April 30th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Today in Nashville the government of the United States was involved in undermining the government of the United States.

A case of alleged employee discrimination against a Muslim employee that began in 2006 finally was concluded in this city today. The details of the case are these: a Muslim employee of the Southern Hills Medical Center (an HCA facility) sued because his request to take 20 days leave to attend the Haj in Mecca was refused.  The US government, through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the employer on behalf of the aggrieved employee. 

The government’s (EEOC) position was that this was a violation of the employee’s Civil Rights (Title 7violation), and that the employer “failed to accommodate the firmly held religious beliefs” of the employee.  EEOC alleged unfair labor practices. Southern Hills, realistically fearing the power of the US government fighting them in court, bad publicity, and growing legal costs, settled today paying the Haj attendee $70,000 for his troubles.

Accommodation to Islam by a host culture (non-Islam) is foundational in the doctrine of Islam. Islam does not accommodate nor assimilate to a host culture; Islam makes the host culture submit. Islam means “submission”. No other religions, no other forms of government are allowed in the doctrine of Islam, only Islam. Anything that makes the host culture crack, anything that forwards Islam is the sacred duty of all Muslims, this is the doctrine of Islam, and this is jihad.

Today in Nashville, the US government caused an American business to submit to Islam, and thus further eroded the ability of the US government to protect itself and the country at large from the threat of encroaching jihad and Sharia law.

Americans do not understand the nature of Sharia law. It is an all-encompassing code of totalitarianism. Americans are told, falsely, that Sharia is just another form of jurisprudence, a form of religious law that is particularly strict. This is true, but its strictness is more akin to Nazism and Stalinism than it is to anything that any American is familiar with from American experience. 

There is a serious difference though, under Nazism the Jews alone were afraid, but under Sharia law and Islam all non-Muslims have very clear cause to fear; fear of total cultural and religious annihilation which is the purpose of Islam at its core.

It is said in Sharia rules, and the Koran that no kafir can ever be above a Muslim in Civil Affairs.

In America today, we manifest our tolerance by giving Islam just one more small destruction of our culture. We feel that then, Islam will be happy and content as neighbors. But the way of Islam is the way of Mohammed. Only 100% is enough. (Bill Warner, PoliticalIslam.com)

And that is what has happened in Nashville today, the kafir (any unbeliever) was taught that making rules over a follower of Islam will have serious consequences, like legal action. And what a boon to Islam that the United States government itself is a dhimmi, a willing executioner of itself, aiding and abetting those whose doctrine demand its overthrow. Ignorance is a costly matter here. Lack of knowledge of the doctrine of Islam and its purposes make otherwise good Americans do very self-destructive things.

Pandora is laughing. Why? She is laughing because we now must re-examine the limits of the term “religion”; the phrase “firmly held religious belief”, and the concept of what employment means and what it means to be an employer.

This surrender on the part of HCA to the misguided EEOC in giving in to the excessive demands of Islam, that no other religious group would likely be successful in prosecuting, is a victory of jihad; soft jihad - but just as dangerous to our civilization and culture as bombs.

According to one legal website, the definition of religion as recognized by the US government is as follows:

The Supreme Court has interpreted religion to mean a sincere and meaningful belief that occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to the place held by God in the lives of other persons. The religion or religious concept need not include belief in the existence of God or a supreme being to be within the scope of the First Amendment.

Because the United States is inclusive (not exclusive like some “religions of peace”) the definition of religion is purposefully broad. Even questionable pseudo-religions/cults like Scientology are given religious protections in the United States.

In addition, a belief does not need to be stated in traditional terms to fall within First Amendment protection. For example, Scientology—a system of beliefs that a human being is essentially a free and immortal spirit who merely inhabits a body—does not propound the existence of a supreme being, but it qualifies as a religion under the broad definition propounded by the Supreme Court. (source cited above.)

In light of the surrender of HCA in Nashville to the lawsuit of a Muslim on grounds of “failure to accommodate firmly held religious beliefs” where is the evidence that shows definitively that the employer’s decision to deny 20-days of vacation was based upon the fact that the employee was a Muslim? Where is the evidence that shows failure to accommodate on the part of the employer?

Is it sufficient evidence for the EEOC that because someone who follows (submits to; a Muslim is “one who submits”) Islam has made an allegation about prejudicial and illegal conduct that therefor it is a fact? Where is the evidence?

One can make a strong case that the surrender of the employer is in no way an admission of guilt but rather is an admission that combatingthe federal government in court is too expensive with little upside and little likelihood of a successful outcome. HCA denies wrongdoing in this case.

One can understand the failure of HCA and Southern Hills to fight this case in court. But who will make this fight? Who will fight against Sharia and encroaching jihad? Who will fight this bizarre and self-destructive embrace of Islam by the EEOC and thereby the US government itself? Who will fight this existentialal fight, and challenge the insanity of political correctness that identifies a totalitarian, misogynist, anti-gay, anti-Christian, anti-Jew, anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist, anti-atheist, anti-democratic, anti-Freedom, anti-all-non-Muslim and claims that it is the “religion of peace” even as the dust of bombs fall to the ground somewhere in the world where violence and war is done in the name of Islam and Mohammed?

Will the next case be from some UFO cultist who, in following in the success today of Islam in Nashville, demands ten weeks vacation from his employer to observe flying saucers at Area 51?

This cultist will have “firmly held religious beliefs” that he must attend UFO observances at Area 51; he will state that his religion requires that he do this; he will state that his belief in his religion is firmly held, and that it is his religious duty to attend this event and that it is a “firmly held religious belief”. He will sue his employer for denying him his requested 10-week leave to attend the saucer observation event.

Will the EEOC sue his employer as they did for the Islam follower in Nashville? Will the EEOC defend this person’s right to embrace and follow the dictates of his “firmly held religious beliefs” and sue the employer for “failure to accommodate”?

This UFO believer’s ”religion” falls within the very liberal range of the definition of religion as understood by the Supreme Court of the United States. You see now where this is leading.

Today’s surrender of American culture in Nashville, quite understandable under the circumstances, as represented by an innocent employer (in this case  HCA) to a Muslim on ground of failure to accommodateIslam is a blow to our economy, a blow to the rights of the employer and a fundamental misunderstanding of the doctrine and purposes of Islam by the US government. 

A victory for Islam is a defeat for the forces of freedom and compassion everywhere.

