim societies and peoples. It’s a Collectivist Faith, and because it purports to regulate every single area of life, it is a Totalitarian Faith. And while it has been from its inception, technological developments have given totalitarian movements the ability to more thoroughly penetrate and dominate the minds of those over whom they have a hold, whether the hold is mainly one limited to a specific state (as Nazi Germany, or Communist Soviet Union) or is a hold based on an ideology spread among True Believers not only in Islam-ruled lands but also in lands where non-Muslims have not yielded to Islam. (Fitzgerald, JihadWatch)

In our twisted multicultural world many of our elites say that all cultures are equal, none is better or worse. This is intellectual and ethical cravenness.

We must draw a line, we must say that there are some things that are beyond the pale; beyond our ability for even us neurotically “tolerant” and “inclusive” multiculturalists to accept. This case is the line in the sand.

We must say NO to a father killing his wife, daughters and extended (female) family members because the male believes that the females have “offended” Islam. There  are many, many cases across the world in which Muslim rape victims are murdered by their male relatives because they have “offended” Islam (and the immediate “family”) by being raped. In Islam there is no family but the umma, all kinship ties are negated and overturned by the adherent’s ties to Islam. This is in Koran and Sira, the foundational doctrine of Islam. Islam is a collectivist ideology; those in it submit to it (or are made to submit).

Islam has no sympathy for the victims; Islam creates victims. The first victims of Islam are Muslims.

Let us provide protection and care to this innocent woman in Florida whose only “crime” was to make a decision for her own life, and future. This is no crime in any civilized society, but it is to Islam. For Islam this is a “crime” that merits death.

Let us show ourselves and the world that we in the United States can still see and understand good and evil, and that we know what is right and what is wrong.

There has rarely been a clearer case of right and wrong than this. Rally to this woman, and show the defenders of the “religion of peace” that we no longer buy the “official line” (based entirely on ignorance and wishful thinking and dhimmitude). 

Islam is a totalitarian ideology of cruelty and barbarism. Let us as a nation stand beside Rifqa Bary against the forces of brutality, cruelty, misogyny and intolerance that is Political Islam.

(video post courtesy of Islam in Action)

August 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are two critical impediments that prevent the West from engaging effectively, or at all, in this existential conflict with Islam. Ignorance and multiculturalism (proto-legitimized moral relativism) must be deconstructed and delegitimized.

It is a moral and ethical failure to be ignorant of the purposes and doctrine of political Islam. Ignorance of an existential enemy is shameful and indefensible. Multiculturalism must be exposed for the disastrous pseudo-philosophy of ignorance that it is. Founded upon ignorance and silly utopianist anti-intellectualism, multiculturalism prevents us from responding to political Islam because to do so in our morally bankrupt multicultural world is seen as intolerance. Defending your nation from cultural and literal annihilation is not “intolerance” it is the height of patriotism and rationality.

The fundamental dual concepts of multiculturalism are “tolerance” and “inclusiveness”. These very “nice” concepts are founded upon the idea that all cultures are of equal value and that differences between cultures are to be applauded and “accepted” rather than condemned when such condemnation is appropriate. The idea that a culture can be corrupt or even evil is dismissed as “bigotry” in the multiculturalist’s broken anti-knowledge world. Multiculturalism is the soiled garden in which Islam grows.

People who know the doctrine of political Islam and have the effrontery to discuss it in public are accused of bigotry by multiculturalists and the ignorant. The doctrine of political Islam as found in Sira, Koran, and Hadith is inherently intolerant and exclusive but this does not deter the multiculturalists. There is an unspoken superiority in their world; they believe themselves superior because they are so inclusive, accepting, and “nice”. The forces of evil see this welcoming inclusiveness from the cultures of the West as the actions of fools. These foolish actions are of great value to political Islam because in their false feelings of superiority multiculturalists are the perfect “dhimmis” for Islam, perfect servents of a totalitarian ideology whose purposes are entirely destructive of inclusiveness and tolerance. Multiculturalists are anti-knowledge useful idiots for the forces of cultural and literal annihilation that is Islam.

