May 13th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Yesterday, CNN posted a lengthy condemnation of a Saudi judge by a female Saudi doctor. Titled, “Wife Slapping Not OK in Islam”, CNN led with this story on their website for a part of the afternoon. The photogenic doctor was condemning the judge in very strong language for having stated publicly that husbands may beat their wives but only if the wife was guilty of lavish spending.

The Arab News, as quoted in the Times of Malta said this of the story from early May.

Arab News says a Saudi judge’s remarks that that a man could slap his wife for lavish spending, have sparked an outcry at a seminar on the role of judicial and security officials in preventing domestic violence. Saudi women have become more vocal about the problem of husbands beating wives and fathers mistreating children. But the judge said some of the blame must be shouldered by wives for their behaviour.

The Times of Malta got the story almost right. More detail is provided by GoogleNews.

RIYADH (AFP) — A Saudi judge has told a seminar on domestic violence that it is okay for a man to slap his wife for lavish spending, a local newspaper reported on Sunday.

Jeddah judge Hamad al-Razine gave the example of overspending to buy a high-end abaya, the head-to toe black shroud Saudi women have to wear in public, as justifying a smack for one’s wife, Arab News said.

“If a person gives 1,200 riyals (320 dollars) to his wife and she spends 900 riyals (240 dollars) to purchase an abaya from a brand shop, and if her husband slaps her on the face as a reaction to her action, she deserves that punishment,” he said.

The judge in this case is entirely wrong. He is astoundingly wrong, but not in the way that you might think (if you are a non-Muslim reading this post). The judge is wrong because it is perfectly OK for husbands to beat their wives in Islam, but they must never strike them in the face.  This is an astounding error for a Saudi judge to make because it shows that he is (apparently) not knowledgable on the doctrine of Islam and Sharia law. As Saudi Arabia is under Sharia Law, one would think that this would be a serious problem for the judge but he, like the doctor in the CNN story may be stretching the truth (i.e., lying/practicing taqiyyah) rather than demonstrating ignorance of the ideology of Islam.

The doctrine of Islam is clear on this point.

Koran 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.” (Click here to see Imams talking about how beating of wives is to be done.)

One of the foundations of Islamic doctrine is the submission of women. The Saudi doctor can say all she wishes, but it does not change the truth of the doctrine and the reality of life for women across the Islamic world. The judge can mistakenly say that wife beating is not ok unless the wife has over-spent and she can only be struck in the face.

But it’s all wrong, all a lie, all taqiyyah. A husband in Islam is allowed to beat his wife whenever he wishes and he cannot be questioned about it, though he must not strike her in the face.

Beating the Muslim wife is not to be done in outrage. No, the husband is putting the world into Islamic order of duality and submission. The husband submits to Allah and the Sunna of Mohammed. The wife must submit to Allah, the Sunna and her husband. Her lack of submission is a fault in the world and the beating restores the proper order of submission. Beatings are justice. So when the husband beats his wife, both are partaking in a sacred moment of good (what is permitted). (Warner.)

In the Muslim world the example of Mohammed the prophet is the perfect example for all Muslims to follow. His perfect example is one of the core components of Islamic doctrine; if Mohammed did it, it’s alright (no matter how horrible it was); if Mohammed saw others do it, and said it was alright, then it is. Unfortunately, Mohammed’s concepts of morality were very different from ours.

A woman came to Mohammad and begged her to stop her husband from beating her.  Her skin was bruised so badly that she it is described as being “greener” than the green veil she was wearing.  Muhammad did not admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to his sexual desires. (Bukhari, Hadith, 72:715)

Our understanding of Mohammed is limited because we are not taught his history and his ideology in school and we are not taught it by our religious and political leaders. They have entirely failed us. We must learn this ideology, and quickly.

The purpose of Islam is submission. The meaning of the word “Islam” is submission. This message is very clear. The message is for all unbelievers. All unbelievers must submit to Islam.

Koran 8:38 “Tell the unbelievers that if they change their ways, then they would be forgiven for the past. If, however, they continue to sin [ed. not accept Islam and convert], let them remember the fate of those who came before them. Fight against them until they stop persecuting you, and Allah’s religion reigns sovereign over all others. If they cease, Allah knows all they do, but if they turn their backs know that Allah is your protector-an excellent helper.”

Mohammed’s opinion of women is not favorable. Therefor the opinion of Islam itself of women is not favorable.

