September 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

(originally posted on SIOANetwork.com)

Introduction

As the 8^th anniversary of the greatest atrocity against innocent Americans, the most miserable and appalling crime and attack ever to occur on our soil approaches it is important to honor our innocent dead and to come to a greater understanding of that event so that we might comprehend our world and our place in it more effectively.

A Politically Incorrect Definition of 9/11 (The Truth)

The Unpleasant Nature of our World in Clear Logic

9/11 was jihad against the unbelievers of the United States. Every participant in 9/11 was a Muslim, a “devout Muslim”.

Every participant explained his actions of the murder of American innocents in an Islamic doctrinal context.

Islam is at war with all unbelievers (kafirs) everywhere and forever as per the directives of Allah and Mohammed in the Islamic doctrine. All Muslims “submit to” and are “slaves of” Allah and Mohammed, his prophet. Allah and Mohammed are found only in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). The doctrine of Islam commands all Muslims to participate in jihad against the unbeliever until the world is ruled by Islam. This is the purpose of Islam.

The existence of kafirs (unbelievers) is an affront to Allah and Mohammed. All Muslims are commanded to participate in jihad or support those who do. Non-participation is apostasy. Apostasy is not tolerated. Jihad is the central concept of Islamic doctrine other than voluntary and forced submission. Islam means “submission”.

The Koran discusses the kafir more than it discusses how to be a good Muslim. Islam is a totalitarian political ideology at war with the United States and all non-Muslim countries, cultures, and religions.

A Politically Correct Version of 9/11 (A Lie)

A False Fantasy of Reality Now Entirely Discredited

The attacks of 9/11 were perpetrated by people who happened to be Islamic. These criminals and terrorists misunderstood the peaceful nature of the doctrine of Islam. 9/11 began a war against “terror” as we were attacked by “terrorists”. These terrible people “hijacked” the “religion of peace”. Islam and its adherents are fully compatible with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The perpetrators/terrorists of 9/11 have given the “religion of peace” a bad name because they misunderstood the concept of perpetual, universal jihad to mean actual universal, perpetual jihad rather than an inner struggle. (It is not relevant of course that the entire history of Islam from Year One is a history of brutality, conquest, and jihad.)

Islam is a “religion of peace”. The many millions of ultra-violent killers and haters across the world who claim to be Muslim are confused about the doctrine of Islam. Signs, and speeches supporting jihad and violent events jihad are all misunderstood and perpetrated by confused people who happen to be Muslim. Jihad has nothing to do with Islam. 9/11 was a blip, an aberration in a long history of Islamic contributions to America and to liberty and decency.

9/11 and Islam are entirely unrelated.

========================

You must decide the truth of 9/11, and the nature of our current world.

You must decide if the doctrine of Islam is to be believed, the words and commands of Allah and Mohammed that all Muslims are required to follow forever or if the ignorant, multiculturalist, politically correct fools who know nothing of Islam, jihad, or Islam doctrine and history are correct.

You must decide if the Islamic world is driven by the doctrine of Islam which states clearly that Islam is a totalitarian political doctrine of brutality, misogyny, war, barbarism, and intolerance or if it is a misunderstood “religion of peace”. We have clear evidence, attacks, threats, rhetoric, doctrine, and a world of universal jihad war that show that this is all so.

The truth of 9/11 is foundationally about the doctrine of Islam. There is no context without the doctrine of Islam in which 9/11, previous and subsequent terror/jihad attacks against Americans and unbelievers around the world make any sense. The context of 9/11 is Islamic doctrine; the context of universal jihad against the kafir unbelievers is the doctrine of Islam.

More importantly, the criminals and killers who do these atrocities tell us in no uncertain terms that they are committing jihad because they are commanded to do so by Allah and Mohammed (as they are found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith). To the jihadists these actions of cruelty, barbarism and violence are not “atrocities” but are rather “fighting in Allah’s cause” as stated in the Koran over 150 times. This is jihad and it is central to the doctrine of Islam, and because of this it is the central responsibility for all Muslims everywhere forever.

We live in a world of war. If 9/11, London, Beslan, Madrid, Bali, USSCole, Paris, Israel, Iraq, Pakistan, and the tens of the thousands of jihad events of barbarism and brutality since are not enough for you to understand the truth, you are not paying quite enough attention – or, worse, you simply choose not to believe the ugly truth. Perhaps you believe as multiculturalists do that if you prefer the world to be tolerant, and if we ourselves are tolerant and nice, then the world itself will be tolerant and nice. The world has never, ever worked in this way.

This is why multiculturalism is a failed concept and must be destroyed.

Political correctness and multiculturalism encourage Americans to believe the entirely false politically correct explanation of 9/11 and other fake things. We use multiculturalism and politically correct speech and thought to prettify ugly things because we hate ugly things and we don’t want to offend anybody. Saying that Muslims perpetrated 9/11 and thousands of other atrocities is the truth, but it is also offensive to Muslims for some reason, so we avoid saying this – we avoid speaking the truth.

We must abandon multiculturalism and its political correctness ally. These are false concepts bereft of truth and value. They are remnants of a fantasy that 9/11, Madrid, Beslan, London, Paris, Bali, etc., have destroyed.

These are failed concepts that belong in the garbage bin of dialectic and discourse and should never again sully our ability to think about, talk about, and understand what is true.

We must discredit and destroy multiculturalism and political correctness to honor our innocent dead of 9/11 and other Islamic jihad atrocities. We must speak the truth about this existential war that is being waged against us, we must identify the enemy, his ideology and fake religion of peace.

We must honor our innocent dead of 9/11 by opposing the oldest, and now resurgent, totalitarianism in the world, Islam. If we do not do this, our honored dead are forgotten, and our freedoms, culture, and country are all lost.

Mourn the dead of 9/11 and remember why they died; they died because an ideology of brutality and cruelty saw them as less than human, kafirs, and their existence was an affront to Allah and Mohammed.

Multiculturalism and political correctness must be destroyed so that we can discuss the war, and respond. If we do not respond we have turned our backs on our history, our honored dead, and the heroes of the present and past who gave their all so that we could live in freedom, equality and tolerance.

Your email:

 

August 30th, 2009 by admin

We all know that Islam is not “peace”. We know this because of daily events of barbarism and jihad done by Muslims against non-believers in the name of Islam.

We know that Islam is not “peace” because of 9/11, Mumbai, London, Paris, Madrid, Bali, etc, and the thousands of violent attacks against non-Muslims by adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” since 9/11.

Islam is not a religion of peace because Islam is a complete totalitarian civilization and ideology which includes politics, jurisprudence, warfare, and religion. Religion is a component of Islam, not the totality of it.

Islam is not “peace” because the prophet of Islam, Mohammed said that it wasn’t. Jihad is an obligation for all adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”. Jihad is “fighting in Allah’s cause”. “Allah’s cause” is the destruction of all non-believers everywhere and forever.

This concept and command is so important it is mentioned approximately 150 times in Koran. Jihad against the unbelievers is the foundation of Islam. Islam is a political ideology of hatred, intolerance, misogyny, barbarism, aggressive war, totalitarianism, and cruelty that is boundless and unsurpassed in its violence and brutality in the history of humanity.

Islam is not “peace” until the entire world is dar al-Islam, the house of Islam. This means that Islam is at war with every non-Muslim political system, religion, and culture (and personally with every non-Muslim on this planet) because this is the house of war, dar al-harb.

Islam is peace… but only when the entire world is Islam; completion of the conquest of Islam is finally peace. But this is no “peace” that any Westerner can abide.

We must learn the doctrine of Islam and understand the history and purposes of Islam. Without this knowledge we are lost. A world entirely under the dominion of Islam is a world without individual rights; a world of forced conformity; a world of brutality and intolerance which few can conceive. But it is all real; the history of Islam demonstrates it, the doctrine of Islam confirms it, and daily events of jihad shows that it is ongoing and very very active.

The doctrine of Islam says that this is the way the world must be; they do this because the existence of unbelievers is an affront to Allah. All adherents of this doctrine must eliminate this affront from Allah, this is Allah’s and Mohammed’s command. All adherents submit to the commands of Allah and Mohammed, this is the definition of Islamic doctrine – all Muslims submit to the doctrine of Islam because this is the only place where Allah and Mohammed are found – Koran, Sira, Hadith. Nothing else in the Islamic world, nothing else in the entirety of the world (according to an adherent) is of the same moment or value as the doctrine.

If we do not learn the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith) we lose.

Your email:

 

August 19th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

When the most important book of the twentieth century was released in 1925 while its author sat in prison with his cronies for an attempted coup against the German government, few could foresee its horrific impact. Mein Kampf set out, in rambling hate-based prose, a program of war, hatred, mass murder, and global conquest. Over the years purchases of the book made Adolf Hitler a wealthy man, but few in the country read the book though most households owned at least one copy. Fewer outside of Germany read the book. Those whose lives would be directly affected by the implementation of the plans described in the book did not read it; and those who should have read it who were put most at risk by it did not read it.

The same scenario is repeated with the Sira of Mohammed. Those who most need to read it (non-Muslims), those most at risk from its message will not, in the main, read it; while those who have read it are those who embrace its themes and message of hate, intolerance, war, and conquest.

The most influential book of the 20th century went mainly unread with disastrous consequences. One of the most influential books in human history, the Sira of Mohammed, is widely known among Muslims though the West is almost entirely ignorant of its contents, and its profound importance for both Muslims and non-believers. Worse still most in the west are ignorant of its existence.

We know what a world looks like when the ideology espoused in Mein Kampf is implemented. The Sira of Mohammed, Mohammed’s biography, tells the story of what the world will look like when Islam is triumphant. The differences between a victory of Nazism and a global conquest of Mohammedanism are difficult to determine as the differences are so minuscule.

We know what the world looked like when Nazism was rising, global warfare and unparalleled suffering. We know from the history of Islam what the world looks like when Islam is rising- jihad, barbarism, hatred, war, conquest, enslavement, and a brutal endless war of elimination of all non-Muslim cultures and political systems.

Had the world paid attention to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, as it is not now doing with the Sira of Mohammed, perhaps WW2 could have been avoided. When we know nothing of Mohammed’s life and his ideology of endless jihad against all unbelievers everywhere and forever we cannot defend ourselves against this growing threat. The threat of Islam originates in the doctrine of Islam of which the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) is one part of a trilogy of doctrinal texts which also includes Koran and Hadith. We are as ignorant (and more) as the clueless of 1933.

One who has read both Mein Kampf and the Sira can make a valid comparison. One who knows the history of WW2, and the Holocaust as well as Islamic history and doctrine, can place these books into an historical and political context. With this understanding of history and doctrine one can know with a reasonable certainty what the future will look like. One can know because just as Mein Kampf made certain promises and laid out certain plans, the Sira of Mohammed also makes promises and plans.

The Sira is not difficult to read. Anyone can read it. In fact recently a 12 year old was asked to read it. The child felt compelled to stop reading because “Mohammed was killing too many people”. The message of hate, violence, intolerance, and cruelty is clear to a 12-year-old but somehow eludes our political, academic, and religious leadership across the West. It eludes them most likely because they have not read it and do not know it exists.

Our lack of understanding of Islam and its foundational concepts of conquest and jihad is indicative of a societal-wide moral, intellectual, and ethical failure that for our own survival, must be swiftly reversed.

When one reads the doctrine of Islam the world shifts, changes. Knowledge of the doctrine brings events into focus in a way that previously was impossible. Just as Mein Kampf is the guide to WW2 before WW2 began, the doctrine of Islam is the guide to present day events and into the future. This is not prophecy, this is a firm understanding of the doctrine and guiding principles of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to our existence. We can know the future when we apply the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith) to present and past events involving Islam and adherents of Islam. This is applied theology and political science.

