August 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are three schools of thought and analysis regarding Islam. Two of these schools are complimentary, the third is not, but it is definitive. The first school is Islam as taught by leaders of Islam, the second is academia and the media, the third is the “foundational school” (Warner, Spencer, Bat Ye’or, etc.).

Islamic leaders have one message of Islam for Muslims and another for kafirs (this is the duality of Islam). Western media and academics know nothing of the doctrine of Islam. Apparently, they believe that they have no other place to go for definitive information about Islam; they are wrong. These schools of thought do not discuss Islamic doctrine (Koran, Sira, Hadith), history of Islam, jihad, or the victims of jihad.

The “Foundational School” studies the doctrine of Islam and formulates arguments and counter-arguments based entirely on Islamic doctrine, Islamic history, and current actions of the adherents of Islam as they implement the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed. This school discusses Allah and Mohammed and the victims of jihad and Islamic brutality for the last 1400+ years. The “Foundational School” is a compassion, and truth-driven group; compassion for the past, present and future victims of Islam is at the forefront of all Foundationalist’s work as is the desire for the truth. Western media knows nothing of the victims of Islam and rarely acknowledges the fact that new victims are made every day across the world.

Islamic leaders and adherents pretend that there is no linkage between jihad and the stunning cruelty that we see daily perpetrated by Muslims against Christians, Jews, gays, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, and other Muslims who are seen as not-quite-Islamic-enough. This is taqiyyah, sacred deception of the unbelievers to forward the cause of Islam.

The foundational school is definitive because it studies the core texts of Islam, the same texts to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to as an adherent of Islam. Learning the doctrine of Islam is akin to learning the playbook of the opposing team in a sports event. Our dire situation as non-Muslims in the world and the constant pressure put upon our cultures, religions, political leadership, and general citizenry by Islam is no sports event.

While multiculturalists attest that the violence and cruelty of Islam are anathema to “real” Muslims, we know that the multiculturalist is ignorant and dhimmitized. The dhimmi supports and defends Islam because they know nothing about it. They defend their idea of what Islam should be (what they want it to be), not what it actually is. The only way to know what Islam truly is is to learn the same doctrine to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to, and study the effects of this doctrine in the past and into the present. This is the core of the foundationalist school.

Our dire circumstances vis-a-vis Islam is an existential conflict of civilizations.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis say that there is no conflict – that Islam is “peaceful” even as it wars against, and kills non-believers (kafirs) and applauds those who kill innocents. Saying such doggerel does not mean that there is no conflict, it simply means that we have decided to not defend ourselves against a brutal enemy whose purpose is our destruction. It means we have refused to name our enemy and even worse we have refused to acknowledge the war. This is a position entirely rejected by foundationalists.

We as a culture must reach a point very soon where the multiculturalist position of ignorance and active anti-knowledge is rejected and condemned everywhere. There must come a time soon when anyone making such a self-destructive and baseless argument is heaped with shame and derision for their lack of scholarship, embrace of anti-knowledge, and their defense of the enemy whom they know literally nothing about. Such a day must come quickly if we are to survive as a nation.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis are tools of a brutal totalitarian ideology of cruelty, misogyny, hate, intolerance, and anti-individualism; they are the “useful idiots” spoken of by Lenin during the rise of Communism.

You may recall the Soviet Union. The West waged ideological war against them. The Soviet Union is gone, swept away by us and their own moral, ethical and political corruption into the “dustbin of history” where it belongs. The same must be done now with Islam.

If we are not prepared to fight an ideological war against an ideology even crueler than the Soviet one; if we are not prepared to name the enemy and, even more egregious, that there is no existential conflict – we are truly doomed. Knowledge is the foundation of avoiding this “doom”. Knowledge in this matter is found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith.

Everyone in the West must understand the nature of Allah and Mohammed, and learn their commands that all adherents of this ideology are required to follow. Those who follow the ideology of Islam are good Muslims; those who do not are not good Muslims. Osama Bin Laden is a “good” Muslim. Those who follow Mohammed and Allah are devout believers, those who do not are “apostates” and can be killed by those who are not “apostates” (or who at least believe that they are not). The “religion of peace” is not a “religion” that one can readily leave. Leaving Islam is punishable by death (Hadith, Bukhari).

After the death of Mohammed Islam was plunged into war. It was not attacked by outside forces but rather fought bloody internal “apostate” wars against its own adherents, those who had chosen to leave Islam. Tens of thousands were killed in these “Apostasy Wars” of early Islam under the guidance of the first “Rightly Guided Caliph”, Abu Bakr. No multiculturalist knows anything about these apostasy wars, or that apostasy in present day Islam equals death. If they do know about it, they will excuse it someone, explain it away because their concept of Islam as “the religion of peace” is far more important and attractive to them than the abysmal truth of the cult of death, which is Islam.

Several days ago Abdel Basset al-Megrahi was released from a Scottish prison on humanitarian grounds. It appears that Mr. Megrahi is suffering from cancer and has only a few months to live. The compassionate authorities of Scotland sent him home to Libya to spend his last few months of life with his family and friends. This is true institutional compassion on the part of the authorities of Scotland, but it is also profoundly misplaced and unfortunate. This is “idiot compassion”.

There are many problems with Mr. Megrahi’s release. First and foremost is that he is a convicted mass murderer. As the only person convicted of the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am 103, December 12, 1988, in which 270 innocent people were slaughtered (including 189 Americans), there is a special section of Hell reserved for him.

Mr. Megrahi is a Muslim. When he returned home to Libya he was met with a hero’s welcome. In Islam Mr. Megrahi is seen as a jihadi, a fighter in Allah’s cause against the kafir (the unbelievers). In the umma, the collectivist community of Islam, Mr. Megrahi is viewed as a hero; he will surely have a place by Allah’s side.

The authorities of Scotland and across the West now wringing their hands with frustration at this revolting celebration of death and murder in Tripoli now have a clue that their compassion has been abused. Some American leaders even have the temerity to suggest that Scottish compassion for Megrahi was a “mockery of justice”. Many Western leaders are now having second thoughts about this misplaced compassion.

The “victory” celebrations in Libya upon the arrival of the mass murderer Megrahi are revolting to us in the West, it elicits a deep anger and a deep frustration; even when we show them compassion they still show us that they hate us.

There is deep confusion in the leadership of the West about events in Libya, but there is no such confusion in those who adhere to the foundational school of the study of Islam. Western “compassionate” multicultural fools and dhimmis are stunned at the rejection of their good will and compassion. They may believe that they have been made fools of, but they are not quite certain. They do not know the doctrine of Islam; they do not believe they are in an existential war. Their compassion has certainly been abused, this is the kafir “submitting” again to Islam; another feather in Islam’s cap from the mass murder of innocent Westerners by the vile person Megrahi. In Islam, this means that Megrahi is a hero. It is long past time for non-Muslims to learn the doctrine of Islam.

The Western way is to show compassion to the enemy in hopes that our compassion will make a friend out of an enemy. This approach cannot work with Islam.

The approach is faulty because of the doctrine of Islam which is followed by every adherent of Islam, and of which the judicial leaders in Scotland and across the West are entirely ignorant.

The foundational school approach affords the scholar and student the ability to understand every event occurring in the so-called “Islamic world”. This is so because the driver of the Islamic world is the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). When this doctrine is known and understood events in Islam become clear as a bright sunlit day.

The doctrine of Islam is a trilogy doctrine. Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed; Ibn Ishaq), and Hadith (Traditions of Mohammed; Bukhari, Muslim, et al.) are the foundations of Islam. All adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are those who “submit”. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a “Muslim” is “one who submits”. In the Koran it is very clear that one who “fights in Allah’s cause” (jihad) is doing the finest thing an adherent can do. Jihad is mentioned almost 150 times in Koran. In fact, death in jihad is the only assured method to Islamic heaven with its houris, flowing honey rivers, wine without hangovers, and little pleasure boys.

In Islam, what is being submitted to is Allah and Mohammed and their commands. Allah and Mohammed are only found in the doctrine trilogy. For those outside of Islam, we are to submit to… Islam.

By killing all those innocent people on Pan Am 103 in 1988 Mr. Megrahi is considered a hero in Libya and across the Islamic world. He is a hero because he is a fighter in Allah’s cause, a jihadist. Jihadists do not have any qualms about killing innocents because Mohammed had no such qualms.

Mohammed slaughtered the Jews of Khaybar and sat for hours with his prepubescent wife (his favorite, Aisha) watching as each male tribesman was beheaded. The men of Khaybar were slaughtered and the women made into sex slaves for their Muslim conquerors. The children were made into Muslims (this is one of the more effective ways that Islam grows; it happens over several generations).

Mr. Megrahi’s crimes, vile and despicable to decent people around the world, are “Sunna” in Islam. Sunna means doing something that Mohammed did. Anything that Mohammed did is “good”. Because Mohammed is “the Prophet” of Allah, and because Koran says that all adherents must follow the commands of both Allah and his prophet, the example of Mohammed is considered the finest example of humanity for all adherents to follow forever.

Mohammed was a mass murderer; Mr. Megrahi is a mass murderer. Mohammed killed unbelievers and struck them down with terror, Mr. Megrahi did the same with Pan Am 103.

The mass murder perpetrated by Mr. Megrahi is Sunna. He is a jihadi, a “fighter in the cause of Allah.” What we in the West consider an unforgivable, indescribable crime of brutality and inhumanity, Islam considers the finest action of a Muslim in the path of Mohammed and Allah.

Islamic “morality” is founded upon the commands of Allah and Mohammed and the events of Mohammed’s life and his sayings. Mohammed was a mass murderer. Mr. Megrahi followed in Mohammed’s path – he took the middle road of submission to Allah and Mohammed. His murder of hundreds of innocent people on Pan Am 103 is Sunna, it is considered the “best course” in Islam because this was the course of Mohammed.

Mr. Megrahi got a hero’s welcome in Libya because he is a mass murderer of non-believers just as Mohammed was. He struck terror into kafir hearts, just as Mohammed did. When we can begin to see and understand the linkage between Islamic doctrine and current day events we can oppose the spread of this ideology of anti-humanity.

Koran: [60.1] O you who believe! do not take My enemy and your enemy for friends: would you offer them love while they deny what has come to you of the truth, driving out the Apostle and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord? If you go forth struggling hard in My path and seeking My pleasure, would you manifest love to them? And I know what you conceal and what you manifest; and whoever of you does this, he indeed has gone astray from the straight path.

Koran: [60:1] O, you who believe, do not take my enemy and your enemy for friends by showing them kindness. They reject the truth that has come to you. They drive out the messengers and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord. If you continue to fight for Allah’s cause (jihad) and from a desire to please Me, would you show them kindness in private? I know best what you conceal and what you reveal. Whoever does this among you has already strayed from the right path. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Koran: [9:5] When the sacred months (by ancient arab custom there were four months during which there was to be no violence) are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

August 19th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

When the most important book of the twentieth century was released in 1925 while its author sat in prison with his cronies for an attempted coup against the German government, few could foresee its horrific impact. Mein Kampf set out, in rambling hate-based prose, a program of war, hatred, mass murder, and global conquest. Over the years purchases of the book made Adolf Hitler a wealthy man, but few in the country read the book though most households owned at least one copy. Fewer outside of Germany read the book. Those whose lives would be directly affected by the implementation of the plans described in the book did not read it; and those who should have read it who were put most at risk by it did not read it.

The same scenario is repeated with the Sira of Mohammed. Those who most need to read it (non-Muslims), those most at risk from its message will not, in the main, read it; while those who have read it are those who embrace its themes and message of hate, intolerance, war, and conquest.

The most influential book of the 20th century went mainly unread with disastrous consequences. One of the most influential books in human history, the Sira of Mohammed, is widely known among Muslims though the West is almost entirely ignorant of its contents, and its profound importance for both Muslims and non-believers. Worse still most in the west are ignorant of its existence.