Another defeat today in Nashville, but this is a chance to learn, to teach. We must understand why this is a serious case, and teach the doctrine of Islam to all. Every American must know the doctrine of Islam. You will not learn it in school, but you must learn it. The greatest force for servitude, cruelty, violence, slavery, intolerance, and war in the world is political Islam.

Today we inch closer to Islamization of America. This is the purpose of political Islam. 

Muslims are prohibited from befriending non-Muslims; the greatest sin in Islam is two-fold, leaving Islam  (apostasy) or never having been a Muslim. To Islam America is just another country and culture and political system that is in dar-al Harb, the House of War; another country to be conquered for Mohammed.

The outside world, which has not yet been subjugated, is called the “House of War,” and strictly speaking a perpetual state of jihad, of holy war, is imposed by the law.

Islam is at war with America because we are not Muslim. Islam’s purpose is to make America Muslim, and Europe and every country in the world that is not now Muslim. Our denial of this fact is not relevant. As Walid Shoebat, a former Islamist PLO terrorist recently said, “The sheep do not know the wolf; but the wolf knows the sheep.”

April 28th, 2009 by admin

ACT Person: “The FBI has refused to deal with CAIR… so how can you be affiliated with CAIR knowing that?”
CAIR Party Volunteer:  (no reply)

These folks in Orlando do great justice to ACT and great justice to the spirit of truth and patriotism, and we applaud their efforts! Bravo!

This is how Americans can learn the truth about CAIR, its many nefarious associates, and its core purposes to spread the totalitarian doctrine of Islam and bring sharia law (which is fundamentally anti-women, anti-democratic, anti-freedom, anti-religious tolerance, anti-gay, and anti-all non-believers).

If folks tell you that they are here to convert your country and overthrow your institutions and supplant your culture with theirs… listen.

April 26th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Post WW2 Germans had few anti-Nazi heroe’s to look to for inspiration.

There was Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg and the July Plotters. Their motive was that Hitler was bringing Germany to ruin and that the war could no longer be won. The outcome would have been the same, had they been successful- the end of Hitlerism and Nazism. Stauffenberg and his colleagues, including the famous Panzer General Irwin Rommel were executed (or in the case of Rommel, told to commit suicide) by the Nazi regime when the plot failed. These men were heroes and are held in high esteem by Germans today for good reason. There were not many others who took a stand as powerful as this. A young college girl and her friends at the University of Munich took a strong stand against the Nazi regime, too.

Sophie Scholl a young college student, her brother a private in the German army, Scholl’s philosophy professor and several others all understand the evil that was Nazism. They formed a loose organization called the White Rose which pamphletted Munich with anti-Nazi messages. They paid a heavy price, all of them.

At the age of 21, Sophie Scholl was executed by the People’s Court in Germany on Feb. 22, 1943, during the Holocaust, for her involvement in The White Rose, an organization that was secretly writing pamphlets calling for the end of the war and strongly denouncing the inhuman acts of the Nazis. (source)

The bravery of these young people cannot be overstated. Germans rightfully remember these few who understood the evil path that their country had taken and actively worked to educate the people to the threat. Read the White Rose pamphlets!

The three members of the White Rose group appeared before the People’s Court judge, Roland Friesler, on 20th February. Found guilty of sedition they were executed by guillotine a few hours later. Just before he was executed Hans Scholl shouted out: “Long live freedom!”

The White Rose is recognized by all lovers of freedom and justice for the heroes that they were. “Two hundred German schools are named for the Scholls, and politicians such as former New York Mayor David Dinkins invoke their names, and visit their graves.” (source)

Sophie Scholls sister Inge Aicher-Scoll wrote: “Perhaps genuine heroism lies in deciding to stubbornly defend the everyday things, the mundane and the immediate.” (source, above)

Today Europe faces a growing threat from an old enemy – totalitarianism and intolerance. Because these new forces of cruelty, violence, hatred, and warfare use the mantle of “religious freedom” to mask the true nature of their purposes Europe stand upon the abyss again. There are new Sophie Scholl’s and new White Roses but across the continent they are maligned as hatemongers and racists. (Memories of the White Rose.)

Why is it acceptable to embrace those who fought the Nazis but it is fashionable to heap scorn and criticism on those who criticise the cruelties, violence, hatred, intolerance, and anti-democratic and anti-freedom mission of political Islam? Why is one fighter against totalitarian cruelty and injustice embraced while people with the same message today are ignored and vilified?

One doesn’t have to look long or far to see the actions of Islam and the cruelties of its adherents as they implement jihad across the world against unbelievers everywhere. The Koran is clear, Islam is superior to all other religions; no other religions can be allowed to exist; Islam is at war (jihad) against all unbelievers everywhere forever until that time when peace can come – when all the world is under Islam.

Muslims are not allowed to befriend unbelievers, unbelievers cannot be trusted. Islam is more important to adherents than ties of family, nation, culture or friendship. This is the doctrine of Islam. Koran 9:23 states, “Oh, believers, do not make friends of your fathers or your brothers if they love unbelief above Islam. He who makes them his friends does wrong.” Even family ties must be broken for Islam. Islam is about Islam, and nothing else. This is the message of warning that the Sophie Scholls of today deliver; they are not embraced today just as Sophie Scholl herself was not embraced during her trials and tribulations.

Mohammed says in the Koran that he is nothing but a messenger and a warner. He warns of the horrors that face those who do not embrace Islam, and those who criticize it or stand in its way. The Koran mentions “the fire” for unbelievers again and again. Many Islamists prefer not to wait for the afterlife to implement these directives.

We see Europe being overrun by Islam and now in the United States we face the same menace of totalitarian ideology that Sophie Scholl was unfortunate enough to be living with.  Adherents of political Islam take the doctrine very, very seriously.  Jihad is incumbent upon all believers. All unbelievers must be brought under the authority of Islam through conquest, conversion, or death. There is no alternative. We have seen this absolutist unforgiving ideology before. Sophie Scholl fought one of its forms.

Today Sophie Scholl and the ideas of bravery and freedom that she lived by are abandoned. Even with a recent movie about Claus Von Stauffenberg, the ideals that prompted his bravery and sacrifice are abandoned in the wider society and culture. Those who criticize Islam are rejected and abused as haters; even those political leaders who criticize Islam and speak the truth are denied access to England (a country writhing in conflict with political Islam).