Knowledge of the Sira of Mohammed opens doors. It opens doors to a world of conflict and war and horror that we would prefer did not exist. There is no avoiding this foundational reality of our world.

When one knows Sira, closely held beliefs of the nature of the human world, how people behave and interact, and most importantly our previous understanding of the “religion of peace” are all shattered.

Learning Islamic doctrine forces us to rethink important concepts of the structure of existence, ideas that make life livable and pleasant, and paints a portrait of the ongoing failure and destruction of the human potential of peaceful co-existence and tolerance.

The doctrine of Islam is clear – there is no peaceful co-existence for Islam with unbelievers. Because non-Muslims have the gall and effrontery to not accept Allah and Mohammed, because we are Christian, Jew, Hindu, atheist, Buddhist, etc., we are seen by Allah and Mohammed as having rejected Koran, Sira, and Hadith – for this we are all kafirs and we must be made to submit. If we do not submit there is nothing that Islam will not do to make us do so. There are no taboos for Islam where kafirs are concerned. This is a fundamental lesson of the Sira of Mohammed.

The Sira, like the Koran and Hadith, is a wake up call for all kafirs (unbelievers). We learn from the Sira all about Islam, all about Mohammed, but we also learn about our own cultures. The lessons are painful and they are immutable.

• We are at war.
  Islam is at war with kafirs everywhere and forever until Islam is defeated or triumphant. The triumph of Islam is the defeat of individual freedoms, women’s rights, gay rights, religious tolerance, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc., etc. The triumph of Islam is a total shift of humanity from reaching for freedom and tolerance to an embrace of submission, enslavement, and intellectual and spiritual deadness from which recovery is unfortunately unlikely.
• We do not live in a “post-historical” world.
  In fact, history haunts us like a hunter. It pursues us until we stand and defend or surrender. This is not the world of the “end of history” of Frances Fukiyama, Bill Clinton, and other multiculturalist fantasists. Islam overturns all of these utopian concepts and crushes them under the boot of endless jihad and dhimmitude.
• We are not “post-modern”.
  We are pursued by forces of 7th century Arabia. They are well-trained; their doctrine of war has been successful for them for 1400 years. We are late in responding. Americans consider themselves forward thinking and not “mired” in issues of the past. We think we are above all of “that”. We are wrong. Our arrogance as to the ascension of our concepts is so strong that in foreign policy matters we simply only have to “reset” and we are on a totally new path, a path without a past – a path outside of context. With Islam there is no “reset”. We live outside of context in a bubble, a bubble that is being deflated rapidly by the rise of Islam.
• Our world is a world of conflict.
  War pursues us because the doctrine of Islam commands that it be so. The forces of Islam are flush with oil wealth transferred to them by us to them in our ignorance of their doctrine. We did this because we did not know their doctrine. We have empowered our enemies because we did not know their doctrine and now the time of reckoning approaches. We are not ready. We are not ready because we know nothing of the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith). If we do not know why and how our enemy fights us, we cannot hope to oppose him successfully. Everything we need to know about Islam is in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Knowledge of the doctrine of Islam is now a survival imperative; it is the patriotic duty of all lovers of freedom in the West to educate themselves and others about the doctrine of Islam. Ignorance of Islam is a moral, intellectual, ethical, and patriotic failure.
• Multiculturalism is wrong.
  In fact, multiculturalism is used by our enemies to immobilize us, keep us confused and unable to respond. Multiculturalism is wrong because the doctrine of Islam demonstrates that it is wrong. Islam is intolerant, we are tolerant; Islam is misogynist, we embrace equality between the sexes; Islam is about aggressive war, we are not. Islam denies the value of the individual, we believe that the empowered individual is the foundation of a healthy society and culture; Islam believes that only Islam is valid, we believe in religious pluralism and tolerance; Islam will not be analysed, criticized, satirized – we believe in humor, criticism and open debate. We believe that open debate is the foundation of intellectual honesty and truth. In Islam debate is not allowed. We do not believe in slavery, Islam strongly believes in slavery and dhimmitude of the unbeliever. The list is extensive. Multiculturalism’s core idea that all cultures are equal is destroyed by the existence and message of the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Truth is this: some cultures are superior in relation to others. Not all cultures are the same. This means that multiculturalism is a fraud and a failed utopian concept that must be delegitimized and destroyed. The product of Islam is jihad. The products of Western culture that enhance the value of existence, empower individuals, and create opportunity and wealth are too numerous to mention here. We do not war against others because they do not believe what we believe. Some cultures are better than others. Multiculturalism is dead, the only problem is that few have noticed its demise.

In Islam the model of the life of Mohammed (Sira) and the things that he said and did according  to his friends (Hadith) are the perfect model of behavior for all Muslims to follow in perpetuity. If Mohammed had been a nice fellow this would be a boon for all humanity, but it is not so. Mohammed was not a nice fellow. In Islam it is said that what Mohammed did is considered “Sunna” that means acceptable and good; what Mohammed disallowed is “haram” or forbidden.

Had Mohammed been a humanitarian this article would not be so lengthy. The Sira and Hadith dictate what is Sunna. Foundationally, jihad is Sunna. This means that anything done to the kafir if it advances the cause of Allah/Islam is Sunna. This includes every negative thing one can imagine. There are no taboos for the kafir.

When one reads the Sira one sees that we in the West are in serious trouble. It is interesting to note that “year one” of the Islamic calendar is not the year in which Mohammed received his first “revelations” from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Rather, it is the year in which Mohammed emigrated from Mecca to Medina. In Mecca Mohammed was an argumentative and disruptive but non-violent “preacher” – he got 150 converts in 9 years. When he went to Medina as an immigrant Mohammed became a warlord. When he was finished there were no enemies left, he was the ruler of all Arabia. All of his opponents had been slaughtered in battle or by assassination or had converted (submitted) to the “religion of peace”.

“Year one” of the Islamic calendar shows definitively that Islam is not a religion only, but a political ideology of conquest and barbarism, totalitarianism and cruelty fronted by a fake “religion of peace”.

“Year one” is a designation of a political event in Mohammed’s life not a religious one. The so-called “religion of peace” is a clever front for a political totalitarian ideology of control, control of Muslims and non-Muslims. Islam’s understanding of control of humans is without peer.

The world’s great cycles of history turn on knowledge, ignorance, and anti-knowledge. Our culture of multicultural ignorance is one of anti-knowledge. Ignorance empowers Islam. Islam is our enemy, it says so in the Sira of Mohammed.

Multiculturalism says that Islam is equal in value and import to our Western cultures of freedom and tolerance and inclusiveness. Multiculturalism empowers our existential enemy.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed so that we can discuss, debate, and condemn evil where necessary. We refuse to learn from doctrine and we ignore the history of jihad at our peril.

The fate of humanity will be decided upon our understanding of the doctrine of our enemies. They know us well, we know little to nothing of them. The old saying, “You may not believe in the devil, but he believes in you” is applicable here. You may not care about Islamic doctrine but it cares very much about you. The majority of Islamic doctrine is about the kafir, us.

Islam is a doctrine whose purpose is the conquest and annihilation of the unbeliever everywhere. We ignore it because we have difficulty accepting that it can be real; we have difficulty letting go of our concepts that we live outside of war and outside of history. We are all too enlightened for all that.

Our enemies do not see the world as we do.

Some in the multicultural West are so ignorant of history that they find the concept of “enemy” excessive and difficult to accept. Such people are outside of history because they are ignorant of history and of human nature. Such people believe that if we are “tolerant” and show how “nice” we are to our enemies that they will love us, and stop hating us.

Our enemies are pleased that we are “tolerant” and “nice” because this makes their mission of conquest all the easier.

These are the bubble people, those who live on  wishful thinking and ignorance. This ideology of ignorance has infected our leadership and institutions to such an extent that when scholars quote the Sira of Mohammed they are excoriated as “bigots”. This discussion of Islamic doctrine is not a matter of opinion. If you do not like the discussion you must take the matter up with Mohammed and make your complaints to him as the messengers (those who discuss doctrine) are only repeating his lines and his example to show the dire nature of our situation. The scholars of the doctrine of Islam bring a message of dire warning.

The fate of humanity turns on the pages of unread books. Mein Kampf was on most every shelf in Germany but few read it; few abroad read it. In the pages of that book was laid out the plan for conquest and murder that would become the 2nd World War.

The Sira of Mohammed is unread widely in the West. It is not difficult to read. The Sira is a plan for domination of all unbelievers everywhere. It is a book of cruelty and violence that often surpasses Mein Kampf in horrors as the stories are (supposedly) an historical record of atrocities while Mein Kampf was essentially a twisted “wish list” of domination and barbarism.

We in the West must study the doctrine of Islam – it is not difficult. We must acknowledge the truth about the “religion of peace” and we must accept unpleasant realities though they shatter our illusions. We must acknowledge that we are at war.

Mohammed’s life is not the kind of life that any decent person anywhere on this planet would want to emulate. His life and actions are the model for all Muslims to aspire to forever. This model of cruelty, hate, intolerance, rape, torture, murder, war, pedophilia, theft, deceit, enslavement, conquest, and misogyny is the model for all Islam forever. “We have a litttle problem” is the most profound  understatement of the millennium.

Your email:

 

August 12th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

A stunning case of an honor killing avoided… or only delayed is now underway in Florida. A 17-year old girl from Ohio converted from Islam to Christianity. Her father vowed to kill her for leaving Islam. The girl fled. She is now in Florida. Read the story here.

Depending on the actions of authorities in Florida and in the American government this promised honor killing will be prevented, or only delayed. A return to her family for this girl is a literal death sentence.

It is the foundation of any civilized society that the innocent are protected, and provided succor. Those who have the means render aid and comfort to those who require help; we provide assistance to those who have not the means to help themselves. This is the core of our Judeo-Christian concept of American democracy. This is our moral and ethical foundation which so many have apparently forgotten. Unfortunately, Islam does not share these concepts.

It is our responsibility to “circle our wagons” around this young woman who has left Islam, the fake “religion of peace”. In Islamic doctrine leaving Islam is a death sentence. This is not theoretical. This is reality. If you leave Islam anyone in the umma of Islam can kill you; it is in the Koran and is commanded thus for all Muslims, those who ”submit to Allah and Mohammed”.

Because the Sira of Mohammed (Mohammed’s biography), the Hadith, and the Koran all say that leaving Islam is punishable by death and that ties to Islam override all ties of friendship and kinship we therefore see these abysmal, anti-human, horrific, barbaric “honor killings” again and again.

The so-called “religion of peace” is something like the Hotel California, you can enter but you can never leave – but it’s much, much worse. 

The killing of female family members is very much a part of Islam. This is no “religion of peace“, it is a lie.

“The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used not to kill the children, so thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside.” — Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4457

Khadir, or Khidr, figures in sura 18 of the Qur’an. He is traveling with Moses, and: “Then they proceeded: until, when they met a young man, he [Khadir] slew him. Moses said: “Hast thou slain an innocent person who had slain none? Truly a foul (unheard of) thing hast thou done!” Khadir replies: “As for the youth, his parents were people of Faith, and we feared that he would grieve them by obstinate rebellion and ingratitude (to Allah and man). So we desired that their Lord would give them in exchange (a son) better in purity (of conduct) and closer in affection….” (18:74, 18:80-81). (source)

This case could and should be a test case, a precedent in opposing the barbarism that is Islam. This insanity must be stopped, and this case is the way that it will be done.

