August 16th, 2009 by admin

Two films of Pierre Rehov

First Comes Saturday, Then Comes Sunday
Silent Exodus

Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Belcourt Cinema
2102 Belcourt Ave.
Nashville, TN
6:30 pm – 9:30 pm

Admission: Free, and open to the public
Donations: Accepted (to defray costs)

Please join us at the Belcourt Cinema in downtown Nashville for an important evening of documentary film viewing. Acclaimed director and film-maker Pierre Rehov will be introducing these challenging and timely films.  Two documentaries of importance to all lovers of freedom and justice will be shown. The event is open to the public. No admission will be charged. Donations will be accepted at the door to offset costs.

The great challenge of our time is that of Islam. Across the world Christians and Jews, and all unbelievers (kafirs), are oppressed and worse by the forces of Islamic intolerance and expansionism. Jihad is the duty of all adherents of the “religion of peace”, it is stated as such by both Allah and Mohammed in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Jihad is violent warfare against all unbelievers everywhere and forever until the entire world is under Islamic dominance and control.

Pierre Rehov has documented the effects of jihad and the suffering of its victims. The information in these films will be new and disturbing for many viewers. When we see the suffering caused by jihad we can learn what jihad truly is. Jihad is warfare against non-believers.

These are important films, we bring them to you out of concern and empathy for our friends across the world and to help educate ourselves and one another as to this existential threat of political Islam and its jihad against all. Ignorance of Islam and jihad is morally and ethically indefensible. These films are a devastating reminder to us all as to the reality of jihad, the brutality of political Islam, and the growing danger that we in the United States face. The suffering of Christians and Jews by political Islam is documented every day, but few take note. (See here, here, here, and here.) It is difficult to ignore the suffering that Mr. Rehov has captured on film. Ignorance of Islam must end, Mr. Rehov’s films are ignorance breakers.

We invite you to learn with us from these films, and from their creator Mr. Pierre Rehov. We invite you to let your  moral outrage, sadness, and horror guide you on a path of compassion for those Christians and Jews whose suffering is so palpable in these films. We hope that with new knowledge more will understand. These are films that cannot and must not be ignored.

-DL Adams

August 6th, 2009 by admin

An Israeli suddenly realizes that the so-called “Palestinian-Israeli problem” is not about politics at all, it’s about jihad. When a difficult enemy is understood to be an intractable one, the world becomes a very menacing place.

This heartfelt article is by an Israeli friend of ACT West Nashville.

-Admin

The undeniable truth of Israel and the lie of fundamentalist Islam

by Golan Shlomi

Growing up in Israel during the 1990s was a very special experience for me that involved hopes for a better future.

As a teenager I remember seeing Palestinians everywhere working and having fun among the Jewish population but it was still not enough for them. They wanted more; they said they want their own land, they wanted independence which sounded very legit to me back then , “Why can’t they have their own country?” I asked myself.

I always thought they deserved their own country like any other nation in the world.

Give them their country, I said, so they won’t need to go through the bureaucracy involved in getting the staying and working permits in Israel.

But lo and behold, in 1994 after the Oslo agreements, it happened!!! Or at least started to happen, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) led by Yasser Arafat became the legal government of the Palestinian authority which was destined to become an independent Palestinian country after the negotiation would end… Oh my, a dream come true, in the streets of Israel people started to plan future trades and tourism with the new Palestinian state, I remember even talks about turning the mandatory service of 3 years in the Israeli army to a fully volunteered service.

But everything collapsed in 2000. In the final talks at Camp David between the Israeli prime minister , Ehud Barak, and Yasser Arafat, with mediation of Bill Clinton, Israel had agreed to give the Palestinian 96% of the territories they demanded plus 4% alternative territories plus sovereignty in the Arab neighborhood in Eastern Jerusalem and in the Temple mount.

In other words, Arafat was offered 100% of his claims with only minor changes due to security arrangements Israel could not afford to give. This was a more than fair agreement to the Palestinians; Israel offerered more to them than any other country in the world would ever agree to. (Let me just mention that a similar package was offered by the former Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, to the current Fatah leader, Mahmud Abbas, several years ago.)

But guess what? Arafat rejected the offer!

After years of armed conflict between the Jews and Arabs the Jews agreed to withdraw from their own lands out of their own free will but still the Palestinian people refused this treasure which was handed to them as if on a silver tray!!! Instead they choose “armed resistance”, jihad, with weapons that were supplied to them by the Israeli government- perhaps we are fools?

A pure truth was revealed then – the truth is that the state of Israel belongs to the Jews and all the Palestinian demands were nothing more than a lie that was a cover for something else, for something bigger, jihad. A lot has happened since that moment in Camp David- the Israeli dreams for peace have been shattered, our hopes were destroyed and my question was why? If the Palestinians wanted a state so badly why did they say no?