We know what a world looks like when the ideology espoused in Mein Kampf is implemented. The Sira of Mohammed, Mohammed’s biography, tells the story of what the world will look like when Islam is triumphant. The differences between a victory of Nazism and a global conquest of Mohammedanism are difficult to determine as the differences are so minuscule.

We know what the world looked like when Nazism was rising, global warfare and unparalleled suffering. We know from the history of Islam what the world looks like when Islam is rising- jihad, barbarism, hatred, war, conquest, enslavement, and a brutal endless war of elimination of all non-Muslim cultures and political systems.

Had the world paid attention to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, as it is not now doing with the Sira of Mohammed, perhaps WW2 could have been avoided. When we know nothing of Mohammed’s life and his ideology of endless jihad against all unbelievers everywhere and forever we cannot defend ourselves against this growing threat. The threat of Islam originates in the doctrine of Islam of which the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) is one part of a trilogy of doctrinal texts which also includes Koran and Hadith. We are as ignorant (and more) as the clueless of 1933.

One who has read both Mein Kampf and the Sira can make a valid comparison. One who knows the history of WW2, and the Holocaust as well as Islamic history and doctrine, can place these books into an historical and political context. With this understanding of history and doctrine one can know with a reasonable certainty what the future will look like. One can know because just as Mein Kampf made certain promises and laid out certain plans, the Sira of Mohammed also makes promises and plans.

The Sira is not difficult to read. Anyone can read it. In fact recently a 12 year old was asked to read it. The child felt compelled to stop reading because “Mohammed was killing too many people”. The message of hate, violence, intolerance, and cruelty is clear to a 12-year-old but somehow eludes our political, academic, and religious leadership across the West. It eludes them most likely because they have not read it and do not know it exists.

Our lack of understanding of Islam and its foundational concepts of conquest and jihad is indicative of a societal-wide moral, intellectual, and ethical failure that for our own survival, must be swiftly reversed.

When one reads the doctrine of Islam the world shifts, changes. Knowledge of the doctrine brings events into focus in a way that previously was impossible. Just as Mein Kampf is the guide to WW2 before WW2 began, the doctrine of Islam is the guide to present day events and into the future. This is not prophecy, this is a firm understanding of the doctrine and guiding principles of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to our existence. We can know the future when we apply the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith) to present and past events involving Islam and adherents of Islam. This is applied theology and political science.

Knowledge of the Sira of Mohammed opens doors. It opens doors to a world of conflict and war and horror that we would prefer did not exist. There is no avoiding this foundational reality of our world.

When one knows Sira, closely held beliefs of the nature of the human world, how people behave and interact, and most importantly our previous understanding of the “religion of peace” are all shattered.

Learning Islamic doctrine forces us to rethink important concepts of the structure of existence, ideas that make life livable and pleasant, and paints a portrait of the ongoing failure and destruction of the human potential of peaceful co-existence and tolerance.

The doctrine of Islam is clear – there is no peaceful co-existence for Islam with unbelievers. Because non-Muslims have the gall and effrontery to not accept Allah and Mohammed, because we are Christian, Jew, Hindu, atheist, Buddhist, etc., we are seen by Allah and Mohammed as having rejected Koran, Sira, and Hadith – for this we are all kafirs and we must be made to submit. If we do not submit there is nothing that Islam will not do to make us do so. There are no taboos for Islam where kafirs are concerned. This is a fundamental lesson of the Sira of Mohammed.

The Sira, like the Koran and Hadith, is a wake up call for all kafirs (unbelievers). We learn from the Sira all about Islam, all about Mohammed, but we also learn about our own cultures. The lessons are painful and they are immutable.

• We are at war.
  Islam is at war with kafirs everywhere and forever until Islam is defeated or triumphant. The triumph of Islam is the defeat of individual freedoms, women’s rights, gay rights, religious tolerance, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc., etc. The triumph of Islam is a total shift of humanity from reaching for freedom and tolerance to an embrace of submission, enslavement, and intellectual and spiritual deadness from which recovery is unfortunately unlikely.
• We do not live in a “post-historical” world.
  In fact, history haunts us like a hunter. It pursues us until we stand and defend or surrender. This is not the world of the “end of history” of Frances Fukiyama, Bill Clinton, and other multiculturalist fantasists. Islam overturns all of these utopian concepts and crushes them under the boot of endless jihad and dhimmitude.
• We are not “post-modern”.
  We are pursued by forces of 7th century Arabia. They are well-trained; their doctrine of war has been successful for them for 1400 years. We are late in responding. Americans consider themselves forward thinking and not “mired” in issues of the past. We think we are above all of “that”. We are wrong. Our arrogance as to the ascension of our concepts is so strong that in foreign policy matters we simply only have to “reset” and we are on a totally new path, a path without a past – a path outside of context. With Islam there is no “reset”. We live outside of context in a bubble, a bubble that is being deflated rapidly by the rise of Islam.
• Our world is a world of conflict.
  War pursues us because the doctrine of Islam commands that it be so. The forces of Islam are flush with oil wealth transferred to them by us to them in our ignorance of their doctrine. We did this because we did not know their doctrine. We have empowered our enemies because we did not know their doctrine and now the time of reckoning approaches. We are not ready. We are not ready because we know nothing of the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith). If we do not know why and how our enemy fights us, we cannot hope to oppose him successfully. Everything we need to know about Islam is in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Knowledge of the doctrine of Islam is now a survival imperative; it is the patriotic duty of all lovers of freedom in the West to educate themselves and others about the doctrine of Islam. Ignorance of Islam is a moral, intellectual, ethical, and patriotic failure.
• Multiculturalism is wrong.
  In fact, multiculturalism is used by our enemies to immobilize us, keep us confused and unable to respond. Multiculturalism is wrong because the doctrine of Islam demonstrates that it is wrong. Islam is intolerant, we are tolerant; Islam is misogynist, we embrace equality between the sexes; Islam is about aggressive war, we are not. Islam denies the value of the individual, we believe that the empowered individual is the foundation of a healthy society and culture; Islam believes that only Islam is valid, we believe in religious pluralism and tolerance; Islam will not be analysed, criticized, satirized – we believe in humor, criticism and open debate. We believe that open debate is the foundation of intellectual honesty and truth. In Islam debate is not allowed. We do not believe in slavery, Islam strongly believes in slavery and dhimmitude of the unbeliever. The list is extensive. Multiculturalism’s core idea that all cultures are equal is destroyed by the existence and message of the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Truth is this: some cultures are superior in relation to others. Not all cultures are the same. This means that multiculturalism is a fraud and a failed utopian concept that must be delegitimized and destroyed. The product of Islam is jihad. The products of Western culture that enhance the value of existence, empower individuals, and create opportunity and wealth are too numerous to mention here. We do not war against others because they do not believe what we believe. Some cultures are better than others. Multiculturalism is dead, the only problem is that few have noticed its demise.

In Islam the model of the life of Mohammed (Sira) and the things that he said and did according  to his friends (Hadith) are the perfect model of behavior for all Muslims to follow in perpetuity. If Mohammed had been a nice fellow this would be a boon for all humanity, but it is not so. Mohammed was not a nice fellow. In Islam it is said that what Mohammed did is considered “Sunna” that means acceptable and good; what Mohammed disallowed is “haram” or forbidden.

Had Mohammed been a humanitarian this article would not be so lengthy. The Sira and Hadith dictate what is Sunna. Foundationally, jihad is Sunna. This means that anything done to the kafir if it advances the cause of Allah/Islam is Sunna. This includes every negative thing one can imagine. There are no taboos for the kafir.

When one reads the Sira one sees that we in the West are in serious trouble. It is interesting to note that “year one” of the Islamic calendar is not the year in which Mohammed received his first “revelations” from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Rather, it is the year in which Mohammed emigrated from Mecca to Medina. In Mecca Mohammed was an argumentative and disruptive but non-violent “preacher” – he got 150 converts in 9 years. When he went to Medina as an immigrant Mohammed became a warlord. When he was finished there were no enemies left, he was the ruler of all Arabia. All of his opponents had been slaughtered in battle or by assassination or had converted (submitted) to the “religion of peace”.

“Year one” of the Islamic calendar shows definitively that Islam is not a religion only, but a political ideology of conquest and barbarism, totalitarianism and cruelty fronted by a fake “religion of peace”.

“Year one” is a designation of a political event in Mohammed’s life not a religious one. The so-called “religion of peace” is a clever front for a political totalitarian ideology of control, control of Muslims and non-Muslims. Islam’s understanding of control of humans is without peer.

The world’s great cycles of history turn on knowledge, ignorance, and anti-knowledge. Our culture of multicultural ignorance is one of anti-knowledge. Ignorance empowers Islam. Islam is our enemy, it says so in the Sira of Mohammed.

Multiculturalism says that Islam is equal in value and import to our Western cultures of freedom and tolerance and inclusiveness. Multiculturalism empowers our existential enemy.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed so that we can discuss, debate, and condemn evil where necessary. We refuse to learn from doctrine and we ignore the history of jihad at our peril.

The fate of humanity will be decided upon our understanding of the doctrine of our enemies. They know us well, we know little to nothing of them. The old saying, “You may not believe in the devil, but he believes in you” is applicable here. You may not care about Islamic doctrine but it cares very much about you. The majority of Islamic doctrine is about the kafir, us.

Islam is a doctrine whose purpose is the conquest and annihilation of the unbeliever everywhere. We ignore it because we have difficulty accepting that it can be real; we have difficulty letting go of our concepts that we live outside of war and outside of history. We are all too enlightened for all that.

Our enemies do not see the world as we do.

Some in the multicultural West are so ignorant of history that they find the concept of “enemy” excessive and difficult to accept. Such people are outside of history because they are ignorant of history and of human nature. Such people believe that if we are “tolerant” and show how “nice” we are to our enemies that they will love us, and stop hating us.

Our enemies are pleased that we are “tolerant” and “nice” because this makes their mission of conquest all the easier.

These are the bubble people, those who live on  wishful thinking and ignorance. This ideology of ignorance has infected our leadership and institutions to such an extent that when scholars quote the Sira of Mohammed they are excoriated as “bigots”. This discussion of Islamic doctrine is not a matter of opinion. If you do not like the discussion you must take the matter up with Mohammed and make your complaints to him as the messengers (those who discuss doctrine) are only repeating his lines and his example to show the dire nature of our situation. The scholars of the doctrine of Islam bring a message of dire warning.

The fate of humanity turns on the pages of unread books. Mein Kampf was on most every shelf in Germany but few read it; few abroad read it. In the pages of that book was laid out the plan for conquest and murder that would become the 2nd World War.

The Sira of Mohammed is unread widely in the West. It is not difficult to read. The Sira is a plan for domination of all unbelievers everywhere. It is a book of cruelty and violence that often surpasses Mein Kampf in horrors as the stories are (supposedly) an historical record of atrocities while Mein Kampf was essentially a twisted “wish list” of domination and barbarism.

We in the West must study the doctrine of Islam – it is not difficult. We must acknowledge the truth about the “religion of peace” and we must accept unpleasant realities though they shatter our illusions. We must acknowledge that we are at war.

Mohammed’s life is not the kind of life that any decent person anywhere on this planet would want to emulate. His life and actions are the model for all Muslims to aspire to forever. This model of cruelty, hate, intolerance, rape, torture, murder, war, pedophilia, theft, deceit, enslavement, conquest, and misogyny is the model for all Islam forever. “We have a litttle problem” is the most profound  understatement of the millennium.

August 11th, 2009 by admin

Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, and PoliticalIslam.com, one of the leading scholars of Islamic history, politics, and doctrine posted this evening a concise and insightful analysis of recent declarations from Obama administration “security” leaders that there is no Jihad, and that there are no Jihadists. The only conflict according to the Obama administration is with al Qaeda. Unfortunately, they are completely wrong.