We must succor this innocent victim of Islam, circle our wagons around her and protect her from her own father who has vowed to kill her because she has “dishonored” him and the Umma (the global  community of Islam) and offended Allah and Mohammed by leaving  Islam. Islam is the great collective; personal choices are entirely verbotten; one only does what is allowed, and doesn’t do what is forbidden. Leaving Islam is strictly forbidden.  Islam as a collective is anti-individual. In Islam the individual “submits” to the doctrine and to the Umma, the world-wide “family/community” of Islam.

Islam is for the person who can’t stand to have to make choices, can’t stand to have to exercise moral sense, and wants, wants, wants, to be part of a faith that is collectivist. You are part of the Army of Islam, and once in, you can’t get out. You must owe your loyalty only to Islam and to fellow Muslims, never — in the slightest way — to non-Muslims or to any legal or political institutions or social arrangements that are the product of non-Muslim societies and peoples. It’s a Collectivist Faith, and because it purports to regulate every single area of life, it is a Totalitarian Faith. And while it has been from its inception, technological developments have given totalitarian movements the ability to more thoroughly penetrate and dominate the minds of those over whom they have a hold, whether the hold is mainly one limited to a specific state (as Nazi Germany, or Communist Soviet Union) or is a hold based on an ideology spread among True Believers not only in Islam-ruled lands but also in lands where non-Muslims have not yielded to Islam. (Fitzgerald, JihadWatch)

In our twisted multicultural world many of our elites say that all cultures are equal, none is better or worse. This is intellectual and ethical cravenness.

We must draw a line, we must say that there are some things that are beyond the pale; beyond our ability for even us neurotically “tolerant” and “inclusive” multiculturalists to accept. This case is the line in the sand.

We must say NO to a father killing his wife, daughters and extended (female) family members because the male believes that the females have “offended” Islam. There  are many, many cases across the world in which Muslim rape victims are murdered by their male relatives because they have “offended” Islam (and the immediate “family”) by being raped. In Islam there is no family but the umma, all kinship ties are negated and overturned by the adherent’s ties to Islam. This is in Koran and Sira, the foundational doctrine of Islam. Islam is a collectivist ideology; those in it submit to it (or are made to submit).

Islam has no sympathy for the victims; Islam creates victims. The first victims of Islam are Muslims.

Let us provide protection and care to this innocent woman in Florida whose only “crime” was to make a decision for her own life, and future. This is no crime in any civilized society, but it is to Islam. For Islam this is a “crime” that merits death.

Let us show ourselves and the world that we in the United States can still see and understand good and evil, and that we know what is right and what is wrong.

There has rarely been a clearer case of right and wrong than this. Rally to this woman, and show the defenders of the “religion of peace” that we no longer buy the “official line” (based entirely on ignorance and wishful thinking and dhimmitude). 

Islam is a totalitarian ideology of cruelty and barbarism. Let us as a nation stand beside Rifqa Bary against the forces of brutality, cruelty, misogyny and intolerance that is Political Islam.

(video post courtesy of Islam in Action)

August 4th, 2009 by admin

 by D. L. Adams

Knowledge of Islamic Doctrine is Foundational in Ideological War

Islam is so strong because we are so weak. Islam is so strong because Islam knows us; we are weak because we do not know Islam. Islam knows our history, our doctrine, our government and laws; we are almost entirely ignorant of Islam except the false claim of the “religion of peace”.

Understanding our opponent’s purposes and motives in this ideological war cannot be overstated. We kafirs have always viewed our government, religions, and core beliefs of freedom and elevation of the individual over the collective in our society as positives. The totalitarian collectivist ideology of Islam, its adherents and apologists,  understands the essential concepts of our culture and society and uses this knowledge against us.

Because Islam understands us so well and we know so little about it – lovers of freedom are confused to such a degree in this conflict that we are paralyzed into inaction. The solution for us is knowledge. We cannot respond to this threat to our freedoms if we know nothing of Islam. It is a patriotic imperative to study Islam.

In ideological war the battleground is intellectual; it is a war of ideas and convictions, it is a conflict of knowledge versus ignorance. We cannot defend ourselves if we are ignorant.

Everything we had previously thought was true about the future and our place in it is now at risk because of the resurgence of a millennia old cult of death, war, violence, and hatred called Islam. It is much more than a religion; it is a unified totalitarian ideology. The “religion of peace” is a facade for the totalitarian purposes of the Ideology of Islam. Conquest and control are the foundations of this ideology.

The core of Islam is Allah and the Prophet Mohammed. All Muslims are required to follow the example of Mohammed as described in the doctrine, Sira, Hadith, and Koran. Mohammed is considered the perfect example for all adherents to follow forever. Unfortunately for us, Mohammed was a killer, pedophile, rapist, slaver, war-monger, misogynist, conqueror, warlord, thief, and an intolerant hater of all who are not Muslim. This means that all Muslims must follow this example. You will hear the term “Moderate Muslim” often in this ideological war; the moderate Muslim is Osama Bin Laden. He is moderate because he follows the middle way of the commands of the doctrine. He is a devout Muslim. The terms “moderate” and “extremist” are western terms that do not apply in Islam. When you see Islam as adherents understand it, through the doctrine, the extremist is the one who does notfollow commands of Allah and Mohammed; the extremist is what we would consider “peaceful”.

Islam is not about peace; Islam is about submission. Those adherents who force unbelievers to submit to Islam (this process is called “jihad”) are devout Muslims, and are completely within the doctrine. Those who refuse the responsibility of jihad are extremists. Do not let these terms confuse you.

When you see Islam as Islam sees itself, everything becomes clear in this ideological war.

If you view Islam through a western inclusive tolerant “lens” you can never understand Islam.

If you have had the misfortune to attend a “bridge building” event or an “interfaith dialogue” you would likely have seen Rabbis who knew their own doctrine but not that of Islam; Pastors and Priests who knew Old and New Testament but know nothing of Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Most disheartening of all you would have seen Imams who know Torah, New Testament, and their own doctrine. Islam is prepared for this war because they have been fighting it for 1400 years. We must eliminate this knowledge gap if we are to prevail against this very old, but now resurgent force of  totalitarianism,  brutality, barbarism, and destruction of the individual.

Islam is an ideology that is steeped in history, in fact their goal is to return to history. In the West, we are disconnected from history and most are ignorant of it. Because of this ignorance few can place this ideological war, and the actions of Islam and its adherents, into any historical or understandable context. Again, our ignorance is our downfall.

Those who do not know history and are ignorant of the doctrine of Islam are easily swayed, easily manipulated to believe what they want to believe.

Those who cannot place this conflict into any reality that they can  comprehend, a reality based on history and understanding of the doctrine of Islam, want to believe that the war is not real, that everything they hold dear is not at risk. They want to believe that Islam will “go away” on its own accord. We know from history that once Islam is in control, it never goes away. Those who do not want to see reality for reality are denialists, anti-knowledge people.

These are the attendees of “interfaith events” who support Islam and remain entirely ignorant of it. These are the useful idiots of Islam, dhimmis.

This wishful thinking is the foundation of multiculturalism which is the idea that if we are nice enough, our enemies will come to love us.  Multiculturalists do not know nor understand history, and they cannot begin to conceive that a book written in the desert of Arabia over a thousand years ago could be the origin and guide of a war of annihilation against us today. It is simply impossible for such people, encased in ignorance, to comprehend.

We do not want war and, when war is waged upon us by reactionary forces whose brightest spark petered out over a millenia ago, it is difficult for many to comprehend. Multiculturalists believe that if they wish hard enough the hatred that Islam has for the kafir will go away; if enough concessions are given, Islam will “calm down” and integrate or assimilate into the host cultures. They are wrong.

Islam does not assimilate, Islam’s purpose is to make the kafir submit. This is done through jihad. Multiculturalsts are the “useful idiots” for the adherents of political Islam.

The forces of darkness count on our ignorance.  When non-Muslim cultures are conquered the vanquished peoples (dhimmis) are banned from study of Koran. It is easy to understand why this is so. The Koran is clear in its motives and its goals relating to the kafir. “Kafir” is the greatest insult perhaps in the world. Ordinary insults do not have the weight of law behind them as does the term “kafir”; anything can be done to the kafir; there are no taboos.

The existence of non-Muslims is an affront to Allah. Therefore all Muslims are commanded to “fight in Allah’s   cause” (jihad) to eliminate this affront to the deity. Jihad is entirely about eliminating the affront that is the
existence of those who do not accept Allah and Mohammed and Koran.

A reasonable person would never describe an ideology that believed such things as “tolerant” or “peaceful”. The dhimmis of the West defend Islam because they know nothing about it. They may claim to have read the doctrine and maybe even have a passage to share to prove their points. The responsibility to validate their defense of Islam resides with them; you will quickly see that they are ignorant of Islam and know far less than you. These are the useful idiots Lenin spoke of but remade for our generation and beyond. Dhimmis are as dangerous as Islam in their ignorance.

Islam is not an intellectual ideology – to Islam all knowledge of value is found in the doctrine. Everything else is extraneous.

Knowledge is Power – Doctrinal Knowledge in Debate

This total belief in the complete comprehensive and divine truth of the doctrine lends adherents of Islam an incredibly powerful sense of purpose. There is a downside to this – Islam is stunningly stunted, insular, self-referential, and ignorant of the wider world (information from sources outside of Islamic doctrine are considered of little value except insofar as how ideas and concepts created by others can be put to use by the umma; this is anti-creativity). This is a strength and weakness of Islam.

In fact, this is the foundation for ideological warriors to wage their fight for freedom against the greatest force of totalitarianism and cruelty and barbarism in human history. Understanding the doctrine of Islam is the foundation  of our defense. If we do not know whythey hate us and fight us, if we do not know what motivates them, we can never hope to prevail. If we understand their motivations and purposes, their views of themselves and of the less-than-human “other” (the kafir, all those who are not Muslim), we have a slight advantage.

Wielding knowledge is a powerful weapon; truth is more powerful than ignorance. This is the battleground of ideological war – truth versus ignorance and lies.

The forces of Islam have come to expect that we are multicultural, politically correct, and ignorant of Islam. When you have knowledge of the doctrine of Islam the battleground of ideological war is levelled. Everything done in the name of Islam comes from the doctrine. Knowledge of doctrine is the greatest weapon that we in the West can possess in our existential war against this evil and powerful retrogressive barbaric force.

You may be surprised to learn that learning doctrine is not difficult; the research is done, the books are available and are readily accessible intellectually. (Please see below.) The doctrine is a trilogy, the Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam), and the Hadith (the traditions of the Prophet). When you have read these three books, you are fully armed for ideological combat.

Once armed with this doctrinal foundational knowledge what is to be done with it? Since ideological war is about ideas and debate, one engages in debates; foundational knowledge of doctrine is your weapon and your greatest shield.

The bulk of the doctrine is about Mohammed, not Allah. Discussion of Mohammed then is critical because the actions and life of Mohammed are so contrary to any accepted norms of civilized behavior in the West.

Your knowledgeable discourse of Mohammed and his crimes will make a profound impression on the adherents of Islam and their dhimmi multicultural defenders (who know nothing of doctrine, Islamic history, etc.). Mohammed’s story is the “great path” for all adherents to follow, it’s horrific. When you share the story of Mohammed, and the fact that all Muslims must follow his example you will see immediately why cruelty against the kafir by Muslims across the world occurs. The doctrine opens every window, every closed door of why things in the world of Islam happen.

One must always remember that Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a Muslim is “one who submits”. Adherents submit to the commands of Allah and Mohammed as found in the trilogy doctrine. If you know the doctrine, you know why the adherents of Islam do what they do. This is the power of understanding doctrine.

When one knows the doctrine it is as if one has the playbook of the opposing team in a football game. But this is not football – this is existential war.

