Print This Post

A 9/11 Plea for Rational Discourse and Defense of the Land and People

September 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

(originally posted on SIOANetwork.com)

Introduction

As the 8th anniversary of the greatest atrocity against innocent Americans, the most miserable and appalling crime and attack ever to occur on our soil approaches it is important to honor our innocent dead and to come to a greater understanding of that event so that we might comprehend our world and our place in it more effectively.

A Politically Incorrect Definition of 9/11 (The Truth)

The Unpleasant Nature of our World in Clear Logic

9/11 was jihad against the unbelievers of the United States. Every participant in 9/11 was a Muslim, a “devout Muslim”.

Every participant explained his actions of the murder of American innocents in an Islamic doctrinal context.

Islam is at war with all unbelievers (kafirs) everywhere and forever as per the directives of Allah and Mohammed in the Islamic doctrine. All Muslims “submit to” and are “slaves of” Allah and Mohammed, his prophet. Allah and Mohammed are found only in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). The doctrine of Islam commands all Muslims to participate in jihad against the unbeliever until the world is ruled by Islam. This is the purpose of Islam.

The existence of kafirs (unbelievers) is an affront to Allah and Mohammed. All Muslims are commanded to participate in jihad or support those who do. Non-participation is apostasy. Apostasy is not tolerated. Jihad is the central concept of Islamic doctrine other than voluntary and forced submission. Islam means “submission”.

The Koran discusses the kafir more than it discusses how to be a good Muslim. Islam is a totalitarian political ideology at war with the United States and all non-Muslim countries, cultures, and religions.

A Politically Correct Version of 9/11 (A Lie)

A False Fantasy of Reality Now Entirely Discredited

The attacks of 9/11 were perpetrated by people who happened to be Islamic. These criminals and terrorists misunderstood the peaceful nature of the doctrine of Islam. 9/11 began a war against “terror” as we were attacked by “terrorists”. These terrible people “hijacked” the “religion of peace”. Islam and its adherents are fully compatible with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The perpetrators/terrorists of 9/11 have given the “religion of peace” a bad name because they misunderstood the concept of perpetual, universal jihad to mean actual universal, perpetual jihad rather than an inner struggle. (It is not relevant of course that the entire history of Islam from Year One is a history of brutality, conquest, and jihad.)

Islam is a “religion of peace”. The many millions of ultra-violent killers and haters across the world who claim to be Muslim are confused about the doctrine of Islam. Signs, and speeches supporting jihad and violent events jihad are all misunderstood and perpetrated by confused people who happen to be Muslim. Jihad has nothing to do with Islam. 9/11 was a blip, an aberration in a long history of Islamic contributions to America and to liberty and decency.

9/11 and Islam are entirely unrelated.

========================

You must decide the truth of 9/11, and the nature of our current world.

You must decide if the doctrine of Islam is to be believed, the words and commands of Allah and Mohammed that all Muslims are required to follow forever or if the ignorant, multiculturalist, politically correct fools who know nothing of Islam, jihad, or Islam doctrine and history are correct.

You must decide if the Islamic world is driven by the doctrine of Islam which states clearly that Islam is a totalitarian political doctrine of brutality, misogyny, war, barbarism, and intolerance or if it is a misunderstood “religion of peace”. We have clear evidence, attacks, threats, rhetoric, doctrine, and a world of universal jihad war that show that this is all so.

The truth of 9/11 is foundationally about the doctrine of Islam. There is no context without the doctrine of Islam in which 9/11, previous and subsequent terror/jihad attacks against Americans and unbelievers around the world make any sense. The context of 9/11 is Islamic doctrine; the context of universal jihad against the kafir unbelievers is the doctrine of Islam.

More importantly, the criminals and killers who do these atrocities tell us in no uncertain terms that they are committing jihad because they are commanded to do so by Allah and Mohammed (as they are found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith). To the jihadists these actions of cruelty, barbarism and violence are not “atrocities” but are rather “fighting in Allah’s cause” as stated in the Koran over 150 times. This is jihad and it is central to the doctrine of Islam, and because of this it is the central responsibility for all Muslims everywhere forever.

We live in a world of war. If 9/11, London, Beslan, Madrid, Bali, USSCole, Paris, Israel, Iraq, Pakistan, and the tens of the thousands of jihad events of barbarism and brutality since are not enough for you to understand the truth, you are not paying quite enough attention – or, worse, you simply choose not to believe the ugly truth. Perhaps you believe as multiculturalists do that if you prefer the world to be tolerant, and if we ourselves are tolerant and nice, then the world itself will be tolerant and nice. The world has never, ever worked in this way.

This is why multiculturalism is a failed concept and must be destroyed.

Political correctness and multiculturalism encourage Americans to believe the entirely false politically correct explanation of 9/11 and other fake things. We use multiculturalism and politically correct speech and thought to prettify ugly things because we hate ugly things and we don’t want to offend anybody. Saying that Muslims perpetrated 9/11 and thousands of other atrocities is the truth, but it is also offensive to Muslims for some reason, so we avoid saying this – we avoid speaking the truth.

We must abandon multiculturalism and its political correctness ally. These are false concepts bereft of truth and value. They are remnants of a fantasy that 9/11, Madrid, Beslan, London, Paris, Bali, etc., have destroyed.

These are failed concepts that belong in the garbage bin of dialectic and discourse and should never again sully our ability to think about, talk about, and understand what is true.

We must discredit and destroy multiculturalism and political correctness to honor our innocent dead of 9/11 and other Islamic jihad atrocities. We must speak the truth about this existential war that is being waged against us, we must identify the enemy, his ideology and fake religion of peace.

We must honor our innocent dead of 9/11 by opposing the oldest, and now resurgent, totalitarianism in the world, Islam. If we do not do this, our honored dead are forgotten, and our freedoms, culture, and country are all lost.

Mourn the dead of 9/11 and remember why they died; they died because an ideology of brutality and cruelty saw them as less than human, kafirs, and their existence was an affront to Allah and Mohammed.

Multiculturalism and political correctness must be destroyed so that we can discuss the war, and respond. If we do not respond we have turned our backs on our history, our honored dead, and the heroes of the present and past who gave their all so that we could live in freedom, equality and tolerance.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

A World of Broken Communications: A New Hero Emerges in Clarksville, TN

September 5th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

We live in a world of communications. But this world is not a world of honest communications; only the politically correct, “tolerant”, multicultural “sensitive” kind are acceptable. Thoughts and ideas that are outside the accepted mainstream meme of political correctness “niceness” are dangerous communications indeed. This is the position that the Mayor of Clarksville, Tennessee now finds himself in.

The Mayor of Clarksville, Johnny Piper, is a truth-teller and hero. He is a hero because he forwarded an email criticising this stamp to his entire city staff, and others. We live in a world of communications – those who communicate the truth, those who oppose the lies of Islam are heroes.

Yes, we are dhimmis!!

Friday morning (9/04) Mayor Johnny Piper forwarded an email suggesting that “patriotic Americans” should boycott the Eid Al-Fitr Islamic holiday UPS stamp. Of course, he is correct, every patriotic American should boycott this slap in the face from Islam and the dhimmitized American government towards all decent Americans that is this stamp. We should not commemorate in a stamp the holidays of a political ideology/fake religion whose purpose is the destruction of the United States and all non-Muslim cultures everywhere on the planet forever, until the world is entirely Muslim. We should not commemorate in a stamp or any other capacity the ideology of the killers who perpetrated 9/11, Pentagon, London, Paris, Bali, Madrid, USSCOLE, Kenyan Embassies, Beslan, and thousands of other atrocities across the world, Iraq, Israel, etc., against innocents whose only “crime” is that they are not adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”.  Non-belief is an affront to Allah and Mohammed. It is the duty of all adherents of this ideology of intolerance and death to eliminate this affront wherever it is found, forever.

These events occured specifically because the doctrine of Islam, the ideological core of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith), commands that these events be done. Adherents are at war with the US and the entire non-believer (kafir) world, forever. If you do not like this state of affairs there is one person you can complain to, Mohammed.

Mayor Piper’s forwarded email sugggested that this stamp was President Obama’s responsibility, but that is not so as the stamp has been around for some time.  According to the “Leaf Chronicle” a Clarksville online publication, “In fact, the stamp was first issued in 2001, and was reissued in 2002, 2006, 2007 and 2008.” This is a minor point.

The Mayor has been receiving a great deal of negative press on his injudicious but very brave, and very correct forward of the anti-Islam stamp email. In fact, the Tennessean, the local dhimmitized newspaper for Nashville and environs says that Mayor Piper is being “blasted” for the email.

“I don’t see any reason why it would be inappropriate,” Piper said (in the Tennessean). He is correct.  Identifying the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 and any other Islamic jihad event as Mulsim-related is nothing other than the truth. For having spoken the truth, Mayor Piper is now being “blasted”. We do not live in a world of truth, we live in a world of communications. The forces of evil are better at communication at this time than the forces of good, and that is the only reason that Mayor Piper is being “blasted” rather than hailed as the hero that he is.

“ClarksvilleOnline” says that the email forward is “a major embarrassment”. But it is nothing of the sort. The Mayor is among a large population of Americans who are truth-tellers and unafraid to speak the truth.

The truth is not “inappropriate” or “embarrassing”; denial of the truth is both of those things.  Denial of the truth is essentially evil because in this way our enemies are empowered. Applaud the truth-tellers.

Among the many condemnatory articles and posts on the story, ClarksvilleOnline is the worst. They imply that perhaps “disciplinary action” may by in order for the Mayor’s “embarrassing” behavior. This is lunacy on the part of ClarksvilleOnline.

Piper called The Leaf-Chronicle before 4 p.m. Friday to clarify his actions and previous remarks.“It was an innocent sending off, but I’m not taking it back, either,” he said. “I don’t like people killing Americans.” (JihadWatch.org)

These so-called “journalists” condemn a brave man who is speaking the truth because they are too cowardly to defend him. What is worse, they are too ignorant and too overwhelmed by the ridiculous concepts of multiculturalism that tell them that any criticism of any culture (though entirely in context and well-deserved) must be wrong and evil. The ignorant “journalists” at ClarksvilleOnline know nothing. Their ignorance and defense of the enemy of our country and all unbelievers everywhere is one of the reasons why we see newspapers fail every day in this country – they are not truth-tellers and they do not defend our country. A message to “ClarksvilleOnline”: You are irrelevent.

The truth is this: Islam is a totalitarian political ideology which includes an entire civilization; politics, warfare, jurisprudence, fake religion. Eid al-Fitr is a holiday of a fake religion whose ideology declares that no religion, no culture  or government can exist but for Allah’s. The dhimmi, multicultural ignorant politically correct know-nothings of the “press” defend Islam because they know nothing of it. Do they suppose that all the jihadists have somehow misinterpreted the Koran, Sira, and Hadith? They haven’t.

Jihadists are killing kafirs (non-believers) daily because non-believers are not Muslim. In Islam, non-belief is a crime worse than murder. The dhimmi multiculturalists know nothing of this, yet condemn those who oppose Islam. Ignorance is a disgusting thing. The detractors of Mayor Piper believe are self-deluded, they believe that their ignorance gives them the moral high ground. This is absurd. Such ignorant people should keep their counsel and educate themselves before they engage on import matters of the day upon which they are not qualified to comment. Ignorance of Islam is morally and ethically indefensible.

Mayor Piper has since attempted to defend his actions, but they are simply indefensible. Muslims are a integral part of this country. They serve honorably in our armed forces, defending our nation, and our freedoms. No one should be treated like a second class citizens based on their religious beliefs, or the actions of a radical fringe. This incident created by our Mayor  has been an embarrassment for our City, our State, and our Country. (Clarskville Online)

There is a great deal wrong with this condemnation of dhimmis (Clarksville Online) of the brave Mayor of Clarksville, TN.

  1. They are entirely defensible because Islam is a political totalitarian ideology whose purposes in the US and any other non-Muslim country are not assimilation but conquest and Islamization. Muslims are not allowed to befriend Jews and Christians, except when it forwards the purposes of Islam. This is the doctrine of Islam. No such doctrine should be commemorated on a US stamp. We do not put Nazi banners on our stamps nor should we put Islamic holidays on them either. Our stamps should be for our heroes.
  2. Those Muslims who serve honorably in our armed forces are not Muslim as they are forbidden from participating in any action that is opposed to Islam and the growth of Islam unless it forwards Islam in some way.
  3. There are good Muslims who obey the Constitution and obey the laws of the US, and do so honestly and from the heart but they are not Muslims, they are hypocrites and apostates (according to the doctrine of Islam and to the Umma).
  4. The term “radical fringe” is inappropriate here. Those who follow the doctrine of Islam; they are commanded to kill, enslave and conquer all unbelievers (kafirs) forever until the world is under Islamic control. Osama bin Laden is not a “radical” he is a devout, moderate Muslim. The “radical fringe” if such a fringe exists, are those who condemn misogyny, intolerance, jihad, anti-reason, barbarism, slavery, brutality, hate, and aggressive war. Such a “radical fringe” has yet to appear.  The “radical fringe” opposes the ideology of Islam. Where is such a “radical fringe”? When they appear perhaps ClarksvilleOnline will do a story on them.