Their ignorant comments display a shocking lack of knowledge about the nature of Islam and its doctrine, Koran, Sira,  and Hadith. Jihad is very real, and Islam is at war with all unbelievers everywhere. This is the foundational truth of our world because this is what Allah and Mohammed command. Since all Muslims must submit to Allah and Mohammed and the doctrine of Islam (the word “Islam” means “submission) then Islam is at war with unbelievers everywhere.

George Orwell coined the term “doublespeak” in 1984; this is when a lie is a truth and a truth a lie. The Obama administration is engaging in doublespeak, and worse.

-DL Adams

There Are No More Jihadists

(article re-printed with permission from politicalislam.com)

John Brennan, Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counter-terrorism, has come forth and enlightened the world with the news that there are no “jihadists”.

Mr. Brennan/Obama says that jihad is an inner struggle and inner purification-a purely spiritual process, and when we call them jihadists, they obtain a religious legitimacy they don’t deserve. He goes further to say that we are actually at war with al Qaeda and its “extremist” allies.

And who is Brennan’s source for the “truth”? Obama. Hmmm. Obama? Since when is Obama an expert on the foundation of Islam? We have had another president, Bush, make his own declarations about what Islam is and he has no more basis to be a foundation of Islam than Obama. Democrats and Republicans are joined at the ideological hip when it comes to Islam, for both are profoundly ignorant about its political doctrine and history. One is dumb, the other is dumber — and you can argue over which is what.

No matter what Brennan/Obama says, the only foundation of Islam is the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. (The Sunna is composed of the Sira, Mohammed’s biography, and the Hadith, his traditions.) If we wanted to know what a jihadist is, why not go to the Koran, Sira and Hadith? Why listen to second-hand hearsay from a politician when you can listen to Allah and Mohammed? Who would you trust, Brennan/Obama or Mohammed? The answer from 1.2 billion Muslims is-trust Mohammed.

What does Mohammed say about jihad? Is it inner struggle or killing kafirs? All three texts have much to say about jihad. In the Hadith by Bukhari approximately 20% of the text is about jihad. Actually, the Hadith is a textbook about the tactics of jihad. Do we find jihad as the inner struggle in the Hadith? Yes, but we also find jihad as the killing of kafirs. Do some simple math and you will discover that around 97% of the text concerning jihad is about the killing of kafirs and 3% is the jihad of inner struggle, the so-called greater jihad.

The Sira, Mohammed’s biography by Ishaq, devotes a lot of attention to jihad. About 70% of the Sira is about jihad. But there is not a single mention of the inner struggle jihad, only killing kafirs.

The Koran calls jihad “fighting in Allah’s cause” and the jihad is about the killing of kafirs.

Having two kinds of jihad is a part of Islamic dualism. Islam is built on two principles, submission and duality. Dualism is its great strength. It allows Islam to hold two contradictory views at the same time. So while jihadists are killing kafirs, Islam is proclaiming itself to be peaceful. Then ignorant kafirs argue about which is the true nature, completely missing the point that Islamic reasoning allows such contradictions to be true for both sides.

There is a clash here between reasoning systems. Brennan/Obama are about authoritarian reasoning. Brennan/Obama are right because they have power, and they assert their power of truth by declaration. They are right because they are powerful.

The other system of reasoning is critical thinking, also called scientific thinking . Notice how different the two systems are. One of them depends upon acceptance of authority, the other depends upon data that anyone can go and check out for them selves.

Obama gave his vision of Official Islam in Cairo. Official Islam is based upon his authority, but Official Islam is not to be found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Obama declared there were no jihadists in his speech in Cairo and called them extremists. How can a Muslim be an extremist if he doing what Mohammed did? Mohammed defines Islam. Mohammed was a jihadist who killed many kafirs, hence, being a jihadist is an Islamic doctrinal model, not an extremist position.

What difference does the name make? It just depends on what you want — scientific truth or fantasy. Official Islam is a fantasy and a deliberate fraud. Official Islam is a Big Lie.

August 6th, 2009 by admin

An Israeli suddenly realizes that the so-called “Palestinian-Israeli problem” is not about politics at all, it’s about jihad. When a difficult enemy is understood to be an intractable one, the world becomes a very menacing place.

This heartfelt article is by an Israeli friend of ACT West Nashville.

-Admin

The undeniable truth of Israel and the lie of fundamentalist Islam

by Golan Shlomi

Growing up in Israel during the 1990s was a very special experience for me that involved hopes for a better future.

As a teenager I remember seeing Palestinians everywhere working and having fun among the Jewish population but it was still not enough for them. They wanted more; they said they want their own land, they wanted independence which sounded very legit to me back then , “Why can’t they have their own country?” I asked myself.

I always thought they deserved their own country like any other nation in the world.

Give them their country, I said, so they won’t need to go through the bureaucracy involved in getting the staying and working permits in Israel.

But lo and behold, in 1994 after the Oslo agreements, it happened!!! Or at least started to happen, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) led by Yasser Arafat became the legal government of the Palestinian authority which was destined to become an independent Palestinian country after the negotiation would end… Oh my, a dream come true, in the streets of Israel people started to plan future trades and tourism with the new Palestinian state, I remember even talks about turning the mandatory service of 3 years in the Israeli army to a fully volunteered service.

But everything collapsed in 2000. In the final talks at Camp David between the Israeli prime minister , Ehud Barak, and Yasser Arafat, with mediation of Bill Clinton, Israel had agreed to give the Palestinian 96% of the territories they demanded plus 4% alternative territories plus sovereignty in the Arab neighborhood in Eastern Jerusalem and in the Temple mount.

In other words, Arafat was offered 100% of his claims with only minor changes due to security arrangements Israel could not afford to give. This was a more than fair agreement to the Palestinians; Israel offerered more to them than any other country in the world would ever agree to. (Let me just mention that a similar package was offered by the former Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, to the current Fatah leader, Mahmud Abbas, several years ago.)

But guess what? Arafat rejected the offer!

After years of armed conflict between the Jews and Arabs the Jews agreed to withdraw from their own lands out of their own free will but still the Palestinian people refused this treasure which was handed to them as if on a silver tray!!! Instead they choose “armed resistance”, jihad, with weapons that were supplied to them by the Israeli government- perhaps we are fools?

A pure truth was revealed then – the truth is that the state of Israel belongs to the Jews and all the Palestinian demands were nothing more than a lie that was a cover for something else, for something bigger, jihad. A lot has happened since that moment in Camp David- the Israeli dreams for peace have been shattered, our hopes were destroyed and my question was why? If the Palestinians wanted a state so badly why did they say no?

But now I have come to a realization that there was one dream that didn’t shatter, an old dream of the Muslim world, a dream of the annihilation of Israel and the Jews.They knew that by saying “yes” to the Israeli offer they would simply destroy their own dream and of course nobody wants to shoot himself in the leg.

They wanted Israel to give them everything including the its self-destruction by trying to force on Israel draconian demands like the absorption of millions of refugees. These are refugees who fled their homes 60 years ago because of a war they initiated themselves against Israel, a demand to which no sane living organism on planet Earth would ever agree.

Such a concession from Israel would prepare the groundwork for the disappearance of Israel as a Jewish state.

All of the above is just a simple truth of the unfounded hatred that has existed for thousands of years. After WWII, Anti-Semitism has become a vulgar term among the world’s nations including Iran which is now the most dangerous enemy of Israel.

Instead, anti-Semites have routed their hatred toward Zionism and the state of Israel. It’s an obvious fact that I can say with confidence – if Israel, Jews and the rest of the world would disappear from the maps the Muslims would be left alone to kill each other.

Any novice psychologist would tell us that when you hate someone you actually hate yourself and hating yourself can only result in self destruction.

The Muslim world appears to be motivated by hate. Hate is destructive and dreams are creative. The sad part is that the Western world is standing in a limbo between hate and vision.

Perhaps the current economic crises has happened for a reason, maybe the US, Europe and even Israel needs this economic downturn to make the switch from economical growth, which is no longer viable at this time, to focusing on real dangers in the world like the growth of fundamentalist Islam for example.

July 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are foundational issues that must be understood. Islam is at war with all democratic countries, and all countries that are not Islamic. This is commanded by both Allah and Mohammed in Koran. It is an obligation upon all Muslims to “fight in Allah’s cause”; this is the term for jihad in Koran. Fighting in Allah’s cause means endless war everywhere against the kafir, the unbeliever. The worst thing in Islam is not murder or rape, or violation of the innocents, it is being an unbeliever or an apostate.

The doctrine of Islam states that anyone who leaves (or changes) their Islamic religion is to be killed (Bukhari Hadith). Islam is a dualistic political ideology of war and conquest. All unbelievers must be brought under the control of Islam until the entire world is under Islam. The kafir can be raped, murdered, enslaved, beheaded, tortured, etc. There are no boundaries, no taboos, where treatment of the kafir by Islam is concerned.

Islam is a unified civilization of which religion is a part, a small part. The majority of the Koran is about how Muslims are to interact with the unbeliever, well over 60% of the text. This means that the Koran is a political document. One cannot know how to be a Muslim just from Koran alone. The central idea in Koran is jihad. Jihad is timeless and universal. Islam is at war with all non-believers forever.

The mosque is the center of Muslim life in any community in which Muslims reside. The case has been made that non-violent Muslims do not know their doctrine. Some even suggest that non-violence means “moderation” – the non-violent Muslim is shown as proof of the non-violence of Islam itself. But this is not so. Because the doctrine is clear that aggressive violence against the kafir is mandated, therefore violent jihadists are observant devout Muslims, they are the moderates. They are moderate because they follow the doctrine, and commands of Allah and Mohammed. The extremists are those who do not participate in Jihad. These are hypocrites and apostates. Such people who do not fight the unbelievers can be killed by jihadists as being outside the family, Umma, of Islam.

When adherents do not know the doctrine of Islam, they learn it from their Imams. All Imams know the doctrine quite well. What happens when the non-violent adherent hears, from the pulpit of the mosque, the commands of Allah to do jihad and kill the unbelievers where ever they are found? They must act. Few will leave Islam, because leaving the religion of peace is a death sentence offense. Most will participate in jihad war against the unbeliever (kafir) with money and with words, some will do violence. Those who die in jihad are guaranteed a direct trip to paradise and access to beautiful girls and little boys forever. The non-violent adherent must act if they are to remain Muslim. Allah says in the Koran that he knows that some will not want to do jihad, but the obligation remains, Allah knows what is best people do not.

Because democracies are tolerant and open societies, in the main, they are welcoming to Islam. They are welcoming to Islam because their peoples do not understand that Islam is at war with them; they do not understand that Islam does not assimilate; they do not understand that the purpose of Islam is to overturn the host culture and change the host culture to an Islamic state. No Muslim can give allegience to any country other than a caliphate, no Muslim can give allegience to a system of law other than the law of Allah and Mohammed, Sharia.  This is clearly stated in doctrine. Muslims who give such allegience may be good citizens but they are not good Muslims. This is a fine point that many find difficult to understand.

Muslims are forbidden to have friendships with Christians or Jews. This is clearly stated in Koran. In addition, Muslims are commanded to kill Jews; this is also clearly stated in doctrine. When the Muslims are actually friends with kafirs, to Islam they are hypocrites (bad Muslims) or apostates. Being a good Muslim and being a good citizen of a democratic state is doctrinally impossible for a Muslim who follows his “religion”.

Islam is at war with the kafir, everywhere and forever. It does not matter if you believe this or not; your opinion on the matter is irrelevent. This is the truth and the command of the Koran, and the Sira of Mohammed as well as Hadith – the doctrine of Islam. If Islam is at war with all kafirs everywhere and the purpose of this endless warfare is the literal end of all non-believers (Koran is clear that no other religion is allowed anywhere on the planet other than Islam) and their cultures; one must come to some conclusion about the value of his/her culture and whether or not it is worthy of defending.