Knowledge of Mohammed’s history and commands are the keys to ideological war against the forces of darkness that is Islam.

No Muslim or dhimmi multiculturalist can argue the “truth” of the doctrine of Islam. Mohammed is the key example for all Muslims. Lay out a case against Mohammed by discussing his life and actions, his crimes and abhorrent, perverse behavior you will have shaken those who oppose you.

It has been suggested that there is only one Muslim, Mohammed. There is truth in this. This is both a strength and a deep weakness in the ideology of hate and intolerance that is Islam.

Authoritarian systems like Islam do not like exposure of the truth. If you know the truth, and it can only be found in the doctrine, you have an advantage in the ideological war.

The battleground in this ideological war is often fought on the internet in chat rooms, forums, blogs, websites, and via email. This is a form of text-based debate. When you know the doctrine of Islam you will be able to refute any lie, divert any takiya and deconstruct any falsehoodthrown at you by adherents of this barbaric ideology and their dhimmi apologists and sycophants.

Multiculturalism is Anti-Knowledge

There has always been an attraction to power for those whose character is weak. This is the nature of the support for Islam among western elites. But there is also ignorance that empowers the dhimmis, an ignorance that can be displaced by knowledge, your knowledge of doctrine.

In this ideological war the ignorant believe that their lack of knowledge gives them the moral high ground. They believe this because they never are required to “offend” anyone by telling the truth about the doctrine of Islam.  Multiculturalists do not want to offend, that is the core of their existence.

Ignorance is not the high ground of morality. In this existential war it is unethical and immoral to be ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. Because you (the knowledgable ideological warrior) speak from a position of knowledge, not of opinion, you have the high moral ground.

Truth is infinitely more moral than anti-knowledge.

It is a patriotic imperative to learn the truth about Islam (through study of the doctrine, then applying that knowledge to today’s events).

Denial of the individual, of themselves, is a strong undercurrent in the multiculturalists of the West. Surrender and submission is attractive to many dhimmis but not to the ideological warrior. Multiculturalists are blindly  and totally inclusive and have lost their moral foundation; their moral compass is smashed. They cannot identify friend from foe, good from evil; these are the true relativists of our times. They are very confused, very convinced, and very dangerous. Shattering the drug-like ignorance and relativism of multiculturalist thinking is one of the battlegrounds in this thought war, this war of civilizations.

For those who have read Koran, Sira, Hadith it is impossible to support Islam.

Islam is clear about its cruelty and hate. If an opponent tells you that they have read the Koran you must ask them to explain their defense of it in light of the cruelty and violence that forms the foundations of the texts. This is an easy way to catch the ignorant in a lie; most who say that they know Islamic doctrine actually know little or nothing. Their support of Islam is based upon opinion and not knowledge. These are anti-knowledgewarriors; you will always vanquish such dhimmis with your knowledge of the doctrine of Islam.

A favorite tactic of the dhimmi defenders of Islam will be to try to take you off your foundationalist course. They will never want to discuss doctrine with you because the doctrine is clearly cruel, hateful, totalitarian, warmongering, brutal, etc. Don’t let them do it. You can discuss the murder of the Khaybar Jews by Mohammed; the rape of captured Christian and Jewish women by Mohammed; Mohammed’s pedophilia (he married a 6 year old named Aisha, his favorite, then “consummated” the “marriage” at age 9); you can discuss the kafir. Allah and Mohammed hate the kafir. They hate the kafir because the kafir is not Muslim.

In Islam only Islam is acceptable, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, everything else is considered bad and must be destroyed.

The massive Buddhas of Afghanistan were destroyed by the Taliban because they were vestiges of a culture previous to Islam (a non-Islamic culture); their iconography, books, art, religions, must be destroyed so that Islam can be the only ideology in existence. You may also recall the total silence from the West about the Taliban and their brutal regime until the destruction of the Buddhas.

For many kafir multiculturalists art is more important than life and defense of innocent victims. Showing multiculturalists their own hypocrisy is an important ideological warfare strategy.

Dhimmis will say, “Well, there is violence in the New Testament and Torah, too!”  They will formulate a shallow, relativist argument that “all religions are equally bad and violent”. There are several problems with this approach that you must explain to these deluded folks.

Violence in Koran is permanent and universal, violence in the doctrinal texts of Judaism and Christianity is temporary and localized, it always comes to an end and life goes on. In Koran and Sira and Hadith the violence never ends, because violence is existence itself.

Islam is not a doctrine that reveres life. Islam reveres death because only through death in jihad is an adherent promised a place in paradise with honey rivers, virgins and little boys. In Islam the active pursuit of death while doing jihad (fighting and killing kafirs) is the highest “calling” in the “religion of peace”.

Waging Ideological Conflict – Adhere to Doctrine as Islam Adheres to Doctrine

Your opponents will try to shake you out of doctrine. When it is clear to them that you have the powerful weapon of knowledge of Islamic doctrine they will do their best to take you down a tangential path. Do not let them take you into a tangent – stick to doctrine, stick to Mohammed and Allah and Koran, Sira, Hadith. They will do this because they are afraid and frustrated.

Your oppenent will know that you cannot be vanquished in ideological conflict because you know Islamic doctrine better than he/she does.

Keep the discussion about doctrine, Islamic history and how Islam commits atrocities every day across the world because this is the command of Allah and Mohammed.

Applying doctrine to daily events is a powerful tool as it illustrates how the doctrine is the cause of events of cruelty. Because you know the doctrine of Islam you can build a direct relationship case between doctrine and violence by the adherents of Islam. This is a powerful ideological warfare tool. This is “applied doctrine”; you will shake many ignorant people out of their ignorance with this approach.

It is important that you know about abrogation. Because the Koran is believed by adherents of Islam to be the perfect word of Allah, perfect and unchangeable, the contradictions in the text must be explained in some way. For example, early in the Koran the Jews are described as “people of the book” who do not understand that Mohammed is the true final prophet of god, whereas later in the Koran the Jews are apes and pigs to be killed on sight for having committed the crime of not accepting Allah, Mohammed and Koran.

The “peaceful” verses are almost entirely found in the early parts of the Koran and are universally abrogated (that is, cancelled) by the violent, hateful message of the later Koran.

The method that Islamic doctrine uses to negate contradictions and rescue the perfection of Allah is “abrogation”. This means that later verses are considered “more powerful” than earlier verses, but both the later and earlier verses are true even if they directly contradict each other. This is the perfect illustration of the concept of “duality” within Islam; two opposing positions in a contradiction are both true. This is impossible in western concepts of unitary logic.

In Islam, when Allah contradicts himself he hasn’t really made a mistake or changed his mind because Allah is considered infallible. What has happened in Koran is that Allah has added a “better” verse which does not negate the previous contrary one logically though the later verse is considered in force and the earlier minimized (or cancelled). This is an important concept for ideological warriors for freedom to understand.

Islam accepts the unification of opposites which western logic denies. Duality is foundational in Islam, as is  abrogation. When you master these concepts you can command most any debate on this issue.

Understanding the concept of abrogation is best done with a Koran that is chronological. The Koran is not  traditionally structured chronologically rather it is organized by largest chapter to smallest. This means that the Koran doesn’t make any sense, in fact some scholars have used the term “incomprehensible” to describe it.

When the Koran is presented in the traditional manner abrogation is difficult to see. However, when the Koran is organized chronologically one can see abrogation clearly, the later verses abrogate (cancel) the earlier verses.

Unfortunately for the kafir (every non-Muslim culture), all the peaceful verses in Koran are early and all the later ones are violent and hateful and warmongering. This means that because of abrogation Islam is an ideology of war, hate, intolerance, cruelty, misogyny, and barbarism. The proof of this assertion is demonstrated every day across the world by the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”.

When the dhimmis and the adherents of the cult of death tell you otherwise you can educate them with their own doctrine. In any debate, you are the master with this technique.

Knowledge is Power – Fighting the Forces of Anti-Knowledge and Barbarism with Doctrinal Scholarship

What is at stake here is nothing less than the future of the West.

We who know that this war exists, that it is real, are on the front lines.

Our weapon is knowledge, knowledge of the foundational texts of the enemy. Surprisingly, many adherents of Islam do not know their own doctrine. This is a powerful truth. Talking about Islam to adherents about their own doctrine may cause them to get upset, but it may also cause them to think. Individual thought is the very thing that totalitarian ideologies like Islam hate the most. Islam is about submission and control, there is no room for the individual because Islam is the apotheosis of the “collective” ideology.

This is an intellectual and spiritual war that we fight in the shadows and in the plain clear light of day while the dhimmis go about their lives pretending it is not real and that you – the defender of freedom – are a villain. Do not believe it.

As you struggle for your cultures and freedoms remember that you are the front line in this as yet undeclared ideological war. There is no doubt that it will one day be declared and you will be a leader in the battles to come if you so choose.

The greatest weapon we have is knowledge. We must be scholar warriors. Without this warrior caste of scholars everything we hold dear, all of democracy’s central concepts of freedom, tolerance, individual worth, and  opportunity will forever be lost under the black pall of Islamic totalitarianism.

Rarely is a country once under Islam ever in a post-Islamic period. The adherents of Islam know their purposes and methods, they use our ignorance against us. They cannot do this when you know doctrine.

So, what of debate? Ad hominem is a popular tool used by the forces of darkness. They will insult you and call you the very things that they are. They will say that your knowledge makes you a bigot, an “Islamophobe”. You won’t care because you know doctrine, which means you know why they say what they say, and do what they do.

Knowledge is truth, knowledge cannot be hate.

The Socratic Method is very important.; use it when debating online. Simply ask a question; “What is a kafir?” and “Why do Allah and Mohammed hate kafirs?” This is a good start.

“Why do Islamic terrorists quote Koran when they commit atrocities?” is another excellent question.

Terrorists are doing what they are told to do in doctrine and are following the example of Mohammed, the finest human being ever to live. Mohammed raped; so do they.  Mohammed killed innocents; so do they. Mohammed tortured people and cut off their heads; they do this and post the film on youtube to horrify and terrorize the kafir. This is called “Sunna” the way of Mohammed and it is considered the finest path for all Muslims everywhere to follow.

Islam is self-referential. If you know the foundational texts which are referenced (doctrine: Koran, Sira, Hadith) you can fight and win in debate against any dhimmi, multiculturalist, or ignorant sycophant person.

It is very important to know this: the ideological warrior must understand Islam as adherents and their defenders do. They must know doctrine and they must understand that it is considered the literal divine truth. Koran is considered the literal word of Allah; it cannot be criticized, revised, rewritten, reformed, changed, mocked, or altered. This is why rote learning of Koran occurs in madrassas around the world. There can be no discussion around Koran, no debate – education on Koran is via memory alone. This is a culture founded upon anti-intellectualism.

Understand Islam as Islam Understands Itself

There is no “Radical” Islam no “extremists”, there is only Islam.

“Radical” is a western kafir term. In Islam it is considered normal and good to kill innocents, attack them and take their goods and women and children;  it is good to rape women slaves; it is good to steal the property of jihad victims; it is good to destroy cultures and forcibly convert people to Islam; it is good to kill people who do not believe in Allah and Mohammed and the so-called “last day”. In Islam these are all good because they are all in the doctrine. Allah said it, and/or Mohammed did it, so it’s all good.

The terrorist who kills an unbeliever on YouTube while quoting Allah is a good Muslim, while the Muslim who is enjoying a beer with you and chatting about work is a failed one. We must always look at Islam through the lens of Islam and not through our western lens. There is no radical Islam, there is only Islam.