Mayor Piper of Clarksville is to be applauded for his bravery and honesty. The United States has many true heroes and supporters of democracy and freedom who could be put on a stamp.

If the current management of the USPS cannot find an American hero to put on a stamp they should be fired, immediately. We do not commemorate the holidays of our existential enemies. Only an ignorant, foolish, self-destructive country/culture would do such a thing!

Such straight-forward honesty as that shown by Mayor Piper is a rarity in our country now, but it is from among the truth-tellers that the leadership in the fight against Islamization and multicultural anti-truth will come. Mayor Piper, welcome to the struggle.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Applied Doctrine of Islam: Why the Lockerbie Mass Murderer Received a Hero’s Welcome

August 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are three schools of thought and analysis regarding Islam. Two of these schools are complimentary, the third is not, but it is definitive. The first school is Islam as taught by leaders of Islam, the second is academia and the media, the third is the “foundational school” (Warner, Spencer, Bat Ye’or, etc.).

Islamic leaders have one message of Islam for Muslims and another for kafirs (this is the duality of Islam). Western media and academics know nothing of the doctrine of Islam. Apparently, they believe that they have no other place to go for definitive information about Islam; they are wrong. These schools of thought do not discuss Islamic doctrine (Koran, Sira, Hadith), history of Islam, jihad, or the victims of jihad.

The “Foundational School” studies the doctrine of Islam and formulates arguments and counter-arguments based entirely on Islamic doctrine, Islamic history, and current actions of the adherents of Islam as they implement the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed. This school discusses Allah and Mohammed and the victims of jihad and Islamic brutality for the last 1400+ years. The “Foundational School” is a compassion, and truth-driven group; compassion for the past, present and future victims of Islam is at the forefront of all Foundationalist’s work as is the desire for the truth. Western media knows nothing of the victims of Islam and rarely acknowledges the fact that new victims are made every day across the world.

Islamic leaders and adherents pretend that there is no linkage between jihad and the stunning cruelty that we see daily perpetrated by Muslims against Christians, Jews, gays, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, and other Muslims who are seen as not-quite-Islamic-enough. This is taqiyyah, sacred deception of the unbelievers to forward the cause of Islam.

The foundational school is definitive because it studies the core texts of Islam, the same texts to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to as an adherent of Islam. Learning the doctrine of Islam is akin to learning the playbook of the opposing team in a sports event. Our dire situation as non-Muslims in the world and the constant pressure put upon our cultures, religions, political leadership, and general citizenry by Islam is no sports event.

While multiculturalists attest that the violence and cruelty of Islam are anathema to “real” Muslims, we know that the multiculturalist is ignorant and dhimmitized. The dhimmi supports and defends Islam because they know nothing about it. They defend their idea of what Islam should be (what they want it to be), not what it actually is. The only way to know what Islam truly is is to learn the same doctrine to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to, and study the effects of this doctrine in the past and into the present. This is the core of the foundationalist school.

Our dire circumstances vis-a-vis Islam is an existential conflict of civilizations.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis say that there is no conflict – that Islam is “peaceful” even as it wars against, and kills non-believers (kafirs) and applauds those who kill innocents. Saying such doggerel does not mean that there is no conflict, it simply means that we have decided to not defend ourselves against a brutal enemy whose purpose is our destruction. It means we have refused to name our enemy and even worse we have refused to acknowledge the war. This is a position entirely rejected by foundationalists.

We as a culture must reach a point very soon where the multiculturalist position of ignorance and active anti-knowledge is rejected and condemned everywhere. There must come a time soon when anyone making such a self-destructive and baseless argument is heaped with shame and derision for their lack of scholarship, embrace of anti-knowledge, and their defense of the enemy whom they know literally nothing about. Such a day must come quickly if we are to survive as a nation.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis are tools of a brutal totalitarian ideology of cruelty, misogyny, hate, intolerance, and anti-individualism; they are the “useful idiots” spoken of by Lenin during the rise of Communism.

You may recall the Soviet Union. The West waged ideological war against them. The Soviet Union is gone, swept away by us and their own moral, ethical and political corruption into the “dustbin of history” where it belongs. The same must be done now with Islam.

If we are not prepared to fight an ideological war against an ideology even crueler than the Soviet one; if we are not prepared to name the enemy and, even more egregious, that there is no existential conflict – we are truly doomed. Knowledge is the foundation of avoiding this “doom”. Knowledge in this matter is found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith.

Everyone in the West must understand the nature of Allah and Mohammed, and learn their commands that all adherents of this ideology are required to follow. Those who follow the ideology of Islam are good Muslims; those who do not are not good Muslims. Osama Bin Laden is a “good” Muslim. Those who follow Mohammed and Allah are devout believers, those who do not are “apostates” and can be killed by those who are not “apostates” (or who at least believe that they are not). The “religion of peace” is not a “religion” that one can readily leave. Leaving Islam is punishable by death (Hadith, Bukhari).

After the death of Mohammed Islam was plunged into war. It was not attacked by outside forces but rather fought bloody internal “apostate” wars against its own adherents, those who had chosen to leave Islam. Tens of thousands were killed in these “Apostasy Wars” of early Islam under the guidance of the first “Rightly Guided Caliph”, Abu Bakr. No multiculturalist knows anything about these apostasy wars, or that apostasy in present day Islam equals death. If they do know about it, they will excuse it someone, explain it away because their concept of Islam as “the religion of peace” is far more important and attractive to them than the abysmal truth of the cult of death, which is Islam.

Several days ago Abdel Basset al-Megrahi was released from a Scottish prison on humanitarian grounds. It appears that Mr. Megrahi is suffering from cancer and has only a few months to live. The compassionate authorities of Scotland sent him home to Libya to spend his last few months of life with his family and friends. This is true institutional compassion on the part of the authorities of Scotland, but it is also profoundly misplaced and unfortunate. This is “idiot compassion”.

There are many problems with Mr. Megrahi’s release. First and foremost is that he is a convicted mass murderer. As the only person convicted of the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am 103, December 12, 1988, in which 270 innocent people were slaughtered (including 189 Americans), there is a special section of Hell reserved for him.

Mr. Megrahi is a Muslim. When he returned home to Libya he was met with a hero’s welcome. In Islam Mr. Megrahi is seen as a jihadi, a fighter in Allah’s cause against the kafir (the unbelievers). In the umma, the collectivist community of Islam, Mr. Megrahi is viewed as a hero; he will surely have a place by Allah’s side.

The authorities of Scotland and across the West now wringing their hands with frustration at this revolting celebration of death and murder in Tripoli now have a clue that their compassion has been abused. Some American leaders even have the temerity to suggest that Scottish compassion for Megrahi was a “mockery of justice”. Many Western leaders are now having second thoughts about this misplaced compassion.

The “victory” celebrations in Libya upon the arrival of the mass murderer Megrahi are revolting to us in the West, it elicits a deep anger and a deep frustration; even when we show them compassion they still show us that they hate us.

There is deep confusion in the leadership of the West about events in Libya, but there is no such confusion in those who adhere to the foundational school of the study of Islam. Western “compassionate” multicultural fools and dhimmis are stunned at the rejection of their good will and compassion. They may believe that they have been made fools of, but they are not quite certain. They do not know the doctrine of Islam; they do not believe they are in an existential war. Their compassion has certainly been abused, this is the kafir “submitting” again to Islam; another feather in Islam’s cap from the mass murder of innocent Westerners by the vile person Megrahi. In Islam, this means that Megrahi is a hero. It is long past time for non-Muslims to learn the doctrine of Islam.

The Western way is to show compassion to the enemy in hopes that our compassion will make a friend out of an enemy. This approach cannot work with Islam.

The approach is faulty because of the doctrine of Islam which is followed by every adherent of Islam, and of which the judicial leaders in Scotland and across the West are entirely ignorant.

The foundational school approach affords the scholar and student the ability to understand every event occurring in the so-called “Islamic world”. This is so because the driver of the Islamic world is the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). When this doctrine is known and understood events in Islam become clear as a bright sunlit day.

The doctrine of Islam is a trilogy doctrine. Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed; Ibn Ishaq), and Hadith (Traditions of Mohammed; Bukhari, Muslim, et al.) are the foundations of Islam. All adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are those who “submit”. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a “Muslim” is “one who submits”. In the Koran it is very clear that one who “fights in Allah’s cause” (jihad) is doing the finest thing an adherent can do. Jihad is mentioned almost 150 times in Koran. In fact, death in jihad is the only assured method to Islamic heaven with its houris, flowing honey rivers, wine without hangovers, and little pleasure boys.

In Islam, what is being submitted to is Allah and Mohammed and their commands. Allah and Mohammed are only found in the doctrine trilogy. For those outside of Islam, we are to submit to… Islam.

By killing all those innocent people on Pan Am 103 in 1988 Mr. Megrahi is considered a hero in Libya and across the Islamic world. He is a hero because he is a fighter in Allah’s cause, a jihadist. Jihadists do not have any qualms about killing innocents because Mohammed had no such qualms.

Mohammed slaughtered the Jews of Khaybar and sat for hours with his prepubescent wife (his favorite, Aisha) watching as each male tribesman was beheaded. The men of Khaybar were slaughtered and the women made into sex slaves for their Muslim conquerors. The children were made into Muslims (this is one of the more effective ways that Islam grows; it happens over several generations).

Mr. Megrahi’s crimes, vile and despicable to decent people around the world, are “Sunna” in Islam. Sunna means doing something that Mohammed did. Anything that Mohammed did is “good”. Because Mohammed is “the Prophet” of Allah, and because Koran says that all adherents must follow the commands of both Allah and his prophet, the example of Mohammed is considered the finest example of humanity for all adherents to follow forever.

Mohammed was a mass murderer; Mr. Megrahi is a mass murderer. Mohammed killed unbelievers and struck them down with terror, Mr. Megrahi did the same with Pan Am 103.

The mass murder perpetrated by Mr. Megrahi is Sunna. He is a jihadi, a “fighter in the cause of Allah.” What we in the West consider an unforgivable, indescribable crime of brutality and inhumanity, Islam considers the finest action of a Muslim in the path of Mohammed and Allah.

Islamic “morality” is founded upon the commands of Allah and Mohammed and the events of Mohammed’s life and his sayings. Mohammed was a mass murderer. Mr. Megrahi followed in Mohammed’s path – he took the middle road of submission to Allah and Mohammed. His murder of hundreds of innocent people on Pan Am 103 is Sunna, it is considered the “best course” in Islam because this was the course of Mohammed.

Mr. Megrahi got a hero’s welcome in Libya because he is a mass murderer of non-believers just as Mohammed was. He struck terror into kafir hearts, just as Mohammed did. When we can begin to see and understand the linkage between Islamic doctrine and current day events we can oppose the spread of this ideology of anti-humanity.

Koran: [60.1] O you who believe! do not take My enemy and your enemy for friends: would you offer them love while they deny what has come to you of the truth, driving out the Apostle and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord? If you go forth struggling hard in My path and seeking My pleasure, would you manifest love to them? And I know what you conceal and what you manifest; and whoever of you does this, he indeed has gone astray from the straight path.

Koran: [60:1] O, you who believe, do not take my enemy and your enemy for friends by showing them kindness. They reject the truth that has come to you. They drive out the messengers and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord. If you continue to fight for Allah’s cause (jihad) and from a desire to please Me, would you show them kindness in private? I know best what you conceal and what you reveal. Whoever does this among you has already strayed from the right path. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Koran: [9:5] When the sacred months (by ancient arab custom there were four months during which there was to be no violence) are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Sira of Mohammed: The Fate of Humanity Turns on the Pages of Unread Books

August 19th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

When the most important book of the twentieth century was released in 1925 while its author sat in prison with his cronies for an attempted coup against the German government, few could foresee its horrific impact. Mein Kampf set out, in rambling hate-based prose, a program of war, hatred, mass murder, and global conquest. Over the years purchases of the book made Adolf Hitler a wealthy man, but few in the country read the book though most households owned at least one copy. Fewer outside of Germany read the book. Those whose lives would be directly affected by the implementation of the plans described in the book did not read it; and those who should have read it who were put most at risk by it did not read it.

The same scenario is repeated with the Sira of Mohammed. Those who most need to read it (non-Muslims), those most at risk from its message will not, in the main, read it; while those who have read it are those who embrace its themes and message of hate, intolerance, war, and conquest.

The most influential book of the 20th century went mainly unread with disastrous consequences. One of the most influential books in human history, the Sira of Mohammed, is widely known among Muslims though the West is almost entirely ignorant of its contents, and its profound importance for both Muslims and non-believers. Worse still most in the west are ignorant of its existence.