A nation headed by a woman shall never succeed. (Bukhari, Wars, 4425)

The worst sin and distraction from virtue that I have left for man is woman. (Bukhari, Fornication, 5096)

When I stood on the door of hell, I saw most of its inhabitants were women. (Bukhari, Fornication, 5196)

Women lack brains and religion. (Bukhari, Menstruation, 304)

If a man summoned his wife for intercourse and she refused, the angels will curse her till the dawn. (Bukhari, Fornication, 5194)

-As quoted in “Living by the Point of My Spear” Zaki Ameen, p.109

Clearly, the position of women in Islam is not a good one, particularly in any country under Sharia law. Rape laws in Islam are particularly unfavorable to women.

A man can divorce his wife as he wishes; Muhammad bin Laden, father of Osama, accumulated more than twenty wives—married and divorced—in his house. Since a Muslim man can only take four wives at a time, he would divorce one of the four wives, not attractive any more, to add a new one in his harem. The divorced wives stayed in his house as unwanted slaves; men are divinely sanctioned to keep unlimited number of slave-concubines in Islam [Koran, 70:29–30, 23:5–6].

Even in Afghanistan where our soldiers shed their blood every day to bring freedom to that backward land, the laws built upon Islamic doctrine are shockingly cruel towards women.

As a result of the Personal Status Law enacted by the Afghan parliament in February and signed by President Karzai in March, Shiite men may force their wives to yield to intercourse, bar them from going to work or school and even demand that they wear cosmetics. Widely viewed as a ploy to attract Shiites’ support in his upcoming re-election bid, the statute was passed in an atmosphere of strong pressure and scare tactics.

Specifically, the marital rape provision compels a woman submit to sex with her husband every four nights. Its proponents note in its defense that the law excuses her from this duty if, for instance, either party suffers from a sexually transmitted disease or the woman is preparing to go on a pilgrimage or fasting for Ramadan.

Now that the foundation has been established we can close the circle and return to the photogenic Saudi doctor and the confused Saudi judge. There are two Islamic terms that must be learned, taqiyyah and kitman. Taqiyyah allows Muslims to lie to unbelievers. Since Muslims are not allowed to take unbelievers as friends, this is not a difficult matter. A total separation from non-Islamic life is fundamental in Islam.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 67, Number 427:
“By Allah, and Allah willing, if I take an oath and later find something else better than that. Then I do what is better and expiate my oath.’ ”

Do not take unbelievers as friends; caution is necessary to befriend the unbelievers (the foundation of Islamic taqiyya and kitman;). (Do not befriend the deniers, even if they are among the closest relatives. In case of danger, Allah allows Muslims to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. The taqiyya is allowed until the Day of Resurrection. Allah has reserved unremitting torment for those who give their support to His enemies, and those who have enmity with His friends.-ibn Kathir; it is all right to tell lies/ adopt deception (taqiyya and kitman) for the sake of Islam. Maududi 3/25: This means that it is lawful for a believer, helpless in the grip of the enemies of Islam and in imminent danger of severe wrong and persecution, to keep his faith concealed and to behave in such a manner as to create the impression that he is on the same side as his enemies. A person whose Muslim identity is discovered is permitted to adopt a friendly attitude towards the unbelievers in order to save his life. If he considers himself incapable of enduring the excesses to which he may be subjected, he may even state that he is not a believer.)…3:28 (Warner.)

Taqiyyah and kitman are Islamic concepts that allow the followers of Islam to lie to non-believers whenever such lying may forward the purposes of Islam. This explains how Yassir Arafat could speak peace in english, then talk of jihad in Ramallah the following day.

Sheik Hilali and the late Yasser Arafat are both on public record as (a) ‘condemning’ the 9/11 attacks, in ambiguous terms, to the Western media and (b) praising suicide bombings, or “ martyrdom operations”, to their Arabic speaking audiences .  (source)

There is no basis in Islamic theology to support domestic abuse of any kind and specifically none pertaining to the matter of a wife’s spending pattern.

Now that we have the background doctrine and history explained we can see the Saudi doctor’s comments of taqiyyah in a clearer light.

Islam is very clear on this issue: Both a husband physically chastising his wife for “overspending” and a judge “upholding justice” by sanctioning this abuse would be acting counter to Islam’s ideals of compassion and justice., she says on CNN.