What we in the West consider radical is described in doctrine as normal and good, in fact jihad is an obligation for all Muslims everywhere and forever. Adherents of the “religion of peace” who do not participate in jihad against the kafirs are hypocrites and radical Muslims.

Perhaps in no other war in memory has understanding the enemy been as important as in this current civilizational conflict. We cannot engage with Islam and defeat it if we do not know why Islam does what it does. Everything to know about Islam is in the doctrine.

No adherent or dhimmi can defeat you in ideological battle if you know the doctrine of Islam. When you know their doctrine they will not want to engage; if they engage you will win because you know why they do what they do. This is a disarming tactic.

Islam sees the West as weak. The umma sees the West as not valuing its own cultures enough to defend them, so they continue to press and push for concessions until those cultures crack and break. They have been very successful up to now.

The future of Europe, the US and the entire West is at stake.

Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are warriors for Allah, Allah’s slaves. All of Allah’s commands, all of Mohammed’s examples and his own commands (just as important as Allah’s) are in the doctrine. The command is war against the unbeliever until the entire world is under the dominion of Islam, under a Caliph and Sharia law.

Ideological war is a knowledge war. Islam is so strong because we are so weak, but we are learning and fighting back in defense of our countries, cultures, religions, and freedoms. This is a civilizational conflict. The roots of the conflict are in the doctrine of Islam. It is a unified civilizational ideology that includes a fake “religion of peace”.

Don’t be fooled by the facade of Islam’s fake “peace”.

In ideological war a winning strategy is knowing the enemy. We cannot oppose Islam if we do not know and understand it. Understanding Islam begins with knowledge of doctrine. When we have knowledge, we are
well-armed.

Know the Battleground; Know the Opponent; Know Why You Fight

It is important to articulate that our  civilization is of value and is worthy of defense. The great military theorists of the past agree on this point: know your opponent and what motivates them, and know yourself and what motivates you.

Knowledge is the foundation of ideological war.

Fundamental knowledge of Islam is found in the doctrine of Islam. There is no greater weapon in this ideological conflict than knowledge of the doctrine of Islam. No Muslim, no dhimmi can argue with Allah, or with Mohammed. The message of Islam is clear, and indefensible.

Educate, speak the truth, read, study. Defend the West with your knowledge.

Resources:

Chronological Koran (abrogation readily visible, all repetition removed):
abridged:
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/an-abridged-Koran/

Complete  Koran (abrogation easily visible, repetition retained):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/A_Simple_Koran.htm

Sira (the biography of Muslim):
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/mohammed-and-the-unbelievers/

Hadith(the traditions of Mohammed):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/The_Political_Traditions_Of_Mohammed.htm

In addition to the doctrine:
Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic
http://www.amazon.com/Sword-Prophet-History-Theology-Impact/dp/1928653111/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1249016225&sr=8-1

Lectures about Political Islam by Bill Warner:
These are foundational lectures about Islam. When you’ve heard these lectures you will be ready to engage in ideological battle. You will know more than most leaders in the western world after you listen. All lectures for free.
http://actwestnashville.com/?page_id=544

History of Jihad:

M. A. Khan,
Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery
http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/

Andrew Bostom;
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Islamic-Antisemitism-Sacred-History/dp/1591025540/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062159&sr=1-1

The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Jihad-Islamic-Holy-Non-Muslims/dp/1591026024/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062219&sr=1-1

Your email:

 

July 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are foundational issues that must be understood. Islam is at war with all democratic countries, and all countries that are not Islamic. This is commanded by both Allah and Mohammed in Koran. It is an obligation upon all Muslims to “fight in Allah’s cause”; this is the term for jihad in Koran. Fighting in Allah’s cause means endless war everywhere against the kafir, the unbeliever. The worst thing in Islam is not murder or rape, or violation of the innocents, it is being an unbeliever or an apostate.

The doctrine of Islam states that anyone who leaves (or changes) their Islamic religion is to be killed (Bukhari Hadith). Islam is a dualistic political ideology of war and conquest. All unbelievers must be brought under the control of Islam until the entire world is under Islam. The kafir can be raped, murdered, enslaved, beheaded, tortured, etc. There are no boundaries, no taboos, where treatment of the kafir by Islam is concerned.

Islam is a unified civilization of which religion is a part, a small part. The majority of the Koran is about how Muslims are to interact with the unbeliever, well over 60% of the text. This means that the Koran is a political document. One cannot know how to be a Muslim just from Koran alone. The central idea in Koran is jihad. Jihad is timeless and universal. Islam is at war with all non-believers forever.

The mosque is the center of Muslim life in any community in which Muslims reside. The case has been made that non-violent Muslims do not know their doctrine. Some even suggest that non-violence means “moderation” – the non-violent Muslim is shown as proof of the non-violence of Islam itself. But this is not so. Because the doctrine is clear that aggressive violence against the kafir is mandated, therefore violent jihadists are observant devout Muslims, they are the moderates. They are moderate because they follow the doctrine, and commands of Allah and Mohammed. The extremists are those who do not participate in Jihad. These are hypocrites and apostates. Such people who do not fight the unbelievers can be killed by jihadists as being outside the family, Umma, of Islam.

When adherents do not know the doctrine of Islam, they learn it from their Imams. All Imams know the doctrine quite well. What happens when the non-violent adherent hears, from the pulpit of the mosque, the commands of Allah to do jihad and kill the unbelievers where ever they are found? They must act. Few will leave Islam, because leaving the religion of peace is a death sentence offense. Most will participate in jihad war against the unbeliever (kafir) with money and with words, some will do violence. Those who die in jihad are guaranteed a direct trip to paradise and access to beautiful girls and little boys forever. The non-violent adherent must act if they are to remain Muslim. Allah says in the Koran that he knows that some will not want to do jihad, but the obligation remains, Allah knows what is best people do not.

Because democracies are tolerant and open societies, in the main, they are welcoming to Islam. They are welcoming to Islam because their peoples do not understand that Islam is at war with them; they do not understand that Islam does not assimilate; they do not understand that the purpose of Islam is to overturn the host culture and change the host culture to an Islamic state. No Muslim can give allegience to any country other than a caliphate, no Muslim can give allegience to a system of law other than the law of Allah and Mohammed, Sharia.  This is clearly stated in doctrine. Muslims who give such allegience may be good citizens but they are not good Muslims. This is a fine point that many find difficult to understand.

Muslims are forbidden to have friendships with Christians or Jews. This is clearly stated in Koran. In addition, Muslims are commanded to kill Jews; this is also clearly stated in doctrine. When the Muslims are actually friends with kafirs, to Islam they are hypocrites (bad Muslims) or apostates. Being a good Muslim and being a good citizen of a democratic state is doctrinally impossible for a Muslim who follows his “religion”.

Islam is at war with the kafir, everywhere and forever. It does not matter if you believe this or not; your opinion on the matter is irrelevent. This is the truth and the command of the Koran, and the Sira of Mohammed as well as Hadith – the doctrine of Islam. If Islam is at war with all kafirs everywhere and the purpose of this endless warfare is the literal end of all non-believers (Koran is clear that no other religion is allowed anywhere on the planet other than Islam) and their cultures; one must come to some conclusion about the value of his/her culture and whether or not it is worthy of defending.

Because democracies are based upon openness and tolerance and individual freedoms, democracies are open to Islam. Islam builds mosques – these are the centers of Muslim culture, politics, religious practice, everything in the Muslim community. While we are aware that many if not most of all new mosques built in Europe, the US and around the world are supported by Saudi oil money this is not the most important point. The critical factor is that every mosque has the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, Hadith as its central intellectual/spiritual/political core. The doctrine itself is hostile to democracies and is a doctrine of warfare, violence, intolerance, hatred, cruelty and brutality that is as yet unsurpassed in human history.

When the doctrine is known, and the history of Islam and the appalling things that have been done by adherents because of its commands, it is difficult (that is, impossible) to defend Islam or any aspect of it.

Islam is a political ideology fundamentally hostile to democracy. It is intolerant and brutal in the extreme. It is often said that terrorists and jihadists have hijacked the “religion of peace” and “misinterpret” the doctrine of Islam. This is a lie. This kind of lie, about the nature and true character and history of Islam, is called “taqiyyah”, sacred deception. It is an obligation (as stated in the doctrine) for all Muslims to falsify the truth of Islam to kafirs everywhere. This results in the kafir being confused and unable to effectively respond in defense of their cultures and lands, countries and people. It is extremely effective. Koran is a blueprint for war. The effectiveness of jihad is seen by the success of Islam in spreading across the world and annihilating cultures and civilizations as it goes. The body count of jihad since Mohammed started his endless war is conservatively estimated at 270 million murdered victims.

What of democracy then as it faces the challenge of advancing and emboldened and oilwealth rich Islam? What of democracy as new mosques are built daily and the demands of Islam increase at the same pace?

Democracy is the condition of freedom, tolerance, and equality. This condition was passed down to us by our founders and secured for us over generations by our brave warriors who fought to sustain these ideals and this condition of freedom. Many who know little of democracy, history, politics, and know nothing whatever of Islam believe that democracy is a process and not a condition.

These ill-informed ill-educated people believe that democracy is ever changing and if a minority desires concessions that are inherently anti-democratic, reactionary, intolerant, and cruel it is all perfectly acceptable if these forces use the processes and structures of democracy to enact their anti-freedom desires. Those who seek our destruction know our ways, our systems, our doctrine, our legal system as we know nothing of theirs. We are at a disadvantage to these aggressive forces of hate and intolerance and anti-freedom because we are almost entirely ignorant of their purposes and their foundational doctrine, Koran, Sira, Hadith – the doctrine of Islam.

The process of democracy is that process which protects the freedoms and structures of equality and tolerance that were passed down to us and secured for us by our forebears. Democracy is a condition of freedom that we must defend, it is not a process by which we surrender those same freedoms that others gave their lives to secure for us and future generations. Our role as lovers of freedom is to sustain democracy again so that our children can enjoy its freedoms, tolerance, and appreciation for the individual.

Democracy is not a process, it is a condition.

If democracy is a condition of freedom and tolerance and equality and not a process, then what must our response be to forces whose purpose is the destruction of democracy? The response must be to oppose such forces.

When the new mosque comes to town, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to spread the word of the greatness of Islam, the fake religion of peace. Its purpose is to be the center of a community of believers whose goal is, according to their deity and prophet, the destruction and/or conversion of the unbelievers in whose midst they have chosen to live.

Immigrants are very important in Islam. The Islamic calendar does not begin with the first revelation from Allah received by Mohammed as one might suppose for a “religion”, rather it begins when Mohammed arrived in Medina from Mecca and began his career as a warlord and killer. This is the real beginning of the power of Islam; not the revelations, but the change of Mohammed’s career from prophet/debater/missionary in Mecca to prophet/warlord/hyperviolent killer in Mecca.

The immigrant is the leading edge of the sword of Islam.

If those who love democracy know nothing of Islam, its doctrine and history – the construction of a new mosque is but a footnote. If those who love democracy know the doctrine and history of Mohammed and of Islam the new mosque is a dangerous threat to their culture, and country.

Islam is a political ideology. The mosque is its party headquarters. Muslim demonstrators on the streets of Europe and America are not shy about their purposes – the destruction of all kafir states and religions and the conquest of Islam. Jihadists are not shy about their motives – they quote Koran as they kill. Yet we say that they are misinterpreting their doctrine. This is a lie we say to one another based on wishful thinking and ignorance. It is not based on knowledge of the doctrine itself.

The Koran is the literal word of Allah, the word of god to adherents of Islam. Mohammed is the prophet, the greatest example of humanity for all to emulate. Jihad, war, murder, violence, misogyny, torture, cruelty, intolerance are the commands. The commands are in the doctrine of Islam. The doctrine is taught at mosques. You connect the dots. 