Because democracies are based upon openness and tolerance and individual freedoms, democracies are open to Islam. Islam builds mosques – these are the centers of Muslim culture, politics, religious practice, everything in the Muslim community. While we are aware that many if not most of all new mosques built in Europe, the US and around the world are supported by Saudi oil money this is not the most important point. The critical factor is that every mosque has the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, Hadith as its central intellectual/spiritual/political core. The doctrine itself is hostile to democracies and is a doctrine of warfare, violence, intolerance, hatred, cruelty and brutality that is as yet unsurpassed in human history.

When the doctrine is known, and the history of Islam and the appalling things that have been done by adherents because of its commands, it is difficult (that is, impossible) to defend Islam or any aspect of it.

Islam is a political ideology fundamentally hostile to democracy. It is intolerant and brutal in the extreme. It is often said that terrorists and jihadists have hijacked the “religion of peace” and “misinterpret” the doctrine of Islam. This is a lie. This kind of lie, about the nature and true character and history of Islam, is called “taqiyyah”, sacred deception. It is an obligation (as stated in the doctrine) for all Muslims to falsify the truth of Islam to kafirs everywhere. This results in the kafir being confused and unable to effectively respond in defense of their cultures and lands, countries and people. It is extremely effective. Koran is a blueprint for war. The effectiveness of jihad is seen by the success of Islam in spreading across the world and annihilating cultures and civilizations as it goes. The body count of jihad since Mohammed started his endless war is conservatively estimated at 270 million murdered victims.

What of democracy then as it faces the challenge of advancing and emboldened and oilwealth rich Islam? What of democracy as new mosques are built daily and the demands of Islam increase at the same pace?

Democracy is the condition of freedom, tolerance, and equality. This condition was passed down to us by our founders and secured for us over generations by our brave warriors who fought to sustain these ideals and this condition of freedom. Many who know little of democracy, history, politics, and know nothing whatever of Islam believe that democracy is a process and not a condition.

These ill-informed ill-educated people believe that democracy is ever changing and if a minority desires concessions that are inherently anti-democratic, reactionary, intolerant, and cruel it is all perfectly acceptable if these forces use the processes and structures of democracy to enact their anti-freedom desires. Those who seek our destruction know our ways, our systems, our doctrine, our legal system as we know nothing of theirs. We are at a disadvantage to these aggressive forces of hate and intolerance and anti-freedom because we are almost entirely ignorant of their purposes and their foundational doctrine, Koran, Sira, Hadith – the doctrine of Islam.

The process of democracy is that process which protects the freedoms and structures of equality and tolerance that were passed down to us and secured for us by our forebears. Democracy is a condition of freedom that we must defend, it is not a process by which we surrender those same freedoms that others gave their lives to secure for us and future generations. Our role as lovers of freedom is to sustain democracy again so that our children can enjoy its freedoms, tolerance, and appreciation for the individual.

Democracy is not a process, it is a condition.

If democracy is a condition of freedom and tolerance and equality and not a process, then what must our response be to forces whose purpose is the destruction of democracy? The response must be to oppose such forces.

When the new mosque comes to town, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to spread the word of the greatness of Islam, the fake religion of peace. Its purpose is to be the center of a community of believers whose goal is, according to their deity and prophet, the destruction and/or conversion of the unbelievers in whose midst they have chosen to live.

Immigrants are very important in Islam. The Islamic calendar does not begin with the first revelation from Allah received by Mohammed as one might suppose for a “religion”, rather it begins when Mohammed arrived in Medina from Mecca and began his career as a warlord and killer. This is the real beginning of the power of Islam; not the revelations, but the change of Mohammed’s career from prophet/debater/missionary in Mecca to prophet/warlord/hyperviolent killer in Mecca.

The immigrant is the leading edge of the sword of Islam.

If those who love democracy know nothing of Islam, its doctrine and history – the construction of a new mosque is but a footnote. If those who love democracy know the doctrine and history of Mohammed and of Islam the new mosque is a dangerous threat to their culture, and country.

Islam is a political ideology. The mosque is its party headquarters. Muslim demonstrators on the streets of Europe and America are not shy about their purposes – the destruction of all kafir states and religions and the conquest of Islam. Jihadists are not shy about their motives – they quote Koran as they kill. Yet we say that they are misinterpreting their doctrine. This is a lie we say to one another based on wishful thinking and ignorance. It is not based on knowledge of the doctrine itself.

The Koran is the literal word of Allah, the word of god to adherents of Islam. Mohammed is the prophet, the greatest example of humanity for all to emulate. Jihad, war, murder, violence, misogyny, torture, cruelty, intolerance are the commands. The commands are in the doctrine of Islam. The doctrine is taught at mosques. You connect the dots. 

July 12th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Taqiya and Duality are two of the most important concepts for all unbelievers, kafirs, to understand about the doctrine of Islam and the inconceivably horrible atrocities that are commited in its name.

The concept of duality is foundationally important to understanding Islam. Islam has a dual code of ethics and logic. This is diametrically opposed to our unitary logic. In unitary logic, which is the logic of the West, in a scenario of a contradiction only one side of the contradiction can be true. So, in symbolic logic, you would say that A and NOT A are contradictory and both cannot be true; either A is true or NOT A is true; both cannot be true.

This is unitary logic. Unitary logic is the foundation of the scientific method and rational thinking. This is not however the logic of political Islam.

Islamic logic is dualistic. In symbolic logic, you would illustrate duality by saying that both A and its opposite, NOT A, are both TRUE. This is impossible in a unitary logic understanding of reality. It is also contrary to the fundamentals of reason and science.

For example, in Islam adherents of the doctrine (those who submit to Allah and Mohammed) can say that Islam is a “religion of peace”  because, in their concept of the term “peace”, insofar as it is laid out in the doctrine, Islam can be described as a religion of peace. The important point that such an assertion neglects is that “peace” in the Islamic concept of the term can be arrived at ONLY through the nonexistence of the kafir, or unbeliever. This means that Islam is at war with every nonbeliever everywhere on this planet forever until everyone is either a dhimmi or a believer (or dead). This means that both statements in dualistic Islamic logic– Islam is a religion of peace, and Islam is a religion of conquest, warfare, violence, and intolerance, are BOTH true.

When we see horrible atrocities committed in the name of Islam; when we see jihadists quoting doctrine as they behead a kafir; when we see churches burned in Iraq and Christians being driven out of that country by the thousands; when we see brutal torture of gays in Baghdad; this is all jihad. Jihad is the obligation of all adherents of the “religion of peace”. Jihad is the violent opposition to all those who do not accept Allah and Muhammad. The Koran calls Jihad “fighting in Allah’s cause”. This phrase  occurs over 150 times in the Koran. It is one of the central concepts of Islam. Death in Jihad is the ONLY promise of a direct route to paradise with all its promised virgins (rivers of honey, and young boys, too) in the doctrine.

Taqiya, or sacred deception, is often used to portray a false vision of what Islam is. It is always practiced in Interfaith dialogue sessions which are always dawa sessions (conversion sessions) for adherents of Islam. Taqiya allows adherents to give a false perception of Islam to the kafir by not giving the full story and by withholding information, and by twisting the reality of Islam so that the Kafir is fooled. Adherents are commanded by Allah to falsify the doctrine of Islam to the Kafir. When the kafir does not understand the reality of Islam, the kafir cannot mount a defense or respond. This is why conquered peoples, the dhimmis, are not allowed to study the Koran. The lies of taqiya, backed by the duality of Islamic logic, has the effect of paralyzing those who would oppose Islam. Taqiya allows the adherent to say, essentially, anything they wish to a kafir on any subject. But most importantly, adherents deceive kafirs about the truth of Islam, its history, and its purpose which is jihad and the destruction of kafirs (and their conversion to Islam).

No treaty, no obligation, is binding to an adherent when it is made with a Kafir. This is Sunna of Muhammad.

Taqiya allows the adherent to hide the fact that the peaceful facade of Islam is truly a mask which hides the reality of Islam which is worldwide conquest until the entire world is under Islam.

You will never hear this truth of Islam from an adherent except from a Jihadist. Jihadis know that Islam is on the rise and that the west is weak, etc. When they hold their signs in Europe that say, “Islam will dominate the World”, they are telling the truth of their intentions; when their signs say, “We love Hitler”, or “The Holocaust is coming Jews!” believe them. They know their doctrine and believe themselves to be good Muslims. When the doctrine of Islam is known and understood it is clear that they (jihadists) are in fact good, observant Muslims – faithful adherents to the doctrine and commands of Allah and Mohammed.

War, according to Muhammad, is deception. (Jihad is war against the unbeliever.) Taqiya, because it allows the adherent to deceive the unbeliever, is a form of Jihad. The purpose of Jihad is to conquer and convert the kafirs everywhere until all the world accepts Allah as the only god, Islam as the only religion and political system, and Mohammed as his prophet.

Our western judaeo-christian concepts of morality are diametrically contrary to Islamic doctrine. We reject the concept of dualistic logic and ethics. We believe in the idea of the family of humanity. Islam does not believe in a family of humanity. In Islam, there is the Umma and there is the Kafir. The Kafir is outside the Umma (the community of believers anywhere in the world) therefore, the kafir is the enemy. The doctrine is clear on these points.

There is no peace with Islam. There is only a pause between battles (hudna). There are no treaties of peace that are worth anything with Islam. A treaty is a tool of war to jihad; not a tool of peace.

The idea of engaging with Islam in the Western rationalist unitary way in which the concepts of Right and Wrong are the foundations of the debate is a failure. There are no moral concepts in the Islamic doctrine (in the way that westerners understand morality)– there is only what is allowed by Allah and Muhammad and that which is forbidden. There is no morality associated - in any way that we understand morality to be – with these injunctions or commands. Essentially, in Islam, what is allowed is moral, and what is forbidden is immoral.

Taqiya (sacred deception of the unbeliever) is both allowed and commanded, and is therefore in the internal logic of Islamic doctrine moral. Because Allah and Mohammad command all adherents to be involved in Jihad forever war against the kafir is considered, in Islam, a moral absolute good. Unfortunately for the non-believer, there are no taboos in Jihad. So, when you see jihadists killing, beheading, torturing, and doing all manner of cruelty to Christians, Jews, Hindus, or any non-believer (and simultanteously quoting doctrine) the jihadist firmly believes that he/she is a moral, upstanding, devout muslim surely on his way to paradise. According to his own doctrine of Koran, Sira, and Hadith he is on the correct path. This path has an end point. Jihad ends only with our destruction.

Nazis followed Sunna in killing kafir Jews

Hijab is a symbol of the subjugation of women - it is not freedom but its opposite. This is taqiya.

Jews are unbelievers - Allah and Mohammed hate the Jews - It is written in the Koran. This is Jihad.

"Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51); Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'” Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 52, Num. 177 also 179 and 180.

July 1st, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

I finished reading the Koran on Sunday afternoon, no “beauty” was found.

I read Abridged Koran (from the Center for the Study of Political Islam). The Koran is organized non-chronologically; it goes from largest chapter to the smallest. The result of this “organization” is that everything in the Koran is without context; events come and go, people come and go without any contextual logic. In addition, there is extensive repetition so that stories are told again and again, with slight variations. This means that the Koran in its original form is almost impossible to understand; not so with the Abridged Koran.

Muslim clerics often assert that the Koran cannot be understood except in the original classical Arabic, but Dr. Puin [a noted German Koranic scholar] maintains that much of the book is unclear, even to Arabic scholars:

“The Koran claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen,’ or ‘clear,’“ [Puin] says. “But if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense. Many Muslims — and Orientalists — will tell you otherwise, of course, but the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible — if it can’t even be understood in Arabic — then it’s not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not — as even speakers of Arabic will tell you — there is a contradiction. Something else must be going on.” (Source: Gates of Vienna)

The Abridged Koran is the only Koran that has eliminated the extensive repetition of stories and linked the text with the biography of Mohammed, the Sira. Most importantly, this Koran is in chronological order. This means that the Koran is understandable from a chronological perspective and is easy to read; this is not to say that reading the Koran is a pleasurable experience; it wasn’t.