This is a lie. The doctrine of Islam specifically hates women, considers them far beneath men, and gives specific permissions and directions for husbands to beat their wives. There certainly is a great deal of basis in Islamic theology to support domestic abuse. We see this daily, if we look. It is almost impossible not to see.

Abuse of women is sanctioned by the doctrine of Islam. The doctor continues at length on CNN describing all the opportunities for women in Saudi Arabia and suggests that women own 40% of the country’s wealth. She does not hint or explain that women are 2nd class citizens in Saudi Arabia; she does not explain the horrors of Sharia for women in her country and across the Islamic world; she does not explain that her husband, if she has one, has every right to beat her upon her arrival home from her CNN interview, for whatever reason he wishes. He is not allowed to strike her in the face.

On January 14, 2004, Sheikh Muhammad Kamal Mustafa, the imam of the mosque of the city of Fuengirola, Costa del Sol, was sentenced by a Barcelona court to a 15 month suspended sentence and fined € 2160 for publishing his book ‘The Woman in Islam.’ In this book, the Egyptian-born Sheikh Mustafa writes, among other things, on wife-beating in accordance with Shar’ia law.

On pages 86-87, Mustafa states: “The [wife-]beating must never be in exaggerated, blind anger, in order to avoid serious harm [to the woman].” He adds, “It is forbidden to beat her on the sensitive parts of her body, such as the face, breast, abdomen, and head. Instead, she should be beaten on the arms and legs,” using a “rod that must not be stiff, but slim and lightweight so that no wounds, scars, or bruises are caused.” Similarly, “[the blows] must not be hard.”

What is this lying about? Why tell falsehoods about the doctrine of Islam? This is called jihad. Jihad is the obligation of all Muslims. There are several kinds of jihad – through violence, the pen, words, and money. All are commanded to fight, if they cannot fight, they must support those who do; there are many ways to do this.

Telling untruths and sugar-coating the unpleasant and violent history and doctrine of Islam is one kind of jihad. Taqiyyah, in this case is the doctor’s jihad against the kafir, can be a kind of jihad; she is fulfilling her duty to Islam. She must know, as the judge must know, that what she has said on CNN will be read by many unknowing and uneducated kafirs; she is doing her duty in falsifying the truth of Saudi Arabia, and the truth of the doctrine of Islam.

Taqiyyah is a weapon of Islam that is used against the kafir. Islam is so strong not because it is great or grand, but because we are ignorant of it. The adherents of Islam use our ignorance against us. Political Islam uses dhimmis like CNN to advance their message of taqiyyah, their false telling of conditions in their cultures and living under Sharia law. CNN is a dhimmi organization because they publish Islamic taqiyyah without comment. Some will be fooled. We are not.

At this time knowledge is our greatest defense; learn.

Taqiyyah - sacred deception.

The truth of doctrine of Islam - Sharia Law

April 3rd, 2009 by admin

Late last month a Palestinian youth orchestra based in the West Bank town of Jenin was disbanded. This was not done without cause. As music is considered the language of peace and understanding – the universal language – something egregious must have occurred. Perhaps there was some mismanagement, some inappropriate behavior, some “misappropriation” of orchestra funds? No.

For the supporters of the orchestra what happened was far worse. What the orchestra had done was something so appalling so horrific to the community from which the orchestra came that the enterprise itself was forever ruined.

For what they had done there could be no forgiveness. The orchestra of Palestinian youth had performed a concert for Jewish Holocaust survivors in Israel.

In the upside-down world of the Palestinian Authority this is an unforgivable sin, a politicized event that undermines the existence of the Palestinian Authority, of Fatah, of the entire world view of the majority of the Palestinian people. For “punishment,” the leader of the orchestra was deported to Israel from the West Bank.

Music is the universal language, except in Islam

JENIN, West Bank (AP) — Authorities in an impoverished Palestinian refugee camp have shut down a youth orchestra, boarded up its rehearsal studio and banned its conductor from the camp after she took 13 young musicians to perform for Holocaust survivors in Israel, an official said Sunday.

Conductor Wafa Younes took the children from her Strings of Freedom orchestra to sing songs of peace last week as part of an annual Good Deeds Day organized by Israel’s richest woman. But once parents and leaders back in West Bank’s Jenin refugee camp realized where the group had been, they shut down the program, saying Younes had dragged the children into a political issue.