But now I have come to a realization that there was one dream that didn’t shatter, an old dream of the Muslim world, a dream of the annihilation of Israel and the Jews.They knew that by saying “yes” to the Israeli offer they would simply destroy their own dream and of course nobody wants to shoot himself in the leg.

They wanted Israel to give them everything including the its self-destruction by trying to force on Israel draconian demands like the absorption of millions of refugees. These are refugees who fled their homes 60 years ago because of a war they initiated themselves against Israel, a demand to which no sane living organism on planet Earth would ever agree.

Such a concession from Israel would prepare the groundwork for the disappearance of Israel as a Jewish state.

All of the above is just a simple truth of the unfounded hatred that has existed for thousands of years. After WWII, Anti-Semitism has become a vulgar term among the world’s nations including Iran which is now the most dangerous enemy of Israel.

Instead, anti-Semites have routed their hatred toward Zionism and the state of Israel. It’s an obvious fact that I can say with confidence – if Israel, Jews and the rest of the world would disappear from the maps the Muslims would be left alone to kill each other.

Any novice psychologist would tell us that when you hate someone you actually hate yourself and hating yourself can only result in self destruction.

The Muslim world appears to be motivated by hate. Hate is destructive and dreams are creative. The sad part is that the Western world is standing in a limbo between hate and vision.

Perhaps the current economic crises has happened for a reason, maybe the US, Europe and even Israel needs this economic downturn to make the switch from economical growth, which is no longer viable at this time, to focusing on real dangers in the world like the growth of fundamentalist Islam for example.

June 4th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

President Obama has made his choice. The choice is the Muslim world over the state of Israel, and appeasement of a hostile ideology instead of active defense of the United States and our allies. This is a sea-change moment in history.

American and European leftists believe that Israel is the cause of Middle Eastern conflicts and war; not the actions of Israel but the very existence of Israel itself. It does not matter that Israel is the only democracy in the region; it does not matter that Israel is an ally of the United States. What is important is that Israel is seen as an impediment to peace because it exists. It is not important that the conflicts arise because Islamic countries attack Israel in the same ongoing universal jihad that has been going on for over 1400 years. If Israel is removed, the conflict problems of the Middle East are solved, immediately. This is absurdity and ignorance.

Daniel Pipes has written an insightful article on the abandonment of Israel by Mr. Obama for Iran a hostile country that stormed our embassy in Tehran and took our embassy staffers, our countrymen, hostage for 444 days in 1979. This was an act of war for which we have never gone to war with Iran. This is an unpaid debt that Iran must pay, but which President Obama, the new messiah and Harvard hero likely is not aware of.

We have the great misfortune to live in a time of great struggle, an existential struggle between freedom and the totalitarian ideology of Islam. President Obama’s trip to Arab states over the last several days and his active appeasement and coddling to dictatorships across the region is an ugly stain on our national identity. Mr. Obama has made the weak case that we are “not at war withIslam, and never will be.” But he ignores the truth of the actions of the followers of Islam and the doctrine of jihad that is central to their ideology of cruelty and conquest. Islam is at war with us.

Walid Shoebat, noted former PLO terrorist and now defender of Israel and the US, said in response to Mr. Obama’s speech today that recent discussion of Obama’s Muslim roots in the mainstream press are a serious matter. In conjunction with the appeasement message of the speech in Cairo today- it is a very serious matter.

This (dladams: mainstream discussion of Obama’s Muslim heritage) should automatically be seen as a red flag, especially if you are a supporter of Israel as an ally, and its right to live in its own land free from threat. Do you honestly know any Muslim that is “pro Israel”? You can count on your hand how many Muslims are pro Israel, so the fact that President Obama is now proud of his Muslim heritage should be a major wake up call to all who voted for him; who also believe in the safety of America and Israel. The evidence of his anti Israel position was hidden by the mainstream media and the twenty years of attendance at Rev Wright’s church as well as being the Presidents spiritual mentor should suggest this position. Further, Obama stated that his friendship with Rashid Khalidi the PLO operative helped in molding his views regarding Israel. The LA Times withheld a video tape a few days prior to the election that exposed Presidents Obama’s true virulent anti Israel position. (Walid Shoebat, List email, June 4, 2009)

This is Chamberlainism – appeasement of an enemy ideology or state because we do not have the political will to defend ourselves. In addition, Chamberlainism is wishfull thinking; rational people do not want to go to war with all the horror that that entails.

Some will do or say anything to prevent war. But like WW2 appeasement Obama’s appeasement of Islam can only delay the inevitable and undermine the forces of defense at work in one’s own country. This benefits the enemy ideology/state.