Your email:

 

July 12th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Taqiya and Duality are two of the most important concepts for all unbelievers, kafirs, to understand about the doctrine of Islam and the inconceivably horrible atrocities that are commited in its name.

The concept of duality is foundationally important to understanding Islam. Islam has a dual code of ethics and logic. This is diametrically opposed to our unitary logic. In unitary logic, which is the logic of the West, in a scenario of a contradiction only one side of the contradiction can be true. So, in symbolic logic, you would say that A and NOT A are contradictory and both cannot be true; either A is true or NOT A is true; both cannot be true.

This is unitary logic. Unitary logic is the foundation of the scientific method and rational thinking. This is not however the logic of political Islam.

Islamic logic is dualistic. In symbolic logic, you would illustrate duality by saying that both A and its opposite, NOT A, are both TRUE. This is impossible in a unitary logic understanding of reality. It is also contrary to the fundamentals of reason and science.

For example, in Islam adherents of the doctrine (those who submit to Allah and Mohammed) can say that Islam is a “religion of peace”  because, in their concept of the term “peace”, insofar as it is laid out in the doctrine, Islam can be described as a religion of peace. The important point that such an assertion neglects is that “peace” in the Islamic concept of the term can be arrived at ONLY through the nonexistence of the kafir, or unbeliever. This means that Islam is at war with every nonbeliever everywhere on this planet forever until everyone is either a dhimmi or a believer (or dead). This means that both statements in dualistic Islamic logic– Islam is a religion of peace, and Islam is a religion of conquest, warfare, violence, and intolerance, are BOTH true.

When we see horrible atrocities committed in the name of Islam; when we see jihadists quoting doctrine as they behead a kafir; when we see churches burned in Iraq and Christians being driven out of that country by the thousands; when we see brutal torture of gays in Baghdad; this is all jihad. Jihad is the obligation of all adherents of the “religion of peace”. Jihad is the violent opposition to all those who do not accept Allah and Muhammad. The Koran calls Jihad “fighting in Allah’s cause”. This phrase  occurs over 150 times in the Koran. It is one of the central concepts of Islam. Death in Jihad is the ONLY promise of a direct route to paradise with all its promised virgins (rivers of honey, and young boys, too) in the doctrine.

Taqiya, or sacred deception, is often used to portray a false vision of what Islam is. It is always practiced in Interfaith dialogue sessions which are always dawa sessions (conversion sessions) for adherents of Islam. Taqiya allows adherents to give a false perception of Islam to the kafir by not giving the full story and by withholding information, and by twisting the reality of Islam so that the Kafir is fooled. Adherents are commanded by Allah to falsify the doctrine of Islam to the Kafir. When the kafir does not understand the reality of Islam, the kafir cannot mount a defense or respond. This is why conquered peoples, the dhimmis, are not allowed to study the Koran. The lies of taqiya, backed by the duality of Islamic logic, has the effect of paralyzing those who would oppose Islam. Taqiya allows the adherent to say, essentially, anything they wish to a kafir on any subject. But most importantly, adherents deceive kafirs about the truth of Islam, its history, and its purpose which is jihad and the destruction of kafirs (and their conversion to Islam).

No treaty, no obligation, is binding to an adherent when it is made with a Kafir. This is Sunna of Muhammad.

Taqiya allows the adherent to hide the fact that the peaceful facade of Islam is truly a mask which hides the reality of Islam which is worldwide conquest until the entire world is under Islam.

You will never hear this truth of Islam from an adherent except from a Jihadist. Jihadis know that Islam is on the rise and that the west is weak, etc. When they hold their signs in Europe that say, “Islam will dominate the World”, they are telling the truth of their intentions; when their signs say, “We love Hitler”, or “The Holocaust is coming Jews!” believe them. They know their doctrine and believe themselves to be good Muslims. When the doctrine of Islam is known and understood it is clear that they (jihadists) are in fact good, observant Muslims – faithful adherents to the doctrine and commands of Allah and Mohammed.

War, according to Muhammad, is deception. (Jihad is war against the unbeliever.) Taqiya, because it allows the adherent to deceive the unbeliever, is a form of Jihad. The purpose of Jihad is to conquer and convert the kafirs everywhere until all the world accepts Allah as the only god, Islam as the only religion and political system, and Mohammed as his prophet.

Our western judaeo-christian concepts of morality are diametrically contrary to Islamic doctrine. We reject the concept of dualistic logic and ethics. We believe in the idea of the family of humanity. Islam does not believe in a family of humanity. In Islam, there is the Umma and there is the Kafir. The Kafir is outside the Umma (the community of believers anywhere in the world) therefore, the kafir is the enemy. The doctrine is clear on these points.

There is no peace with Islam. There is only a pause between battles (hudna). There are no treaties of peace that are worth anything with Islam. A treaty is a tool of war to jihad; not a tool of peace.

The idea of engaging with Islam in the Western rationalist unitary way in which the concepts of Right and Wrong are the foundations of the debate is a failure. There are no moral concepts in the Islamic doctrine (in the way that westerners understand morality)– there is only what is allowed by Allah and Muhammad and that which is forbidden. There is no morality associated - in any way that we understand morality to be – with these injunctions or commands. Essentially, in Islam, what is allowed is moral, and what is forbidden is immoral.

Taqiya (sacred deception of the unbeliever) is both allowed and commanded, and is therefore in the internal logic of Islamic doctrine moral. Because Allah and Mohammad command all adherents to be involved in Jihad forever war against the kafir is considered, in Islam, a moral absolute good. Unfortunately for the non-believer, there are no taboos in Jihad. So, when you see jihadists killing, beheading, torturing, and doing all manner of cruelty to Christians, Jews, Hindus, or any non-believer (and simultanteously quoting doctrine) the jihadist firmly believes that he/she is a moral, upstanding, devout muslim surely on his way to paradise. According to his own doctrine of Koran, Sira, and Hadith he is on the correct path. This path has an end point. Jihad ends only with our destruction.

Your email:

 

July 1st, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

I finished reading the Koran on Sunday afternoon, no “beauty” was found.

I read Abridged Koran (from the Center for the Study of Political Islam). The Koran is organized non-chronologically; it goes from largest chapter to the smallest. The result of this “organization” is that everything in the Koran is without context; events come and go, people come and go without any contextual logic. In addition, there is extensive repetition so that stories are told again and again, with slight variations. This means that the Koran in its original form is almost impossible to understand; not so with the Abridged Koran.

Muslim clerics often assert that the Koran cannot be understood except in the original classical Arabic, but Dr. Puin [a noted German Koranic scholar] maintains that much of the book is unclear, even to Arabic scholars:

“The Koran claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen,’ or ‘clear,’“ [Puin] says. “But if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense. Many Muslims — and Orientalists — will tell you otherwise, of course, but the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible — if it can’t even be understood in Arabic — then it’s not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not — as even speakers of Arabic will tell you — there is a contradiction. Something else must be going on.” (Source: Gates of Vienna)

The Abridged Koran is the only Koran that has eliminated the extensive repetition of stories and linked the text with the biography of Mohammed, the Sira. Most importantly, this Koran is in chronological order. This means that the Koran is understandable from a chronological perspective and is easy to read; this is not to say that reading the Koran is a pleasurable experience; it wasn’t.

Defenders of Islam must read the Koran and build their defenses of Islam around the Koran and the two other books of the Islamic doctrine trilogy, the Hadith and the Sira. There is no other foundation upon which to discuss Islam other than the doctrine and the things that Muslims do on account of it. Most defenders have not read the Koran. If they had read the Koran they would find it difficult to defend because it is such a shattering book to read. For a non-believer there is nothing in the Koran that is defensible.

I could only read it in segments of an hour or less. For a kafir the Koran is mentally and emotionally exhausting.

Understanding that this document is the core of the doctrine of over one billion people is an astounding and deeply disturbing revelation. Reading the Koran is as shattering an experience as learning that the earth is not flat, or that some deeply held foundational beliefs about the world are wrong.

When I reached the end of the Koran I realized that everything that occurs in the world of Islam is because of the Koran and the doctrine trilogy. What this means for unbelievers is deeply disturbing as it means that we are at war with an ideology that is a diabolical as Nazism and even more cruel. The Nazis planned destruction for the Jews and were clear on this point in their own foundational document, Mein Kampf. The Koran does not limit itself to Jews alone, though there is a special deep hatred for Jews in the Koran; rather the Koran and Islam is at war with all unbelievers (the kafir) everywhere and forever. War against the kafir is described in the Koran as “fighting in Allah’s cause”. All Muslims are obligated to do Jihad, even if they do not want to participate.

Murder of innocents is not the greatest sin of the Koran; unbelief and apostasy (leaving Islam) are far worse. Because unbelievers are guilty through their lack of acceptance of Allah and Islam, anything can be done to them by Muslims.

Islam is at war with kafirs because kafirs do not believe. The fact that kafirs in the west pretend that the war is not real is irrelevent only to the dreaming kafirs, nothing about Islam is relevant; to Islam it is an ally in jihad.

Islam’s purpose is to bring the unbelievers into Islam, out of their criminal “ignorance” as the Koran puts it. If kafirs refuse to accept Islam they can be killed or enslaved to live as dhimmis as their cultures, countries, and religions are destroyed by Islam. Osama bin Laden specifically called the west to Islam before and after 9/11 just for this ideological purpose – when the west refuses or ignores the call to Islam anything, even mass murder, can be done to them because they are unbelievers, the worst kind of sinners in Islam. An “invitation” from Islam cannot be whimsically ignored; this is akin to the “offer that one cannot refuse” from the “mob”.

In Islamic doctrine one is a slave of Allah and of Mohammed. Mohammed is Allah’s Prophet but he has a special role. Mohammed is not just a prophet of Allah, rather he is The Prophet. The Koran puts Mohammed in a position of authority over Muslims equivalent with Allah. This is why all Muslims everywhere emulate Mohammed as the perfect human being to be modeled. Mohammed is the model for all humanity forever in the Islamic worldview.

When you see terrorists beheading kafir captives and quoting the Koran, they do this because Mohammed did this; when you see Islamists torture and kill the innocent they do this because Mohammed did; when you see Islamists kill thousands of kafirs, torture them, burn their churches and temples, and rape their women, they do this because Mohammed the perfect example for all Muslims forever did these things.

“We have prepared a blazing fire for these unbelievers who do not believe in Allah and his Messenger.” (Koran, 48:13)

As an example of moral and ethical behavior most decent people in the west would reject Mohammed as someone worhty of emulation. Not so in Islam. Mohammed is the perfect example; Mohammed killed the kafir, so today and since the inception of Islam, Muslims have done the same thing.

Koran is alive. While it lives, kafirs die.

Mohammed is the example for all Muslims to follow.

“Those who obey the Messenger, obey Allah.”
(4:79, 4:80)

“And it is not the place of a believer, either man or woman, to have a choice in his or her affairs when Allah and his Messenger have decided on a matter. Those who disobey Allah and his Messenger are clearly on the wrong path.” (33:36)

All Muslims are obligated to participate in Jihad. This is the conquest of kafirs and bringing them into Islam, very often by force. If they do not come to Islam, they are destroyed. Because the majority of the Koran is reserved for how Islam treats kafirs it is a political document. Because conquest, conversion, or death are the only options for kafirs the Koran is exceedingly dangerous for any unbeliever.

There are “five pillars” of Islam, these are religious and community-oriented (the Muslim community, not the human community). But there is much more to being a Muslim than the five pillars. The core of Koran is “fighting in Allah’s cause”.