Totalitarian thinkers and political leaders wearing a military or clerical uniform are very similar. They use the weaknesses of their target societies and cultures against them. This is exactly what Islam does every day. The news of sharia killings and cruelty daily do not sway people, the hate speech from Islamic pulpits daily does not sway people; the violence and terror attacks do not sway; the anti-democratic, anti-Jew, anti-Christian, anti-Gay, anti-Freedom hate speech does nothing to sway those who are distracted.

The distractions and challenges of daily life, of the embrace of careerism, the abandonment of community, the severing of ties for monetary necessity or advancement – these are the tools of our own making with which political Islam makes advances across the West and in the United States. Our Founders knew the dangers of Islam, we ignore them; our great philosophers knew the dangers of Islam, we ignore them, too.

And now the new White Roses are forming across the country and across the world to educate the people about the cruelties of Islam, the designs of conquest and intolerance and the purposes of Islam as laid out in the doctrine clear as day and as implemented every day by adherents of this cruel, expansionist, anti-Freedom ideology of fear and violence, intolerance and hate.

“Approximately 51% of the Medinan Koran text is about jihad and verbal threats directed against Jews, non-Mulsims, and hypocrites (half-hearted Muslims). The Koran of Medina is 10.8% anti-Jewish in nature. By comparison, only 6.8% of the text (measured by paragraphs) of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf is anti-Jewish.” (An Abridged Koran, Bill Warner, PoliticalIslam.com)

Those who claim reverence for the memory of Sophie Scholl and the White Rose yet condemn those who speak about the doctrine of Islam are confused. The mission is the same, the purpose is the same; to educate the people about an ideology that is essentially and fundamentally contrary to human freedom.

Many do not know Sophie Scholl, but they will. She is the model of educating Americans about the great threat that political Islam represents.

Sophie Scholl had the misfortune of living in Germany after it had already been overrun. Her bravery and that of her colleagues in the White Rose is all the more extraordinary because their likelihood for success was so slim, and the likelihood of disaster to them and their cause so great.

We in the United States have the luxury of speaking out as many in Europe and across the world do not, we can speak out about political Islam. This threat to all unbelievers and our democratic concepts of government and society comes directly from the doctrine of Islam.  The forces of totalitarianism use our openness, our ignorance, our multi-cultural fantasies to undermine our societies and advance their goals. They are simply doing what they are commanded to do in the doctrine of Islam. Our ignorance must not be our downfall. We stand on a precipice, and must not be pushed forward to fall. We have heroes to look to for their bravery and their message. (Read “The White Rose: Lessons in Dissent”)

Richard Hansen sums up the story of The White Rose:

“In the vogue words of the time, the Scholls and their friends represented the “other” Germany, the land of poets and thinkers, in contrast to the Germany that was reverting to barbarism and trying to take the world with it. What they were and what they did would have been “other” in any society at any time. What they did transcended the easy division of good-German/bad-German and lifted them above the nationalism of time–bound events. Their actions made them enduring symbols of the struggle, universal and timeless, for the freedom of the human spirit wherever and whenever it is threatened. “

The message of Sophie Scholl is clear – we must fight totalitarianism in whatever garb it might be wearing. The news of the day is about the advance of Islam, the actions of Islamists implementing the doctrine, cruelty, violence, intolerance, hatred, and war. This is a message we must reject, and embrace Sophie Scholl whereever we find her.

April 24th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

As a species we are very good at denying the truth.

When reality is ugly, or simply too unpleasant to countenance we deny it; often vocally railing against it. Very few now deny the truth of the crimes of the Nazis during WW2 but the denial of the crimes of Islam from its inception to today continues to occur almost universally in western society.

Denial of the reality of Islam, its purposes and foundational doctrine of cruelty, hatred, misogyny, and universal perpetual warfare against unbelievers has brought more than several countries in Europe to the breaking point.

Again, and again we see the violence and cruelty of Islam; we hear the language of hate and intolerance from Muslim leaders and yet we continue to deny the ugly truth of what Islam truly is about. This ability to deny unpallatable truths and our societal ignorance of Islam and its doctrine is the foundation of our failure to respond to the existential threat that Islam represents.

Two recent cases of tragic lovers illustrate denial; denial of individuals to face ugly truths, and denial of Islam to accept any behavior that is outside the doctrine, outside the collective construct of what is acceptable to Islam in life.

In Islam pleasure can only be understood in the way that Mohammed and the doctrine of Islam approve, anything outside this context of absolute control by Islam of its adherents, or those trapped within its borders, is strictly verboten. Time and again, we see that the penalty for human individualism, human questing for freedom and love and happiness outside of Islam is death.

Islam is about a collective reality and has nothing whatever to do with the concept of “the individual” except in so far as the individual conforms to the doctrine and fits into the collective. This is a form of mind-control and a brutality of the spirit that can only be understood in a totalitarian context.

Islam is a totalitarian ideology built upon the denial of the human spirit and the better part of our souls; it is the denial of the individual. Can there be a more contrasting philosophy to democracy and inclusiveness and tolerance than this?

The great historian and analyst of American democracy, Alexis de Tocqueville understood this to be so when he wrote in a letter to Arthur de Gobineau, 10/22/1843, “I studied the Koran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. (source).”

The nature of Islam is clear and cannot be disputed, it is described in detail in the doctrine of Islam – the Koran, Sira, and Hadiths; the violent history of Islam originates directly from the doctrine.

“In fact, an appropriate and statistically acceptable characterization is that Islamic doctrines overwhelmingly preaches dislike, hatred and conquest of unbelievers and that this material constitutes the majority of the content in the Koran.”

The goals of Islam are the same as they have ever been - the complete Islamization of the world and destruction of every religion, culture, and government that is not Islamic; this is indisputable. Because we are not taught the history of Islam, and because we are in the main ignorant of it we cannot respond intelligently nor defend ourselves from this existential threat that is Islam (which is seen clearly in the doctrine and in Islamic history).

Islam is at war with all unbelievers everywhere and forever, this is jihad. Unbelievers are called kafirs in Islamic doctrine and in Muslim speech today. But through ignorance and the failure of our leaders to acknowledge the truth of Islam, and teach their people, “Kafirs are in absolute denial that a history of political Islam even exists. (source)“ 

The majority of Americans do not know history, and cannot therefor place any current events of Islamic violence and cruelty into an understandable and rational context. In many ways, as a society, we are personally outside of the flow of history, though history does not care.