Mr. Obama is the new Chamberlain. It does not matter that he says that we are not at war with Islam, we aren’t; nor do we want to be. What matters is that Islam is at war with us. We must not pretend that it is not so. (Source of photo below.)

An earlier Obama attempts to make peace with totalitarian forces whose aims are anything but peace.

Mr. Obama spoke today in Cairo, Egypt. He says that he wants a new eraof cooperation and understanding between the US and Islam. Mr. Obama’s tone was quite conciliatory, quite apologetic. But what have we done to offend Islam? We have defended Muslims in Kosovo and Bosnia; we have sent billions in aid money to multiple Islamic countries; we have propped up Saudi Arabia and other dictatorships and tyrannies and brought them out of the depths of poverty with decades of oil purchases; we have recently freed two Islamic nations from despotism and insane cruelty (Iraq & Afghanistan) so what have we done to offend Islam? What we have done to Islam is exist.

Fundamentally, Islam is an expansive ever growing ideology whose purpose is its own growth and expansion. Islam is a unified ideology of existence that included religion, politics, jurisprudence (sharia), military doctrine, and culture. Islam is much more than a religion.

Despite George W. Bush’s concept of Islam as the religion of peace it is actually the opposite. The history of Islamic conquest, jew hatred, mass murder, brutality, and cruelty shows it to be so. Islam’s doctrine is essentially political, how non-Mulsims are to be treated by believers – the doctrine is not kind on this point.

Jihad, “fighting in the cause of Allah” as the Koran puts it, is the foundational tool of Islam’s expansion and is basically its 6th pillar. Jihad is unforgiving and brutal warfare against the kafir, the unbeliever, until all the unbeliever states and cultures are conquered and their peoples enslaved, converted to Islam, or killed. This is the real Islam. We have been lied to about Islam again and again. (source of photo below)

Followers of the religion of peace view Obama's Appeasement Speech with weapons at the ready. (Source: YahooNews)

In the western conception of the word “extremist” Islam is inherently extreme. Adherents are not allowed to take Jews and Christians as friends; adherents must fight unbelievers everywhere and forever for “Allah’s cause” (jihad); no religion or political system is allowed anywhere but Allah’s.

We saw just yesterday the evidence of this doctrine of cruelty and hatred and warfare when an American convert to Islam shot and killed a US Army private and wounded another in front of a recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas. Robert Spencer, one of the top scholars of Islam in the United States believes that this is jihad, and there are more attacks to follow. One is hard-pressed to find a counterargument.

We pretend that Islam is a religion of peace at our peril. Daniel Pipes, another top scholar, has been watching the violence of converts for some time. He describes the sudden violence of new converts as “sudden jihad syndrome”.

“Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers.” I wrote those words days after 9/11 and have been criticized for them ever since. But an incident on March 3 at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill suggests I did not go far enough. (Source)

Adherents of Islam believe that they are at war with us, but just want say it, unless of course one is talking about Osama bin Laden and his ilk who make no bones about the state of war that exists between the west and Islam. Most Islamists, even terrorists, deny that there is war because this confuses the enemy (us), and leads us to doubt reality and the intentions of Islam.

Mohammed said that war/jihad is “deception”; the adherents of Islam have had 1400 years of practice. In fact, the doctrine of deception is codified in Islam as “taqiyyah” which states that a Muslim may lie to any kafir (non-believer) for reasons of forwarding the aims of the Umma or of Islam.

And so, we are deceived. We do not want to listen to the words of the killers, the jihadists; we do not want to read the doctrine of Islam which the killers follow to the letter; we do not want to listen to our few scholars who ring the bell of warning about this existential threat. Our ignorant leaders, our dhimmi leaders, are deceived and will apologize and beg for peace before those whose purpose and goal is our destruction and conquest. The forces of Islam could not be happier.

Khalil Al-’Anani in al-Hayat warned that the Obama administration’s readiness to negotiate on a basis of making concessions with radical states and forces would teach Middle Easterners to conclude “that extremism is the most effective way to attract the U.S.’s attention, and to compel them to conduct dialogue.” By showing weakness, the United States would ensure its enemies concluded that America was defeated and to make more demands. He even calls this policy one of “appeasement.” (Source)

Chamberlain showed that appeasement is a fool’s errand. We are at war already. 9/11 and all the previous and subsequent attacks against our country, people, and allies across the world show this to be true. Islam and its leaders are clear on this point. The Saudis use their oil wealth which we have supplied them in the last decades in the greatest transfer of wealth in human history to build mosques and Islamic centers in the US for the purpose of spreading their absolutist ideology of conquest. We may not see another attack (though it is very possible) – another hyper-violent attack like 9/11 is not necessary as the Islamists are winning through demographic growthand the denial of any threat by the populations of the west.