Anyone who fights and dies in Allah’s cause will live forever in paradise with Allah. The temporal world is not the focus of the Koran, rather it is the world to come. The only assured way to get to paradise in Islam is by doing jihad (and ideally, dying in the process). Jihad is killing and enslaving kafirs. This means that Islam is in an existential war with all unbelievers wherever they may be, forever. It also means that Islam is an ideology of anti-life, death; the world to come is superior to the world we live in and the best way to get there is by killing unbelievers in jihad.

“Existential” means that our existence as individuals and as part of nations or religions or anything external to, other than, Islam is at stake. If Islam is successful, there is nothing in the world but Islam. Nothing.

“Let those who would sell the life of this world for the world to come fight for Allah’s cause. Whoever fights for Allah’s cause, whether he is killed or is victorious, We will grant him a great reward. How could you not fight for Allah’s cause?” (4:74)

“The believers fight for Allah’s cause, and the unbelievers fight for Satan. Therefore, fight against the friends of Satan. Truly Satan’s strategy is weak.” (4:76)

In Islam, all non-believers are evil and  ignorant, and must be brought under Islam, enslaved or killed. The history of Islam shows that this is believed, literally. The events of today show that this ideology of war and cruelty is very much alive.

The defenders of Islam speak of the “beauty” of the Koran. I found none. There is some poetics, but it is reserved for the descriptions of unbelievers burning in hell.

“If only you could witness the angels carrying off the unbelievers’ souls!They slash their faces and backs saying, ‘Taste the torment of the fire!’” (8:49)

The real “beauty” of the koran is for the jihadists. Koran is not about our world, it is about the next, and how to get there. Unfortunately, for those who are not Muslim, the best path to paradise is by jihad, war against the kafir. We see jihad every day. Jihad is the murder of kafirs, wherever they are.

“The forgiveness and mercy they, who die or are killed for Allah’s cause, will receive from Allah will be far better than anything they could have gained. If you die or are killed, then surely you will all be gathered before Allah.” (3:157)

If the reader is, like me, a non-Muslim the Koran is not a friendly book. There is little tolerance in the Koran. The only tolerance is for Muslims, there is none for the kafir. If you are a Jew or Christian, reading the Koran is particularly unpleasant.

“Oh, believer, do not take the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you take them for his friends, he surely is one of them. Allah will not guide the evil doers.” (5:51)

One could quote the Koran for hundreds of pages to illustrate the actual message of the Koran. There is no need for this as the Koran is quite clear about its message. We in the kafir world simply choose to ignore it. This doctrine of pretending, this immature view of the world in which we pretend that the world is something other than what it is is the foundation of political correctness and multiculturalism. These two absurd concepts further the purposes of jihad. Politically correct people who prevent the truth of Islam to be disseminated are self-destructive fools, the useful idiots of jihad. 

Muslims are not allowed to be friends with Christians or Jews or any unbeliever. The fate for unbelievers is hellfire, death, or conquest/conversion. So, why bother befriending such people, I suppose. But more importantly, the kafir is considered evil, ignorant, and less than human as they are outside of Islam. Anything outside of Islam is considered evil in the doctrine. This is the opposite of inclusiveness and tolerance. Those apologists and defenders of Islam who say that it is tolerant are lying or are ignorant of the doctrine, or both.

“The unbelievers among the People of the Book (Jews & Christians) and the idolators will burn for eternity in the fire of Hell. Of all the created beings, they are the most despicable.” (98:6)

The Koran is a diabolical political document that lays out a plan for the conquest of the entire world by Islam. One could put this ideology into a movie and make quite a thriller out of it, but nobody would believe it. Suspension of disbelief would not be possible as the plot would be seen as impossible, completely unrealistic. But this is exactly what is happening now in the west, total disbelief and no suspension of it. Our ignorance of Islamic doctrine furthers the cause of jihad, and undermines our ability to exist. This is cultural insanity and suicide. We do not defend ourselves against jihad because we prefer to pretend that it is not real.

This reluctance to accept the truth of the Koran and of Islam is entirely based upon ignorance of Islam and its very clear doctrine, and ignorance of jihad. The time for wishful thinking is long over.

Defense of Islam is not based upon knowledge, experience, learning, or understanding of the motivations of Islam which come entirely and without exception from the doctrine trilogy of Koran, Hadith and Sira. The Koran is diabolical because it justifies and demands death for untold millions and more. Defense of such an ideology can only be explained in two ways, ignorance or active support. In this case, ignorance of Islam and it doctrine is support of jihad and the destruction of kafirs.

Mohammed said that war is deception. Jihad is war and one of its weapons is deception. We are told that Islam is the “religion of peace” but we see in Koran that it is a religion and ideology and political system of war. It is much more than religion, it is an entire civilizational system dedicated to the destruction of all non-believers everywhere and forever.

We are told that Islam has been “hijacked” by “extremists” and that Islam is peaceful and tolerant. The only tolerance in Koran is for believers, there is no tolerance for kafirs. 

The word “extremist” and “moderate” are western concepts, they are not Islamic. In the Islamic context these concepts are completely different in meaning. In Islam someone who follows Koran and participates in Jihad as commanded by Allah and Mohammed are actually moderate because they are following the law of Islam as dictated to Mohammed by Allah through the angel Gabriel.

Those non-jihadist Muslims sought out by western apologists and wishful thinker fantasists as proof that there is tolerance in Islam are outside the religion/ideology as they deny their obligation to do jihad. Failure to do jihad is antithetical to Islam; it is a sin. Jihad is required.

Non-jihadist Muslims are in apostasy and are extremists. The moderate Muslim is Osama bin Laden because he follows the doctrine; the Taliban are moderate because they follow the doctrine (in the extreme). These are the true pious followers of Mohammed.

The fact that so many millions of Pakistanis are fleeing the Taliban shows that many Muslims do not want to be jihadists. Many Muslims do not accept their doctrine. The response to the Taliban in Pakistan is cause for hope because it shows that many Muslims reject their doctrine, it also means that Muslims are victims of Islam, too, in many ways.

What are we kafirs who have read the Koran to do? Koran is the word of Allah delivered to Mohammed by the angel Gabriel, according to Islam. Criticism of the doctrine is forbidden, debate is forbidden. This is why we see rote learning of Koran and Hadith and Sira in Madrassahs all over the world because rote learning is the only way to learn the word of Allah. Can such a doctrine founded upon the word of Allah that cannot be debated or criticized be reformed? This is a great question of the moment, and the answer would appear to be “No”.

We kafirs must accept the world in which we live; accept the Koran for what it says, and take the jihadists at their word when they say they are killing unbelievers because their doctrine (Allah and Mohammed) tells them to do so. They are not lying. We just pretend that they are, or that they have misinterpreted their doctrine. They haven’t. We are unwilling to face the truth. This reluctance to learn and to know and to teach empowers jihad.

This is the ugly truth of our times – murderers and conquerors are motivated by this book to do appalling inhuman things. They believe that they are doing “God’s work”. When you read the Koran you will see that this is not possible. The work of God as we understand him is peace not wholesale cruelty, hatred, intolerance, violence, brutality, and war.

All the mysteries of terror attacks; all the warfare in the middle east; all the conflicts with Islamic states; all the brutality against Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, against all non-believers by Muslims around the world will become clear when you read the Koran.

The most important and widely discussed but rarely read book of the 1920s and 30s was Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Its sales made Hitler a wealthy man, but few who purchased the book read it though many chose (incorrectly) to defend Hitler as the “rescuer” of Germany in spite of not having read it. Had the book been widely read at home and abroad the plans of the lunatic Fuehrer for world war and for the destruction of the Jews would have been known because they were all discussed in detail in the unread Mein Kampf. Could Chamberlain have gone to Berlin and declare “peace in our time” had the majority of those in Europe read Mein Kampf?

Now, with the rise of Islamism and global jihad across the world another profoundly important book goes almost entirely unread but is widely discussed regardless, the Koran. Most discuss Islam and Koran from ignorance and wishful thinking and condemn those who have read it, understand it and ring the bell of warning about it.

There can be little confusion as to the message of the Koran. In the Koran you will find no good news.

There is no more important book in the world at this time than the Koran. It is fitting that Mein Kampf and the Koran are juxtaposed; both lay out a grand plan of global conquest and war, both involve violence, intolerance, and hatred; both are ideological political documents that present a plan for world-wide totalitarianism. The high cost of Mein Kampf is now known – in the tens of millions of victims. The ongoing cost of jihad is almost too painful to consider; the cost of Jihad since the publication of the Koran is in the hundreds of millions.

Everyday in the persecution of unbelievers across the world we see a resurgent Islam. This is the great struggle, the great jihad. They are fighting heart and soul to bring the world to Islam by any means – while we pretend it is not so. Jihadists are obeying their god and their messenger, while we ignore both and pretend that both are peaceful and tolerant. They are not.

The events of violence, hate and war coming from the Islamic world are not “hijackings” of a peaceful tolerant religion, they are the thrashings of a great beast of war. Read the Koran, you will see. When you see, you must teach others. There is nothing of more import than learning the motives of the cruelest ideology on the planet earth. An ideology whose purpose is our destruction.

Ignorance is not an option. Read the Koran. The guidebook of the world as we know it now is the Koran. It is a book without beauty, it is a book of war and horrors. We had better read it. All of us.

Your email:

 

June 4th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

President Obama has made his choice. The choice is the Muslim world over the state of Israel, and appeasement of a hostile ideology instead of active defense of the United States and our allies. This is a sea-change moment in history.

American and European leftists believe that Israel is the cause of Middle Eastern conflicts and war; not the actions of Israel but the very existence of Israel itself. It does not matter that Israel is the only democracy in the region; it does not matter that Israel is an ally of the United States. What is important is that Israel is seen as an impediment to peace because it exists. It is not important that the conflicts arise because Islamic countries attack Israel in the same ongoing universal jihad that has been going on for over 1400 years. If Israel is removed, the conflict problems of the Middle East are solved, immediately. This is absurdity and ignorance.

Daniel Pipes has written an insightful article on the abandonment of Israel by Mr. Obama for Iran a hostile country that stormed our embassy in Tehran and took our embassy staffers, our countrymen, hostage for 444 days in 1979. This was an act of war for which we have never gone to war with Iran. This is an unpaid debt that Iran must pay, but which President Obama, the new messiah and Harvard hero likely is not aware of.

We have the great misfortune to live in a time of great struggle, an existential struggle between freedom and the totalitarian ideology of Islam. President Obama’s trip to Arab states over the last several days and his active appeasement and coddling to dictatorships across the region is an ugly stain on our national identity. Mr. Obama has made the weak case that we are “not at war withIslam, and never will be.” But he ignores the truth of the actions of the followers of Islam and the doctrine of jihad that is central to their ideology of cruelty and conquest. Islam is at war with us.

Walid Shoebat, noted former PLO terrorist and now defender of Israel and the US, said in response to Mr. Obama’s speech today that recent discussion of Obama’s Muslim roots in the mainstream press are a serious matter. In conjunction with the appeasement message of the speech in Cairo today- it is a very serious matter.

This (dladams: mainstream discussion of Obama’s Muslim heritage) should automatically be seen as a red flag, especially if you are a supporter of Israel as an ally, and its right to live in its own land free from threat. Do you honestly know any Muslim that is “pro Israel”? You can count on your hand how many Muslims are pro Israel, so the fact that President Obama is now proud of his Muslim heritage should be a major wake up call to all who voted for him; who also believe in the safety of America and Israel. The evidence of his anti Israel position was hidden by the mainstream media and the twenty years of attendance at Rev Wright’s church as well as being the Presidents spiritual mentor should suggest this position. Further, Obama stated that his friendship with Rashid Khalidi the PLO operative helped in molding his views regarding Israel. The LA Times withheld a video tape a few days prior to the election that exposed Presidents Obama’s true virulent anti Israel position. (Walid Shoebat, List email, June 4, 2009)

This is Chamberlainism – appeasement of an enemy ideology or state because we do not have the political will to defend ourselves. In addition, Chamberlainism is wishfull thinking; rational people do not want to go to war with all the horror that that entails.