“Considered as a nation, they are deplorably wretched, because they have no property in the soil to inspire an ambition to cultivate it. They are abject slaves to the despotism of their government, and they are humiliated by tyranny, the worst of all tyrannies, the despotism of priestcraft. They live in more solemn fear of the frowns of a bigot who has been dead and rotten above a thousand years, than of the living despot whose frown would cost them their lives… The ignorance, superstitious tradition and civil and religious tyranny, which depress the human mind here, exclude improvement of every kind…”
William Eaton — U. S. Consul to Tunis (1764-1811)

Our leaders and our population continues to deny the truth of Islam, just as we as individuals in our own personal lives shut away the truth and create bubbles of palatable illusion into which we retreat when truth is just too ugly to accept. “‘Denial can be a very intoxicating state,’ said criminal profiler John Kelly.”

The doctrine of Islam encourages and demands a level of cruelty, institutionalized and society- wide, through its concepts of sharia law and jihad that westerners can barely comprehend and accept. The doctrine cannot be more clear: “61 percent of the Koran talks ills of unbelievers or calls for their violent conquest and subjugation, but only 2.6 percent of it talks about the overall good of humanity.” Two similar cases of tragedy illustrate denial in a way that is difficult to …deny.

Ongoing investigations into the so-called “Craigslist Killer” in the Boston area appear to show a young man with an apparently bright future but a predilection to murder and brutality. An unlikely suspect, a 22-year old male medical school student has been arrested for the murder and assault in the case. Police authorities have found a gun in his apartment, which they now say is the murder weapon; they have found articles of clothing belonging to the victims in his apartment, and have tracked his internet use and connected it definitively to at least one victim. The evidence is mounting, and is overwhelming. In addition, surveillance photos from the crime scenes appear to show a man who looks remarkably like the arrested man.

But this picture, this reality of a man who is a predator and a killer is entirely contrasted with how his fiance and most of those who knew him (but not all) understood his character to be. The fiance in fact is now publicly defending the suspect, stating to the press that “he couldn’t hurt a fly”.

There is a great deal of interest in this case and in the denial of the fiance to accept the ugly reality of her boyfriend, the man she was to marry in August. This is an illustrative case; denial of the fiance is roundly criticized. The deluded woman is attacked across the internet. Most people condemn her foolishness and lack of insight in refusing to accept the obvious truth that her fiance is a fiend, a predator, and killer. There is sympathy, too, but mainly astounded disbelief that someone could be so attached to an idea and simply refuse to give it up when reality proves that the idea is false. This is classic denial. “‘People fall in love and want to see what they want to see. It’s a fool’s paradise,’ said family therapist Charles Foster of Cambridge.”

There is little sympathy for those who speak the truth about the history of Islam, the doctrine of Islam, the dangers of Sharia, and the cruelty of this ideology that has killed millions over the course of the centuries. Why? Because the majority of Americans, forgiving, multicultural, tolerant, and ignorant of history and Islamic doctrine live in a “fool’s paradise”.

As we face a growing threat from Islam across the west, those few brave enough to speak the truth are attacked as hatemongers and racists and bigots because the West is in denial about Islam. Worse, those who discuss the history and doctrine of Islam are criticized by the deniers as ignorant, while the ignorant deniers take the high moral ground of knowledge and scholarship – a false “scholarship” based upon ignorance.

We have been warned about the denial of knowledge and learning; about the embrace of ignorance by Huxley, Orwell, and many other authors and philosophers. We have seen in history where denial of truth and the embrace of ignorance leads- it leads to Nuremberg rallies and Sobibor and Treblinka.

One could ask if “ignorance is bliss” why aren’t more people happy? Ignorance is the embrace of a lie. Lies do not bring happiness; the fiance of the Craigslist killer in Boston will tell you.

This denial will see the destruction of our countries, our religions, our cultures over time. Denial is demise, destruction.

Islam also embraces denial but in a very different way. Islam’s denial is the foundation of its ideology, the denial of the individual; denial of the truth of Islam by the West is the denial of our own independence and individuality which is the mission of Islam. We know this because this is what the doctrine says, this is what Mohammed says, this is what the followers of Islam say across the world. If these ugly and unpopular truths are denied perhaps they will go away. Perhaps the poor deluded fiance whose betrothed is a killer can will reality away with her active denial of the truth; perhaps she can will the past to return when everything seemed alright and the future was still before her rosy and bright? Her denial has placed herself outside the flow of reality, but reality does not care.

Islam is very interested in denial although it is characterized as freedom. “Islam” means “submission”, all Muslims (one who “submits”) must submit to Allah and to the doctrine of Islam.  Submission is the opposite of freedom. Freedom through submission is a popular concept in cults, and in totalitarian states and in cultures that believe all cultures are of equal value, merit, and importance (like ours). For those who submit, or who are born into submission to Islam, attempted escape or non-compliance with the rules of Islam can have dire consequences.

Submission is encouraged and required, denial of submission is a death sentence. Two young people in Afghanistan unlucky enough to live in a Taliban-controlled area found this out recently. For every kafir, this is an instructive case. For every denier of the truth of Islam this is an impossible case because what it means is that the truth of Islam is very unpleasant and very dangerous, it is a truth that must be denied, again and again and again by those who hate the truth.

Islam is not known for its tolerance, forgiveness, or acceptance of others. Intolerance is at the core of Islam and its all-ecompassing ideology of control. Leaving Islam, leaving the collective, or disobeying the rules of Sharia are particularly serious matters.

“The consensus among Muslim scholars for a long time — for 14 centuries — was that those who leave the faith should be killed,” said terrorism expert Daveed Gartenstein-Ross.

Gartenstein-Ross has studied Islamic law extensively. He says those who convert out of Islam–especially Christians–lead a lonely and dangerous existence.

He said, “And even today, the view that apostates from Islam should not be killed — that people should be free to convert to another religion — is very much a minority view.”