There has long been a concept very popular in the United States regarding immigration and assimilation which is that if we show new-comers to our shores how nice, welcoming, and good we are, they will all become Americans. This model has worked for generations with European, Asian, South Americans and immigrants from across the world. Islam does not fit this model.

The model has failed because Islam does not assimilate. Islam does not assimilate because Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” translates to “submission”. Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are not interested in assimilation, they are interested only in bringing the entire world under Allah’s “religion”. For adherents of this miserable and cruel political ideology of hate and conquest only one religion, one political system, and one culture is allowed – that of Allah and Mohammed.  All other religions, cultures, and political systems are to be annihilated.

Because multiculturalists are willfully ignorant about the cultures that they defend – to them all cultures (no matter how abysmal they may be) are worthy of defense simply because they are “different” – Islam sees that the cultures of the West cannot defend themselves against them.

In fact, multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam infiltrates our institutions and political systems. Islam is at war with all non-believers everywhere and forever, this is called “jihad” or “fighting in Allah’s cause”. Jihad is so foundational to Islam that it is mentioned over 150 times in the text of the Koran. Because multiculturalists have no need to know anything about any culture (after all, all cultures are “equal” therefore knowledge of any one culture is of little necessity, value, or import) they do not understand that they are under attack.

Multiculturalism and ignorance, the two walk hand in hand together, are the greatest weaknesses of the cultures of the West.

The model of assimilation has failed. It has failed because resurgent Islam and its jihad has no interest in assimilation. Multiculturalists do not know this, and when they are told the truth, they refuse obstinately to believe it. Acceptance of the truth of Islam is to accept the failure of the fundamental concepts of multiculturalism.

We in the West must judge cultures and adherents to such cultures when we make immigration decisions. We must accept the literal truth that some cultures are unpleasant and have belief systems that are contrary to ours. The idea that everyone loves freedom is a broken and confused concept. It is a ruined shell because in Islam the only freedom that is considered of value is the complete submission to Allah and Mohammed (and the doctrine of Islam). Islam sees freedom in total submission to the doctrine of Islam.

When we open our doors to Islam, we open ourselves and our nations to forces that reject our concepts of tolerance and inclusiveness. This is the absurdity and horror of multiculturalism- it is a failed philosophy of self-destruction.

We must learn the doctrine of Islam. Knowledge of the doctrine is akin to having the “playbook” of the opposing team in a sporting match. But this is not sport for us, it is about nothing less than our existential survival as non-Islamic countries and cultures. We must learn the doctrine of Islam to dispel our ignorance of Islam. Without knowledge of Islam we cannot oppose it; without knowledge some do not even realize that they are at war with us and therefore we are at war with them.

The banishment of ignorance through knowledge is critically important if we are to survive as freedom-loving, tolerant, and “nice” cultures. It is a patriotic duty to learn the doctrine of Islam and educate others about it.

We must destroy multiculturalism; deconstruct it, delegitimize it, and acknowledge it as the utopian self-destructive fantasy that it is. All cultures are not equivalent. Some cultures are better than others, and some are our enemies and some our friends. This is reasonable, rational thinking. The foundational concept of multiculturalism is that all cultures are of equal value and worth. This is inclusiveness, tolerance, and “niceness” taken to the extreme. This is anti-intellectualism and irrational thinking that will result in the entire loss of our civilizations. Multiculturalism must be destroyed and swept into the dustbin of absurdity where it belongs.

Failure to destroy multiculturalism, delegitimize it and its adherents as the intellectual imposters and fools that they are is a national failure whose consequences are beyond unpleasant. Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam gains access to our countries for the purpose of the destruction of the host culture.

The doctrine of Islam is clear on these points as are the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”. Jihad is a responsibility for all Muslims. It is the command of both Allah and Mohammed. Mulsims who do Jihad are “good” Muslims because they follow the commands of Allah and Mohammed; those who do not do jihad are “extremists” because they reject the commands of the doctrine of Islam. Those who reject jihad are perfect fodder for jihadists because they are not “good” Muslims. This concept must be understood clearly. Our conceptions of good/evil, right/wrong do not apply in the Islamic worldview.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed. Multiculturalists must be mocked and criticised for the self-destructive fools that they are. Their philosophy is used by our enemies to gain entree and power in our institutions and cultures. Multiculturalists, in their utopian ignorance, are tools of the enemy – their philosophy must be rejected, repudiated, and deconstructed so that rational thought can again be the dominant mode of thought across the West. To do any less is failure.