Some will do or say anything to prevent war. But like WW2 appeasement Obama’s appeasement of Islam can only delay the inevitable and undermine the forces of defense at work in one’s own country. This benefits the enemy ideology/state.

Mr. Obama is the new Chamberlain. It does not matter that he says that we are not at war with Islam, we aren’t; nor do we want to be. What matters is that Islam is at war with us. We must not pretend that it is not so. (Source of photo below.)

Mr. Obama spoke today in Cairo, Egypt. He says that he wants a new eraof cooperation and understanding between the US and Islam. Mr. Obama’s tone was quite conciliatory, quite apologetic. But what have we done to offend Islam? We have defended Muslims in Kosovo and Bosnia; we have sent billions in aid money to multiple Islamic countries; we have propped up Saudi Arabia and other dictatorships and tyrannies and brought them out of the depths of poverty with decades of oil purchases; we have recently freed two Islamic nations from despotism and insane cruelty (Iraq & Afghanistan) so what have we done to offend Islam? What we have done to Islam is exist.

Fundamentally, Islam is an expansive ever growing ideology whose purpose is its own growth and expansion. Islam is a unified ideology of existence that included religion, politics, jurisprudence (sharia), military doctrine, and culture. Islam is much more than a religion.

Despite George W. Bush’s concept of Islam as the religion of peace it is actually the opposite. The history of Islamic conquest, jew hatred, mass murder, brutality, and cruelty shows it to be so. Islam’s doctrine is essentially political, how non-Mulsims are to be treated by believers – the doctrine is not kind on this point.

Jihad, “fighting in the cause of Allah” as the Koran puts it, is the foundational tool of Islam’s expansion and is basically its 6th pillar. Jihad is unforgiving and brutal warfare against the kafir, the unbeliever, until all the unbeliever states and cultures are conquered and their peoples enslaved, converted to Islam, or killed. This is the real Islam. We have been lied to about Islam again and again. (source of photo below)

In the western conception of the word “extremist” Islam is inherently extreme. Adherents are not allowed to take Jews and Christians as friends; adherents must fight unbelievers everywhere and forever for “Allah’s cause” (jihad); no religion or political system is allowed anywhere but Allah’s.

We saw just yesterday the evidence of this doctrine of cruelty and hatred and warfare when an American convert to Islam shot and killed a US Army private and wounded another in front of a recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas. Robert Spencer, one of the top scholars of Islam in the United States believes that this is jihad, and there are more attacks to follow. One is hard-pressed to find a counterargument.

We pretend that Islam is a religion of peace at our peril. Daniel Pipes, another top scholar, has been watching the violence of converts for some time. He describes the sudden violence of new converts as “sudden jihad syndrome”.

“Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers.” I wrote those words days after 9/11 and have been criticized for them ever since. But an incident on March 3 at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill suggests I did not go far enough. (Source)

Adherents of Islam believe that they are at war with us, but just want say it, unless of course one is talking about Osama bin Laden and his ilk who make no bones about the state of war that exists between the west and Islam. Most Islamists, even terrorists, deny that there is war because this confuses the enemy (us), and leads us to doubt reality and the intentions of Islam.

Mohammed said that war/jihad is “deception”; the adherents of Islam have had 1400 years of practice. In fact, the doctrine of deception is codified in Islam as “taqiyyah” which states that a Muslim may lie to any kafir (non-believer) for reasons of forwarding the aims of the Umma or of Islam.

And so, we are deceived. We do not want to listen to the words of the killers, the jihadists; we do not want to read the doctrine of Islam which the killers follow to the letter; we do not want to listen to our few scholars who ring the bell of warning about this existential threat. Our ignorant leaders, our dhimmi leaders, are deceived and will apologize and beg for peace before those whose purpose and goal is our destruction and conquest. The forces of Islam could not be happier.

Khalil Al-’Anani in al-Hayat warned that the Obama administration’s readiness to negotiate on a basis of making concessions with radical states and forces would teach Middle Easterners to conclude “that extremism is the most effective way to attract the U.S.’s attention, and to compel them to conduct dialogue.” By showing weakness, the United States would ensure its enemies concluded that America was defeated and to make more demands. He even calls this policy one of “appeasement.” (Source)

Chamberlain showed that appeasement is a fool’s errand. We are at war already. 9/11 and all the previous and subsequent attacks against our country, people, and allies across the world show this to be true. Islam and its leaders are clear on this point. The Saudis use their oil wealth which we have supplied them in the last decades in the greatest transfer of wealth in human history to build mosques and Islamic centers in the US for the purpose of spreading their absolutist ideology of conquest. We may not see another attack (though it is very possible) – another hyper-violent attack like 9/11 is not necessary as the Islamists are winning through demographic growthand the denial of any threat by the populations of the west.

Mr. Obama’s concession speech to the Arab world is viewed as weakness by Islam. We are at a moment of deep national and cultural failure and weakness before our enemies but few are aware of it, apparently. Iran is actively seeking nuclear weapons; they have tested missiles that can reach Israel and beyond; they have promised nuclear destruction of Israel and the US via nuclear war, but our president now says that Iran has a legitimate right to nuclear power. The response from Iran to all of this American appeasement and open-handed pleadings for peace has been rejection and derision.

Iran’s supreme leader dismissed President Obama’s speech at Cairo University Thursday, saying the Muslim world continues to “hate America.” (Source)

This is insanity and national suicide.

Islam is so strong because we are so weak. We are so weak because we are in denial. We are in denial about the truth of Islam; Islam is not a religion of peace it is an ideology of totalitarianism and war that is fundamentally opposed to our way of life, our freedoms, our very existence as a nation.

We are at war. But we do not fight. We fight in Iraq, and we fight in Afghanistan to protect Muslims from one another, but we do not fight to protect ourselves from this existential and growing threat that is the doctrine of Islam. We must wake up, we must defend ourselves. There is much at stake… everything.

Denial is fundamental to the continued obsession with the economy, to the continued non-action in defense of our liberties and lands, to the appeasement of an ideology who purpose is our destruction. What is being denied? That we are in a war of civilizations.

Modern westerners cannot seem to conceive that people outside of their cultures would want western culture destroyed because of a religious and politicalideology of 1400 years ago; they cannot conceive that such concepts still motivate people to kill- but they do. Most importantly our inability to accept the truth empowers the forces against us in their goalto destroy us. This is an ideological, a military, and an existential war. 9/11 and all the other attacks before and since fit into a context of warfare that those in the west do not understand because they have never experienced it, and have never learned it. “Everything that happpens in Islam is based on an actual doctrine.” (PoliticalIslam.com)

A doctor in Israel tells the following story. It is illustrative. Israel is a rational, civilized, allied, democratic country. Mr. Obama has sided with Iran, a country fundamentally hostile to the United States and to Israel.

We are at a cross-roads. With the re-emergence of appeasement as the guiding principle of American foreign policy vis-a-vis the Islamic world, we have undermined our ability to resist Islam. We have undermined our political will to defend ourselves and our friends and we have given ample evidence to the enemies of civilization that the United States is not prepared to defend itself or its friends.

This is a sea-change moment in the history of the world. The possible results can only be disastrous.

I was instrumental in establishing the Israeli National Skin Bank, which is the largest in the world. The National Skin Bank stores skin for every day needs as well as for war time or mass casualty situations. This skin bank is hosted at the Hadassah Ein KeremUniversity hospital in Jerusalem where I was the chairman of plastic surgery. This is how I was asked to supply skin for an Arab woman from Gaza, who was hospitalized in Soroka Hospital in Beersheba after her family burned her. Usually, such atrocities happen among Arab families when the women are suspected of having an affair. We supplied all the needed Homografts for her treatment. She was successfully treated by my friend and colleague Prof. Lior Rosenberg, and discharged to return to Gaza. She was invited for regular follow up visits to the outpatient clinic in Beersheba. One day she was caught at a border crossing wearing a suicide belt. She meant to explode herself in the outpatient clinic of the hospital where they saved her life. It seems that her family promised her that if she did that, they would forgive her.
 
This is only one example of the war between Jews and Muslims in the Land of Israel. It is not a territorial conflict. This is a civilizational conflict. (source)

After Chamberlain came Churchill. This is our hope, too. There is a new Churchill who will ring the alarm of warning, and motivate us to defend outselves and our country, culture, and religions. If the new Chamberlainism is triumphant, western freedoms are defeated, forever.

Note: Additional analyses of Obama’s Appeasement Speech are available…

• Bat Ye’or
• Robert Spencer
• Caroline Glick
• Bill Warner
• Alex Knepper
• Hugh Fitzgerald
• Andrew McCarthy
• Charles Krauthammer
• David Horowitz
• Wafa Sultan

Your email:

 

May 15th, 2009 by admin

Recently, the David Horowitz Freedom Center released a very disturbing online video about the ongoing Muslim persecution of Christians. The news is very bad, and the images in this movie are very disturbing. If you are squeemish, do not watch this video.

To Islam, Christians are people of the book, those who have rejected the message of the prophet Mohammed and his god Allah. Just as the Jews have done, they have refused to convert to Islam. For this reason, Islam hates Christians and Jews… passionately.

This is a very old hatred that began when Mohammed was rejected by the Jews of Medina, and was not embraced by Christians in Arabia. But this hatred is still very much alive.

“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world…. Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers] Islam says Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us Islam says Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy Islam says Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other [Koranic] verses and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.” (Ayatollah Khomeni, 1942; the founder of the Iranian Islamic Revolution)

For followers of Islam, befriending non-believers is a sin.

“O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people, they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear to you, if you will understand.”  (Koran, 3:118)

“O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.” (Koran, 5:51)

It is a sin to befriend unbelievers unless such friendship is false and furthers Islam. What is mandated is jihad against the unbelievers.

“We will strike terror into the hearts of the unbelievers because they worship others besides Allah, which He gave them no permission to do. Their home will be the fire, a terrible resting place for the evil doers.” (Koran, 3:149)

If you’ve ever wondered why Islamic jihad mobs burn down churches and homes, the above quote explains it.  Read the following, and put them into the context of the images you will see in the following film, if you can handle it.

“The flames of Hell are sufficient punishment for them [the people of the book]! Those who reject Our revelations We will cast into the fire. As soon as their skins are burnt away, We will give them new skins so that they will truly experience the torment.” (Koran, 4:53)

“As for the unbelievers, they will be punished with excrutiating agony in this world and the world to come. They will have noone to help them.” (Koran, 3: 54) (source)

Jihad is about bringing agony, terror and death to the unbelievers everywhere in this world and the next. Followers of Islam take the Koran, Hadith (traditions of Mohammed), and Sira (the biography or Way of Mohammed) very, very seriously. This seriousness is an existential threat to all kafirs (unbelievers) everywhere.

A final warning: Please do not watch this movie if you are squeemish or if horrible, violent, murderous images disturb you. Jihad is upon us. We must learn and respond. 

Jihad was first developed from the eighth century by theologians and jurists who divided the world in two: Muslims and infidels. Infidels, as they saw it, included all non-Muslims and those Muslims not pious enough according to them. The jihadists concluded that Muslims have a sacred duty, mandated by Allah, to defeat the infidels and to impose Qur’anic law [Sharia] upon them. – Bat Ye’Or, Global Jihad and America’s War.