Defenders of Islam must read the Koran and build their defenses of Islam around the Koran and the two other books of the Islamic doctrine trilogy, the Hadith and the Sira. There is no other foundation upon which to discuss Islam other than the doctrine and the things that Muslims do on account of it. Most defenders have not read the Koran. If they had read the Koran they would find it difficult to defend because it is such a shattering book to read. For a non-believer there is nothing in the Koran that is defensible.

I could only read it in segments of an hour or less. For a kafir the Koran is mentally and emotionally exhausting.

Understanding that this document is the core of the doctrine of over one billion people is an astounding and deeply disturbing revelation. Reading the Koran is as shattering an experience as learning that the earth is not flat, or that some deeply held foundational beliefs about the world are wrong.

When I reached the end of the Koran I realized that everything that occurs in the world of Islam is because of the Koran and the doctrine trilogy. What this means for unbelievers is deeply disturbing as it means that we are at war with an ideology that is a diabolical as Nazism and even more cruel. The Nazis planned destruction for the Jews and were clear on this point in their own foundational document, Mein Kampf. The Koran does not limit itself to Jews alone, though there is a special deep hatred for Jews in the Koran; rather the Koran and Islam is at war with all unbelievers (the kafir) everywhere and forever. War against the kafir is described in the Koran as “fighting in Allah’s cause”. All Muslims are obligated to do Jihad, even if they do not want to participate.

Murder of innocents is not the greatest sin of the Koran; unbelief and apostasy (leaving Islam) are far worse. Because unbelievers are guilty through their lack of acceptance of Allah and Islam, anything can be done to them by Muslims.

Islam is at war with kafirs because kafirs do not believe. The fact that kafirs in the west pretend that the war is not real is irrelevent only to the dreaming kafirs, nothing about Islam is relevant; to Islam it is an ally in jihad.

Islam’s purpose is to bring the unbelievers into Islam, out of their criminal “ignorance” as the Koran puts it. If kafirs refuse to accept Islam they can be killed or enslaved to live as dhimmis as their cultures, countries, and religions are destroyed by Islam. Osama bin Laden specifically called the west to Islam before and after 9/11 just for this ideological purpose – when the west refuses or ignores the call to Islam anything, even mass murder, can be done to them because they are unbelievers, the worst kind of sinners in Islam. An “invitation” from Islam cannot be whimsically ignored; this is akin to the “offer that one cannot refuse” from the “mob”.

In Islamic doctrine one is a slave of Allah and of Mohammed. Mohammed is Allah’s Prophet but he has a special role. Mohammed is not just a prophet of Allah, rather he is The Prophet. The Koran puts Mohammed in a position of authority over Muslims equivalent with Allah. This is why all Muslims everywhere emulate Mohammed as the perfect human being to be modeled. Mohammed is the model for all humanity forever in the Islamic worldview.

When you see terrorists beheading kafir captives and quoting the Koran, they do this because Mohammed did this; when you see Islamists torture and kill the innocent they do this because Mohammed did; when you see Islamists kill thousands of kafirs, torture them, burn their churches and temples, and rape their women, they do this because Mohammed the perfect example for all Muslims forever did these things.

“We have prepared a blazing fire for these unbelievers who do not believe in Allah and his Messenger.” (Koran, 48:13)

As an example of moral and ethical behavior most decent people in the west would reject Mohammed as someone worhty of emulation. Not so in Islam. Mohammed is the perfect example; Mohammed killed the kafir, so today and since the inception of Islam, Muslims have done the same thing.

Koran is alive. While it lives, kafirs die.

Mohammed is the example for all Muslims to follow.

“Those who obey the Messenger, obey Allah.”
(4:79, 4:80)

“And it is not the place of a believer, either man or woman, to have a choice in his or her affairs when Allah and his Messenger have decided on a matter. Those who disobey Allah and his Messenger are clearly on the wrong path.” (33:36)

All Muslims are obligated to participate in Jihad. This is the conquest of kafirs and bringing them into Islam, very often by force. If they do not come to Islam, they are destroyed. Because the majority of the Koran is reserved for how Islam treats kafirs it is a political document. Because conquest, conversion, or death are the only options for kafirs the Koran is exceedingly dangerous for any unbeliever.

There are “five pillars” of Islam, these are religious and community-oriented (the Muslim community, not the human community). But there is much more to being a Muslim than the five pillars. The core of Koran is “fighting in Allah’s cause”.

Anyone who fights and dies in Allah’s cause will live forever in paradise with Allah. The temporal world is not the focus of the Koran, rather it is the world to come. The only assured way to get to paradise in Islam is by doing jihad (and ideally, dying in the process). Jihad is killing and enslaving kafirs. This means that Islam is in an existential war with all unbelievers wherever they may be, forever. It also means that Islam is an ideology of anti-life, death; the world to come is superior to the world we live in and the best way to get there is by killing unbelievers in jihad.

“Existential” means that our existence as individuals and as part of nations or religions or anything external to, other than, Islam is at stake. If Islam is successful, there is nothing in the world but Islam. Nothing.

“Let those who would sell the life of this world for the world to come fight for Allah’s cause. Whoever fights for Allah’s cause, whether he is killed or is victorious, We will grant him a great reward. How could you not fight for Allah’s cause?” (4:74)

“The believers fight for Allah’s cause, and the unbelievers fight for Satan. Therefore, fight against the friends of Satan. Truly Satan’s strategy is weak.” (4:76)

In Islam, all non-believers are evil and  ignorant, and must be brought under Islam, enslaved or killed. The history of Islam shows that this is believed, literally. The events of today show that this ideology of war and cruelty is very much alive.

The defenders of Islam speak of the “beauty” of the Koran. I found none. There is some poetics, but it is reserved for the descriptions of unbelievers burning in hell.

“If only you could witness the angels carrying off the unbelievers’ souls!They slash their faces and backs saying, ‘Taste the torment of the fire!’” (8:49)

The real “beauty” of the koran is for the jihadists. Koran is not about our world, it is about the next, and how to get there. Unfortunately, for those who are not Muslim, the best path to paradise is by jihad, war against the kafir. We see jihad every day. Jihad is the murder of kafirs, wherever they are.

“The forgiveness and mercy they, who die or are killed for Allah’s cause, will receive from Allah will be far better than anything they could have gained. If you die or are killed, then surely you will all be gathered before Allah.” (3:157)

If the reader is, like me, a non-Muslim the Koran is not a friendly book. There is little tolerance in the Koran. The only tolerance is for Muslims, there is none for the kafir. If you are a Jew or Christian, reading the Koran is particularly unpleasant.

“Oh, believer, do not take the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you take them for his friends, he surely is one of them. Allah will not guide the evil doers.” (5:51)

One could quote the Koran for hundreds of pages to illustrate the actual message of the Koran. There is no need for this as the Koran is quite clear about its message. We in the kafir world simply choose to ignore it. This doctrine of pretending, this immature view of the world in which we pretend that the world is something other than what it is is the foundation of political correctness and multiculturalism. These two absurd concepts further the purposes of jihad. Politically correct people who prevent the truth of Islam to be disseminated are self-destructive fools, the useful idiots of jihad. 

Muslims are not allowed to be friends with Christians or Jews or any unbeliever. The fate for unbelievers is hellfire, death, or conquest/conversion. So, why bother befriending such people, I suppose. But more importantly, the kafir is considered evil, ignorant, and less than human as they are outside of Islam. Anything outside of Islam is considered evil in the doctrine. This is the opposite of inclusiveness and tolerance. Those apologists and defenders of Islam who say that it is tolerant are lying or are ignorant of the doctrine, or both.

“The unbelievers among the People of the Book (Jews & Christians) and the idolators will burn for eternity in the fire of Hell. Of all the created beings, they are the most despicable.” (98:6)

The Koran is a diabolical political document that lays out a plan for the conquest of the entire world by Islam. One could put this ideology into a movie and make quite a thriller out of it, but nobody would believe it. Suspension of disbelief would not be possible as the plot would be seen as impossible, completely unrealistic. But this is exactly what is happening now in the west, total disbelief and no suspension of it. Our ignorance of Islamic doctrine furthers the cause of jihad, and undermines our ability to exist. This is cultural insanity and suicide. We do not defend ourselves against jihad because we prefer to pretend that it is not real.

This reluctance to accept the truth of the Koran and of Islam is entirely based upon ignorance of Islam and its very clear doctrine, and ignorance of jihad. The time for wishful thinking is long over.

Defense of Islam is not based upon knowledge, experience, learning, or understanding of the motivations of Islam which come entirely and without exception from the doctrine trilogy of Koran, Hadith and Sira. The Koran is diabolical because it justifies and demands death for untold millions and more. Defense of such an ideology can only be explained in two ways, ignorance or active support. In this case, ignorance of Islam and it doctrine is support of jihad and the destruction of kafirs.

Mohammed said that war is deception. Jihad is war and one of its weapons is deception. We are told that Islam is the “religion of peace” but we see in Koran that it is a religion and ideology and political system of war. It is much more than religion, it is an entire civilizational system dedicated to the destruction of all non-believers everywhere and forever.

We are told that Islam has been “hijacked” by “extremists” and that Islam is peaceful and tolerant. The only tolerance in Koran is for believers, there is no tolerance for kafirs. 

The word “extremist” and “moderate” are western concepts, they are not Islamic. In the Islamic context these concepts are completely different in meaning. In Islam someone who follows Koran and participates in Jihad as commanded by Allah and Mohammed are actually moderate because they are following the law of Islam as dictated to Mohammed by Allah through the angel Gabriel.

Those non-jihadist Muslims sought out by western apologists and wishful thinker fantasists as proof that there is tolerance in Islam are outside the religion/ideology as they deny their obligation to do jihad. Failure to do jihad is antithetical to Islam; it is a sin. Jihad is required.

Non-jihadist Muslims are in apostasy and are extremists. The moderate Muslim is Osama bin Laden because he follows the doctrine; the Taliban are moderate because they follow the doctrine (in the extreme). These are the true pious followers of Mohammed.

The fact that so many millions of Pakistanis are fleeing the Taliban shows that many Muslims do not want to be jihadists. Many Muslims do not accept their doctrine. The response to the Taliban in Pakistan is cause for hope because it shows that many Muslims reject their doctrine, it also means that Muslims are victims of Islam, too, in many ways.

What are we kafirs who have read the Koran to do? Koran is the word of Allah delivered to Mohammed by the angel Gabriel, according to Islam. Criticism of the doctrine is forbidden, debate is forbidden. This is why we see rote learning of Koran and Hadith and Sira in Madrassahs all over the world because rote learning is the only way to learn the word of Allah. Can such a doctrine founded upon the word of Allah that cannot be debated or criticized be reformed? This is a great question of the moment, and the answer would appear to be “No”.

We kafirs must accept the world in which we live; accept the Koran for what it says, and take the jihadists at their word when they say they are killing unbelievers because their doctrine (Allah and Mohammed) tells them to do so. They are not lying. We just pretend that they are, or that they have misinterpreted their doctrine. They haven’t. We are unwilling to face the truth. This reluctance to learn and to know and to teach empowers jihad.

This is the ugly truth of our times – murderers and conquerors are motivated by this book to do appalling inhuman things. They believe that they are doing “God’s work”. When you read the Koran you will see that this is not possible. The work of God as we understand him is peace not wholesale cruelty, hatred, intolerance, violence, brutality, and war.

All the mysteries of terror attacks; all the warfare in the middle east; all the conflicts with Islamic states; all the brutality against Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, against all non-believers by Muslims around the world will become clear when you read the Koran.