When we know nothing of Islam, we lose. When we say that all cultures are equivalent and we can no longer identify good and evil, right and wrong, we lose. Ignorance of Islam is not acceptable, it is a moral and ethical failure.

Multiculturalism is a tool of Islam; it is a disastrous ideology of false “nice” that is used to stifle critical thought and open debate. Multiculturalism is a complete failure as it is used by our enemies to destroy us. It is a failed fake intellectual concept for “nice” people to abjure their responsibilities to themselves, their cultures and countries. Multiculturalism must be destroyed.

June 26th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

The adherents of multiculturalism, the doyens of political correctness, are anti-intellectual. They reside in a self-referential world outside of reality and  devoid of common sense; they are the soldiers of anti-knowledge.

PC people are constantly mentally busy because they are always doing self-checks to be sure that they are adhering to their doctrine of wishful thinking.

There is a mental gymnastic that the followers of this modern religion perform often many times every day. It is a kind of self-check to make sure that they are within the orthodoxy, within the mainstream of wishful, positive thinking upon which their belief system is founded.

The ongoing jihad against the west (and against multiculturalists, of course) is a case in point. When critics, analysts, and historians of Islam speak negatively about Islam the mutliculturalists always are ready with a contrarian reply. Their response is not based on knowledge of the subject, nor historical understanding, appreciation of current events, understanding of Islamic doctrine, or even lending credence to terrorists who say they are doing terror and murder because of the doctrine of Islam. Rather,  multiculturalists perform a mental protocol which allows them to respond with a self-identified authority but without knowledge or understanding. This is anti-knowledge.

The politically correct response to an intellectual challenge is an anti-intellectual negation of the learning of those who hold opinions that are considered unpleasant and outside their orthodoxy.

Alan Bloom in “Closing of the American Mind” discussed this phenomenon during the 1980s in the elite universities of the United States, but he did not go far enough. The adherents of Political correctness are the vanguard of an anti-intellectualism that negates knowledge and learning and fundamentally undermines the purpose of the academy itself. If only Bloom could have seen further along into the future than he did, perhaps his book would have been titled something like “The Failure of the American Intellectual Elite and its Discontents”.

When a critic of Islam says, “Islam is a cruel political system masquerading as a religion” the multiculturalists are deeply offended. They are not upset because Islam is so cruel but rather that Islam is being criticized.

Criticism of any belief system is contrary to the concepts of total acceptance, total tolerance that multiculturalists espouse but  most importantly criticism of Islam is considered entirely outre. Perhaps this is because Islam is now under scrutiny because of 9/11, Beslan, Mumbai, London, Madrid, Bali, Pakistan, Iraq, Israel, etc. Islam must not be scrutinized because something unpleasant might be found. Unpleasantness anywhere, especially in Islam is not part of this world view of multiculturalists.

This is their foundation because they believe that every belief system is of inherent value (particularly Islam) and is of equal import. This is why President Obama said in Cairo recently to  the so-called “Muslim World” that Islam was important in the development of the United States. The truth is this: Islam was not important in the development of the United States except in the development of American military (naval) power.

American naval power was developed specifically to fight jihadist Barbary Coast Islamic piracy in the early 1800s. This is not an issue open for debate it is simply an historical fact supported by the policies and writings of President Jefferson and the historical record.

Multiculturalists will not acknowledge this fact, but it is truth nonetheless. Political correctness is not an orthodoxy of truth, it is one of hope and ignorance. It is founded upon hope that extreme tolerance will make enemies into friends and upon the denial of knowledge .

In the mental worldview of the mutliculturalist there is no good and no bad, only differences. To these shallow analysts “differences” whatever they may be are fundamentally good.