We know what a world looks like when the ideology espoused in Mein Kampf is implemented. The Sira of Mohammed, Mohammed’s biography, tells the story of what the world will look like when Islam is triumphant. The differences between a victory of Nazism and a global conquest of Mohammedanism are difficult to determine as the differences are so minuscule.

We know what the world looked like when Nazism was rising, global warfare and unparalleled suffering. We know from the history of Islam what the world looks like when Islam is rising- jihad, barbarism, hatred, war, conquest, enslavement, and a brutal endless war of elimination of all non-Muslim cultures and political systems.

Had the world paid attention to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, as it is not now doing with the Sira of Mohammed, perhaps WW2 could have been avoided. When we know nothing of Mohammed’s life and his ideology of endless jihad against all unbelievers everywhere and forever we cannot defend ourselves against this growing threat. The threat of Islam originates in the doctrine of Islam of which the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) is one part of a trilogy of doctrinal texts which also includes Koran and Hadith. We are as ignorant (and more) as the clueless of 1933.

One who has read both Mein Kampf and the Sira can make a valid comparison. One who knows the history of WW2, and the Holocaust as well as Islamic history and doctrine, can place these books into an historical and political context. With this understanding of history and doctrine one can know with a reasonable certainty what the future will look like. One can know because just as Mein Kampf made certain promises and laid out certain plans, the Sira of Mohammed also makes promises and plans.

The Sira is not difficult to read. Anyone can read it. In fact recently a 12 year old was asked to read it. The child felt compelled to stop reading because “Mohammed was killing too many people”. The message of hate, violence, intolerance, and cruelty is clear to a 12-year-old but somehow eludes our political, academic, and religious leadership across the West. It eludes them most likely because they have not read it and do not know it exists.

Our lack of understanding of Islam and its foundational concepts of conquest and jihad is indicative of a societal-wide moral, intellectual, and ethical failure that for our own survival, must be swiftly reversed.

When one reads the doctrine of Islam the world shifts, changes. Knowledge of the doctrine brings events into focus in a way that previously was impossible. Just as Mein Kampf is the guide to WW2 before WW2 began, the doctrine of Islam is the guide to present day events and into the future. This is not prophecy, this is a firm understanding of the doctrine and guiding principles of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to our existence. We can know the future when we apply the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith) to present and past events involving Islam and adherents of Islam. This is applied theology and political science.

Knowledge of the Sira of Mohammed opens doors. It opens doors to a world of conflict and war and horror that we would prefer did not exist. There is no avoiding this foundational reality of our world.

When one knows Sira, closely held beliefs of the nature of the human world, how people behave and interact, and most importantly our previous understanding of the “religion of peace” are all shattered.

Learning Islamic doctrine forces us to rethink important concepts of the structure of existence, ideas that make life livable and pleasant, and paints a portrait of the ongoing failure and destruction of the human potential of peaceful co-existence and tolerance.

The doctrine of Islam is clear – there is no peaceful co-existence for Islam with unbelievers. Because non-Muslims have the gall and effrontery to not accept Allah and Mohammed, because we are Christian, Jew, Hindu, atheist, Buddhist, etc., we are seen by Allah and Mohammed as having rejected Koran, Sira, and Hadith – for this we are all kafirs and we must be made to submit. If we do not submit there is nothing that Islam will not do to make us do so. There are no taboos for Islam where kafirs are concerned. This is a fundamental lesson of the Sira of Mohammed.

The Sira, like the Koran and Hadith, is a wake up call for all kafirs (unbelievers). We learn from the Sira all about Islam, all about Mohammed, but we also learn about our own cultures. The lessons are painful and they are immutable.

  • We are at war.
    Islam is at war with kafirs everywhere and forever until Islam is defeated or triumphant. The triumph of Islam is the defeat of individual freedoms, women’s rights, gay rights, religious tolerance, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc., etc. The triumph of Islam is a total shift of humanity from reaching for freedom and tolerance to an embrace of submission, enslavement, and intellectual and spiritual deadness from which recovery is unfortunately unlikely.
  • We do not live in a “post-historical” world.
    In fact, history haunts us like a hunter. It pursues us until we stand and defend or surrender. This is not the world of the “end of history” of Frances Fukiyama, Bill Clinton, and other multiculturalist fantasists. Islam overturns all of these utopian concepts and crushes them under the boot of endless jihad and dhimmitude.
  • We are not “post-modern”.
    We are pursued by forces of 7th century Arabia. They are well-trained; their doctrine of war has been successful for them for 1400 years. We are late in responding. Americans consider themselves forward thinking and not “mired” in issues of the past. We think we are above all of “that”. We are wrong. Our arrogance as to the ascension of our concepts is so strong that in foreign policy matters we simply only have to “reset” and we are on a totally new path, a path without a past – a path outside of context. With Islam there is no “reset”. We live outside of context in a bubble, a bubble that is being deflated rapidly by the rise of Islam.
  • Our world is a world of conflict.
    War pursues us because the doctrine of Islam commands that it be so. The forces of Islam are flush with oil wealth transferred to them by us to them in our ignorance of their doctrine. We did this because we did not know their doctrine. We have empowered our enemies because we did not know their doctrine and now the time of reckoning approaches. We are not ready. We are not ready because we know nothing of the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith). If we do not know why and how our enemy fights us, we cannot hope to oppose him successfully. Everything we need to know about Islam is in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Knowledge of the doctrine of Islam is now a survival imperative; it is the patriotic duty of all lovers of freedom in the West to educate themselves and others about the doctrine of Islam. Ignorance of Islam is a moral, intellectual, ethical, and patriotic failure.
  • Multiculturalism is wrong.
    In fact, multiculturalism is used by our enemies to immobilize us, keep us confused and unable to respond. Multiculturalism is wrong because the doctrine of Islam demonstrates that it is wrong. Islam is intolerant, we are tolerant; Islam is misogynist, we embrace equality between the sexes; Islam is about aggressive war, we are not. Islam denies the value of the individual, we believe that the empowered individual is the foundation of a healthy society and culture; Islam believes that only Islam is valid, we believe in religious pluralism and tolerance; Islam will not be analysed, criticized, satirized – we believe in humor, criticism and open debate. We believe that open debate is the foundation of intellectual honesty and truth. In Islam debate is not allowed. We do not believe in slavery, Islam strongly believes in slavery and dhimmitude of the unbeliever. The list is extensive. Multiculturalism’s core idea that all cultures are equal is destroyed by the existence and message of the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Truth is this: some cultures are superior in relation to others. Not all cultures are the same. This means that multiculturalism is a fraud and a failed utopian concept that must be delegitimized and destroyed. The product of Islam is jihad. The products of Western culture that enhance the value of existence, empower individuals, and create opportunity and wealth are too numerous to mention here. We do not war against others because they do not believe what we believe. Some cultures are better than others. Multiculturalism is dead, the only problem is that few have noticed its demise.

In Islam the model of the life of Mohammed (Sira) and the things that he said and did according  to his friends (Hadith) are the perfect model of behavior for all Muslims to follow in perpetuity. If Mohammed had been a nice fellow this would be a boon for all humanity, but it is not so. Mohammed was not a nice fellow. In Islam it is said that what Mohammed did is considered “Sunna” that means acceptable and good; what Mohammed disallowed is “haram” or forbidden.

Had Mohammed been a humanitarian this article would not be so lengthy. The Sira and Hadith dictate what is Sunna. Foundationally, jihad is Sunna. This means that anything done to the kafir if it advances the cause of Allah/Islam is Sunna. This includes every negative thing one can imagine. There are no taboos for the kafir.

When one reads the Sira one sees that we in the West are in serious trouble. It is interesting to note that “year one” of the Islamic calendar is not the year in which Mohammed received his first “revelations” from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Rather, it is the year in which Mohammed emigrated from Mecca to Medina. In Mecca Mohammed was an argumentative and disruptive but non-violent “preacher” – he got 150 converts in 9 years. When he went to Medina as an immigrant Mohammed became a warlord. When he was finished there were no enemies left, he was the ruler of all Arabia. All of his opponents had been slaughtered in battle or by assassination or had converted (submitted) to the “religion of peace”.

“Year one” of the Islamic calendar shows definitively that Islam is not a religion only, but a political ideology of conquest and barbarism, totalitarianism and cruelty fronted by a fake “religion of peace”.

“Year one” is a designation of a political event in Mohammed’s life not a religious one. The so-called “religion of peace” is a clever front for a political totalitarian ideology of control, control of Muslims and non-Muslims. Islam’s understanding of control of humans is without peer.

The world’s great cycles of history turn on knowledge, ignorance, and anti-knowledge. Our culture of multicultural ignorance is one of anti-knowledge. Ignorance empowers Islam. Islam is our enemy, it says so in the Sira of Mohammed.

Multiculturalism says that Islam is equal in value and import to our Western cultures of freedom and tolerance and inclusiveness. Multiculturalism empowers our existential enemy.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed so that we can discuss, debate, and condemn evil where necessary. We refuse to learn from doctrine and we ignore the history of jihad at our peril.

The fate of humanity will be decided upon our understanding of the doctrine of our enemies. They know us well, we know little to nothing of them. The old saying, “You may not believe in the devil, but he believes in you” is applicable here. You may not care about Islamic doctrine but it cares very much about you. The majority of Islamic doctrine is about the kafir, us.

Islam is a doctrine whose purpose is the conquest and annihilation of the unbeliever everywhere. We ignore it because we have difficulty accepting that it can be real; we have difficulty letting go of our concepts that we live outside of war and outside of history. We are all too enlightened for all that.

Our enemies do not see the world as we do.

Some in the multicultural West are so ignorant of history that they find the concept of “enemy” excessive and difficult to accept. Such people are outside of history because they are ignorant of history and of human nature. Such people believe that if we are “tolerant” and show how “nice” we are to our enemies that they will love us, and stop hating us.

Our enemies are pleased that we are “tolerant” and “nice” because this makes their mission of conquest all the easier.

These are the bubble people, those who live on  wishful thinking and ignorance. This ideology of ignorance has infected our leadership and institutions to such an extent that when scholars quote the Sira of Mohammed they are excoriated as “bigots”. This discussion of Islamic doctrine is not a matter of opinion. If you do not like the discussion you must take the matter up with Mohammed and make your complaints to him as the messengers (those who discuss doctrine) are only repeating his lines and his example to show the dire nature of our situation. The scholars of the doctrine of Islam bring a message of dire warning.

The fate of humanity turns on the pages of unread books. Mein Kampf was on most every shelf in Germany but few read it; few abroad read it. In the pages of that book was laid out the plan for conquest and murder that would become the 2nd World War.

The Sira of Mohammed is unread widely in the West. It is not difficult to read. The Sira is a plan for domination of all unbelievers everywhere. It is a book of cruelty and violence that often surpasses Mein Kampf in horrors as the stories are (supposedly) an historical record of atrocities while Mein Kampf was essentially a twisted “wish list” of domination and barbarism.

We in the West must study the doctrine of Islam – it is not difficult. We must acknowledge the truth about the “religion of peace” and we must accept unpleasant realities though they shatter our illusions. We must acknowledge that we are at war.

Mohammed’s life is not the kind of life that any decent person anywhere on this planet would want to emulate. His life and actions are the model for all Muslims to aspire to forever. This model of cruelty, hate, intolerance, rape, torture, murder, war, pedophilia, theft, deceit, enslavement, conquest, and misogyny is the model for all Islam forever. “We have a litttle problem” is the most profound  understatement of the millennium.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

We Must Defend the Innocents

August 12th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

A stunning case of an honor killing avoided… or only delayed is now underway in Florida. A 17-year old girl from Ohio converted from Islam to Christianity. Her father vowed to kill her for leaving Islam. The girl fled. She is now in Florida. Read the story here.

Depending on the actions of authorities in Florida and in the American government this promised honor killing will be prevented, or only delayed. A return to her family for this girl is a literal death sentence.

It is the foundation of any civilized society that the innocent are protected, and provided succor. Those who have the means render aid and comfort to those who require help; we provide assistance to those who have not the means to help themselves. This is the core of our Judeo-Christian concept of American democracy. This is our moral and ethical foundation which so many have apparently forgotten. Unfortunately, Islam does not share these concepts.

It is our responsibility to “circle our wagons” around this young woman who has left Islam, the fake “religion of peace”. In Islamic doctrine leaving Islam is a death sentence. This is not theoretical. This is reality. If you leave Islam anyone in the umma of Islam can kill you; it is in the Koran and is commanded thus for all Muslims, those who ”submit to Allah and Mohammed”.

Because the Sira of Mohammed (Mohammed’s biography), the Hadith, and the Koran all say that leaving Islam is punishable by death and that ties to Islam override all ties of friendship and kinship we therefore see these abysmal, anti-human, horrific, barbaric “honor killings” again and again.

The so-called “religion of peace” is something like the Hotel California, you can enter but you can never leave – but it’s much, much worse. 

The killing of female family members is very much a part of Islam. This is no “religion of peace“, it is a lie.