Within the Islamic world there are at least 14 states that make it illegal to convert out of Islam. In at least eight of those states, it is punishable by death.(source)

Even at America’s supposedly “finest university” the horrific, intolerant idea that leaving Islam is a justifiable death sentence can be found, and only last week! The Islamic Chaplain at Harvard supports this concept. Why? Because it is in the doctrine, and since the doctrine is perfect and absolute he is doing what he is supposed to do as a practicing Muslim- submit to the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed. (”It is clear quite clear that under Islamic Law an apostate must be put to death. There is no dispute on this ruling among classical Muslim or modern scholars.”-Ibn Warraq)

“In a private e-mail to a student last week, Abdul-Basser wrote that there was “great wisdom (hikma) associated with the established and preserved position (capital punishment [for apostates]) and so, even if it makes some uncomfortable in the face of the hegemonic modern human rights discourse, one should not dismiss it out of hand.(source)”

Early in April it was reported that a young couple was executed by a Taliban Sharia court in Afghanistan for attempting to elope. Some reports stated the young woman’s age at 14. “Officials said they were shot by a firing squad outside the mosque in Lokhi, the village where they had lived.”(source, UPI)

The Guardian (UK) states, “Officials from the south-western province of Nimroz say Gul Pecha, in her late teens, and her boyfriend Abdul Aziz, 21, were shot by a firing squad outside a mosque in their home village of Lokhi on Monday.” The execution of these young people is the action of a Sharia court, “who held them for four days in Lokhi’s mosque before putting them on trial” (The Globe UK). This case is illustrative of the cruelty of Islam, the denial of individual freedoms and the savagery of Sharia law. (This case is covered extensively in international media, one could not make up such things.)

It is important not to dimiss this horror as the action of extremists.

The Taliban is comprised of Pakistanis and Afghanis who are considered the true “Mujahideen” or “holy warriors of Allah” because they have established a purely Islamic state which rigidly conforms to the “pious Muslim ideals” which were outlined and set down by Prophet Mohammed. (source)

Islam is about control, a deep, pervasive, obsessive control of all Muslims everywhere, and the desire to control all non-believers. This is a political ideology, a unified brutal way of life. This is totalitarianism.

“…for all its pretensions about ideology and doctrine, militant Islam is first and foremost about power. It is totalitarianism, not ideology. It is the Communism of this era.” (source)

Throughout history there have been totalitarian movements, cruel and harsh systems of total control. Nothing comes close to the all-encompassing desire for control of Islam.

The Greek historian Thucydides, writing about the calamitous war that had destroyed his own world, made an important observation about the causes of historical events: Even though circumstances may change, human nature remains the same…(source)

H.L. Mencken the great American journalist, editor, and iconoclast once said about the Puritans, that Puritanism was “the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.” The desire for control of others and the capability to deny truth are two of the more unfortunate components of human nature. In Islam, doctrinally acceptable “happiness” is the only acceptable form. The leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini proved the point; no fun of any kind is allowed.

Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun or joy in whatever is serious.

 

Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini, radio sermon, 1979. (source)

The murder of the young couple by the Taliban occured because two young people wanted to find happiness outside of Islam. Hugh Fitzgerald laid out the truth of Islam in a superb article in Jihad Watch recently.

Islam is the most regulating of all faiths. It’s a Total Belief-System. It tells its adherents what to do, and does not suggest but rather offers a complete list of what is Prohibited, and what is Commanded. It does not offer room for possible autonomous moral judgment, for at every step one is discouraged from one’s own questioning, is told to be “a slave of Allah” and to realize that whatever Allah wills must not be questioned.”

Fitzgerald shows clearly that Islam is so attractive to so many because adherents are never required to make moral choices, they are all made already. Islam is the perfect cult.

The mistake that the two unfortunate lovers in Afghanistan made is that they thought that they had some leeway to make decisions for themselves. They did not. They thought that they could make moral and ethical decisions about their own lives themselves; they were wrong. In Islam, there is no room for such things. Anything that is contrary to Islam is offensive to Islam, and must be quashed.

“One submits, one never questions, one never has an occasion to exercise moral sense. And far from being a faith that allows for individual autonomy, Islam is a collectivist faith. One’s sole duty is to Islam. In Islam, it is perhaps most accurate to say that neither Allah nor even Muhammad, that exemplary Perfect Man, is being worshipped, but rather Islam itself. Yes, in Islam one worships….Islam.” (Fitzgerald)

Denial is a very popular philosophy in America in 2009. Its greatest proponents are our political and religious leaders, our uninformed scholars, and the rapidly failing establishment media.

Denial of Islam is taught in the public schools and called “history” or “politics” or “international relations”. The doctrine of Islam is not taught, nor is the history of jihad.

When it comes to Islam and understanding it we are in complete denial as a society. Bill Warner in a March, 2009 interview described this embrace of ignorance as the “NewState”.

The Newstate prohibits the study of political Islam in the Universities. The role of Islam in the history of slavery, the dhimmi (unbelievers living under Islamic rule) history, and the annihilation of kafir (unbeliever) civilizations is forbidden. The curriculum of the Universities only includes small samples from the Koran, the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and the Hadith (his traditions).

Even after 9/11, Beslan, Mumbai, London, Paris, Madrid, Khobar Towers, Kenya, and daily events around the world (here, here, here) that illustrate the implementation of Islamic doctrine and the true nature of the so-called “religion of peace” we sustain our denial.

As a culture we are the characters in history who say “It is not so”, when the survivors of a critical battle return home to warn their countrymen to rise and defend their homes, their country and their lives. Our denial empowers an existentially destructive ideology.

“In July 1942, he, his first wife and their 12 year old daughter lived in the Warsaw Ghetto. ‘I knew what was happening,’ he said.  ‘Many people knew, but most of them wanted to pretend they didn’t.  I knew for certain because, only ten days before, I was finally taken (August 27, 1942), a young man called Friedmann came back from Treblinka hidden under rags. His escape had been carefully arranged so as to have somebody come back to bring us the truth; to warn us. But nobody believed him. It was perfectly extraordinary. But I did.’” (Another source tells how this young man besought the ghetto elders to believe him and how finally they said he was overwrought and needed a rest which they would arrange for him in the ghetto clinic…).” (Sereny, Into That Darkness, p.257, Vintage Books/Random House (1974, 1st Random House edition, 1983))

As we embrace this false peace between Islam and our society (and the West), and lies of a false history and fake present we step aside from the flow of history and are passed by.