The foundation of political correctness is the acceptance of differences, extreme tolerance of core differences- even for those ideologies that instruct their followers to commit murder of those who are not part of the group – you know, like uber-tolerant multiculturalists.

This extreme tolerance is fundamentally what multiculturalists claim is the best part of their orthodoxy. They suggest that when we as a society are tolerant, we can “all just get along”. But this is moral relativism because there are some individuals and some philosophies that we cannot get along with who have no interest in getting along with us.

In order to be intellectually valid the political correctness theory requires both sides of the moral equation to be equally tolerant; they rarely are.

In the case of Islam, the tolerance of American multiculturalists for Islam’s intolerance is a sign to Islam of western societal and moral degredation and weakness.

This reality of the failure of multiculturism is reflected in the rejection of Obama’s open hand of appeasement by the mullahs of Iran.

Islam uses political correctness. Islam grows because multiculturalists who know nothing of Islam and protect it because extreme tolerance is their moral philosophy, are the “useful idiots”, the anti-intellectual foot soldiers of totalitarianism.

The PC acolytes believe that since Islamic totalitarianism is “different” – and “difference” is inherently worthy -  it is considered then of equal value to anything else, equivalent to democracy and freedom. This is intellectual and moral failure.

Western political correctness is nothing more than prettified cultural and societal surrender.

The forces of totalitarian Islam see and understand this “philosophy” as the politically correct adherents do not. To the forces who desire our demise political correctness is their ally.

Extreme tolerance, tolerance of those who want to conquer us through any means, is seen by the forces of evil as moral, ethical and societal weakness and that is exactly what it is.

Islam is on the rise because we are on the decline.

When a critic of Islam says, “Islam is a totalitarian, cruel ideology of hatred and intolerance” the multiculturalist, extreme tolerance-centric westerner does this: they replace “Islam” with “Jew” and do a “self-test”. They restate the statement about Islam but now it is about Judaism.

“Judaism”, the desperate multiculturalist thinks-using their broken calculus, “is a totalitarian, cruel ideology of hatred and intolerance”. The next step for the PC doyen is quick: did the Nazis say such things against the Jews? Well, if they didn’t it sure sounds like a Nazi-ish statement!

Then, the multiculturalist dismisses the original statement about Islam and condemns the speaker for being a racist and bigot. This is the core of political correctness lunacy and anti-intellectualism. Dismissal of true context and a reassignment of inappropriate context to the argument specifically for the protection of politically correct ideas (and not for the pursuit of truth) is the purpose of the politically correct response.

Political correctness and multiculturalism are self-referential theories, they understand reality only in so far as it confirms or denies their foundational concepts. Anything that offends their fundamental concepts of how the world functions must be destroyed and the proponents of such ideas vilified. This is how self-referential ideologies (multiculturalism and Islam) that deny reality continue to exist and grow. Truth is not the core, protecting the ideology is the core.

The Jews of Germany prior to the Holocaust were completely assimilated into German culture. In fact, most Jews of Germany prior to the 2nd World War considered themselves Germans first and Jews second.

The mental gymnastics of the politically correct anti-intellectuals is false. Jews did not attack Germany, instead they were at the core of German intellectual, and cultural life. Jews were at the core of German life. Our own Manhattan Project was staffed with brilliant Jewish scientist escapees from nazism.

Islam has declared war on the west, on the United States andIsrael, but we prefer to pretend that there is no war, that Islam is “the religion of peace” and that terrorists quoting Islamic doctrine as they kill non-believers are misunderstanding and “highjacking” the doctrine of Islam. Political correctness is a fraud.

The adherent of multiculturalism denies a truth that they do not prefer to accept.

The truth of Islam is that it IS totalitarian, it is cruel and it is intolerant. We see evidence of this in the doctrine of Islam, in the activities of Islam every day, and in the writings of jihadists. This is the true reality. Political correctness and multiculturalism is the denial of reality and nothing less.

Islam is at war with us, and we pretend that it is not.

In no other war in history has any nation ever persevered when the very existence of the conflict was denied. Our multiculturalists and politically correct well-wishers are self-destructive.