“The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used not to kill the children, so thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside.” — Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4457

Khadir, or Khidr, figures in sura 18 of the Qur’an. He is traveling with Moses, and: “Then they proceeded: until, when they met a young man, he [Khadir] slew him. Moses said: “Hast thou slain an innocent person who had slain none? Truly a foul (unheard of) thing hast thou done!” Khadir replies: “As for the youth, his parents were people of Faith, and we feared that he would grieve them by obstinate rebellion and ingratitude (to Allah and man). So we desired that their Lord would give them in exchange (a son) better in purity (of conduct) and closer in affection….” (18:74, 18:80-81). (source)

This case could and should be a test case, a precedent in opposing the barbarism that is Islam. This insanity must be stopped, and this case is the way that it will be done.

We must succor this innocent victim of Islam, circle our wagons around her and protect her from her own father who has vowed to kill her because she has “dishonored” him and the Umma (the global  community of Islam) and offended Allah and Mohammed by leaving  Islam. Islam is the great collective; personal choices are entirely verbotten; one only does what is allowed, and doesn’t do what is forbidden. Leaving Islam is strictly forbidden.  Islam as a collective is anti-individual. In Islam the individual “submits” to the doctrine and to the Umma, the world-wide “family/community” of Islam.

Islam is for the person who can’t stand to have to make choices, can’t stand to have to exercise moral sense, and wants, wants, wants, to be part of a faith that is collectivist. You are part of the Army of Islam, and once in, you can’t get out. You must owe your loyalty only to Islam and to fellow Muslims, never — in the slightest way — to non-Muslims or to any legal or political institutions or social arrangements that are the product of non-Muslim societies and peoples. It’s a Collectivist Faith, and because it purports to regulate every single area of life, it is a Totalitarian Faith. And while it has been from its inception, technological developments have given totalitarian movements the ability to more thoroughly penetrate and dominate the minds of those over whom they have a hold, whether the hold is mainly one limited to a specific state (as Nazi Germany, or Communist Soviet Union) or is a hold based on an ideology spread among True Believers not only in Islam-ruled lands but also in lands where non-Muslims have not yielded to Islam. (Fitzgerald, JihadWatch)

In our twisted multicultural world many of our elites say that all cultures are equal, none is better or worse. This is intellectual and ethical cravenness.

We must draw a line, we must say that there are some things that are beyond the pale; beyond our ability for even us neurotically “tolerant” and “inclusive” multiculturalists to accept. This case is the line in the sand.

We must say NO to a father killing his wife, daughters and extended (female) family members because the male believes that the females have “offended” Islam. There  are many, many cases across the world in which Muslim rape victims are murdered by their male relatives because they have “offended” Islam (and the immediate “family”) by being raped. In Islam there is no family but the umma, all kinship ties are negated and overturned by the adherent’s ties to Islam. This is in Koran and Sira, the foundational doctrine of Islam. Islam is a collectivist ideology; those in it submit to it (or are made to submit).

Islam has no sympathy for the victims; Islam creates victims. The first victims of Islam are Muslims.

Let us provide protection and care to this innocent woman in Florida whose only “crime” was to make a decision for her own life, and future. This is no crime in any civilized society, but it is to Islam. For Islam this is a “crime” that merits death.

Let us show ourselves and the world that we in the United States can still see and understand good and evil, and that we know what is right and what is wrong.

There has rarely been a clearer case of right and wrong than this. Rally to this woman, and show the defenders of the “religion of peace” that we no longer buy the “official line” (based entirely on ignorance and wishful thinking and dhimmitude)

Islam is a totalitarian ideology of cruelty and barbarism. Let us as a nation stand beside Rifqa Bary against the forces of brutality, cruelty, misogyny and intolerance that is Political Islam.

(video post courtesy of Islam in Action)

Print This Post

Ignorance and Multiculturalism Must be Destroyed

August 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are two critical impediments that prevent the West from engaging effectively, or at all, in this existential conflict with Islam. Ignorance and multiculturalism (proto-legitimized moral relativism) must be deconstructed and delegitimized.

It is a moral and ethical failure to be ignorant of the purposes and doctrine of political Islam. Ignorance of an existential enemy is shameful and indefensible. Multiculturalism must be exposed for the disastrous pseudo-philosophy of ignorance that it is. Founded upon ignorance and silly utopianist anti-intellectualism, multiculturalism prevents us from responding to political Islam because to do so in our morally bankrupt multicultural world is seen as intolerance. Defending your nation from cultural and literal annihilation is not “intolerance” it is the height of patriotism and rationality.

The fundamental dual concepts of multiculturalism are “tolerance” and “inclusiveness”. These very “nice” concepts are founded upon the idea that all cultures are of equal value and that differences between cultures are to be applauded and “accepted” rather than condemned when such condemnation is appropriate. The idea that a culture can be corrupt or even evil is dismissed as “bigotry” in the multiculturalist’s broken anti-knowledge world. Multiculturalism is the soiled garden in which Islam grows.

People who know the doctrine of political Islam and have the effrontery to discuss it in public are accused of bigotry by multiculturalists and the ignorant. The doctrine of political Islam as found in Sira, Koran, and Hadith is inherently intolerant and exclusive but this does not deter the multiculturalists. There is an unspoken superiority in their world; they believe themselves superior because they are so inclusive, accepting, and “nice”. The forces of evil see this welcoming inclusiveness from the cultures of the West as the actions of fools. These foolish actions are of great value to political Islam because in their false feelings of superiority multiculturalists are the perfect “dhimmis” for Islam, perfect servents of a totalitarian ideology whose purposes are entirely destructive of inclusiveness and tolerance. Multiculturalists are anti-knowledge useful idiots for the forces of cultural and literal annihilation that is Islam.

There has long been a concept very popular in the United States regarding immigration and assimilation which is that if we show new-comers to our shores how nice, welcoming, and good we are, they will all become Americans. This model has worked for generations with European, Asian, South Americans and immigrants from across the world. Islam does not fit this model.

The model has failed because Islam does not assimilate. Islam does not assimilate because Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” translates to “submission”. Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are not interested in assimilation, they are interested only in bringing the entire world under Allah’s “religion”. For adherents of this miserable and cruel political ideology of hate and conquest only one religion, one political system, and one culture is allowed – that of Allah and Mohammed.  All other religions, cultures, and political systems are to be annihilated.

Because multiculturalists are willfully ignorant about the cultures that they defend – to them all cultures (no matter how abysmal they may be) are worthy of defense simply because they are “different” – Islam sees that the cultures of the West cannot defend themselves against them.

In fact, multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam infiltrates our institutions and political systems. Islam is at war with all non-believers everywhere and forever, this is called “jihad” or “fighting in Allah’s cause”. Jihad is so foundational to Islam that it is mentioned over 150 times in the text of the Koran. Because multiculturalists have no need to know anything about any culture (after all, all cultures are “equal” therefore knowledge of any one culture is of little necessity, value, or import) they do not understand that they are under attack.

Multiculturalism and ignorance, the two walk hand in hand together, are the greatest weaknesses of the cultures of the West.

The model of assimilation has failed. It has failed because resurgent Islam and its jihad has no interest in assimilation. Multiculturalists do not know this, and when they are told the truth, they refuse obstinately to believe it. Acceptance of the truth of Islam is to accept the failure of the fundamental concepts of multiculturalism.

We in the West must judge cultures and adherents to such cultures when we make immigration decisions. We must accept the literal truth that some cultures are unpleasant and have belief systems that are contrary to ours. The idea that everyone loves freedom is a broken and confused concept. It is a ruined shell because in Islam the only freedom that is considered of value is the complete submission to Allah and Mohammed (and the doctrine of Islam). Islam sees freedom in total submission to the doctrine of Islam.

When we open our doors to Islam, we open ourselves and our nations to forces that reject our concepts of tolerance and inclusiveness. This is the absurdity and horror of multiculturalism- it is a failed philosophy of self-destruction.

We must learn the doctrine of Islam. Knowledge of the doctrine is akin to having the “playbook” of the opposing team in a sporting match. But this is not sport for us, it is about nothing less than our existential survival as non-Islamic countries and cultures. We must learn the doctrine of Islam to dispel our ignorance of Islam. Without knowledge of Islam we cannot oppose it; without knowledge some do not even realize that they are at war with us and therefore we are at war with them.

The banishment of ignorance through knowledge is critically important if we are to survive as freedom-loving, tolerant, and “nice” cultures. It is a patriotic duty to learn the doctrine of Islam and educate others about it.

We must destroy multiculturalism; deconstruct it, delegitimize it, and acknowledge it as the utopian self-destructive fantasy that it is. All cultures are not equivalent. Some cultures are better than others, and some are our enemies and some our friends. This is reasonable, rational thinking. The foundational concept of multiculturalism is that all cultures are of equal value and worth. This is inclusiveness, tolerance, and “niceness” taken to the extreme. This is anti-intellectualism and irrational thinking that will result in the entire loss of our civilizations. Multiculturalism must be destroyed and swept into the dustbin of absurdity where it belongs.

Failure to destroy multiculturalism, delegitimize it and its adherents as the intellectual imposters and fools that they are is a national failure whose consequences are beyond unpleasant. Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam gains access to our countries for the purpose of the destruction of the host culture.

The doctrine of Islam is clear on these points as are the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”. Jihad is a responsibility for all Muslims. It is the command of both Allah and Mohammed. Mulsims who do Jihad are “good” Muslims because they follow the commands of Allah and Mohammed; those who do not do jihad are “extremists” because they reject the commands of the doctrine of Islam. Those who reject jihad are perfect fodder for jihadists because they are not “good” Muslims. This concept must be understood clearly. Our conceptions of good/evil, right/wrong do not apply in the Islamic worldview.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed. Multiculturalists must be mocked and criticised for the self-destructive fools that they are. Their philosophy is used by our enemies to gain entree and power in our institutions and cultures. Multiculturalists, in their utopian ignorance, are tools of the enemy – their philosophy must be rejected, repudiated, and deconstructed so that rational thought can again be the dominant mode of thought across the West. To do any less is failure.

When we know nothing of Islam, we lose. When we say that all cultures are equivalent and we can no longer identify good and evil, right and wrong, we lose. Ignorance of Islam is not acceptable, it is a moral and ethical failure.

Multiculturalism is a tool of Islam; it is a disastrous ideology of false “nice” that is used to stifle critical thought and open debate. Multiculturalism is a complete failure as it is used by our enemies to destroy us. It is a failed fake intellectual concept for “nice” people to abjure their responsibilities to themselves, their cultures and countries. Multiculturalism must be destroyed.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Foundational Concepts for Ideological War – Opposing Anti-Knowledge

August 4th, 2009 by admin

 by D. L. Adams

Knowledge of Islamic Doctrine is Foundational in Ideological War

Islam is so strong because we are so weak. Islam is so strong because Islam knows us; we are weak because we do not know Islam. Islam knows our history, our doctrine, our government and laws; we are almost entirely ignorant of Islam except the false claim of the “religion of peace”.

Understanding our opponent’s purposes and motives in this ideological war cannot be overstated. We kafirs have always viewed our government, religions, and core beliefs of freedom and elevation of the individual over the collective in our society as positives. The totalitarian collectivist ideology of Islam, its adherents and apologists,  understands the essential concepts of our culture and society and uses this knowledge against us.

Because Islam understands us so well and we know so little about it – lovers of freedom are confused to such a degree in this conflict that we are paralyzed into inaction. The solution for us is knowledge. We cannot respond to this threat to our freedoms if we know nothing of Islam. It is a patriotic imperative to study Islam.

In ideological war the battleground is intellectual; it is a war of ideas and convictions, it is a conflict of knowledge versus ignorance. We cannot defend ourselves if we are ignorant.

Everything we had previously thought was true about the future and our place in it is now at risk because of the resurgence of a millennia old cult of death, war, violence, and hatred called Islam. It is much more than a religion; it is a unified totalitarian ideology. The “religion of peace” is a facade for the totalitarian purposes of the Ideology of Islam. Conquest and control are the foundations of this ideology.

The core of Islam is Allah and the Prophet Mohammed. All Muslims are required to follow the example of Mohammed as described in the doctrine, Sira, Hadith, and Koran. Mohammed is considered the perfect example for all adherents to follow forever. Unfortunately for us, Mohammed was a killer, pedophile, rapist, slaver, war-monger, misogynist, conqueror, warlord, thief, and an intolerant hater of all who are not Muslim. This means that all Muslims must follow this example. You will hear the term “Moderate Muslim” often in this ideological war; the moderate Muslim is Osama Bin Laden. He is moderate because he follows the middle way of the commands of the doctrine. He is a devout Muslim. The terms “moderate” and “extremist” are western terms that do not apply in Islam. When you see Islam as adherents understand it, through the doctrine, the extremist is the one who does notfollow commands of Allah and Mohammed; the extremist is what we would consider “peaceful”.

Islam is not about peace; Islam is about submission. Those adherents who force unbelievers to submit to Islam (this process is called “jihad”) are devout Muslims, and are completely within the doctrine. Those who refuse the responsibility of jihad are extremists. Do not let these terms confuse you.