Our strongest desire is that Islam is not what its detractors say it is; that the doctrine cannot be real; that Muslims want to assimilate; that Islam is a friend to America. These are the foundations of our denial as a society, the falsehoods that we so desperately want to be true.

We are in denial, none of it is true.

April 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

It is not a common thing to see a religious leader calling for murder from the pulpit – except in the Arab world. The reason that this is so common in the Islamic world is that the doctrine of Islam calls for the conversion and/or death of all unbelievers. In the clip posted here you will see an Imam condemn the Jews and worse, and reference Koran and Mohammed, and the Sunna as justification.

In the world at large and even during the Nazi Holocaust we did not see religious leaders call for their followers to do appalling things because it was “God’s Work” or “Christ’s Work”. We do see this in the Islamic world, however – such things are Mohammed’s work.

This is the great threat of political Islam. Watch, and see. The Hamas Imam begins his “sermon”…

“We Muslims know best the nature of the Jews, because the Koran has informed us about this, and because the pure Sunna of the Prophet Muhammad has devoted much space to informing the Muslims of the truth about the Jews and their hostility to Islam and its Prophet.” [...]

Hatred of the Jews is foundational in the doctrine of Islam. This Jew hatred continues today, every day. Andrew Bostom has documented this hatred in his encylopedic work, “The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism”

The following quotes are from a Hamas sermon run recently on Hamas TV in Gaza. Click the film still below to watch the actual broadcast, translated by MEMRI. (Courtesy of FrontPage.)

“Allah Willing, The Moment Will Come When… Not a Single Jew Or Zionist is Left on the Face of the Earth”; “Dogs And Pups Bark and Bite, and… Are Impure – That Is The Truth About the Jews”

“Allah willing, the moment will come when their property will be destroyed and their sons annihilated, until not a single Jew or Zionist is left on the face of the Earth.

[...]

“There once was a dog that frightened the entire neighborhood with its barking. This dog begot a pup which was more wicked than its father. The Jews are always the same, brothers. Both dogs and pups bark and bite, and both are impure. That is the truth about the Jews.”

Hamas and Islamists everywhere are clear in their rhetoric in Arabic, but often not so in English. Arafat was famous for talking about peace in English to American and European audiences then screaming for Jihad and death to the Jews in Arabic the following day. This has always been very confusing to westerners; so many are convinced that there must be some mistake, or some miscommunication. But there is no miscommunication, only misunderstanding on our side; the Islamists are very clear, and always have been.

They are guided by their doctrine which is forever unchanging and perfect, and guided by their Prophet Mohammed, the great example for Muslims to follow. If Mohammed had been more a peace-loving fellow, there would likely be little concern today. But we are not so lucky. The message of Mohammed is jihad forever and everywhere until the entire world is Islamic and all live under Sharia in the great Umma. Islam and its doctrine is quite clear; Muslims who follow the doctrine do not hide the message or their goals. We choose not to listen.

A Sermon from the Religion of Peace

For those not interested in becoming Muslim, living as a dhimmi, being conquered and having their cultures and states destroyed or subsumed, or being dead Islam is something of an unfortunate philosophy that is difficult to accept.

There are many kinds of non-acceptance. Active and vociferous denial is the most common response in the American cultural landscape. This is most unfortunate for those who discuss the doctrine of Islam, that is those who speak the truth.

Only in literature has there been a more anti-intellectual environment than that of America, 2009. There is a time, and a place. The place is in a book, and the setting is 1984.

For those who speak the truth, and have the temerity and bravery to discuss such unpopular things as truth the epithet “hater” is often thrown about. What is one to do? How should one respond? Here are a few suggestions, courtesy of Citizen Warrior.

As a service to our readers, please find responses below to those poor ignorant folks who suggest that discussion of the truth of Islamic doctrine and Islamic cruelties is hatred, and that you must be a “hatemonger” for speaking of such things.

A fearful, clueless person might say, “You are a hater!”  Consider a reply as follows:

Hatred is not the answer. If anything, I am anti-hatred. That’s why I am trying to expose Islamic teachings: Shari’a law includes a system of legally-mandated hatred. Mohammad is their model, and he expressed hatred toward non-Muslims. He maligned them, robbed them, tortured them, killed them, raped them, and took them as slaves. Muslims are supposed to follow his example. It says so in the Qur’an over seventy times.

… “You’re a bigot!”

I’m talking about the teachings, not the people. Some Muslims follow the teachings, and some are Muslim in name only. But non-Muslims need to know about the teachings, because many of the most fundamental Islamic teachings are about how to deal with non-Muslims. According to the teachings, we must be subjugated under Islamic law. All of us. Voluntarily or by force. And the tens of millions or hundreds of millions who follow Islamic doctrine to the letter are actively working toward that end. They have gained control over how Islam is taught in American schoolbooks. Devoted followers have set up organizations in the United States and other Western democracies with the express purpose of undermining those democracies from within. We need to know about this stuff. It is affecting us already.

…”You’re a hatemonger!”

If I say the teachings of communism advocate ending economic inequalities, does that make me a hatemonger? If I say Republicans advocate smaller government, does that make me a hater? If I say Buddhists believe in reincarnation, does that make me a hater? But if I say the teachings of Islam advocate striving to institute worldwide Shari’a law, that makes me a hatemonger? That doesn’t make any sense. Where did you come up with that?

Walid Shoebat in his new book God’s War on Terror says, “May I suggest that for your next vacation you go to Mecca and carry a poster that says, ‘We all worship the same god – Muslims, Christians, Jews, and Bhuddists are all one – and Allah, Jehovah, God, and Bhudda are but the same God.’ You will learn that when it comes to God Muslims will not simply draw a line in the sand, but on your neck. (p. 15)

Most folks you talk with who know nothing of Islam will know one thing, they will know fear. Fear is the capital with which Islam trades across the world. Islamists understand that fear works, they use it everywhere. Fear is the great weapon of Islam, of totalitarianism everywhere throughout history.

Consider this:

Westerners do not understand that when it comes to the Muslim world, even the most “moderate” of Muslims, if they are religious, all believe in the coming of the Mahdi and the establishment of the Caliphate to rule the entire Globe by changing world laws to adopt the Islamic Sharia. The coming of the Mahdi to religious Muslims is as holy of a belief as the coming of the Messiah is to Christians and Jews. (God’s War on Terror, Walid Shoebat, p.45)

The only thing that fights fear is knowledge. Learn, teach, don’t fear.

