April 30th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Today in Nashville the government of the United States was involved in undermining the government of the United States.

A case of alleged employee discrimination against a Muslim employee that began in 2006 finally was concluded in this city today. The details of the case are these: a Muslim employee of the Southern Hills Medical Center (an HCA facility) sued because his request to take 20 days leave to attend the Haj in Mecca was refused.  The US government, through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the employer on behalf of the aggrieved employee. 

The government’s (EEOC) position was that this was a violation of the employee’s Civil Rights (Title 7violation), and that the employer “failed to accommodate the firmly held religious beliefs” of the employee.  EEOC alleged unfair labor practices. Southern Hills, realistically fearing the power of the US government fighting them in court, bad publicity, and growing legal costs, settled today paying the Haj attendee $70,000 for his troubles.

Accommodation to Islam by a host culture (non-Islam) is foundational in the doctrine of Islam. Islam does not accommodate nor assimilate to a host culture; Islam makes the host culture submit. Islam means “submission”. No other religions, no other forms of government are allowed in the doctrine of Islam, only Islam. Anything that makes the host culture crack, anything that forwards Islam is the sacred duty of all Muslims, this is the doctrine of Islam, and this is jihad.

Today in Nashville, the US government caused an American business to submit to Islam, and thus further eroded the ability of the US government to protect itself and the country at large from the threat of encroaching jihad and Sharia law.

Americans do not understand the nature of Sharia law. It is an all-encompassing code of totalitarianism. Americans are told, falsely, that Sharia is just another form of jurisprudence, a form of religious law that is particularly strict. This is true, but its strictness is more akin to Nazism and Stalinism than it is to anything that any American is familiar with from American experience. 

There is a serious difference though, under Nazism the Jews alone were afraid, but under Sharia law and Islam all non-Muslims have very clear cause to fear; fear of total cultural and religious annihilation which is the purpose of Islam at its core.

It is said in Sharia rules, and the Koran that no kafir can ever be above a Muslim in Civil Affairs.

In America today, we manifest our tolerance by giving Islam just one more small destruction of our culture. We feel that then, Islam will be happy and content as neighbors. But the way of Islam is the way of Mohammed. Only 100% is enough. (Bill Warner, PoliticalIslam.com)

And that is what has happened in Nashville today, the kafir (any unbeliever) was taught that making rules over a follower of Islam will have serious consequences, like legal action. And what a boon to Islam that the United States government itself is a dhimmi, a willing executioner of itself, aiding and abetting those whose doctrine demand its overthrow. Ignorance is a costly matter here. Lack of knowledge of the doctrine of Islam and its purposes make otherwise good Americans do very self-destructive things.

Pandora is laughing. Why? She is laughing because we now must re-examine the limits of the term “religion”; the phrase “firmly held religious belief”, and the concept of what employment means and what it means to be an employer.

This surrender on the part of HCA to the misguided EEOC in giving in to the excessive demands of Islam, that no other religious group would likely be successful in prosecuting, is a victory of jihad; soft jihad - but just as dangerous to our civilization and culture as bombs.

According to one legal website, the definition of religion as recognized by the US government is as follows:

The Supreme Court has interpreted religion to mean a sincere and meaningful belief that occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to the place held by God in the lives of other persons. The religion or religious concept need not include belief in the existence of God or a supreme being to be within the scope of the First Amendment.

Because the United States is inclusive (not exclusive like some “religions of peace”) the definition of religion is purposefully broad. Even questionable pseudo-religions/cults like Scientology are given religious protections in the United States.

In addition, a belief does not need to be stated in traditional terms to fall within First Amendment protection. For example, Scientology—a system of beliefs that a human being is essentially a free and immortal spirit who merely inhabits a body—does not propound the existence of a supreme being, but it qualifies as a religion under the broad definition propounded by the Supreme Court. (source cited above.)

In light of the surrender of HCA in Nashville to the lawsuit of a Muslim on grounds of “failure to accommodate firmly held religious beliefs” where is the evidence that shows definitively that the employer’s decision to deny 20-days of vacation was based upon the fact that the employee was a Muslim? Where is the evidence that shows failure to accommodate on the part of the employer?

Is it sufficient evidence for the EEOC that because someone who follows (submits to; a Muslim is “one who submits”) Islam has made an allegation about prejudicial and illegal conduct that therefor it is a fact? Where is the evidence?

One can make a strong case that the surrender of the employer is in no way an admission of guilt but rather is an admission that combatingthe federal government in court is too expensive with little upside and little likelihood of a successful outcome. HCA denies wrongdoing in this case.

One can understand the failure of HCA and Southern Hills to fight this case in court. But who will make this fight? Who will fight against Sharia and encroaching jihad? Who will fight this bizarre and self-destructive embrace of Islam by the EEOC and thereby the US government itself? Who will fight this existentialal fight, and challenge the insanity of political correctness that identifies a totalitarian, misogynist, anti-gay, anti-Christian, anti-Jew, anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist, anti-atheist, anti-democratic, anti-Freedom, anti-all-non-Muslim and claims that it is the “religion of peace” even as the dust of bombs fall to the ground somewhere in the world where violence and war is done in the name of Islam and Mohammed?

Will the next case be from some UFO cultist who, in following in the success today of Islam in Nashville, demands ten weeks vacation from his employer to observe flying saucers at Area 51?

This cultist will have “firmly held religious beliefs” that he must attend UFO observances at Area 51; he will state that his religion requires that he do this; he will state that his belief in his religion is firmly held, and that it is his religious duty to attend this event and that it is a “firmly held religious belief”. He will sue his employer for denying him his requested 10-week leave to attend the saucer observation event.

Will the EEOC sue his employer as they did for the Islam follower in Nashville? Will the EEOC defend this person’s right to embrace and follow the dictates of his “firmly held religious beliefs” and sue the employer for “failure to accommodate”?

This UFO believer’s ”religion” falls within the very liberal range of the definition of religion as understood by the Supreme Court of the United States. You see now where this is leading.

Today’s surrender of American culture in Nashville, quite understandable under the circumstances, as represented by an innocent employer (in this case  HCA) to a Muslim on ground of failure to accommodateIslam is a blow to our economy, a blow to the rights of the employer and a fundamental misunderstanding of the doctrine and purposes of Islam by the US government. 

A victory for Islam is a defeat for the forces of freedom and compassion everywhere.

Another defeat today in Nashville, but this is a chance to learn, to teach. We must understand why this is a serious case, and teach the doctrine of Islam to all. Every American must know the doctrine of Islam. You will not learn it in school, but you must learn it. The greatest force for servitude, cruelty, violence, slavery, intolerance, and war in the world is political Islam.

Today we inch closer to Islamization of America. This is the purpose of political Islam. 

Muslims are prohibited from befriending non-Muslims; the greatest sin in Islam is two-fold, leaving Islam  (apostasy) or never having been a Muslim. To Islam America is just another country and culture and political system that is in dar-al Harb, the House of War; another country to be conquered for Mohammed.

The outside world, which has not yet been subjugated, is called the “House of War,” and strictly speaking a perpetual state of jihad, of holy war, is imposed by the law.

Islam is at war with America because we are not Muslim. Islam’s purpose is to make America Muslim, and Europe and every country in the world that is not now Muslim. Our denial of this fact is not relevant. As Walid Shoebat, a former Islamist PLO terrorist recently said, “The sheep do not know the wolf; but the wolf knows the sheep.”