When you see Islam as Islam sees itself, everything becomes clear in this ideological war.

If you view Islam through a western inclusive tolerant “lens” you can never understand Islam.

If you have had the misfortune to attend a “bridge building” event or an “interfaith dialogue” you would likely have seen Rabbis who knew their own doctrine but not that of Islam; Pastors and Priests who knew Old and New Testament but know nothing of Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Most disheartening of all you would have seen Imams who know Torah, New Testament, and their own doctrine. Islam is prepared for this war because they have been fighting it for 1400 years. We must eliminate this knowledge gap if we are to prevail against this very old, but now resurgent force of  totalitarianism,  brutality, barbarism, and destruction of the individual.

Islam is an ideology that is steeped in history, in fact their goal is to return to history. In the West, we are disconnected from history and most are ignorant of it. Because of this ignorance few can place this ideological war, and the actions of Islam and its adherents, into any historical or understandable context. Again, our ignorance is our downfall.

Those who do not know history and are ignorant of the doctrine of Islam are easily swayed, easily manipulated to believe what they want to believe.

Those who cannot place this conflict into any reality that they can  comprehend, a reality based on history and understanding of the doctrine of Islam, want to believe that the war is not real, that everything they hold dear is not at risk. They want to believe that Islam will “go away” on its own accord. We know from history that once Islam is in control, it never goes away. Those who do not want to see reality for reality are denialists, anti-knowledge people.

These are the attendees of “interfaith events” who support Islam and remain entirely ignorant of it. These are the useful idiots of Islam, dhimmis.

This wishful thinking is the foundation of multiculturalism which is the idea that if we are nice enough, our enemies will come to love us.  Multiculturalists do not know nor understand history, and they cannot begin to conceive that a book written in the desert of Arabia over a thousand years ago could be the origin and guide of a war of annihilation against us today. It is simply impossible for such people, encased in ignorance, to comprehend.

We do not want war and, when war is waged upon us by reactionary forces whose brightest spark petered out over a millenia ago, it is difficult for many to comprehend. Multiculturalists believe that if they wish hard enough the hatred that Islam has for the kafir will go away; if enough concessions are given, Islam will “calm down” and integrate or assimilate into the host cultures. They are wrong.

Islam does not assimilate, Islam’s purpose is to make the kafir submit. This is done through jihad. Multiculturalsts are the “useful idiots” for the adherents of political Islam.

The forces of darkness count on our ignorance.  When non-Muslim cultures are conquered the vanquished peoples (dhimmis) are banned from study of Koran. It is easy to understand why this is so. The Koran is clear in its motives and its goals relating to the kafir. “Kafir” is the greatest insult perhaps in the world. Ordinary insults do not have the weight of law behind them as does the term “kafir”; anything can be done to the kafir; there are no taboos.

The existence of non-Muslims is an affront to Allah. Therefore all Muslims are commanded to “fight in Allah’s   cause” (jihad) to eliminate this affront to the deity. Jihad is entirely about eliminating the affront that is the
existence of those who do not accept Allah and Mohammed and Koran.

A reasonable person would never describe an ideology that believed such things as “tolerant” or “peaceful”. The dhimmis of the West defend Islam because they know nothing about it. They may claim to have read the doctrine and maybe even have a passage to share to prove their points. The responsibility to validate their defense of Islam resides with them; you will quickly see that they are ignorant of Islam and know far less than you. These are the useful idiots Lenin spoke of but remade for our generation and beyond. Dhimmis are as dangerous as Islam in their ignorance.

Islam is not an intellectual ideology – to Islam all knowledge of value is found in the doctrine. Everything else is extraneous.

Knowledge is Power – Doctrinal Knowledge in Debate

This total belief in the complete comprehensive and divine truth of the doctrine lends adherents of Islam an incredibly powerful sense of purpose. There is a downside to this – Islam is stunningly stunted, insular, self-referential, and ignorant of the wider world (information from sources outside of Islamic doctrine are considered of little value except insofar as how ideas and concepts created by others can be put to use by the umma; this is anti-creativity). This is a strength and weakness of Islam.

In fact, this is the foundation for ideological warriors to wage their fight for freedom against the greatest force of totalitarianism and cruelty and barbarism in human history. Understanding the doctrine of Islam is the foundation  of our defense. If we do not know whythey hate us and fight us, if we do not know what motivates them, we can never hope to prevail. If we understand their motivations and purposes, their views of themselves and of the less-than-human “other” (the kafir, all those who are not Muslim), we have a slight advantage.

Wielding knowledge is a powerful weapon; truth is more powerful than ignorance. This is the battleground of ideological war – truth versus ignorance and lies.

The forces of Islam have come to expect that we are multicultural, politically correct, and ignorant of Islam. When you have knowledge of the doctrine of Islam the battleground of ideological war is levelled. Everything done in the name of Islam comes from the doctrine. Knowledge of doctrine is the greatest weapon that we in the West can possess in our existential war against this evil and powerful retrogressive barbaric force.

You may be surprised to learn that learning doctrine is not difficult; the research is done, the books are available and are readily accessible intellectually. (Please see below.) The doctrine is a trilogy, the Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam), and the Hadith (the traditions of the Prophet). When you have read these three books, you are fully armed for ideological combat.

Once armed with this doctrinal foundational knowledge what is to be done with it? Since ideological war is about ideas and debate, one engages in debates; foundational knowledge of doctrine is your weapon and your greatest shield.

The bulk of the doctrine is about Mohammed, not Allah. Discussion of Mohammed then is critical because the actions and life of Mohammed are so contrary to any accepted norms of civilized behavior in the West.

Your knowledgeable discourse of Mohammed and his crimes will make a profound impression on the adherents of Islam and their dhimmi multicultural defenders (who know nothing of doctrine, Islamic history, etc.). Mohammed’s story is the “great path” for all adherents to follow, it’s horrific. When you share the story of Mohammed, and the fact that all Muslims must follow his example you will see immediately why cruelty against the kafir by Muslims across the world occurs. The doctrine opens every window, every closed door of why things in the world of Islam happen.

One must always remember that Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a Muslim is “one who submits”. Adherents submit to the commands of Allah and Mohammed as found in the trilogy doctrine. If you know the doctrine, you know why the adherents of Islam do what they do. This is the power of understanding doctrine.

When one knows the doctrine it is as if one has the playbook of the opposing team in a football game. But this is not football – this is existential war.

Knowledge of Mohammed’s history and commands are the keys to ideological war against the forces of darkness that is Islam.

No Muslim or dhimmi multiculturalist can argue the “truth” of the doctrine of Islam. Mohammed is the key example for all Muslims. Lay out a case against Mohammed by discussing his life and actions, his crimes and abhorrent, perverse behavior you will have shaken those who oppose you.

It has been suggested that there is only one Muslim, Mohammed. There is truth in this. This is both a strength and a deep weakness in the ideology of hate and intolerance that is Islam.

Authoritarian systems like Islam do not like exposure of the truth. If you know the truth, and it can only be found in the doctrine, you have an advantage in the ideological war.

The battleground in this ideological war is often fought on the internet in chat rooms, forums, blogs, websites, and via email. This is a form of text-based debate. When you know the doctrine of Islam you will be able to refute any lie, divert any takiya and deconstruct any falsehoodthrown at you by adherents of this barbaric ideology and their dhimmi apologists and sycophants.

Multiculturalism is Anti-Knowledge

There has always been an attraction to power for those whose character is weak. This is the nature of the support for Islam among western elites. But there is also ignorance that empowers the dhimmis, an ignorance that can be displaced by knowledge, your knowledge of doctrine.

In this ideological war the ignorant believe that their lack of knowledge gives them the moral high ground. They believe this because they never are required to “offend” anyone by telling the truth about the doctrine of Islam.  Multiculturalists do not want to offend, that is the core of their existence.

Ignorance is not the high ground of morality. In this existential war it is unethical and immoral to be ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. Because you (the knowledgable ideological warrior) speak from a position of knowledge, not of opinion, you have the high moral ground.

Truth is infinitely more moral than anti-knowledge.

It is a patriotic imperative to learn the truth about Islam (through study of the doctrine, then applying that knowledge to today’s events).

Denial of the individual, of themselves, is a strong undercurrent in the multiculturalists of the West. Surrender and submission is attractive to many dhimmis but not to the ideological warrior. Multiculturalists are blindly  and totally inclusive and have lost their moral foundation; their moral compass is smashed. They cannot identify friend from foe, good from evil; these are the true relativists of our times. They are very confused, very convinced, and very dangerous. Shattering the drug-like ignorance and relativism of multiculturalist thinking is one of the battlegrounds in this thought war, this war of civilizations.

For those who have read Koran, Sira, Hadith it is impossible to support Islam.

Islam is clear about its cruelty and hate. If an opponent tells you that they have read the Koran you must ask them to explain their defense of it in light of the cruelty and violence that forms the foundations of the texts. This is an easy way to catch the ignorant in a lie; most who say that they know Islamic doctrine actually know little or nothing. Their support of Islam is based upon opinion and not knowledge. These are anti-knowledgewarriors; you will always vanquish such dhimmis with your knowledge of the doctrine of Islam.

A favorite tactic of the dhimmi defenders of Islam will be to try to take you off your foundationalist course. They will never want to discuss doctrine with you because the doctrine is clearly cruel, hateful, totalitarian, warmongering, brutal, etc. Don’t let them do it. You can discuss the murder of the Khaybar Jews by Mohammed; the rape of captured Christian and Jewish women by Mohammed; Mohammed’s pedophilia (he married a 6 year old named Aisha, his favorite, then “consummated” the “marriage” at age 9); you can discuss the kafir. Allah and Mohammed hate the kafir. They hate the kafir because the kafir is not Muslim.

In Islam only Islam is acceptable, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, everything else is considered bad and must be destroyed.

The massive Buddhas of Afghanistan were destroyed by the Taliban because they were vestiges of a culture previous to Islam (a non-Islamic culture); their iconography, books, art, religions, must be destroyed so that Islam can be the only ideology in existence. You may also recall the total silence from the West about the Taliban and their brutal regime until the destruction of the Buddhas.

For many kafir multiculturalists art is more important than life and defense of innocent victims. Showing multiculturalists their own hypocrisy is an important ideological warfare strategy.

Dhimmis will say, “Well, there is violence in the New Testament and Torah, too!”  They will formulate a shallow, relativist argument that “all religions are equally bad and violent”. There are several problems with this approach that you must explain to these deluded folks.

Violence in Koran is permanent and universal, violence in the doctrinal texts of Judaism and Christianity is temporary and localized, it always comes to an end and life goes on. In Koran and Sira and Hadith the violence never ends, because violence is existence itself.

Islam is not a doctrine that reveres life. Islam reveres death because only through death in jihad is an adherent promised a place in paradise with honey rivers, virgins and little boys. In Islam the active pursuit of death while doing jihad (fighting and killing kafirs) is the highest “calling” in the “religion of peace”.

Waging Ideological Conflict – Adhere to Doctrine as Islam Adheres to Doctrine

Your opponents will try to shake you out of doctrine. When it is clear to them that you have the powerful weapon of knowledge of Islamic doctrine they will do their best to take you down a tangential path. Do not let them take you into a tangent – stick to doctrine, stick to Mohammed and Allah and Koran, Sira, Hadith. They will do this because they are afraid and frustrated.

Your oppenent will know that you cannot be vanquished in ideological conflict because you know Islamic doctrine better than he/she does.

Keep the discussion about doctrine, Islamic history and how Islam commits atrocities every day across the world because this is the command of Allah and Mohammed.

Applying doctrine to daily events is a powerful tool as it illustrates how the doctrine is the cause of events of cruelty. Because you know the doctrine of Islam you can build a direct relationship case between doctrine and violence by the adherents of Islam. This is a powerful ideological warfare tool. This is “applied doctrine”; you will shake many ignorant people out of their ignorance with this approach.

It is important that you know about abrogation. Because the Koran is believed by adherents of Islam to be the perfect word of Allah, perfect and unchangeable, the contradictions in the text must be explained in some way. For example, early in the Koran the Jews are described as “people of the book” who do not understand that Mohammed is the true final prophet of god, whereas later in the Koran the Jews are apes and pigs to be killed on sight for having committed the crime of not accepting Allah, Mohammed and Koran.

The “peaceful” verses are almost entirely found in the early parts of the Koran and are universally abrogated (that is, cancelled) by the violent, hateful message of the later Koran.

The method that Islamic doctrine uses to negate contradictions and rescue the perfection of Allah is “abrogation”. This means that later verses are considered “more powerful” than earlier verses, but both the later and earlier verses are true even if they directly contradict each other. This is the perfect illustration of the concept of “duality” within Islam; two opposing positions in a contradiction are both true. This is impossible in western concepts of unitary logic.

In Islam, when Allah contradicts himself he hasn’t really made a mistake or changed his mind because Allah is considered infallible. What has happened in Koran is that Allah has added a “better” verse which does not negate the previous contrary one logically though the later verse is considered in force and the earlier minimized (or cancelled). This is an important concept for ideological warriors for freedom to understand.