The most important and widely discussed but rarely read book of the 1920s and 30s was Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Its sales made Hitler a wealthy man, but few who purchased the book read it though many chose (incorrectly) to defend Hitler as the “rescuer” of Germany in spite of not having read it. Had the book been widely read at home and abroad the plans of the lunatic Fuehrer for world war and for the destruction of the Jews would have been known because they were all discussed in detail in the unread Mein Kampf. Could Chamberlain have gone to Berlin and declare “peace in our time” had the majority of those in Europe read Mein Kampf?

Now, with the rise of Islamism and global jihad across the world another profoundly important book goes almost entirely unread but is widely discussed regardless, the Koran. Most discuss Islam and Koran from ignorance and wishful thinking and condemn those who have read it, understand it and ring the bell of warning about it.

There can be little confusion as to the message of the Koran. In the Koran you will find no good news.

There is no more important book in the world at this time than the Koran. It is fitting that Mein Kampf and the Koran are juxtaposed; both lay out a grand plan of global conquest and war, both involve violence, intolerance, and hatred; both are ideological political documents that present a plan for world-wide totalitarianism. The high cost of Mein Kampf is now known – in the tens of millions of victims. The ongoing cost of jihad is almost too painful to consider; the cost of Jihad since the publication of the Koran is in the hundreds of millions.

Everyday in the persecution of unbelievers across the world we see a resurgent Islam. This is the great struggle, the great jihad. They are fighting heart and soul to bring the world to Islam by any means – while we pretend it is not so. Jihadists are obeying their god and their messenger, while we ignore both and pretend that both are peaceful and tolerant. They are not.

The events of violence, hate and war coming from the Islamic world are not “hijackings” of a peaceful tolerant religion, they are the thrashings of a great beast of war. Read the Koran, you will see. When you see, you must teach others. There is nothing of more import than learning the motives of the cruelest ideology on the planet earth. An ideology whose purpose is our destruction.

Ignorance is not an option. Read the Koran. The guidebook of the world as we know it now is the Koran. It is a book without beauty, it is a book of war and horrors. We had better read it. All of us.

June 14th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

President Obama  recently assured the “Muslim World” that we are not war with Islam, and never will be. The response has been less than encouraging. The lack of buy-in to Obama’s message of friendship and pandering to the “Muslim World” is because while we may not be at war with them, they are certainly at war with us.

Throughout history there have been civilizations that are so fundamentally different from one another that no interaction or accommodation between them could be possible. This is the situation with Islam. Because Islam is at war with every kafir state and religion everywhere and forever, accommodation or understanding with Islam in the Obama model cannot be successful.

The doctrine of Islam states that no religion is acceptable other than Islam; it asserts Islam’s superiority over every political and religious system anywhere and for all time. Adherents to the ideology of Islam are required to “fight in Allah’s cause” even though they’d not prefer to be involved in such things. Allah commands that all must be involved in Jihad or at least support those who are. Islam is much more than a religion, it is also a political, cultural, legal, and military system that encompasses the entirety of existence from birth to death; it is a comprehensive ideology.

Because the majority of the Koran discusses how adherents are to interact with non-believers the Koran is the foundational document of a political ideology whose purpose is the conversion and destruction of all  non-Muslim states and cultures and peoples everywhere and forever. This conversion and destruction of non-Muslim peoples is acccomplished through Jihad.

Jihad is asymmetrical war. This is the kind of warfare we now face in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is about propaganda, street violence, assassinations, church burnings, brutality and barbarism and small unit actions of violence and mass-murder that terrify the kafirs into inaction. There are no mass armies on the move in this war (though some jihad actions in the past have involved such kinds of warfare), no massive air bombing campaigns like those of WW2 there is only constant strife and conflict at the street level and into the institutions of the host culture whereby they are undermined and prevented from mounting an effective defense.

There are two phases of Islamic jihad, active warfare and hudna. Hudna is not peace because no Muslim is bound by any treaty of word or paper with a non-Muslim. Treaties between Muslims and kafirs are worth less than the paper that they are printed upon. Mohammed broke treaties, and encouraged lies and deceptions in Jihad and that is exactly what we see today.

“The Quran also allows them to be “disobedient towards the disbelievers and their governments and strive against the unvlievers with great endeavour.” (25:52)
- Shoebat, Why We Want to Kill You, p214

Westerners confuse the temporary period of non-fighting which is “hudna” with actual peace. The truth is that hudna is just a period of time that passes without conflict while the forces of jihad regroup, rearm and wait for new opportunities to fight the kafir unbelievers. Mohammed used this tactic to great success as do all of his followers over time.

There is no peace with Islam and with Jihad, there is only a temporary pause as the jihadists await better opportunities. For many it is difficult to conceive that this status quo of fighting punctuated by pauses could be a tactic rather than a situational response to political conflict (e.g., Israel-Palestine). Our leaders say that we are not at war because they cannot conceive that this kind of warfare can be real, but it is. This is entirely an ignorance-based position. We are very much at war with Islam but we do not defend ourselves because our leadership has deluded itself into believing that the war is not real.

But the war is very real, and we are losing it because we will not take action for defense.

We are overrun and in retreat everywhere even as we apologize to our enemies and pretend that their culture is foundational to our own, which is false.  We cannot fight a war that is waged against us when we pretend that it is not happening. Jihad has never stopped since the founding of this ideology, it only pauses. So long as the trilogy doctrine of Islam requires adherents to “fight in Allah’s Cause” everywhere and forever, we are at war with Islam because they are at war with us. This is not a matter of opinion it is rather a matter of the acceptance of an ugly reality.

In the Islamic world honor and pride override all boundaries and linkages of kin and morality. Those who offend the honor and pride of their Islamic familiesdo so at their peril. Family bonds and responsibilities are subsumed by the demands of Islam.  The Umma of Islam is the family to adherents. This is contrary to our western concepts of the overriding value of family connections. One’s connection to Islam is more important than one’s connections to family, father and children, sister and brother, etc.

In their investigation, PCHR said police sources “revealed that the victim’s father issued a confession to the police” that he had killed his daughter to “preserve family honor.” (Maan News, see link above)

………………

In the first incident of its kind, a Palestinian family has killed its 15-year-old son in the West Bank after accusing him of “collaboration” with Israel.  

Raed Wael Sawalha’s body was discovered in the basementof a house in his village of Hijjah in the Kalkilya area on Wednesday.

The Palestinian Authority security forces announced that they have arrested a number of the boy’s family members in connection with the killing. (Jerusalem Post)

This kind of barbarity is fundamentally in opposition to our concepts of morality and family relationships. This is a civilizational conflict.

Recently in Pakistan a Christian man was murdered for drinking from a cup that was designated for Muslims only. He was beaten to death with “stones, iron rods and clubs” by 14 Muslim men. This is barbarism and this is a civilization  opposed to our own. A recent public beating in Afghanistan by a Taliban man puts on clear display the totalitarian brutality of Islam and those states that follow Sharia law.

Several weeks ago, a US Army private was killed in front of an army recruiting center in Little Rock, Arkansas. The killer was a Muslim jihadist. A memorial service for this victim of Islamic jihad was held in Little Rock. A Muslim woman in a burka showed up at the event screaming Islamic supremacist and Jew hatred slogans, interfering with the memorial. This was all captured on video. (See below).

Why would someone interfere at a memorial event for an innocent American murdered by a new-fangled Muslim jihadist killer? Interfering in the service was this woman’s jihad, fighting in Allah’s cause against the kafir. No compassion is extended to the kafir unbelievers in jihad, no basic courtesy even in mourning is given. Kafirs are less than human, they do not merit any courtesies from Muslims. Terrorizing kafirs, confusing them, and preventing them from following their own traditions of remembrance and respect are all jihad actions.

The kafir culture and kafirs themselves merit no respect by Islam and its adherents. Because kafirs have not accepted Allah and Mohammed so they are therefore the enemy. Islam knows its enemies – all non-believers wherever they might be. We do not know ours. ”The sheep do not know the wolf, but the wolf knows the sheep.” (Walid Shoebat)

Deconstruction of western traditions and even funeral observances are all part of the ongoing jihad. This is asymmetrical warfare in this civilizational conflict. We pretend it is not real – but it will not go away nevertheless.

May 27th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

The greatest difference between the Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazis in Germany and that of the endless Jihad against kafirs perpetrated by the so-called “religion of peace” is that the German Holocaust ended.  Second only to the difference in longevity between these abominations is the body count.

The Nazis killed millions of innocent Jews, and millions of Russians and Europeans and Americans and British and French and people of many nations during the war in addition to all the millions of Germans they caused to die. Some say the total body count of WW2 is approximately 60 million. The death toll of universal Jihad courtesy of the “religion of peace” since its inception by Mohammed, the greatest example of humanity for all Muslims to forever follow is approximately 270 million.

Though the unity of these two holocausts is in the massive death that they brought to innocents, there is a great difference in how history and successive generations have chosen to deal with them.

There are thousands of books about the Nazi holocaust, there are few about the endess jihad of Islam. The jihad of Islam, “fighting in the cause of Allah” as the Koran puts it, is rarely spoken about. When jihad is discussed currently it is only in the context of “the hijackers” rather than the truth of jihad which is that it is a foundational component of the doctrine of Islam itself. Jihad is endless war against the unbelievers until the entire world is under Islam. This is the doctrine of Islam.

Jihad is fundamental to Islam, this is why 9/11 happened and countless acts of killing, violence, hatred, brutality before and since. We very rarely hear the truth of jihad and its core importance to Islam. When it is discussed in this way, those who discuss it are labelled as “racists” though Islam is not a race. The majority in the West cannot separate the political aspects of Islam from the religious, and this is exactly what Islam desires – the complete inability of kafir cultures to respond to jihad. Muslims are completely motivated for jihad; it is foundational to their doctrine.

“Jihadism is a message of salvation. For one to die in the cause of Allah is an assurance of salvation and entry to paradise.” (Walid Shoebat, Why We Want to Kill You, p51)

Islam is at war with all non-Muslim peoples and cultures, and all non-Islamic governments forever. This is in the Koran, Hadith, and Sira, the doctrine of Islam. Islam considers the kafirs losers who will burn in Hell forever. They are not to be given succor.

Then if they will endure, still the fire is their abode, and if they ask for goodwill, then are they not of those who shall be granted goodwill. (Koran, 42:24)

The great sin of the unbelievers is that they are not Muslim. If they are Jews and Christians, Islam is angrier with them because they rejected the Koran and the Prophet of Islam and retained their identities. Being a non-Muslim is one of the great sins of Islam. 

Many Messengers who came before you were mocked. For a long time We allowed the unbelievers to go unpunished, but finally We punished them. Then how terrible was Our punishment! (Koran, 13:32) 

Every day we see violence that is Islamic in origin. Only last week 4 American Islamic converts plotted to blow up a synagogue in New York. These men were converted to Islam in prison, the place where Islam is gaining its greatest ground in the United States.  While this may not have been a suicide mission for these people, suicide killing is directly in line with Islamic doctrine, and is demonstrated in the actions of Islamists almost every day around the world.

“Some Westerners find it difficult to comprehend that Muslims aspire to die. So, they blame suicide bombings on poverty or human rights issues. But if poverty and human rights issues are the cause of suicide bombings, again we must ask, why do we never hear of a Palestinian Christian suicide martyr?” (Shoebat, p54)

The men in the bomb plot were violently angry, their anger mainly directed at the Jews. This again is directly in line with Islamic doctrine. Hatred of, and violence towards the Jews is foundational in Islamic ideology.

“They wanted to make a statement,” a law enforcement source said. “They were filled with rage and wanted to take it out on what they considered the source of all problems in America – the Jews.”

The group’s alleged ringleader, James Cromitie, according to the complaint, discussed targets with an undercover agent. “The best target [the World Trade Center] was hit already,” he allegedly told the agent. Later, he rejoiced in a terrorist attack on a synagogue.