Mr. Obama’s concession speech to the Arab world is viewed as weakness by Islam. We are at a moment of deep national and cultural failure and weakness before our enemies but few are aware of it, apparently. Iran is actively seeking nuclear weapons; they have tested missiles that can reach Israel and beyond; they have promised nuclear destruction of Israel and the US via nuclear war, but our president now says that Iran has a legitimate right to nuclear power. The response from Iran to all of this American appeasement and open-handed pleadings for peace has been rejection and derision.

Iran’s supreme leader dismissed President Obama’s speech at Cairo University Thursday, saying the Muslim world continues to “hate America.” (Source)

This is insanity and national suicide.

Islam is so strong because we are so weak. We are so weak because we are in denial. We are in denial about the truth of Islam; Islam is not a religion of peace it is an ideology of totalitarianism and war that is fundamentally opposed to our way of life, our freedoms, our very existence as a nation.

We are at war. But we do not fight. We fight in Iraq, and we fight in Afghanistan to protect Muslims from one another, but we do not fight to protect ourselves from this existential and growing threat that is the doctrine of Islam. We must wake up, we must defend ourselves. There is much at stake… everything.

Denial is fundamental to the continued obsession with the economy, to the continued non-action in defense of our liberties and lands, to the appeasement of an ideology who purpose is our destruction. What is being denied? That we are in a war of civilizations.

Modern westerners cannot seem to conceive that people outside of their cultures would want western culture destroyed because of a religious and politicalideology of 1400 years ago; they cannot conceive that such concepts still motivate people to kill- but they do. Most importantly our inability to accept the truth empowers the forces against us in their goalto destroy us. This is an ideological, a military, and an existential war. 9/11 and all the other attacks before and since fit into a context of warfare that those in the west do not understand because they have never experienced it, and have never learned it. “Everything that happpens in Islam is based on an actual doctrine.” (PoliticalIslam.com)

A doctor in Israel tells the following story. It is illustrative. Israel is a rational, civilized, allied, democratic country. Mr. Obama has sided with Iran, a country fundamentally hostile to the United States and to Israel.

We are at a cross-roads. With the re-emergence of appeasement as the guiding principle of American foreign policy vis-a-vis the Islamic world, we have undermined our ability to resist Islam. We have undermined our political will to defend ourselves and our friends and we have given ample evidence to the enemies of civilization that the United States is not prepared to defend itself or its friends.

This is a sea-change moment in the history of the world. The possible results can only be disastrous.

I was instrumental in establishing the Israeli National Skin Bank, which is the largest in the world. The National Skin Bank stores skin for every day needs as well as for war time or mass casualty situations. This skin bank is hosted at the Hadassah Ein KeremUniversity hospital in Jerusalem where I was the chairman of plastic surgery. This is how I was asked to supply skin for an Arab woman from Gaza, who was hospitalized in Soroka Hospital in Beersheba after her family burned her. Usually, such atrocities happen among Arab families when the women are suspected of having an affair. We supplied all the needed Homografts for her treatment. She was successfully treated by my friend and colleague Prof. Lior Rosenberg, and discharged to return to Gaza. She was invited for regular follow up visits to the outpatient clinic in Beersheba. One day she was caught at a border crossing wearing a suicide belt. She meant to explode herself in the outpatient clinic of the hospital where they saved her life. It seems that her family promised her that if she did that, they would forgive her.
 
This is only one example of the war between Jews and Muslims in the Land of Israel. It is not a territorial conflict. This is a civilizational conflict. (source)

After Chamberlain came Churchill. This is our hope, too. There is a new Churchill who will ring the alarm of warning, and motivate us to defend outselves and our country, culture, and religions. If the new Chamberlainism is triumphant, western freedoms are defeated, forever.

Note: Additional analyses of Obama’s Appeasement Speech are available…

• Bat Ye’or
• Robert Spencer
• Caroline Glick
• Bill Warner
• Alex Knepper
• Hugh Fitzgerald
• Andrew McCarthy
• Charles Krauthammer
• David Horowitz
• Wafa Sultan

Existential War. The Nazi Holocaust ended; the Jihad Islamic Holocaust continues.

May 31st, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Recent efforts to torpedo the New English Review’s symposium on “Understanding the jihad in Israel, Europe, and America” were unsuccessful. The recent Nashville Symposium was a great success.

The symposium was originally intended to be held at the Loews Vanderbilt hotel formerly considered a superior establishment; no longer. With contract in place and arrangements made months in advance, the management of the formerly respectable Loews Vanderbilt hotel cancelled the event only four days before it was to begin. One can only assume that the purpose of the cancellation on the part of the formerly respectable hotel previously mentioned at that late date was to cause the symposium to fail (i.e., cancelled). They were unsuccessful.