Islam accepts the unification of opposites which western logic denies. Duality is foundational in Islam, as is  abrogation. When you master these concepts you can command most any debate on this issue.

Understanding the concept of abrogation is best done with a Koran that is chronological. The Koran is not  traditionally structured chronologically rather it is organized by largest chapter to smallest. This means that the Koran doesn’t make any sense, in fact some scholars have used the term “incomprehensible” to describe it.

When the Koran is presented in the traditional manner abrogation is difficult to see. However, when the Koran is organized chronologically one can see abrogation clearly, the later verses abrogate (cancel) the earlier verses.

Unfortunately for the kafir (every non-Muslim culture), all the peaceful verses in Koran are early and all the later ones are violent and hateful and warmongering. This means that because of abrogation Islam is an ideology of war, hate, intolerance, cruelty, misogyny, and barbarism. The proof of this assertion is demonstrated every day across the world by the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”.

When the dhimmis and the adherents of the cult of death tell you otherwise you can educate them with their own doctrine. In any debate, you are the master with this technique.

Knowledge is Power – Fighting the Forces of Anti-Knowledge and Barbarism with Doctrinal Scholarship

What is at stake here is nothing less than the future of the West.

We who know that this war exists, that it is real, are on the front lines.

Our weapon is knowledge, knowledge of the foundational texts of the enemy. Surprisingly, many adherents of Islam do not know their own doctrine. This is a powerful truth. Talking about Islam to adherents about their own doctrine may cause them to get upset, but it may also cause them to think. Individual thought is the very thing that totalitarian ideologies like Islam hate the most. Islam is about submission and control, there is no room for the individual because Islam is the apotheosis of the “collective” ideology.

This is an intellectual and spiritual war that we fight in the shadows and in the plain clear light of day while the dhimmis go about their lives pretending it is not real and that you – the defender of freedom – are a villain. Do not believe it.

As you struggle for your cultures and freedoms remember that you are the front line in this as yet undeclared ideological war. There is no doubt that it will one day be declared and you will be a leader in the battles to come if you so choose.

The greatest weapon we have is knowledge. We must be scholar warriors. Without this warrior caste of scholars everything we hold dear, all of democracy’s central concepts of freedom, tolerance, individual worth, and  opportunity will forever be lost under the black pall of Islamic totalitarianism.

Rarely is a country once under Islam ever in a post-Islamic period. The adherents of Islam know their purposes and methods, they use our ignorance against us. They cannot do this when you know doctrine.

So, what of debate? Ad hominem is a popular tool used by the forces of darkness. They will insult you and call you the very things that they are. They will say that your knowledge makes you a bigot, an “Islamophobe”. You won’t care because you know doctrine, which means you know why they say what they say, and do what they do.

Knowledge is truth, knowledge cannot be hate.

The Socratic Method is very important.; use it when debating online. Simply ask a question; “What is a kafir?” and “Why do Allah and Mohammed hate kafirs?” This is a good start.

“Why do Islamic terrorists quote Koran when they commit atrocities?” is another excellent question.

Terrorists are doing what they are told to do in doctrine and are following the example of Mohammed, the finest human being ever to live. Mohammed raped; so do they.  Mohammed killed innocents; so do they. Mohammed tortured people and cut off their heads; they do this and post the film on youtube to horrify and terrorize the kafir. This is called “Sunna” the way of Mohammed and it is considered the finest path for all Muslims everywhere to follow.

Islam is self-referential. If you know the foundational texts which are referenced (doctrine: Koran, Sira, Hadith) you can fight and win in debate against any dhimmi, multiculturalist, or ignorant sycophant person.

It is very important to know this: the ideological warrior must understand Islam as adherents and their defenders do. They must know doctrine and they must understand that it is considered the literal divine truth. Koran is considered the literal word of Allah; it cannot be criticized, revised, rewritten, reformed, changed, mocked, or altered. This is why rote learning of Koran occurs in madrassas around the world. There can be no discussion around Koran, no debate – education on Koran is via memory alone. This is a culture founded upon anti-intellectualism.

Understand Islam as Islam Understands Itself

There is no “Radical” Islam no “extremists”, there is only Islam.

“Radical” is a western kafir term. In Islam it is considered normal and good to kill innocents, attack them and take their goods and women and children;  it is good to rape women slaves; it is good to steal the property of jihad victims; it is good to destroy cultures and forcibly convert people to Islam; it is good to kill people who do not believe in Allah and Mohammed and the so-called “last day”. In Islam these are all good because they are all in the doctrine. Allah said it, and/or Mohammed did it, so it’s all good.

The terrorist who kills an unbeliever on YouTube while quoting Allah is a good Muslim, while the Muslim who is enjoying a beer with you and chatting about work is a failed one. We must always look at Islam through the lens of Islam and not through our western lens. There is no radical Islam, there is only Islam.

What we in the West consider radical is described in doctrine as normal and good, in fact jihad is an obligation for all Muslims everywhere and forever. Adherents of the “religion of peace” who do not participate in jihad against the kafirs are hypocrites and radical Muslims.

Perhaps in no other war in memory has understanding the enemy been as important as in this current civilizational conflict. We cannot engage with Islam and defeat it if we do not know why Islam does what it does. Everything to know about Islam is in the doctrine.

No adherent or dhimmi can defeat you in ideological battle if you know the doctrine of Islam. When you know their doctrine they will not want to engage; if they engage you will win because you know why they do what they do. This is a disarming tactic.

Islam sees the West as weak. The umma sees the West as not valuing its own cultures enough to defend them, so they continue to press and push for concessions until those cultures crack and break. They have been very successful up to now.

The future of Europe, the US and the entire West is at stake.

Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are warriors for Allah, Allah’s slaves. All of Allah’s commands, all of Mohammed’s examples and his own commands (just as important as Allah’s) are in the doctrine. The command is war against the unbeliever until the entire world is under the dominion of Islam, under a Caliph and Sharia law.

Ideological war is a knowledge war. Islam is so strong because we are so weak, but we are learning and fighting back in defense of our countries, cultures, religions, and freedoms. This is a civilizational conflict. The roots of the conflict are in the doctrine of Islam. It is a unified civilizational ideology that includes a fake “religion of peace”.

Don’t be fooled by the facade of Islam’s fake “peace”.

In ideological war a winning strategy is knowing the enemy. We cannot oppose Islam if we do not know and understand it. Understanding Islam begins with knowledge of doctrine. When we have knowledge, we are
well-armed.

Know the Battleground; Know the Opponent; Know Why You Fight

It is important to articulate that our  civilization is of value and is worthy of defense. The great military theorists of the past agree on this point: know your opponent and what motivates them, and know yourself and what motivates you.

Knowledge is the foundation of ideological war.

Fundamental knowledge of Islam is found in the doctrine of Islam. There is no greater weapon in this ideological conflict than knowledge of the doctrine of Islam. No Muslim, no dhimmi can argue with Allah, or with Mohammed. The message of Islam is clear, and indefensible.

Educate, speak the truth, read, study. Defend the West with your knowledge.

Resources:

Chronological Koran (abrogation readily visible, all repetition removed):
abridged:
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/an-abridged-Koran/

Complete  Koran (abrogation easily visible, repetition retained):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/A_Simple_Koran.htm

Sira (the biography of Muslim):
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/mohammed-and-the-unbelievers/

Hadith(the traditions of Mohammed):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/The_Political_Traditions_Of_Mohammed.htm

In addition to the doctrine:
Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic
http://www.amazon.com/Sword-Prophet-History-Theology-Impact/dp/1928653111/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1249016225&sr=8-1

Lectures about Political Islam by Bill Warner:
These are foundational lectures about Islam. When you’ve heard these lectures you will be ready to engage in ideological battle. You will know more than most leaders in the western world after you listen. All lectures for free.
http://actwestnashville.com/?page_id=544

History of Jihad:

M. A. Khan,
Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery
http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/

Andrew Bostom;
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Islamic-Antisemitism-Sacred-History/dp/1591025540/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062159&sr=1-1

The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Jihad-Islamic-Holy-Non-Muslims/dp/1591026024/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062219&sr=1-1

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Humor is not Just for Entertainment

July 27th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

It has been observed that humor stops at Mohammed’s door. 

It is Sunna to kill those who mock Islam, and its leaders. Sunna means that this is an example set by Mohammed for all adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” to follow forever. Beheading, brutality, pedophilia, and murder are also “Sunna”.

While the life of Mohammed does give us examples of humor from the perspective of the prophet, the finest example of humanity that all adherents of the “religion of peace” are to emulate, we have seen that anything deviating from these pious examples is frowned upon. 

This lack of humor inclusiveness was discovered by the Danish cartoonists much to their horror and that of millions of other funny people (i.e., people who love liberty and freedom). Now, the comedian Sasha Baron Cohen has discovered it as well.

The mystery of the recent threat against “Borat” is not that it has been issued but rather that it seems so late in coming.

Generally, a humor assault on the sacred concepts of Islam results in immediate street demonstrations, fatwas, and overt acts of violence against the humorist (and his/her supporters). Not in this case. The response from the terrorist adherents of the “religion of peace” appears tardy.

The Times of London is reporting today (July 28, 2009) that Sasha Baron Cohen, the aggressive humorist behind the “Borat” character, is under threat by terrorists. His crime: he played a joke on them. (Click on the link to see the video, it’s quite short and funny.)

Sacha Baron Cohen has stepped up his security after being threatened by a militant Palestinian group angered at its portrayal in the film Brüno.

The al-AqsaMartyrs’ Brigades, a coalition of Palestinian militias in the West Bank, said in a statement released to a Jerusalem-based journalist that it was “very upset” that it featured in the film starring Baron Cohen’s homosexual fashionista alter ego.

“We reserve the right to respond in the way we find suitable against this man,” it said. “The movie was part of a conspiracy against the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades.” (Times of London)

Cultures that are modern and inclusive understand and embrace humor. Cultures that are reactionary and pre-modern as is Islam cannot countenance satire and humor. Humor and satire are consistent with free-thinking, freedom of thought and speech, and intellectualism. People who think freely find humor in one another and in the world. In totalitarian systems like Islam humor is not allowed; only authoritarian thinking is allowed,that is one can only think what the theocratic dictatorship clicque want you to think. They get these directives directly from the doctrine of Islam. In Islam it is considered pious to kill people who tell jokes. Mohammed did it, so it is sunna.

Let us examine Islamic humor for a moment. Mohammed had a sense of humor. It is somewhat different from ours. Allah also likes humor. Unfortunately, what is funny to them means death to us.

‘Asim b. ‘Umar b. Qatada told me that ‘Auf b. Harith-his mother was ‘Afra’-said ‘O apostle of God, what makes the Lord laugh with joy at His servant?’ He answered, ‘When he plunges into the midst of the enemy without mail.’ ‘Auf drew off the mail-coat that was on him and threw it away: then he seized his sword and fought the enemy till he was slain. (Sira, Ishaq, 446)

=======

I said (to myself), ‘You will soon know!’ and as soon as the /badu/ was asleep and snoring I got up and killed him in a more horrible way than any man has been killed. I put the end of my bow in his sound eye, then I bore down on it until I forced it out at the back of his neck. Then I came out like a beast of prey and took the highroad like an eagle hastening until I came out at a village which, (said the narrator), he described; then to Rakuba and al-Naqi’ where suddenly there appeared two Meccans whom Quraysh had sent to spy on the apostle. I recognized them and called on them to surrender, and when they refused I shot one and killed him, and the other surrendered. I bound him and took him to the apostle.

Ibn Ishaq from Sulayman b. Wardan from his father from ‘Amr b.

Umayya: ‘When I got to Medina I passed some shaykhs of the Ansar and, when they exclaimed at me some young men heard my name and ran to tell the apostle. Now I had bound my prisoner’s thumbs with my bow­string, and when the apostle looked at him he laughed so that one could see his back teeth. He asked my news and when I told him what had happened he
blessed me’) (Sira, Tabari, 914).

Consider the annoyance that the terrorists must have felt when they realized that a kafir jew pretending to be a kafir gay man had a laugh at their expense. The insult could not have been deeper. Response must be made; Mohammed killed those who mocked him, it is sunna!

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “Allah welcomes two men with a smile; one of whom kills the other and both of them enter Paradise. One fights in Allah’s Cause and gets killed. Later on Allah forgives the ‘killer who also gets
martyred (In Allah’s Cause).” (Bukhari, Hadith, 4:52:80)

In Islam Jews and gays are the worst kinds of kafir, the unbeliever; Allah and Mohammed hate the Jews with a passion. The gays, well, they don’t fair much better. In fact, in Baghdad, Iraq, the new Islamic Sharia state built by American military power and profound ignorance and self-destructiveness, gay men are being systematically tortured and murdered in the most brutal ways imaginable.

Remember, Islam is the “religion of peace”; Islam has been hijacked by “extremists” who don’t understand their doctrine and when they quote Koran, Hadith, and Sira as they commit atrocities the killers are really merely confused people who are just trying to get Islam some bad press. This is all a lie.