Denial of reality is self-destructive; denial of reality is anti-intellectual. Political correctness is jihad. 

May 24th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There is no Amish Jihad. There is no Jewish Jihad and no Christian Jihad. There is only Islamic Jihad. Why?

The failure to acknowledge the unpleasant truths of Islam, its intolerance, violence, cruelty, misogyny, and hatred is fundamental to multiculturalism. Moral relativism is multiculturalism. We are told that we cannot discuss Islam because Islam is a religion and that therefore what Islam is about is the business of Muslims only. This is a confusion of purpose and a lack of understanding of daily events whereby Muslims kill and abuse non-believers with Western multiculturalists defending their right to such activity on the basis of ”its their religion”. 

The concept that “Islam has been hijacked” and that Islam is “the religion of peace” is counterintuitive as much as it is a worldview that is simply untrue. Since the majority of the doctrine of Islam is about how Muslims are to interact with kafirs (non-believers) it is the right and duty of all kafirs to understand Islam and discuss it, especially when Islam’s purpose vis-a-vis unbelievers (and apostates) is overtly hostile.

The greatest mistake of President Bush’s administration was in stating that Islam is a “hijacked” “religion of peace”. The statement is false. Acceptance and tolerance of a political political ideology that is existentially opposed to everything that Americans say that they hold dear in the name of “tolerance” is national suicide and nothing less.

A recent ethical and core mission failure on the part of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is illustrative.  Geert Wilders the Danish parliamentarian and creator of the film Fitna has been a lightning rod of controversy across the world for his outspoken views on the dangers that Islam and the ever-increasing Muslim population of Europe and in the US (and the concomitant shrinking of the populations of host countries) pose to the West. Wilders is only one of very few European politicians who are speaking out on these issue. He is several years ahead of the curve, though Europe is probably ten years late in responding to this very serious problem. At a recent speech in Florida Mr. Wilders was condemned by the state director of the ADL.

The Florida area director of the ADL, one Andrew Rosenkranz, attacked Wilders who has been speaking at synagogues across Florida. Rosenkranz condemned Wilders’ alleged “message of hate” which refuses to distinguish between the religion of Islam and Jihadism. A great many scholars of Islam would not affirm Mr. Rosenkranz’s simplistic bifurcation (however civic-minded). Making that distinction is, in fact, a far more difficult intellectual and theological undertaking than he recognizes. While in a narrow sense Islamism with a capital “I” is a recent historical development – we associate the derivation of the term with the birth of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in 1928 under the leadership of Hasan al-Banna – Islamism/Jihadism has been a foundation stone of Islam from its inception, and any close reading of the Qur’an, the Hadith, or familiarity with the Sunnah or the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence makes the point incontestable.

The ADL’s embrace of tolerance for all includes tolerance for those whose ideology tells them to kill Jews wherever they are found. It is a moral and ethical failure to recognize a conflict between good and evil.

Without an apology by the ADL, the ADL’s effectiveness as a defender of Jews is at an end, and their new mission of defending liberal concepts of multiculturalism and inclusiveness has now come to the fore. The irony of defending those whose ideology promotes absolutism and intolerance under the banner of tolerance is likely lost on the leadership of ADL.

Americans confuse tolerance and inclusiveness far too often with a complete laissez-faire political and cultural milieux that simply does not exist; it pretends that the world is not what it is and immediately forgets 9/11, Mumbai, London, Paris, Beslan, Khobar, USS Cole, Pentagon, Flight 93, Kenyan embassies, Bali, etc.

This blind tolerance of intolerance is founded upon anti-intellectualism and a firmly held disconnect from the realities that surround us and of those forces of brutality and death whose goal is our destruction. Only a society in danger can actively defend those whose mission is the destruction of that society. We did not defend the rights of Nazis during the Second World War; we fought them.

We have dealt with absolutist and cruel ideologies in the past; and we have gone to war against those ideologies. Americans oppose ideologies that value death over life or, at least we did so in the past. Cultures that cannot identify cruelty and violence as something to be opposed are fertile ground for absolutist ideologies, be they cults or “religions”.