The discord highlights both the distrust many Palestinians have of any engagement with Israel, as well as their reluctance to acknowledge Jewish historical suffering because of concerns that it weakens their own claim to this disputed land. (See link above for more.)

The Holocaust is a serious political matter in the Islamic world, especially in the Palestinian Authority. Why? Because acknowledgment of the suffering of Jews humanizes Jews, and puts the existence of the State of Israel into an historical context that is intolerable for the jihadists of the PA.

These allegations are part of a central antisemitic motif in the Koran which decrees an eternal curse upon the Jews (Koran 2:61/ reiterated at 3:112) for slaying the prophets and transgressing against the will of Allah. It should be noted that Koran 3:112 is featured in the pre-amble to Hamas’ foundational Covenant.  This central motif is coupled to Koranic verses 5:60, and 5:78, which describe the Jews transformation into apes and swine (5:60), or simply apes, (i.e. verses 2:65 and 7:166), having been “…cursed by the tongue of David, and Jesus, Mary’s son” (5:78). Muhammad himself repeats this Koranic curse in a canonical hadith (Sunan Abu Dawoud, Book 37, Number 4322). And the related verse, 5:64, accuses the Jews-as Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas did in a January 2007 speech, citing Koran 5:64-of being “spreaders of war and corruption,” a sort of ancient Koranic antecedent of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The centrality of the Jews’ permanent “abasement and humiliation,” and being “laden with God’s anger” in the corpus of Muslim exegetic literature on Koran 2:61/3:112, is clear. By nature deceitful and treacherous, the Jews rejected Allah’s signs and prophets, including Isa, the Muslim Jesus. Classical Koranic commentators when discussing Koran 5:82, which includes the statement (”Thou wilt surely find the most hostile of men to the believers are the Jews..”), concur on the unique animus of the Jews towards the Muslims, which is repeatedly linked to the curse of  Koran 2:61/3:112. (Bostom, American Thinker)

The leadership there have been very determined to paint the Holocaust in just the right context so that the children can learn the right lessons, and continue the jihad against Israel and the Jews. It’s difficult to do jihad against people with whom one has sympathy or empathy. So the PA, aided by the doctrine of Islam, does everything it can to make sure that the Jewish people of Israel are never humanized – empathy is an evil in the Orwellian world of the PA and the wider Islamic world.

The doctrine of Islam supports this hard-hearted approach to the kafirs, the unbelievers. All followers of Islam are warriors in jihad for Allah – fighters with moral compunctions and empathy for the unbelievers might turn out not so effective. This cannot be allowed to happen.

The PA has used the tools of authority since its inception to dehumanize and demonize the Jews of Israel. This is pure Islamic doctrine, there is nothing new here but the context and the technology.

Those aware of the Holocaust’s role in PA media, culture, and education will not be surprised by any of this, and a handy summary is available here. For instance (source):

• PA TV has asserted that the Nazis did not specifically plan to kill Jews and that the term Holocaust refers to experiences of Palestinians and Gypsies.
• A PA crossword puzzle matches “Yad Vashem” (the Holocaust memorial museum in Jerusalem) with “the Jewish Center for eternalizing the Holocaust and the lies.”
• PA educational TV has taught that Dachau and Auschwitz were disinfection sites.
• The official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida wrote that “The Jews transformed what people think is the smoke of their burnt bodies into…a hen laying golden eggs.”

This kind of callousness, cruelty on such a large scale, is foreign to most westerners. Islam’s hatred of the kafir (unbelievers) has been discussed at length in other posts and is a central lesson of the Islamic doctrine. Islam is at war forever and everywhere with unbelievers. All Muslims are to do jihad for Allah and Islam. Those who die in jihad have fulfilled the highest purposes of the Islamic doctrine – expansion of Islam and the destruction and conquest of all non-Islamic cultures and political structures whereever they may be.  We have seen since 9/11 beheadings of Americans and other westerners (all kafirs) by Islamists in Iraq and elsewhere. We say, how can this be; how can these people be so heartless, so cruel? The answer is in the doctrine of Islam.

There are three components of the doctrine of  Islam: the Koran (word of Allah), the Hadiths (stories of Mohammed told by contemporaries), and the Sunna (the life of Mohammed). The version of Hadith considered most authoritative is Sahih Bukari. It is from Bukari’s Hadiths that an understanding of the cruelty of the PA, the callousness of its leadership, and the miseducation of its people can be found. But this need not be limited to the PA; all of Islam is required to obey the lessons of Mohammed as found in the triumverate doctrine. All of Islam is therefore callous, as this is what the doctrine of Islam commands.