Islam is a brutal ideology of totalitarianism, cruelty, hatred, intolerance, and endless war against those who are not Muslim. There can be no greater force for cruelty and hate on this planet than this fake “religion of peace”.

Humor has power, it is a weapon. Societies that embrace the individual, that revel in intellectual discourse all have the ability to poke fun at themselves. In Islam this is not the case. Authoritarians hate humor.

Reactionary, retrogressive ideologies cannot countenance satire; you see, they are far too serious – the revealed truthof reality is far too serious for humor, even if that ”truth” is about hate, violence, intolerance, pedophilia, war-mongering, misogyny, and totalitarian universal supremacism. How funny was 7th century Arabia, after all?

Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun or joy in whatever is serious. (Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini, radio sermon, 1979.)

For Islam no other religion, no other culture, no other political system is acceptable. In fact, no religion other than Allah’s is permitted to exist. This is why Islam is at war with the kafirs everywhere – it is not because of anything that the non-believer has done; it is not because of any “crime” or real “offense” that the unbelievers have committed. The war against the unbeliever is waged for one reason only. The crime of the kafir is that they exist.

The existence of anyone who is not Muslim is an offense to Allah, Mohammed and the Umma of Islam. Islam is at war with the unbelievers because unbelievers exist. The existence of non-Muslims is why they are at war with us and why we must defend ourselves. But we must give credit where credit is due, Mohammed and Allah have a sense of humor. Allah and Mohammed laugh at the pain and suffering of those they conquer, those they enslave, those they wish to dominate.

“Verily our Lord laughs at the despair that His servants feel, even though His Help is so close!” So Laqit bin Saburah said “O Messenger of Allah – may my mother and father be given as your ransom – and does our Lord laugh?” The prophet replied, “Yes!” Laqit said, “In that case, we will never give up hope of receiving good from a Lord that laughs!” (Hadith, Ibn Majah)

There is humor in the doctrine of Islam. Mohammed and Allah enjoy a good laugh here and there, but for the kafir it’s all not very funny at all.

(See previous post here on this matter.)

Satire is an insult in Islam. There is no humor in Islam, because Islam is founded upon the perfect literal word of Allah, Koran. Any satire of Islam is seen as an insult to Allah. This is unacceptable to Islam.

Satire is an insult in Islam. There is no humor in Islam, because Islam is founded upon the perfect literal word of Allah, Koran. Any satire of Islam is seen as an insult to Allah. This is unacceptable to Islam.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Democracy is Not a Process

July 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are foundational issues that must be understood. Islam is at war with all democratic countries, and all countries that are not Islamic. This is commanded by both Allah and Mohammed in Koran. It is an obligation upon all Muslims to “fight in Allah’s cause”; this is the term for jihad in Koran. Fighting in Allah’s cause means endless war everywhere against the kafir, the unbeliever. The worst thing in Islam is not murder or rape, or violation of the innocents, it is being an unbeliever or an apostate.

The doctrine of Islam states that anyone who leaves (or changes) their Islamic religion is to be killed (Bukhari Hadith). Islam is a dualistic political ideology of war and conquest. All unbelievers must be brought under the control of Islam until the entire world is under Islam. The kafir can be raped, murdered, enslaved, beheaded, tortured, etc. There are no boundaries, no taboos, where treatment of the kafir by Islam is concerned.

Islam is a unified civilization of which religion is a part, a small part. The majority of the Koran is about how Muslims are to interact with the unbeliever, well over 60% of the text. This means that the Koran is a political document. One cannot know how to be a Muslim just from Koran alone. The central idea in Koran is jihad. Jihad is timeless and universal. Islam is at war with all non-believers forever.

The mosque is the center of Muslim life in any community in which Muslims reside. The case has been made that non-violent Muslims do not know their doctrine. Some even suggest that non-violence means “moderation” – the non-violent Muslim is shown as proof of the non-violence of Islam itself. But this is not so. Because the doctrine is clear that aggressive violence against the kafir is mandated, therefore violent jihadists are observant devout Muslims, they are the moderates. They are moderate because they follow the doctrine, and commands of Allah and Mohammed. The extremists are those who do not participate in Jihad. These are hypocrites and apostates. Such people who do not fight the unbelievers can be killed by jihadists as being outside the family, Umma, of Islam.

When adherents do not know the doctrine of Islam, they learn it from their Imams. All Imams know the doctrine quite well. What happens when the non-violent adherent hears, from the pulpit of the mosque, the commands of Allah to do jihad and kill the unbelievers where ever they are found? They must act. Few will leave Islam, because leaving the religion of peace is a death sentence offense. Most will participate in jihad war against the unbeliever (kafir) with money and with words, some will do violence. Those who die in jihad are guaranteed a direct trip to paradise and access to beautiful girls and little boys forever. The non-violent adherent must act if they are to remain Muslim. Allah says in the Koran that he knows that some will not want to do jihad, but the obligation remains, Allah knows what is best people do not.

Because democracies are tolerant and open societies, in the main, they are welcoming to Islam. They are welcoming to Islam because their peoples do not understand that Islam is at war with them; they do not understand that Islam does not assimilate; they do not understand that the purpose of Islam is to overturn the host culture and change the host culture to an Islamic state. No Muslim can give allegience to any country other than a caliphate, no Muslim can give allegience to a system of law other than the law of Allah and Mohammed, Sharia.  This is clearly stated in doctrine. Muslims who give such allegience may be good citizens but they are not good Muslims. This is a fine point that many find difficult to understand.

Muslims are forbidden to have friendships with Christians or Jews. This is clearly stated in Koran. In addition, Muslims are commanded to kill Jews; this is also clearly stated in doctrine. When the Muslims are actually friends with kafirs, to Islam they are hypocrites (bad Muslims) or apostates. Being a good Muslim and being a good citizen of a democratic state is doctrinally impossible for a Muslim who follows his “religion”.

Islam is at war with the kafir, everywhere and forever. It does not matter if you believe this or not; your opinion on the matter is irrelevent. This is the truth and the command of the Koran, and the Sira of Mohammed as well as Hadith – the doctrine of Islam. If Islam is at war with all kafirs everywhere and the purpose of this endless warfare is the literal end of all non-believers (Koran is clear that no other religion is allowed anywhere on the planet other than Islam) and their cultures; one must come to some conclusion about the value of his/her culture and whether or not it is worthy of defending.

Because democracies are based upon openness and tolerance and individual freedoms, democracies are open to Islam. Islam builds mosques – these are the centers of Muslim culture, politics, religious practice, everything in the Muslim community. While we are aware that many if not most of all new mosques built in Europe, the US and around the world are supported by Saudi oil money this is not the most important point. The critical factor is that every mosque has the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, Hadith as its central intellectual/spiritual/political core. The doctrine itself is hostile to democracies and is a doctrine of warfare, violence, intolerance, hatred, cruelty and brutality that is as yet unsurpassed in human history.

When the doctrine is known, and the history of Islam and the appalling things that have been done by adherents because of its commands, it is difficult (that is, impossible) to defend Islam or any aspect of it.

Islam is a political ideology fundamentally hostile to democracy. It is intolerant and brutal in the extreme. It is often said that terrorists and jihadists have hijacked the “religion of peace” and “misinterpret” the doctrine of Islam. This is a lie. This kind of lie, about the nature and true character and history of Islam, is called “taqiyyah”, sacred deception. It is an obligation (as stated in the doctrine) for all Muslims to falsify the truth of Islam to kafirs everywhere. This results in the kafir being confused and unable to effectively respond in defense of their cultures and lands, countries and people. It is extremely effective. Koran is a blueprint for war. The effectiveness of jihad is seen by the success of Islam in spreading across the world and annihilating cultures and civilizations as it goes. The body count of jihad since Mohammed started his endless war is conservatively estimated at 270 million murdered victims.

What of democracy then as it faces the challenge of advancing and emboldened and oilwealth rich Islam? What of democracy as new mosques are built daily and the demands of Islam increase at the same pace?

Democracy is the condition of freedom, tolerance, and equality. This condition was passed down to us by our founders and secured for us over generations by our brave warriors who fought to sustain these ideals and this condition of freedom. Many who know little of democracy, history, politics, and know nothing whatever of Islam believe that democracy is a process and not a condition.

These ill-informed ill-educated people believe that democracy is ever changing and if a minority desires concessions that are inherently anti-democratic, reactionary, intolerant, and cruel it is all perfectly acceptable if these forces use the processes and structures of democracy to enact their anti-freedom desires. Those who seek our destruction know our ways, our systems, our doctrine, our legal system as we know nothing of theirs. We are at a disadvantage to these aggressive forces of hate and intolerance and anti-freedom because we are almost entirely ignorant of their purposes and their foundational doctrine, Koran, Sira, Hadith – the doctrine of Islam.

The process of democracy is that process which protects the freedoms and structures of equality and tolerance that were passed down to us and secured for us by our forebears. Democracy is a condition of freedom that we must defend, it is not a process by which we surrender those same freedoms that others gave their lives to secure for us and future generations. Our role as lovers of freedom is to sustain democracy again so that our children can enjoy its freedoms, tolerance, and appreciation for the individual.

Democracy is not a process, it is a condition.

If democracy is a condition of freedom and tolerance and equality and not a process, then what must our response be to forces whose purpose is the destruction of democracy? The response must be to oppose such forces.

When the new mosque comes to town, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to spread the word of the greatness of Islam, the fake religion of peace. Its purpose is to be the center of a community of believers whose goal is, according to their deity and prophet, the destruction and/or conversion of the unbelievers in whose midst they have chosen to live.

Immigrants are very important in Islam. The Islamic calendar does not begin with the first revelation from Allah received by Mohammed as one might suppose for a “religion”, rather it begins when Mohammed arrived in Medina from Mecca and began his career as a warlord and killer. This is the real beginning of the power of Islam; not the revelations, but the change of Mohammed’s career from prophet/debater/missionary in Mecca to prophet/warlord/hyperviolent killer in Mecca.

The immigrant is the leading edge of the sword of Islam.

If those who love democracy know nothing of Islam, its doctrine and history – the construction of a new mosque is but a footnote. If those who love democracy know the doctrine and history of Mohammed and of Islam the new mosque is a dangerous threat to their culture, and country.

Islam is a political ideology. The mosque is its party headquarters. Muslim demonstrators on the streets of Europe and America are not shy about their purposes – the destruction of all kafir states and religions and the conquest of Islam. Jihadists are not shy about their motives – they quote Koran as they kill. Yet we say that they are misinterpreting their doctrine. This is a lie we say to one another based on wishful thinking and ignorance. It is not based on knowledge of the doctrine itself.

The Koran is the literal word of Allah, the word of god to adherents of Islam. Mohammed is the prophet, the greatest example of humanity for all to emulate. Jihad, war, murder, violence, misogyny, torture, cruelty, intolerance are the commands. The commands are in the doctrine of Islam. The doctrine is taught at mosques. You connect the dots. 

dominate

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Reading the Koran – No Tolerance or Peace Found

July 1st, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

I finished reading the Koran on Sunday afternoon, no “beauty” was found.

I read Abridged Koran (from the Center for the Study of Political Islam). The Koran is organized non-chronologically; it goes from largest chapter to the smallest. The result of this “organization” is that everything in the Koran is without context; events come and go, people come and go without any contextual logic. In addition, there is extensive repetition so that stories are told again and again, with slight variations. This means that the Koran in its original form is almost impossible to understand; not so with the Abridged Koran.

Muslim clerics often assert that the Koran cannot be understood except in the original classical Arabic, but Dr. Puin [a noted German Koranic scholar] maintains that much of the book is unclear, even to Arabic scholars:

“The Koran claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen,’ or ‘clear,’“ [Puin] says. “But if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense. Many Muslims — and Orientalists — will tell you otherwise, of course, but the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible — if it can’t even be understood in Arabic — then it’s not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not — as even speakers of Arabic will tell you — there is a contradiction. Something else must be going on.” (Source: Gates of Vienna)

koran_abridged

The Abridged Koran is the only Koran that has eliminated the extensive repetition of stories and linked the text with the biography of Mohammed, the Sira. Most importantly, this Koran is in chronological order. This means that the Koran is understandable from a chronological perspective and is easy to read; this is not to say that reading the Koran is a pleasurable experience; it wasn’t.

Defenders of Islam must read the Koran and build their defenses of Islam around the Koran and the two other books of the Islamic doctrine trilogy, the Hadith and the Sira. There is no other foundation upon which to discuss Islam other than the doctrine and the things that Muslims do on account of it. Most defenders have not read the Koran. If they had read the Koran they would find it difficult to defend because it is such a shattering book to read. For a non-believer there is nothing in the Koran that is defensible.

I could only read it in segments of an hour or less. For a kafir the Koran is mentally and emotionally exhausting.

Understanding that this document is the core of the doctrine of over one billion people is an astounding and deeply disturbing revelation. Reading the Koran is as shattering an experience as learning that the earth is not flat, or that some deeply held foundational beliefs about the world are wrong.