Many multi-culturalists and defenders of Islam, those who generally know nothing of Islam and its doctrine, often look to the Holocaust. They say that criticism of Islam is akin to the criticism of the Jews by the Nazis prior to the Holocaust.  They say that criticism of a religion or group of people must then inevitably result in some horrible reaction against adherents of such groups.

But there is no underlying hatred of Muslims in the United States, nor in Europe, as there was extreme Jew hatred across Europe prior to the war, and now resurgent again today. The West opposed Communism and Nazism because the ideologies of these movements were fundamentally antagonistic to our own American culture and political system. These were ideologies of cruelty and expansion and a total deconstruction and debasement of the individual to the system. The doctrine of Islam is similar.

In Islam the individual Muslim is not alone with God. Instead, he is a “slave of Allah” and the rules of his mental and moral and other kinds of servitude are all set out in the Shari’a, the Holy Law of Islam. So you’ve Got Friends. Every Muslim is your new true-blue friend. And, because of how Muslims are taught to view the world, every Infidel who somehow makes problems for Islam, who insists, for example, on the right of free peoples in the West to exercise their freedoms — freedom of speech, freedom of conscience — is now your enemy. (Fitzgerald)

This is not to say that there aren’t nice Muslims; there are. This discussion is not about individuals but about a political ideology of warfare, conquest, cruelty, and intolerance.

Many Muslims know less of their doctrine than non-believers. But, since the Koran  is the actual word of Allah the Koran cannot be changed, ever. Because the Koran is very clear that Jews are to be killed; that no religion can exist other than Islam; that Islam is at war with all unbelievers everywhere and forever; that those captured in war can be enslaved; that slaves can be raped and sold; that torture and brutality, theft, murder, pedophilia, and a demand for total submission to this doctrine by all adherents are fundamental requirements; and that leaving the religion is a sin punishable by death – what is the nice Muslim who does not know the doctrine to do when he/she finds out about it?

Because the doctrine of Islam is locked in time and cannot be changed or reformed, the nice Muslim must make a decision to behave according to the rules laid down by Allah and Mohammed in the Koran or become an apostate and leave the religion.  For many, this is a very, very difficult decision. But many have left and are speaking out about the truth of Islam and its doctrine.

The context of world events in which cruelty and barbarism are seen daily as perpetrated by Islamists is the doctrine of Islam. The majority of the Koran is not about how to be a Muslim but is about how Muslims are to interact with non-believers. This means that Islam is a political ideology.

Because Islam is a political ideology as well as a religion adherents must behave towards the unbelievers as commanded by Koran (the never-changing perfect word of Allah) to war against them forever until they are conquered or until they submit to Islam. This means that an observant Muslim must embrace the political concepts and commands of the doctrine if they are to be a devout religionist in Islam and properly submit to Allah and the commands of Mohammed.

According to statistical analysis, “the amount of text in the entire Koran devoted to kafirs is 61%.”  A kafir is non-believer, all non-Muslims are kafirs.

Defenders of Islam, mainly those who know nothing of the doctrine, say that the violence in the Koran is echoed by similar violence in the major religious books of Judaism and Christianity. This is not so.

The violence in the old and new Testaments is temporaryand localized; the violence in the doctrine of Islam is permanent and universal. Islam is always at war with the unbelievers, forever and everywhere; Islam is always desirous of the death of Jews, everywhere and forever; Islam requires kafirs to be conquered, converted, or killed, everywhere and forever. Those multiculturists and leftists who defend Islam and its doctrine usually know nothing of its doctrine and usually explain away all terror attacks and daily events of cruelty and violence done because of the doctrine of Islam as further evidence of the “hijacking” of Islam rather than further proof of its actual cruel and barbaric nature.