“I hate those motherf—–s, those f—ing Jewish bastards. . . . I would like to get [destroy] a synagogue.” (NY Daily News)

The hatred of Jews in Islam is documented in both Islamic history and in Islamic doctrine. Mohammed hated the Jews, so all Muslims must do the same. Allah hated the Jews, so all Muslims must do the same.  Mohammed viciously killed Jews, so Muslims must do the same. As Mohammed is the Prophet of Allah, and he is considered the finest example of humanity for all to follow forever, whatever Mohammed did those who follow him also do. This is not an ideology of right and wrong, but of expediency.

This confusion of morality is consistent throughout the doctrine of Islam. What is forbidden and allowed is by far more important than what is moral and what is immoral. The confusion is so ingrained that if Mohammed beheaded innocent people (he did), particularly Jews, then it is alright for Muslims to do the same forever. This is an ideology that is amoral.

It is an ideology of submission, admittedly so by those who submit to the doctrine and to Allah and Mohammed. (”Islam” means “submission”; a “Muslim” is one who “submits”.) Islam is a self-perpetuating ideology of violence and cruelty whose history and deeds are hidden in plain site, continuously ignored and covered over because Islam has its one god Allah so Islam is characterized as one of the three “great religions of the world”. But submission is not reserved for Muslims, the entire world of unbelievers must also submit as no other religion or political system is allowed in the doctrine of Islam.

We see the culture of death that is Islam every day. Yet we pretend it is not so. We use the “hijack” term to describe the horrors that its adherents commit from Pakistan to India to Israel, Iraq and in New York City and across Europe and the world.

We excuse it all because we cannot conceive that such an ideology of cruelty and conquest can be real. But it is.

“…In order to become a martyr, one must die, and by coming a shaheed, one would have an assurance of his or her salvation. In Islam, the idea of Christ dying for all humanity is rejected and is one of the reasons why Islam was founded. This is the major difference between Muslim salvation and Christian salvation; it’s not the death (and resurrection) of Christ which provides entrance into heaven, but your own death.” (Shoebat, p57)

How can an ideology that elevates death over life be a “religion of peace”?  Our ignorance about the ideology of this brutal political system is our undoing. Why are kafirs are not allowed to study Koran (as commanded in Koran)? It is all so painfully obvious, and so brutally clear what is to happen to kafirs, that is why.

The doctrine of Islam does not hide its purposes; the followers of the doctrine do not hide its purposes and goals; only we do.

When we discuss Islam and its doctrine we are not discussing a race of people, as the Germans did the Jews during the Holocaust. Those who discuss and study the doctrine of Islam are not demonizing those who follow the doctrine; the doctrine demonizes itself. There is no issue in this discussion with individuals or races, only a doctrine that is hostile to our culture and way of life.

Those who speak of the Islamic causations of violence and terror, and honor killings and wife beating, and the implementation of Sharia law do so to warn our fellow Americans to an existential threat from a hostile political ideology.

The Jews of Germany had no agenda but to be “good Germans”; almost entirely assimilated the majority of the Jewish community in Germany absolutely refused to believe that the Holocaust was real even as they stepped inside the “showers” of Bergen-Belsen, Treblinka, and Auschwitz and other killing centers (”concentration camps”). This ability to deny, this desperate need to deny is the foundation of our own denial ideology towards this brutal political doctrine that is Islam.

So many in the West confuse the religion of Islam with its politics and ideology towards unbelievers; the majority of the Koran is not about how to be a good Muslim but is rather about how Muslims are to interact with unbelievers, the kafir. There are three choices for kafirs in the Koran- conversion, dhimmitude (semi-slavery), conquest/death. These are all choices that involve the complete destruction of American society, government, and religions. There is no Constitution under Islamic law but Sharia, the savage, barbaric law of the doctrine of Islam. Sharia is entirely contrary to every foundational concept of freedom that we Americans hold dear.

This is not a discussion about a race of people; this is a discussion of a brutal and cruel political ideology masquerading as a religion of peace whose followers are obliged to follow. If this ideology were inclusive rather than exclusive there would be little cause for discussion but curiosity; if the doctrine of Islam accepted other religions there would be no violence every day across the world. If this doctrine did not elevate death over life there would not be suicide murders almost every day. But it is all these things. It is our responsibility to ourselves and our country to study this doctrine and oppose it just as we did Nazism and Communism.

Many confuse this discussion with bigotry or racism. It was never bigotry or racism to discuss and oppose Nazis and Communists though both ideologies involved religious components of  a cult of personality (similar to the elevation and concept of Mohammed in Islam).

This discussion involves the total acceptance of the fact that there are good people who follow Islam but who do not know the doctrine, and when they learn it – what will they do? They must make a decision that will affect their lives, and possibly the lives and deaths of others. And what of those Muslims who know the doctrine but are “devout” Muslims regardless?

When faced with an ideology of brutality, cruelty and a total lack of respect for women and the individual it is our duty to learn about it and tell others of the dangers that it represents.

We do not pretend that 9/11 and the myriad other Islamic attacks were not related to Islam, they were. As in Israel, the front line of global jihad, our culture celebrates and elevates life, the culture and ideology of Islam elevates death.

Can there be a reformation of Islam when the Koran with its exhortations to violence and hatred are the literal words of Allah? How can this reformation be done? It cannot be done by unbelievers.

Why are those who study Islamic doctrine dismissed as bigots and racists when the discussion is centered on the doctrine of Islam entirely? There is no desire to demonize any group of people in this discussion because of their race or national origin; there is no race hatred, no race bating, only a desire for the truth.

What is the doctrine of Islam really about? What does it mean to non-believers that over a billion people follow this doctrine? Is it not clear that the responsibilities of those who submit to Allah, Mohammed, and the doctrine are great? The word of the Koran is (in Islam) the literal word of god, Allah, and must be followed.

Unfortunately, for all non-Muslims, the word of the Koran (and the rest of the doctrine of Islam) says that Islam is at war with kafirs forever. This is important information, yes?

We live in a society with freedom of speech, this is guaranteed to us by our Constitution. While the Koran expressly forbids the kafir from studying Koran, we are not bound by this requirement. We are not bound by any Islamic, Jewish, or Christian requirements because we live in a secular state in which religion is separated from the church(es).  Yet, we impose a self-censorship when it comes to Islam, why?

This censorship is encouraged by Islam and its apologists because it aids them in their mission and undermines our ability to understand and respond. There are no such strictures against discussing Nazis and Communists; are they a threat in the same definitive immediate way that Islam is a threat? No. 

We claim to be interested in the past, yet learn little from it. We are obsessed with the future but are entirely unprepared for it because we cannot learn from history.

Faced with an existential threat we are comfortable instead discussing dead Nazis and their destroyed doctrine, and armaments and tactics and strategies but shush those who speak of Islam; we speak of the defeat of Communism with pride but refuse to discuss the ongoing victories of Islam and its cruel and thoroughly anti-human ideology as being impolitic, politically incorrect, unpopular, distasteful.

We must stop mislearning the lessons of history. We must discuss threats to our way of life whereever they are and in whatever form they take – to do otherwise is literally insane.

We cannot defend ourselves when we will not discuss the threat, name the threat, and talk of defense. We must value what we have then take steps to secure what we have as it of immense value and we want to pass it down to our children.

The history of jihad is lengthy, much longer by far than the history of democracy. Jihad has been highly successful across the world for millenia and longer. Jihad is deception, Mohammed said it was so. Deception is the tactic of an enemy in war. We must stop deceiving ourselves. It must stop here, now.

May 20th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

The late 1970s conversion to Islam of Cat Stevens, the most popular singer-songwriter in the world at the time, came as no surprise to those who followed the deep threads of searching that he wove throughout his songs. Cat had always been a searcher, searching for “something” as was the popular motif during those days.

Always searching, he finally found what he didn’t know he had been looking for, Islam. His embrace of religion was the not-surprising conclusion to his extensive songbook of yearning and searching for “something”,  his selection of Islam and his subsequent and continuing embrace of jihad is a profound disappointment and a deep betrayal of the entirety of western culture and the finer concepts of love and brotherhood, forgiveness and humanity about which he so consistently wrote and sang.

For me personally, I learned the guitar because of my affection for Cat Stevens’ music. I learned his songs, playing them for hours at a time. His conversion to Islam and his embrace of Islamic domination of all others; his support of the death of Salmon Rushdie, his financial support of terrorist organizations that eventually got him placed on a US “no-fly” list was a personal disaster to me. Owning all his records, and now CDs as I do, they sit now unlistened.

But it is also a cultural disaster for the world because his music was so stunningly beautiful and so indicative of acceptance and love. I do not listen to the music of pseudo failed artists who support global jihad - neither should you.

Last week, Cat Stevens played a venue in Los Angeles for the first time in 20 years. The review in the LA Times was sycophantic, fawning, and as out-of-context as it possibly could have been. There was no mention of his Islamism, Rushdie, terrorism links, nothing.  They failed to mention this:

He also courted controversy by allegedly funding charities that were fronts for the Islamic militant group Hamas. Israeli authorities have barred Islam twice from entering the country because of his alleged ties to Hamas. (source)

There were some Hollywood glitterati in attendance. There is no question, his voice is astounding, but his ethics are revolting. The Hollywood types cared not a whit.

It was an invitation-only event, potentially a prelude to an actual concert tour, and the audience was dotted with celebs, including Josh Groban, Colin Farrell, Rosanna Arquette, Cameron Crowe and Jake (Body by Jake) Steinfeld.

In the now obvious theme of journalistic ignorance, intellectual dishonesty (bias) and white-washing the “reviewer” commented that Cat Stevens, now an entirely different entity named “Yusuf Islam” was not proselytizing but was “reconnecting” with his old fans who appeared to know nothing about his new self, or don’t care. The truth is that everything “Yusuf Islam” does in public is dawa, converting people to Islam with propaganda and falsehoods.

He also made it effortless for fans to reconnect with him personally, even for those who can’t fully comprehend the scope of his conversion three decades ago to the Islamic faith. His new songs reflect a perspective of one who, unlike Bono, has found what he’s looking for spiritually, but never in a proselytizing or patronizing way. (Source: LA Times)

Mr. Stevens/Islam is now two people; he is a man with a laudable past, a man who once embraced brotherhood and peace but now an emissary of a totalitarian ideology who embraces a brutal and intolerant way of life whose purpose is global expansion and the destruction of every culture and form of religion or government that is not Islamic. This is the doctrine of Islam, and as a total believer Mr. Stevens/Islam embraces this horrific ideology in its entirety.

In 2007, Mr. Stevens/Islam received an “award” from MEDEA for his work in bridging the gap between the Arab world and Europe. Unfortunately, the Islamic concept of “peace” only includes a world in which there are no other religions; this is the concept of “dar al-Islam”. There is only “peace” where Islam reigns; everywhere else is war “dar al-harb”.

Yusuf is being awarded the prestigious award as a result of the work he has done to increase peace in the world. (Source, Gates of Vienna)

Stevens/Islam said that he has read the Koran and that is why he converted to Islam, you know, for the message of peace that he found there. He said, in August, 2005, that

The message I picked up from the Qur’an was quite different. I found the light of knowledge and godliness shining from the verses and stories, linking mankind together as one family, regardless of color, status or nationality. It told me of the wondrous universal teachings of peace and unity advocated by the greatest of educators, people such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus and others. (source)

The Salmon Rushdie affair is illustrative of the profound change that has occurred within this person formerly known as Cat Stevens. Once a global spokesman for peace, understanding, tolerance, love, and goodwill, Mr. Stevens/Islam called publicly for the death of a writer whose book he does not approve (because his new “ideology” does not approve it). This is anti-art, anti-intellectualism, anti-creativity, and anti-human, all foundational principles of the doctrine of political Islam. This is the polar opposite of what Cat Stevens used to be.

May 22, 1989: The musician known as Cat Stevens said in a British television program to be broadcast next week that rather than go to a demonstration to burn an effigy of the author Salman Rushdie, ”I would have hoped that it’d be the real thing.” …

He also said that if Mr. Rushdie turned up at his doorstep looking for help, ”I might ring somebody who might do more damage to him than he would like.”