When I reached the end of the Koran I realized that everything that occurs in the world of Islam is because of the Koran and the doctrine trilogy. What this means for unbelievers is deeply disturbing as it means that we are at war with an ideology that is a diabolical as Nazism and even more cruel. The Nazis planned destruction for the Jews and were clear on this point in their own foundational document, Mein Kampf. The Koran does not limit itself to Jews alone, though there is a special deep hatred for Jews in the Koran; rather the Koran and Islam is at war with all unbelievers (the kafir) everywhere and forever. War against the kafir is described in the Koran as “fighting in Allah’s cause”. All Muslims are obligated to do Jihad, even if they do not want to participate.

Murder of innocents is not the greatest sin of the Koran; unbelief and apostasy (leaving Islam) are far worse. Because unbelievers are guilty through their lack of acceptance of Allah and Islam, anything can be done to them by Muslims.

Islam is at war with kafirs because kafirs do not believe. The fact that kafirs in the west pretend that the war is not real is irrelevent only to the dreaming kafirs, nothing about Islam is relevant; to Islam it is an ally in jihad.

Islam’s purpose is to bring the unbelievers into Islam, out of their criminal “ignorance” as the Koran puts it. If kafirs refuse to accept Islam they can be killed or enslaved to live as dhimmis as their cultures, countries, and religions are destroyed by Islam. Osama bin Laden specifically called the west to Islam before and after 9/11 just for this ideological purpose – when the west refuses or ignores the call to Islam anything, even mass murder, can be done to them because they are unbelievers, the worst kind of sinners in Islam. An “invitation” from Islam cannot be whimsically ignored; this is akin to the “offer that one cannot refuse” from the “mob”.

In Islamic doctrine one is a slave of Allah and of Mohammed. Mohammed is Allah’s Prophet but he has a special role. Mohammed is not just a prophet of Allah, rather he is The Prophet. The Koran puts Mohammed in a position of authority over Muslims equivalent with Allah. This is why all Muslims everywhere emulate Mohammed as the perfect human being to be modeled. Mohammed is the model for all humanity forever in the Islamic worldview.

When you see terrorists beheading kafir captives and quoting the Koran, they do this because Mohammed did this; when you see Islamists torture and kill the innocent they do this because Mohammed did; when you see Islamists kill thousands of kafirs, torture them, burn their churches and temples, and rape their women, they do this because Mohammed the perfect example for all Muslims forever did these things.

“We have prepared a blazing fire for these unbelievers who do not believe in Allah and his Messenger.” (Koran, 48:13)

As an example of moral and ethical behavior most decent people in the west would reject Mohammed as someone worhty of emulation. Not so in Islam. Mohammed is the perfect example; Mohammed killed the kafir, so today and since the inception of Islam, Muslims have done the same thing.

Koran is alive. While it lives, kafirs die.

Mohammed is the example for all Muslims to follow.

“Those who obey the Messenger, obey Allah.”
(4:79, 4:80)

“And it is not the place of a believer, either man or woman, to have a choice in his or her affairs when Allah and his Messenger have decided on a matter. Those who disobey Allah and his Messenger are clearly on the wrong path.” (33:36)

All Muslims are obligated to participate in Jihad. This is the conquest of kafirs and bringing them into Islam, very often by force. If they do not come to Islam, they are destroyed. Because the majority of the Koran is reserved for how Islam treats kafirs it is a political document. Because conquest, conversion, or death are the only options for kafirs the Koran is exceedingly dangerous for any unbeliever.

There are “five pillars” of Islam, these are religious and community-oriented (the Muslim community, not the human community). But there is much more to being a Muslim than the five pillars. The core of Koran is “fighting in Allah’s cause”.

Anyone who fights and dies in Allah’s cause will live forever in paradise with Allah. The temporal world is not the focus of the Koran, rather it is the world to come. The only assured way to get to paradise in Islam is by doing jihad (and ideally, dying in the process). Jihad is killing and enslaving kafirs. This means that Islam is in an existential war with all unbelievers wherever they may be, forever. It also means that Islam is an ideology of anti-life, death; the world to come is superior to the world we live in and the best way to get there is by killing unbelievers in jihad.

“Existential” means that our existence as individuals and as part of nations or religions or anything external to, other than, Islam is at stake. If Islam is successful, there is nothing in the world but Islam. Nothing.

“Let those who would sell the life of this world for the world to come fight for Allah’s cause. Whoever fights for Allah’s cause, whether he is killed or is victorious, We will grant him a great reward. How could you not fight for Allah’s cause?” (4:74)

“The believers fight for Allah’s cause, and the unbelievers fight for Satan. Therefore, fight against the friends of Satan. Truly Satan’s strategy is weak.” (4:76)

In Islam, all non-believers are evil and  ignorant, and must be brought under Islam, enslaved or killed. The history of Islam shows that this is believed, literally. The events of today show that this ideology of war and cruelty is very much alive.

The defenders of Islam speak of the “beauty” of the Koran. I found none. There is some poetics, but it is reserved for the descriptions of unbelievers burning in hell.

“If only you could witness the angels carrying off the unbelievers’ souls!They slash their faces and backs saying, ‘Taste the torment of the fire!’” (8:49)

The real “beauty” of the koran is for the jihadists. Koran is not about our world, it is about the next, and how to get there. Unfortunately, for those who are not Muslim, the best path to paradise is by jihad, war against the kafir. We see jihad every day. Jihad is the murder of kafirs, wherever they are.

“The forgiveness and mercy they, who die or are killed for Allah’s cause, will receive from Allah will be far better than anything they could have gained. If you die or are killed, then surely you will all be gathered before Allah.” (3:157)

If the reader is, like me, a non-Muslim the Koran is not a friendly book. There is little tolerance in the Koran. The only tolerance is for Muslims, there is none for the kafir. If you are a Jew or Christian, reading the Koran is particularly unpleasant.

“Oh, believer, do not take the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you take them for his friends, he surely is one of them. Allah will not guide the evil doers.” (5:51)

One could quote the Koran for hundreds of pages to illustrate the actual message of the Koran. There is no need for this as the Koran is quite clear about its message. We in the kafir world simply choose to ignore it. This doctrine of pretending, this immature view of the world in which we pretend that the world is something other than what it is is the foundation of political correctness and multiculturalism. These two absurd concepts further the purposes of jihad. Politically correct people who prevent the truth of Islam to be disseminated are self-destructive fools, the useful idiots of jihad. 

Muslims are not allowed to be friends with Christians or Jews or any unbeliever. The fate for unbelievers is hellfire, death, or conquest/conversion. So, why bother befriending such people, I suppose. But more importantly, the kafir is considered evil, ignorant, and less than human as they are outside of Islam. Anything outside of Islam is considered evil in the doctrine. This is the opposite of inclusiveness and tolerance. Those apologists and defenders of Islam who say that it is tolerant are lying or are ignorant of the doctrine, or both.

“The unbelievers among the People of the Book (Jews & Christians) and the idolators will burn for eternity in the fire of Hell. Of all the created beings, they are the most despicable.” (98:6)

The Koran is a diabolical political document that lays out a plan for the conquest of the entire world by Islam. One could put this ideology into a movie and make quite a thriller out of it, but nobody would believe it. Suspension of disbelief would not be possible as the plot would be seen as impossible, completely unrealistic. But this is exactly what is happening now in the west, total disbelief and no suspension of it. Our ignorance of Islamic doctrine furthers the cause of jihad, and undermines our ability to exist. This is cultural insanity and suicide. We do not defend ourselves against jihad because we prefer to pretend that it is not real.

This reluctance to accept the truth of the Koran and of Islam is entirely based upon ignorance of Islam and its very clear doctrine, and ignorance of jihad. The time for wishful thinking is long over.

Defense of Islam is not based upon knowledge, experience, learning, or understanding of the motivations of Islam which come entirely and without exception from the doctrine trilogy of Koran, Hadith and Sira. The Koran is diabolical because it justifies and demands death for untold millions and more. Defense of such an ideology can only be explained in two ways, ignorance or active support. In this case, ignorance of Islam and it doctrine is support of jihad and the destruction of kafirs.

Mohammed said that war is deception. Jihad is war and one of its weapons is deception. We are told that Islam is the “religion of peace” but we see in Koran that it is a religion and ideology and political system of war. It is much more than religion, it is an entire civilizational system dedicated to the destruction of all non-believers everywhere and forever.

We are told that Islam has been “hijacked” by “extremists” and that Islam is peaceful and tolerant. The only tolerance in Koran is for believers, there is no tolerance for kafirs. 

The word “extremist” and “moderate” are western concepts, they are not Islamic. In the Islamic context these concepts are completely different in meaning. In Islam someone who follows Koran and participates in Jihad as commanded by Allah and Mohammed are actually moderate because they are following the law of Islam as dictated to Mohammed by Allah through the angel Gabriel.

Those non-jihadist Muslims sought out by western apologists and wishful thinker fantasists as proof that there is tolerance in Islam are outside the religion/ideology as they deny their obligation to do jihad. Failure to do jihad is antithetical to Islam; it is a sin. Jihad is required.

Non-jihadist Muslims are in apostasy and are extremists. The moderate Muslim is Osama bin Laden because he follows the doctrine; the Taliban are moderate because they follow the doctrine (in the extreme). These are the true pious followers of Mohammed.

The fact that so many millions of Pakistanis are fleeing the Taliban shows that many Muslims do not want to be jihadists. Many Muslims do not accept their doctrine. The response to the Taliban in Pakistan is cause for hope because it shows that many Muslims reject their doctrine, it also means that Muslims are victims of Islam, too, in many ways.

What are we kafirs who have read the Koran to do? Koran is the word of Allah delivered to Mohammed by the angel Gabriel, according to Islam. Criticism of the doctrine is forbidden, debate is forbidden. This is why we see rote learning of Koran and Hadith and Sira in Madrassahs all over the world because rote learning is the only way to learn the word of Allah. Can such a doctrine founded upon the word of Allah that cannot be debated or criticized be reformed? This is a great question of the moment, and the answer would appear to be “No”.

We kafirs must accept the world in which we live; accept the Koran for what it says, and take the jihadists at their word when they say they are killing unbelievers because their doctrine (Allah and Mohammed) tells them to do so. They are not lying. We just pretend that they are, or that they have misinterpreted their doctrine. They haven’t. We are unwilling to face the truth. This reluctance to learn and to know and to teach empowers jihad.

This is the ugly truth of our times – murderers and conquerors are motivated by this book to do appalling inhuman things. They believe that they are doing “God’s work”. When you read the Koran you will see that this is not possible. The work of God as we understand him is peace not wholesale cruelty, hatred, intolerance, violence, brutality, and war.

All the mysteries of terror attacks; all the warfare in the middle east; all the conflicts with Islamic states; all the brutality against Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, against all non-believers by Muslims around the world will become clear when you read the Koran.

The most important and widely discussed but rarely read book of the 1920s and 30s was Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Its sales made Hitler a wealthy man, but few who purchased the book read it though many chose (incorrectly) to defend Hitler as the “rescuer” of Germany in spite of not having read it. Had the book been widely read at home and abroad the plans of the lunatic Fuehrer for world war and for the destruction of the Jews would have been known because they were all discussed in detail in the unread Mein Kampf. Could Chamberlain have gone to Berlin and declare “peace in our time” had the majority of those in Europe read Mein Kampf?

Now, with the rise of Islamism and global jihad across the world another profoundly important book goes almost entirely unread but is widely discussed regardless, the Koran. Most discuss Islam and Koran from ignorance and wishful thinking and condemn those who have read it, understand it and ring the bell of warning about it.

There can be little confusion as to the message of the Koran. In the Koran you will find no good news.

There is no more important book in the world at this time than the Koran. It is fitting that Mein Kampf and the Koran are juxtaposed; both lay out a grand plan of global conquest and war, both involve violence, intolerance, and hatred; both are ideological political documents that present a plan for world-wide totalitarianism. The high cost of Mein Kampf is now known – in the tens of millions of victims. The ongoing cost of jihad is almost too painful to consider; the cost of Jihad since the publication of the Koran is in the hundreds of millions.

Everyday in the persecution of unbelievers across the world we see a resurgent Islam. This is the great struggle, the great jihad. They are fighting heart and soul to bring the world to Islam by any means – while we pretend it is not so. Jihadists are obeying their god and their messenger, while we ignore both and pretend that both are peaceful and tolerant. They are not.

The events of violence, hate and war coming from the Islamic world are not “hijackings” of a peaceful tolerant religion, they are the thrashings of a great beast of war. Read the Koran, you will see. When you see, you must teach others. There is nothing of more import than learning the motives of the cruelest ideology on the planet earth. An ideology whose purpose is our destruction.

Ignorance is not an option. Read the Koran. The guidebook of the world as we know it now is the Koran. It is a book without beauty, it is a book of war and horrors. We had better read it. All of us.

Your email:

 

« Previous Entries