April 20th, 2009 by admin

You are watching the fall of Sweden, if this process of multiculturalism, national suicide, Islamization is not stopped, quickly.

This is our future.

Film courtesy of a friend in Ohio. Islam is a totalitarian ideology that will not assimilate. Assimilation is contrary to the foundations, purposes, and goals of Islam. We must learn and know Islam’s ideology in order to stop this horrific process of the loss of our cultures, and our countries to Islamization.

April 20th, 2009 by admin

An original article that was first posted several days ago on this site about the Somali pirates, Islam/jihad and the origins of the US Navy was picked up today by the ACT national organization and distributed via email throughout the world. The article is called “Those Who Ignore History Are Condemned: Somali Piracy in Context.” Numerous websites and blogs have also reposted the piece. Our site URL (this one) was linked in the article as well as Bill Warner’s excellent site PoliticalIslam.com. Kudos to everyone in ACT WestNashville.

-Admin

April 19th, 2009 by admin

The United States government has withdrawn from the UN racist conference on racisim.  This is excellent and unexpected good news.

The United States is boycotting a U.N. conference on racism next week over a document that “singles out” Israel in its criticism and conflicts with the nation’s “commitment to unfettered free speech,” the U.S. State Department said Saturday.

The ongoing bad news is that so many leaders still remain clueless as to the threats posed by US involvement in institutional racism and protection of Islam from criticism. These leaders confuse their own agendas with the character of the United States.

Meanwhile, the Congressional Black Caucus said it was “deeply dismayed” by the decision made by the nation’s first African-African president, saying it was inconsistent with administration policies.

“Had the United States sent a high-level delegation reflecting the richness and diversity of our country, it would have sent a powerful message to the world that we’re ready to lead by example,” the statement said. “Instead, the administration opted to boycott the conference, a decision that does not advance the cause of combating racism and intolerance, but rather sets the cause back.”

Non-participation at Durban II mirrors non-participation in Durban I by the Bush administration.

The Bush administration walked out of the last U.N. racism conference, held in Durban, South Africa, in September 2001, protesting the singling out of Israel “for censure and abuse.” Israel also withdrew, and some of the language targeting Israel in the conference draft documents was subsequently changed.

The UN is not noted for its objective views on Islam, quite the contrary.

This is a key element of the Stealth Jihad: the attempt to silence those who speak about the ideological underpinnings of jihad terrorism. Most Americans probably aren’t aware that there are serious discussions at the UN about criminalizing discussion of the motives and goals of Islamic jihadists, and even fewer probably realize what the implications of this are for the United States and the First Amendment in the coming years.

Any ideology that instructs its adherents to hate and despise and distrust all unbelievers everywhere and forever, and that supports active violence against non-adherents should be criticised. Any efforts to curtail such criticism should be opposed. 

Religious groups and free-speech advocates are banding together to fight a United Nations resolution they say is being used to spread Sharia law to the Western world and to intimidate anyone who criticizes Islam.

The non-binding resolution on “Combating the Defamation of Religion” is intended to curtail speech that offends religion — particularly Islam.

April 18th, 2009 by admin

Islam is not discriminating in who it discriminates against. 

The goal of political Islam is to convert the kafir (unbelievers), enslave them, or kill them. Dar al-Islam, the “house of peace”, can only be brought about when Islam is in control, and ruling. Islam does not discriminate. All those who are unbelievers, who do not accept Mohammed and Allah are hated by Islam. It is clear in the doctrine again and again. The doctrine of Islam is very important to those who follow Islam, those who submit. Islam means “submission”. Those who do not submit must be forced to do so. This is the way of jihad.

The doctrine of Islam is why Jews, Christians, Hindhus, atheists, all unbelievers around the world are persecuted by Islam. Islam does not discriminate; if you are an unbeliever, Islam hates you – passionately.

This Bulletin courtesy of PoliticalIslam.com.

April 16th, 2009 by admin

Islam suggests that it is “the religion of peace”; that it has been hijacked by “extremists” who have “misused and abused the teachings” of Islam and its messenger Mohammed. This is not so.

Don’t be fooled by the Taqiyyah of Islam. The extremism you see is the very foundation, the core of Islam itself.  If you attend an “interfaith” “bridge building” event, this is the message that you will get, but it is not so.

What we call “extremism” in the judeo-christian culture is called “moderation” in the Islamic doctrine. Islam is a violent, anti-unbeliever, totalitarian ideology.  Jihad is its tactic, the implementation of Sharia lawis one of its goals. Islam is fundamentally anti-Jewish and anti-Christian. Islamic violence against the Jews and Christians of the world, and now Americans and westerners (all non-believers, kafirs) is foundational to the doctrine. Allah and Mohammed hate and distrust unbelievers. Unbelievers are not to be trusted, not to be befriended. There is no charity for unbelievers. The doctrine of Islam is a totalitarian one, utterly opposed to American concepts of inclusiveness, liberty and freedom.

Sura (5:51) – “O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.”

Sura (3:28) - “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah…”

Sura (3:118) – “O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people, they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear to you, if you will understand.” 

The violence and hatred of Islam against the unbeliever is universal, and permanent. Islam is at war with the kafir forever. Violence against the unbeliever, particularly Jews, is at the core of political Islam. If you do not believe this, read the doctrine.

“This is not a radical Muslim. This is a pious Muslim. The radicals would be the ones who would attempt to reform Islam. Those are the true radicals.”  (source: AtlasShrugs blog)

“It is not me who says so. The Prophet said: ‘Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and tree will call: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him – except for the Gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews.’ I have heard that they are planting many of these trees now.
  
[...]
  
“As for you Jews – the curse of Allah upon you. The curse of Allah upon you, whose ancestors were apes and pigs. You Jews have sown hatred in our hearts, and we have bequeathed it to our children and grandchildren.. You will not survive as long as a single one of us remains. ” (Muhammad Hussein Ya’qoub)

Andrew Bostom, the great scholar and historian of Islam Jihad and Jew Hatred uses the term “loathing” for Islam’s approach towards Jews.

“The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The time [of judgment] will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews and kill them; until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!” (Sahih Muslim book 41, no. 6985, source)

Until Islam is reformed, and repudiates violence against the unbeliever, and hatred of the unbeliever, and universal jihad which we have no reason to hope will happen anytime soon, what you see in the following bulletin is what we can expect, every day.