With attendees from across the United States and Europe and speeches by world class scholars and writers, the New English Review symposium was a very special event that the city of Nashville and the formerly respectable hotel should have welcomed with open arms. The Symposium does a great honor to the city of Nashville and speaks volumes about the quality of scholarship and leadership that currently resides in this great city. There could be few events anywhere in the world on the subject of political Islam, its doctrine, purposes, strategies and tactics and the dangers that it presents to the west better than the New English Review symposium which ended last Saturday evening.

The issue of jihad across the world is not an issue whose existence is open to debate though those who prefer not to discuss it would like to shape the debate on such terms. It is not a debatable matter; Islam is at war with the West; the doctrine of Islam is antithetical to women’s rights, the rights of the individual, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the essential concepts that are the foundations of American liberty. The only debate on the matter is if one accepts reality or if one does not. For those who accept reality and can see that jihad is happening, and growing and that we in the United States are under threat by it then the Symposium was for you. For those who do not believe that jihad is real, who do not listen to the followers of Islam who talk about jihad then kill in its name then the symposium would have been an eye-opening experience. 

This is the crux of the matter, to open the eyes of the people of the west, to all non-believers (kafirs) as to the existential threat that jihad and Islam represents. We believe the adherents of Islam when they say that no other religion or political system is acceptable other than Islam. We have evidence upon evidence that proves the point, and no contrary evidence that shows that they are lying. Jihadists, those who supposedly have “hijacked” Islam do not make up doctrine to then follow; they do not make up stories of Mohammed to then emulate – there is no need. The doctrine of Islam is clear, the jihad against us is obvious and what is at stake is simply… everything.

The event kicked off on Friday evening with a reception and gathering. All the speakers were present at the reception. This was a fantastic opportunity to speak informally with some of the finest scholars of Islamic doctrine, history, politics, tactics, and strategies working and writing today. The feeling at the reception was informal and friendly with new friendships and associations being made.

Saturday’s schedule was an aggressive one with lectures and panel discussions the entire day from 9am and ending in the late evening with a pre-recorded greeting by Geert Wilders the famous Dutch politician (and creator of the important documentary “Fitna“). Noted for his outspoken and entirely accurate views on Islam, Wilders is one of very few politicians and public figures in the world today ringing the bell of warning about the Islamization of Europe and the US and the existential danger that Islam represents to the west.

Wilders made the case that Islam is imcompatible with democratic concepts of freedom, tolerance, and individual rights. As the final event of the day, Wilders’ speech reiterated the message given by every speaker – that of rising concern with the growth of Islam across the west and its inherent antagonism towards all cultures that are not Islam. It does not matter that, as president Obama says, “We are not at war with Islam.” What matters is that they are at war with us.

The staff and writers of New Enlish Review educated the audience on current events in the United States, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Islamic history, doctrine, politics, and terrorism was also covered in detail. In light of the negative opinion held of all non-Islamic societies by the doctrine of Islam and those who follow it, the news of increasing immigration from Islamic countries to the United States was particularly alarming. At the least the United States government should more strictly limit if not entirely freeze immigration from all countries that are under Islamic domination.

At a time in our not-so-distant past we were very choosy about who could come to this country and partake of the opportunities and freedoms available here. We fundamentally want people who will come here and become Americans, who will assimilate and adhere to our laws and customs; we do not want people whose ideology tells them that they owe no allegience to any political system other than Islam; that they cannot befriend Jews and Christians; that unbelievers are to conquered, converted or killed; that all host countries and cultures must eventually submit to Islam and that the host system must be overturned and replaced by Islam. Our unfettered immigration policies, particularly those that open our doors so wide to those who adhere to an ideology whose purpose is our destruction is nothing short of national insanity and cultural suicide.

Indepth analysis on political, cultural and international issues including review and analysis of Islamic doctrine, history, and politics was delivered throughout the day. For those in the audience with a deep background on the subject of political and religious aspects of Islam to people quite new to the issue there was a great deal to learn. 

Compliments are due to the editors and staff of New English Review for their highly successful symposium held under intense pressure by the last minute cancellation of the management of the original venue (a once respectable hotel). One can only think that moral and ethical cowardice are the foundations of their decision to cancel this event almost literally at the last moment which had been arranged months in advance. Breach of contract is a serious matter, one would think.