”I’d try to phone the Ayatollah Khomeini and tell him exactly where this man is,” said Mr. Islam, who watched a preview of the program today and said in an interview that he stood by his comments. (source)

Interviewed on Larry King’s show in early October of 2004, Mr. Stevens/Islam let it “all hang out”.

“And the first thing that came so clear to me was this declaration in the belief in one God in this universe. You know, now that’s powerful. That’s powerful. Of course, in the Jewish faith, you know, that’s fairly well known but — but here, it was a universal approach. It wasn’t now, you know, if you like a racial approach where it was only owned by Arabs. The Quran was talking to me in terms of humanity. I’d never heard that before.

When I saw the name of Jesus and Moses, Abraham, along with the prophet Mohammed, of all these prophets mentioned in the Quran, that was quite startling. I never expected that.” (Larry King interview, transcript)

This is taqiyyah, sacred deception. Mr. Stevens/Islam must know that the Koran is very clear about universality, in that there isn’t any. Muslims are not allowed to befriend Jews and Christians and any unbelievers; the Jesus, Moses, and Abraham stories of the Old and New Testaments are lifted from the original holy books so that all of them are Islamic prophets in Islam. Mr. Stevens/Islam’s education in Koranic studies perhaps was not as thorough as it should have been. And, after all this time, one would think he would have done his homework and “caught up”. This is likely.

He is “caught up” now but he is no longer Cat Stevens the lover of humanity; he is now the creature “Yusuf Islam”, the perpetrator of deception and falsehoods, and the proponent of global jihad. There have been fewer more public transformations than his.

The Larry King interview performance is textbook taqiyyah.

KING: So a Muslim who commits terrorism is going totally against his faith?

ISLAM: Yes. I mean, this is obvious. And the Quran is very clear about it. You know, if you look at the teachings of Quran, which I learned when I became a Muslim, you know, what does it say? It says belief, you know, and good deeds. Well, you tell me how to do good deeds. Good deeds is prayer, it’s charity, it’s fasting, it’s speaking the truth. It’s being honest.

So you know, it’s an antithesis of what Islam stands for, and therefore, you know, we completely condemned it. It’s abhorrent.

And if you study the history of Islam — when it was correctly applied in this world, it was tolerant, there’s always the room for people of different faiths living together.

If only this were truth. It is not.

There is no tolerance in Islam for unbelievers, and little for Muslims themselves. The 1.5 million people fleeing the Taliban, the great implementers of the doctrine of Islam, is evidence of this. The doctrine is cruel and brutal to everyone, believers and unbelievers alike. Those who know it, flee.

The suggestion that Islam is tolerant is false. Islam is not tolerant of any other faith, culture or political system. Islam is a form of totalitarianism akin to Stalinism and Nazism. Mr. Stevens/Islam knows this, but he does not care. He is a believer, woe to the unbeliever. (Was “Woe to the Unbeliever” ever a Cat Stevens tune? No.)

A statistical study of Islam recently undertaken by Mr. Bill Warner shows that there is a peaceful component of Islam.

The Sirais Mohammed’s biography (sira is an Arabic word that means biography, but Sira is reserved for Mohammed) and has three versions by three authors. The most definitive is by Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, translated by A. Guillaume as The Life of Muhammad….

Based upon the Sira, Islam is 2% peace, 28% argument and threats, and 70% jihad. If the Sira were a two-hour movie, then the peaceful part would last for nearly 3 minutes, the fist fights, brawls, arguments and threats would last 34 minutes and the killing would take up 83 minutes. But the movie ends with the beaten kafirs saying that they will do whatever Mohammed wants, if he will only stop the jihad. (Bill Warner, PoliticalIslam.com)

A great deal of the doctrine of Islam deals with the Jews. Islam does not like the Jews. The Jews rejected Mohammed’s prophethood, Mohammed hated them for it, so then do all Muslims. Mr. Stevens/Islam has another interpretation for those who know nothing of the matter.

KING: Does the Quran at all attack Judaism? I’ve never read the Quran, but I’ve heard this through the years that the Quran — parts of the Quran are anti-Semitic.

ISLAM: Well, I think part of the New Testament would be too if you analyze it. I mean, Jesus is reported at some point to have been correcting certain Pharisees and scribes and saying, oh you, whatever.

Of course, there are verses in the Quran which try to, if you like, correct maybe some deviations, but as far as the Jewish faith is concerned, let me tell you a verse in the Quran, a very important verse. It says: “Those who believe,” means Muslims in this case, “and those who are Judized (ph) and those Sadains (ph) and the Christians, whoever believes in God and the last day and does good works, no fear shall come upon them, neither shall they grieve.”

That is a verse of the Quran, Larry. Now, a lot of people don’t get to that part. They look at some of the sections, which, yes, they talk about certain wars which took place. Again, some of those are historical and have to be read in context. But the general principle is that there is no compulsion in religion and life is sacred, simple as that.

Islam hates all non-believers (kafirs), but reserves a special hatred for Jews.  There is this “PeaceTrain” for all unbelievers, it is a train to Auschwitz:

Koran, 2:191 – And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.  (source)

For the Jews, there are many doctrinal comments about killing:

Sahih Bukhari Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176: Narrated by ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle said, “You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, ‘O ‘Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’” Sahih Bukhari Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177: Narrated by Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.” (source)

Things are not much better for those who want to leave Islam. Islam is something like LaCosaNostra, or “the Company” – nobody leaves:

Koran: 4:089 – They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper.  (source)

One wonders which Koran Mr. Stevens/Islam read when he converted to Islam. There is one Koran, wherein it says to kill Jews and hate the unbelievers and kill and hate those who want to leave Islam. There is but one God this God says the same, there can be no religion but Allah’s religion. All kafirs must convert, be enslaved, or die.

Where is the beauty in Koran? Perhaps there is some small speck left of what was Mr. Cat Stevens. Perhaps the Islamic concepts of charity are what got him so interested in Islam, interested enough to embrace its totalitarian concepts of existence. Many searchers finds absolutism attractive, this is likely what happened with Cat Stevens. It does not matter that Islam is opposed to everything he ever said, ever sang about prior to his conversion; what matters is that his searching is over, his questions (every one of them forever) are now answered, and he can rest.

You learn fasting. You learn — well, you might already be giving charity, but here you learn how to give — you have to give charity. It’s not a question of an option or a voluntary choice. You have to give charity. (Larry King interview, see above)

Islam believes in charity… but only for Muslims; the kafir, the unbeliever is not considered worthy of Islamic charity.

A person who calls himself or herself a Muslim might offer help to a kafir out of true generosity. But let’s closely examine the psychology of this event. The only way for a Muslim to give freely to a kafir is to not see him as a kafir, but as a fellow human being, an equal deserving compassion and empathy. But a kafiris not ever equal to a Muslim. Seeing humanity as one is contrary to the Islamic doctrine of kafir and believer found in the Koran. Humanity-as-one is a kafir concept, not an Islamic concept. ….

The zakat is the Islamic charity.
The zakat is to be given to eight categories: the poor, those short of money, administrative costs, those whose hearts are to be reconciled, slaves to buy their freedom, those in debt, jihadists, and travelers who need assistance. A kafir (a non-believer) is forbidden to receive money from the zakat.
So Islam, as a corporate body, does not give charity to kafirs. (Warner, PoliticalIslam.com)

What Mr. Islam has lost is his soul, what we have all lost is a great artist and humanitarian. Cat Stevens is gone, he is a wisp in YouTube movies and captured on CDs and LPs around the world. His lyrics are beautiful as are his guitar work, and singing. Mr. Stevens repudiated and abandoned the principles and moral/ethical concepts that are the foundation of his music and artistic output. So much of his lyrics talk of searching. Mr. Islam believes he is found, but he is truly lost.

Cat Stevens: Father and Son:

Now theres a way and I know that I have to go away.

Koran, Jihad:

Koran, 3:156 – O you who believe, do not be like those who disbelieved and said of their kinsmen who traveled or mobilized for war, “Had they stayed with us, they would not have died or gotten killed.” GOD renders this a source of grief in their hearts. GOD controls life and death. GOD is Seer of everything you do. (source)

Koran, 3:157 – The forgiveness and mercy they, who die or are killed for Allah’s cause (jihad), will receive from Allah will be far better than anything they could have gained. If you die or are killed, then surely you will all be gathered before Allah.

Cat Stevens: If you Want to Sing Out, Sing Out

Well, if you want to sing out, sing out
and if you want to be free be free
’cause there’s a million things to be
you know that there are, you know that there are

Koran, Slavery

Qur’an (33:50) – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee.”

Qur’an (24:32) – “And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves…” 

 Cat Stevens, Miles From Nowhere

I have my freedom
I can make my own rules
Oh yeah, the ones that I choose

Islam, a totalitarian ideology

No freedom of Speech
Thought Control and intellectual, spiritual conformity
Domination of Women: Brutality of Sharia law
Global, perpetual murder, killing and war for Allah – Jihad
Gay hatred
Brutality and barbarism
Jew hatred

Cat Steven, Sad Lisa

She must be hurt very badly.
Tell me what’s making you sadly?
Open your door, don’t hide in the dark.
You’re lost in the dark, you can trust me.
cause you know that’s how it must be.

Islam, Wife Beating

Koran, 4:34  - “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.” (source)

Muslim (4:2127) – Muhammad struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission.  Aisha narrates, “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.”

Cat Stevens, Wild World

Oh, baby, baby, it’s a wild world
I’ll always remember you like a child, girl

You know i’ve seen a lot of what the world can do
And it’s breakin’ my heart in two
Because i never wanna see you a sad, girl
Don’t be a bad girl
But if you wanna leave, take good care
Hope you make a lot of nice friend out there
But just remember there’s a lot of bad and beware

Islam - Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6 years old, consummated the marriage when she was 9. In the Islamic doctrine whatever Mohammed has done, since he is the perfect example of humanity, is the right thing to do, even if it’s wrong.

Interview with Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-’Ubeidi, an Iraqi expert on Islamic law, which aired on Al-Rafidein TV on March 14, 2008:

Many criminals, the enemies of Islam, ask: “How could the Prophet Muhammad, at 52 years of age, marry ‘Aisha when she was only 8 years old, and consummate the marriage when she was 9 years old?” I say to them: People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Why do you permit your young girls to fornicate? They consider it one of their liberties. Therefore, in these stupid countries, you rarely find girls aged 10 or 12 who are still virgins. They permit this. They have even legislated laws stating that if a girl is under the age of 18, and her girlfriend [sic] or whatever has had sex with her, she has the right to have an abortion. How can you permit the outcome without accepting the cause? Why do you allow your girls to have sex and say this is an individual liberty? It is okay to fornicate with girls there or force them to have sex, and so on, and they have the right to have an abortion. If you permit all this before the age [of 18], without a marriage contract and without any legal grounds – how come you forbid marriage? (source)

 Cat Stevens, Peace Train

Everyone jump upon the peace train
Come on now peace train
Get your bags together, go bring your good friends too
Cause its getting nearer, it soon will be with you

 Koran, endless war against unbelievers everywhere, universal Jihad

Koran, 2:190: – ..fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you…[2.191] And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers. (source)

Koran, 4:89- …take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back [to their homes], then seize them and kill them wherever you find them… Koran, 4:91 – seize them and kill them wherever you find them…(source)

Koran, 5:51 – Oh, believers, do not take the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you takes them for his friends, he surely is one of them. Allah will not guide the evildoers. (source)

There is no Peace Train; there is only Universal JihadTrain. This is a train that must be derailed. Cat Stevens is gone, don’t let Yusuf Islam tell you otherwise.

 What is Lost

What Remains

Note: This is not Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam, the placard represents the belief system of his adopted ideology. Cat Stevens is gone.