With special thanks to the indefatigable staff of PoliticalIslam.com, this Bulletin is reprinted here. If you doubt the truth of the doctrine  of Islam, watch the news, open your browser and look. Listen to what the killers and abusers and haters are saying; they are talking about the doctrine of Islam. It is time for us to listen.
 

 Bulletin of Jew Hatred, April 15, 2009

Facts without comments – we collect the dots, you connect them

 Please distribute this bulletin and send us events that you find

 

Summaries:

North America
 
March 22, 2009
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Police in Chicago arrested Mohammed Alkaramla in connection with a bomb threat made towards a Jewish school.  His fingerprints were found on the envelope and the text of the letter was on his computer’s hard drive.

March 24, 2009
New York, USA
Journalist Khaled Abu Toameh writes, “During a recent visit to several university campuses in the U.S., I discovered that there is more sympathy for Hamas there than there is in Ramallah.  Listening to some students and professors on these campuses, for a moment I thought I was sitting opposite a Hamas spokesman or a would-be-suicide bomber.”

April 10, 2009
Washington, DC
A US immigration board rejected suspected Nazi John Demjanjuk’s appeal of an order to extradite him to Germany to face charges he helped murder 29,000 Jews as a death camp guard. 

March 26, 2009
New York, USA
Jewish groups have denounced a cartoon by a prize-winning political cartoonist as anti-Semitic.  Pat Oliphant’s cartoon, published Wednesday, shows a headless figure chasing while pushing a large Star of David with fangs and pursuing a tiny woman carrying a child labeled “Gaza.” The syndicated cartoon appeared in newspapers around the world.  The Simon Wiesenthal Center said in a statement: “The imagery in this cartoon mimics the venomous anti-Semitic propaganda of the Nazi and Soviet eras. It is cartoons like this that inspired millions of people to hate in the 1930s and help set the stage for the Nazi genocide.”

March 27, 2009
Washington, DC
Ari Roth of the Washington DC Jewish Community Center made the decision to stage a reading of the anti-Semitic play “Seven Jewish Children: A Play for Gaza”.  Originally produced in London, it describes how the Jewish parents discuss teaching their children about the Jewish state and the Gaza war. For example, one portion deals with living in Israel. The parent says: “Tell her, of course tell her, tell her everyone was driven out and the country is waiting for us to come home. Don’t tell her she doesn’t belong here.”

March 27, 2009
Toronto, Canada
A Canadian Jewish group is asking the government to consider barring two Palestinian clerics from speaking in April.  The two clerics have publicly supported suicide bombings, questioned the Holocaust and preached hatred against Jews.

March 27, 2009
New York, USA
During a speaking event moderated by Charlie Rose, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev said President Reagan raised the plight of the Soviet Jewry in every meeting the two held.

March 30, 2009
Sourced article that focuses on two aspects of the increased anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic attacks that  demonized “the Jews using motifs from the Islamic tradition, and the comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany”. 

April 8, 2009
Florida, USA
A swastika was painted on the door of a fraternity house at the University of Florida.  Fraternity member Alex Mehler told the Gainsville Sun that the vandalism was “a blatant act of anti-Semitism” and said many members of the fraternity were “distraught.” He said the Florida AEPi chapter has been working on building the house for three years and plans to move into the facility at the beginning of the next school year.

April 9, 2009
New York, USA
Many people still blame Jews for capitalism’s faults, says author Ira Stoll.

South America

March 27, 2009
Caracas, Venezuela
Eight police officers were charged in conneciton with an attack at the Jewish synagogue in Caracas, Venezuela.  In January, the synagogue was vandalized, religious objects desecrated, anti-Semitic statements were painted on the walls, and records with the names and addresses of local Jews were stolen.

Europe

March 23, 2009
France
The Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions will not renew dialogue with French Muslim groups that equated Operation Cast Lead in Gaza with the Holocaust, said the group’s vice president, Meyer Habib.  During Operation Cast Lead, some Muslim organizers of pro-Palestinian demonstrations equated Israel’s actions with the Nazi Holocaust, and even carried banners that read “death to Jews.”

April 7, 2009
London, England
From jail, a Muslim cleric is continuing to issue fatwas, anti-Semitic statements, and incite violence, according to counter-extremism organization The Quilliam Foundation.  One of the cleric’s statements were, “I congratulate the mujahideen and the people of Gaza, and may Allah have mercy on the martyrs and make us follow them, and may Allah curse the Jews and the rulers of apostasy and the crusaders — amen, amen.”

Middle East

March 22, 2009
Jerusalem, Israel
A former Nazi SS guard deported from the United States was freed by Austria a day later.  The statute of limitations in Austria precluded Josias Kumpf from being put on trial.

March 23, 2009
Iran
Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei responds to Obama by saying, “Change in words Is not enough . . . my advice to you is to give it [this speech] to someone to translate it for you – but don’t give it to the Zionists to translate…” 

April 7, 2009
Gaza
On Al-Aqsa TV aired a show at the Gaza Islamic University, portraying Jews drinking and washing with Muslims’ blood.   

April 10, 2009
Qatar
On Al-Jazeera TV,  Saudi cleric Khaled Al-Khlewi teaches children “the Jew is treacherous, disloyal, deceitful, and belligerent by nature; nothing works with him but force”  and refers to the Jews’ aspirations as expansionist. 

Video:

On Al-Jazeera TV,  Saudi cleric Khaled Al-Khlewi teaches children “the Jew is treacherous, disloyal, deceitful, and belligerent by nature; nothing works with him but force”  and refers to the Jews’ aspirations as expansionist.  Video here . 

Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei responds to Obama by saying, “Change in words Is not enough . . . my advice to you is to give it [this speech] to someone to translate it for you – but don’t give it to the Zionists to translate…”  Video here .

On Al-Aqsa TV aired a show at the Gaza Islamic University, portraying Jews drinking and washing with Muslims’ blood.   Video here.    

 

---

 

This material is not copyrighted. Please forward. You may remove the header and the by-line, if that suits your purposes. If you wish to get a direct subscription, go to www.politicalislam.com and sign up for our newsletters.  

Produced by www.politicalislam.com
Publisher:  Bill Warner; Editor:  Kendra M
Permalink: http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/bulletin-of-jew-hatred-april-15-2009/