Among several stories on the web regarding this event, these are among the first. If you have some interest to see the heated nature of the debate around even the discussion of political Islam, review the comments on one or all of the following.

nashville scene…
http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/pitw/2009/05/loews_pulls_plug_on_islamophob.php
 
tennessean..
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090530/NEWS01/905300331/Nashville+hotel+drops+jihad+conference+over+safety+concerns
 
well known blogger on islam covers the cancellation…
http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/update-loews-hotel-dhimmis-in-nashville-cave-to-the-islamofascists-and-cancel-anti-islam-symposium/

New English Review is a strong pillar of the intellectual life of Nashville and of the country and beyond. The superb thinkers, analysts, educators, and writers who are published there are at the pinnacle of quality regarding history, politics, literature, religion, and most importantly, understanding and opposing the totalitarian ideology of political Islam. I hope that when the leadership of New English Review decide to have another symposium that they will again allow Nashville to host them, their writers and their readers.

Thank you to New English Review, their staff and writers, and everyone involved in this very special event, and to those who travelled many thousands of miles to attend this symposium in our excellent city. There is hope certainly when some of the finest minds in this field in the United States (and from beyond our borders) get together to educate on the subject of political Islam, the greatest threat to the west and to our freedoms and national identity. As one blogger is fond of saying “It’s not ‘Islamophobia’ when they really do want to kill you!”

Please click here for a list of speakers.

May 14th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

If you thought contrary thinking, good=bad, war=peace, hate=love, evil=goodness was codified so nicely by George Orwell in his novel 1984; think again.

Orwell was outdone by Mohammed. He was outdone because 1400 years after the founding of Islam, people still throw their children into jihad to make them martyrs, killing the kafirs for allah.

For believers in Islamic doctrine, this is all good; for all kafirs (non-believers, non-Muslims) everywhere, this is very, very bad.

This (jihad) is coming our way if we do not stop it. We will find ourselves living in an Islamified version of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale or, of course, George Orwell’s 1984 or Animal Farm.

What are we–what are you going to do about this? (Chesler, PajamasMedia)

Golda Meir the 4th prime minister of Israel once said of the so-called Palestinian/Israeli conflict: 

Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us.

She was right, but not right enough.

A better way to say how peace will come is that peace will come when Islam values life more than it values death. An ideology that values death over life is fundamentally opposed to our American values of the sanctity and value of human life.

There can be no greater and discrete line in the sand; we value life, Political Islam does not.

All Muslims must participate in jihad, the eternal war against the kafirs everywhere and forever. In the koran, allah rewards those who give their money, and their lives for jihad. Allah hates those that do not participate. This is the doctrine of Islam.

(Thank you for posting this video, BarenakedIslam.com)

May 7th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Many relativists who know nothing of Islam and its doctrine of jihad suggest that the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East specifically focused on the destruction of Israel are a shared problem caused by Israel and her neighbors.  Relativists criticise Israel for defending itself and equate self-defense with aggression. This is a bizarre and failed logic.

There is no peace on the borders of Israel because those who live outside the borders of Israel are at war with Israel and have no interest in peace. When one party wants peace and the other party does not, the only way to actually have peace is for one party to defeat the other militarily. In such cases where outright defeat of the aggressor is not possible inflicting enough damage upon them so that they will stop attacking is the next best thing.

This is what happened during the recent Israeli attacks in Gaza called “Operation Cast Lead“. The restraint shown by Israel in receiving constant rocket fire from Hamas terrorists/jihadists in Gaza without responding for years is unprecendented yet the international community condemned Israel for finally responding in its own defense. Self-defense has always been a sacred right for all countries under attack – except for Israel.

There is no peace in Israel because those who live in neighboring states are not interested in peace. In a recent speech to a Palestinian youth group the PA president Mahmoud Abbas said the following regarding Israel. His words brought “enthusiastic applause” from the audience.

“The ‘Jewish state.’ What is a ‘Jewish state?’ We call it, the ‘State of Israel’. You can call yourselves whatever you want. You can call yourselves whatever you want. But I will not accept it. And I say this on a live broadcast. It’s not my job to define it, to provide a definition for the state and what it contains. You can call yourselves the Zionist Republic, the Hebrew, the National, the Socialist [Republic] call it whatever you like. I don’t care.” (Click here to see a video of Abbas delivering this quote.)

The derision of Abbas for Israel is clear. Israel is the front line of jihad. Jihad is the commandment of Islamic doctrine to fight all kafirs everywhere and forever. The Jews in particular have seen the brunt of Islamic hatred for centuries. In fact, Jihad began in the koran with the massacre of the Jews of Kaybar by Mohammed and his jihadists. Andrew Bostom has documented this history of Islamic jew hatred in The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism. The Palestinian Authority is run by a terror group, Fatah. Abbas is its chief. It was recently ejected from the Gaza Strip by another terror group, Hamas, elected in a landslide by the Palestinian people. Jihad and hatred of Jews and Israel was part of Hamas’ campaign strategy.