It is critical to bear in mind that Muslims cannot view the Qur’an as Westerners do their Holy Scripture as a smorgasbord from which to pick and choose in the interest of the most humane exegesis. In Islam, one cannot retain the nice bits and leave out the nasty ones. That’s because there’s no parallel between the status of the Qur’an in Islam and that of the Hebrew Bible in Judaism or the New Testament in Christianity. The great majority of Jews and Christians (excluding the relative handful of true literalists in both faiths) understand scripture as the divinely inspired words of human beings who were children of their time, whose values were historically conditioned. If an ancient text has become an ethical anachronism (such as passages in Leviticus recommending stoning homosexuals or adulterers) we no longer consider them binding. But Muslim believers see the Qur’an in very different terms. It is the literal word of God transmitted whole and perfect – perfect for all time – to Mohammed by the Angel Gabriel. It is thus an extension of God himself; the analogy would not be the Hebrew Bible or New Testament but rather to the Christian Eucharist. No human being can change what is written or reinterpret it in light of contemporary understanding. It is neither historically nor socially conditioned. What was true when the revelation was allegedly made to Mohammed in the seventh century is equally true now. Passages that strike a modern Western ear as utterly barbarous and malevolent – because they are – retain all their sanctity for an authority over believers. (Stephen Steinlight, FrontPage Magazine, source)

Defenders of Islam, those who say that Islam is “peaceful”, are generally unaware that there were previous holocausts perpetrated by Islam against Jews, Hindus, Christians, Zoroastrians, and many other religions and cultures. The body count of jihadis in the hundreds of millions since the inception of this cruel ideology 1400 years ago. The extreme cruelty of Islam is ignored by multiculturalists who prefer to see Islam and the world itself as they would prefer it to be rather than acknowledge the truth.

Tolerance of ideologies that oppose our existence is not rational. Opposing an ideology that is brutal and cruel and intolerant itself is not hate-mongering or “racism” or “bigotry”. Islam is not a race.

The discussion of the doctrine of Islam, in particular Islam’s holiest book the Koran, holds all the answers. The cruelty of the Koran and its almost unbelievable commands to adherents for perpetual war, slaving, barbarity and hatred is too much for many in the West to accept. Every day we see proofs that the ideology of Islam is alive and well, and motivating many across the world to do deeds that we consider outside the family of humanity.

There are no Amish jihadis. If there were, would they hassle you with annoying encomiums of their religion and suggest strongly that you convert, and give you a headache? Yes. This is not the approach of Islam. In Islam, all kafirs(non-believers) must submit to Allah and Mohammed – they will not give you a headache, they will remove your head. 

We have daily reports of the brutality of the ”religion of peace”, but many will not listen choosing not to believe it. Read the Koran yourself.

We have fought cruel ideologies in the past. We have faced Nazis and Communists, and destroyed them. We destroyed them because if we did not, they would destroy us.

All kafirs are to be conquered, converted, or killed. Any philosophy that raises death over life we have in the past and should today condemn and oppose.  Amidst a devastating ideological war that involves the killing and brutalization of Jews, Christians, Americans, and non-believers across the world it is absurd that we should pretend that such a conflict does not exist.

Suggesting that this conflict is not real, and that Islam is the “religion of peace” is contrary to the doctrine of Islam and the daily activities and stated aims of those who submit to Islam. Suggesting that Islam is the religion of peace – hijacked, is akin to suggesting that there are Amish jihadists.

There is no Amish jihad.

Walid Shoebat, the former PLO terrorist, recently said about the Jews, “The sheep do not know the wolf, but the wolf knows the sheep.” It is not only the Jews who do not know the sheep, it is the majority of western society that does not oppose those whose mission is the destruction of everything that we hold dear. Our lack of knowledge of Islam is a moral failure, our failure to oppose cruelty and barbarity is the seed of our national destruction. Knowledge is the foundation of any response to this existential threat that is political Islam. Pretending that Islam is the “religion of peace” is a convenient sop for the majority but it is not so.

Too many in the West prefer to fight dead Nazis, and Amish jihadists while the real battle continues without them. The forces of Islamic jihad prefer that we fight Amish jihadists. If only we should be so lucky in that Islam’s foundation would be non-violence (instead of warfare and cruelty) like those concepts embraced by the Amish. We are not so blessed. We must accept the world for what it is, and the nature of Islam for what it is also. To do otherwise is national suicide.