Mohammed commands that women mourning at funerals are not to cry. No crying at funerals. Mohammed was quite clear on this point. When told that the women would not listen to him, he ordered his followers to fill their mouths with dust so that they would obey. No crying at funerals. The followers must never cry, only Mohammed may shed tears at funerals.

Bukhari Hadith
http://www.iiu.edu.my/deed/hadith/bukhari/023_sbt.html
Volume 2, Book 23, Number 386:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
When the Prophet got the news of the death of Ibn Haritha, Ja’far and Ibn Rawaha he sat down and looked sad and I was looking at him through the chink of the door. A man came and told him about the crying of the women of Ja’far. The Prophet ordered him to forbid them. The man went and came back saying that he had told them but they did not listen to him. The Prophet (p.b.u.h) said, “Forbid them.” So again he went and came back for the third time and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! By Allah, they did not listen to us at all.” (’Aisha added): Allah’s Apostle ordered him to go and put dust in their mouths. I said, (to that man) “May Allah stick your nose in the dust (i.e. humiliate you)! You could neither (persuade the women to) fulfill the order of Allah’s Apostle nor did you relieve Allah’s Apostle from fatigue. ”
 
Volume 2, Book 23, Number 390:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
We went with Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) to the blacksmith Abu Saif, and he was the husband of the wet-nurse of Ibrahim (the son of the Prophet). Allah’s Apostle took Ibrahim and kissed him and smelled him and later we entered Abu Saif’s house and at that time Ibrahim was in his last breaths, and the eyes of Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) started shedding tears. ‘Abdur Rahman bin ‘Auf said, “O Allah’s Apostle, even you are weeping!” He said, “O Ibn ‘Auf, this is mercy.” Then he wept more and said, “The eyes are shedding tears and the heart is grieved, and we will not say except what pleases our Lord, O Ibrahim ! Indeed we are grieved by your separation.”

As Mohammed was a military commander, a politician, and a warlord as well as the leader of his disciples rigid discipline, rigid emotional discipline would be very useful. Followers, all obligated to do  jihad, who could suppress their emotions, who could control their sorrow, stop their tears would be excellent fighters for the cause. 

But there is some confusion added by another hadith:

Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Ubaidullah bin Abi Mulaika:

One of the daughters of ‘Uthman died at Mecca. We went to attend her funeral procession. Ibn ‘Umar and Ibn Abbas were also present. I sat in between them (or said, I sat beside one of them. Then a man came and sat beside me.) ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar said to ‘Amr bin ‘Uthman, “Will you not prohibit crying as Allah’s Apostle has said, ‘The dead person is tortured by the crying of his relatives.?” Ibn Abbas said, “Umar used to say so.” Then he added narrating, “I accompanied Umar on a journey from Mecca till we reached Al-Baida. There he saw some travelers in the shade of a Samura (A kind of forest tree). He said (to me), “Go and see who those travelers are.” So I went and saw that one of them was Suhaib. I told this to ‘Umar who then asked me to call him. So I went back to Suhaib and said to him, “Depart and follow the chief of the faithful believers.” Later, when ‘Umar was stabbed, Suhaib came in weeping and saying, “O my brother, O my friend!” (on this ‘Umar said to him, “O Suhaib! Are you weeping for me while the Prophet said, “The dead person is punished by some of the weeping of his relatives?” Ibn Abbas added, “When ‘Umar died I told all this to Aisha and she said, ‘May Allah be merciful to Umar. By Allah, Allah’s Apostle did not say that a believer is punished by the weeping of his relatives. But he said, Allah increases the punishment of a non-believer because of the weeping of his relatives.” Aisha further added, “The Quran is sufficient for you (to clear up this point) as Allah has stated: ‘No burdened soul will bear another’s burden.’ ” (35.18). Ibn Abbas then said, “Only Allah makes one laugh or cry.” Ibn Umar did not say anything after that.