Hamas and Fatah take the doctrine of Islam very seriously. Here is an illustrative quote from a Hamas Imam:

Imam Yousif al-Zahar of Hamas said in his sermon at the Katib Wilayat mosque in Gaza that “Jews are a people who cannot be trusted. They have been traitors to all agreements. Go back to history. Their fate is their vanishing.”

Hamas takes this hadith particulary seriously.

Moreover, if the links have been distant from each other and if obstacles, placed by those who are the lackeys of Zionism in the way of the fighters obstructed the continuation of the struggle, the Islamic Resistance Movement aspires to the realisation of Allah’s promise, no matter how long that should take. The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said:

“The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree,  would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.” (related by al-Bukhari and Muslim). (Hamas Charter, here.)

All muslims are required to participate in jihad. This is a sacred religious duty. The Jews and Christians are particularly offensive to Islam as they are “the people of the Book”, the people with the incorrect Torah and New Testament of Jesus Christ (a Muslim prophet). Because the Jews and Christians rejected Mohammed and would not convert Islam is at war forever with them, and all non-believers. The house of peace (dar al-Islam)  is reached only when all kafirs are conquered and enslaved, or converted to Islam.

The moral and ethical relativists say, well, there is violence in the New Testament and in the Torah, just as there is violence in the koran. There is a serious difference that they do not know, or will not admit. The violence in the Torah and New Testament is localized and temporary; violence in the koran is permanent and universal. Islam is at war with all kafirs forever. This is why, for Islam, the world is in the house of war, “dar al-harb”.

There is a wider context into which the ongoing struggles of Israel must be placed. This is the context of jihad. Israel is the front line of jihad specifically because of its geographic location in the middle of the so-called Muslim world. Think: If Israel were populated by Christians, Hindus, or atheists, and not a Jew lived there (as in Arabia – no Jews) the region would still be at war because Islam is at war with all kafirs, everywhere and forever. How do we know that Israel is the front line of jihad? We know it for two reasons: 1. This is the doctrine of Islam, and 2. A leading PLO terrorist told an interviewer that this was exactly the case.

Zuheir Mohsen a PLO terrorist let the cat out of the bag during an interview with a Dutch newspaper in 1977.

The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.

The so-called Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not a political issue. Israel is one of the strongest democracies in the world and deserves our support. Their culture is ours, their world view is ours, they are our only ally in the region. Israel is our friend, and we support our friends. Israel is at the front line of global jihad.

Koran, 2:216 – “Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims), though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not.” [Another translation reads:] “Warfare is ordained for you.” (source)

Islam is at war with Israel just as it is at war with every kafir country in the world including the United States. As a fellow kafir culture Israel is our natural ally and friend in this existential struggle for the human race and freedom against the forces of darkness, cruelty, violence, and barbarism that is Islam.

Israel’s struggle for survival is our fight, too. As the front line against global jihad we owe them our support. We are brother kafirs fighting totalitarian forces whose sole purpose is our destruction. When we turn our back on our kafir friends we add arrows to Islam’s overflowing quivers. When we abandon our kafir friends to the horrors of Sharia and the cruelty and mind-numbing dhimmitude of life under Islam, we hurt ourselves. We are in a global struggle whose front line is Israel. The line is moving rapidly. Across the world global jihad advances because kafirs are not united, and our understanding of Islam, its doctrine and purposes so limited. Our future is our present – a growing conflict with Islam that will never end, regardless of the opinions of the dhimmis and the relativists.

If Islam overruns the kafir world, relativists are the first to fall. First by the horror of what they have done in empowering the forces of darkness with their hard ignorance, and second under the sword of Islam, the sword of the religion of peace.

April 3rd, 2009 by admin

Late last month a Palestinian youth orchestra based in the West Bank town of Jenin was disbanded. This was not done without cause. As music is considered the language of peace and understanding – the universal language – something egregious must have occurred. Perhaps there was some mismanagement, some inappropriate behavior, some “misappropriation” of orchestra funds? No.

For the supporters of the orchestra what happened was far worse. What the orchestra had done was something so appalling so horrific to the community from which the orchestra came that the enterprise itself was forever ruined.

For what they had done there could be no forgiveness. The orchestra of Palestinian youth had performed a concert for Jewish Holocaust survivors in Israel.

In the upside-down world of the Palestinian Authority this is an unforgivable sin, a politicized event that undermines the existence of the Palestinian Authority, of Fatah, of the entire world view of the majority of the Palestinian people. For “punishment,” the leader of the orchestra was deported to Israel from the West Bank.