Reviewing #375, we see that Aisha, Mohammed’s favorite wife, said that the other hadiths on the same subject were incorrect and that Mohammed meant that only unbelievers would be punished by weeping at a relative’s funeral. According to Aisha’s interpretation the unbelievers would be punished by Allah if they weep for a relative. Even in the confusion is callousness, callousness for the kafir (the unbelievers) that they are denied sorrow and mourning for their loved ones. The text is clear, kafirs are punished for their humanity, for their sorrows. The previous hadiths are to control the jihadists, those who submit while the hadith above promises Allah’s wrath for the unbelievers who weep for their losses. Allah controls tears and sorrow and everything else; Islam is “submission”. “Only Allah makes one laugh or cry.” In all events, the kafir is the victim – this is the way of Islam. 

Suppression of emotions is a classic form of group control (and self-control) that has been used for centuries. We see jihadists do the cruelest things; we saw the brutality of the Mumbai attacks during which Allah and Islam were invoked again and again as the cause and purpose of the horror. We know this because the phone conversations between the killers and their jihadist handlers in Pakistan were intercepted and recorded.

“WE HAVE three foreigners, including women from Singapore and China,” a terrorist says into his mobile phone. “Kill them,” is the reply.

Doctrinal Callousness

People everywhere are entitled to their religious beliefs, this is the idea of God and the worship of God. Islam is a political system as well as a religion and that is the issue. Islam’s relationship with unbelievers is endless warfare, endless conflict and jihad. Jihad for Islam is commanded to all Muslims everywhere, forever. This is the doctrine of Islam.

After several generations of indoctrination by the authorities of the PA in the West Bank and Gaza we see the results. The results are not good for those who value civilization and freedom, but they are very good for those who do jihad for Islam. Followers of this extreme and cruel ideology know their purpose, and act.

Islam has become a set of fundamentals which preach social segregation, hatred of non-Muslims and elimination of dissenters through dominance, death and destruction. These conclusions, no matter how true, cannot be palatable to the Muslims and therefore rank as fabrications, from their standpoint. I can do no better than quote from the Koran to decide the issue. Examine the following for yourself:

1. “Do not let non-Muslims enter mosques. They will go to hell.” ( Repentance: 17 )
2. “O ye who believe! The non-Muslims are unclean. So let them not come near the Inviolable Place of Worship.” (Repentance: 28)
3. “O ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers …. and let them find harshness in you.” (Repentance: 123)
4. “Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute.” (Repentance: 29)
5. “O believers, do not treat your fathers and brothers as your friends, if they prefer unbelief to belief, whosoever of you takes them for friends, they are evil-doers.” (Repentance: 20)
6. “Certainly, God is an enemy to the unbelievers.” ( The Cow: 90 )
7. “God has cursed the unbelievers, and prepared for them a blazing hell.” ( The Confederates 60 )
8. “Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends…. whoso does that belongs not to God.” (The House of Imram: 60)
9. “O believers, do not make friends with the Jews and Christians; ..whoso of you makes them his friend is one of them.” (The Table: 55)
10. “The believers indeed are brothers.” ( Apa rtments: 10 )
11. “Moslems are hard against the unbelievers, merciful to one another.” (Victory: 25) (Source)

People who have Islams’s doctrine as their guide who believe it is their duty to kill unbelievers and treat them with a callousness that is unimaginable in our culture are the perfect soldiers of jihad and the expansion of Islam.

• A terrorist on Thursday (April 2) infiltrated Bat Ayin in the Gush Etzion region of the West Bank and killed Shlomo Nativ, a 13-year-old Israeli boy, by striking him in the head with an axe. [1] (Source)

The cruelty and callousness of adherents to Islam who do their ideology’s jihad as they are commanded knows no bounds and continues to bring us fresh assaults daily.  Only today an apparent American is shown on an Islamist video posted on the internet fighting with an alqaeda group in Somalia, jihad. People do horrible things because the doctrine of Islamic tells them to.

Another English speaker does not appear on the tape but raps over a track of Islamic devotional songs.

“Bomb by bomb, blast by blast, only going to bring back the glorious past,” the man chants atonally. “Mortar by mortar, shell by shell, I’m only gonna stop when I send them to hell.”

Ben Venzke, director of IntelCenter, the U.S. contractor that tracks extremist propaganda, told the AP that the video appears to be authentic.

Recognition of this threat is critically important to the survival of the west and of freedom everywhere. Jihad is the core principal of the expansion of Islam across the world at the expense of kafirs everywhere. The doctrine is clear, the followers are following. Learn the doctrine, knowledge is power.