Music is the universal language, except in Islam

JENIN, West Bank (AP) — Authorities in an impoverished Palestinian refugee camp have shut down a youth orchestra, boarded up its rehearsal studio and banned its conductor from the camp after she took 13 young musicians to perform for Holocaust survivors in Israel, an official said Sunday.

Conductor Wafa Younes took the children from her Strings of Freedom orchestra to sing songs of peace last week as part of an annual Good Deeds Day organized by Israel’s richest woman. But once parents and leaders back in West Bank’s Jenin refugee camp realized where the group had been, they shut down the program, saying Younes had dragged the children into a political issue.

The discord highlights both the distrust many Palestinians have of any engagement with Israel, as well as their reluctance to acknowledge Jewish historical suffering because of concerns that it weakens their own claim to this disputed land. (See link above for more.)

The Holocaust is a serious political matter in the Islamic world, especially in the Palestinian Authority. Why? Because acknowledgment of the suffering of Jews humanizes Jews, and puts the existence of the State of Israel into an historical context that is intolerable for the jihadists of the PA.

These allegations are part of a central antisemitic motif in the Koran which decrees an eternal curse upon the Jews (Koran 2:61/ reiterated at 3:112) for slaying the prophets and transgressing against the will of Allah. It should be noted that Koran 3:112 is featured in the pre-amble to Hamas’ foundational Covenant.  This central motif is coupled to Koranic verses 5:60, and 5:78, which describe the Jews transformation into apes and swine (5:60), or simply apes, (i.e. verses 2:65 and 7:166), having been “…cursed by the tongue of David, and Jesus, Mary’s son” (5:78). Muhammad himself repeats this Koranic curse in a canonical hadith (Sunan Abu Dawoud, Book 37, Number 4322). And the related verse, 5:64, accuses the Jews-as Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas did in a January 2007 speech, citing Koran 5:64-of being “spreaders of war and corruption,” a sort of ancient Koranic antecedent of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The centrality of the Jews’ permanent “abasement and humiliation,” and being “laden with God’s anger” in the corpus of Muslim exegetic literature on Koran 2:61/3:112, is clear. By nature deceitful and treacherous, the Jews rejected Allah’s signs and prophets, including Isa, the Muslim Jesus. Classical Koranic commentators when discussing Koran 5:82, which includes the statement (”Thou wilt surely find the most hostile of men to the believers are the Jews..”), concur on the unique animus of the Jews towards the Muslims, which is repeatedly linked to the curse of  Koran 2:61/3:112. (Bostom, American Thinker)

The leadership there have been very determined to paint the Holocaust in just the right context so that the children can learn the right lessons, and continue the jihad against Israel and the Jews. It’s difficult to do jihad against people with whom one has sympathy or empathy. So the PA, aided by the doctrine of Islam, does everything it can to make sure that the Jewish people of Israel are never humanized – empathy is an evil in the Orwellian world of the PA and the wider Islamic world.

The doctrine of Islam supports this hard-hearted approach to the kafirs, the unbelievers. All followers of Islam are warriors in jihad for Allah – fighters with moral compunctions and empathy for the unbelievers might turn out not so effective. This cannot be allowed to happen.

The PA has used the tools of authority since its inception to dehumanize and demonize the Jews of Israel. This is pure Islamic doctrine, there is nothing new here but the context and the technology.

Those aware of the Holocaust’s role in PA media, culture, and education will not be surprised by any of this, and a handy summary is available here. For instance (source):

• PA TV has asserted that the Nazis did not specifically plan to kill Jews and that the term Holocaust refers to experiences of Palestinians and Gypsies.
• A PA crossword puzzle matches “Yad Vashem” (the Holocaust memorial museum in Jerusalem) with “the Jewish Center for eternalizing the Holocaust and the lies.”
• PA educational TV has taught that Dachau and Auschwitz were disinfection sites.
• The official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida wrote that “The Jews transformed what people think is the smoke of their burnt bodies into…a hen laying golden eggs.”

This kind of callousness, cruelty on such a large scale, is foreign to most westerners. Islam’s hatred of the kafir (unbelievers) has been discussed at length in other posts and is a central lesson of the Islamic doctrine. Islam is at war forever and everywhere with unbelievers. All Muslims are to do jihad for Allah and Islam. Those who die in jihad have fulfilled the highest purposes of the Islamic doctrine – expansion of Islam and the destruction and conquest of all non-Islamic cultures and political structures whereever they may be.  We have seen since 9/11 beheadings of Americans and other westerners (all kafirs) by Islamists in Iraq and elsewhere. We say, how can this be; how can these people be so heartless, so cruel? The answer is in the doctrine of Islam.

There are three components of the doctrine of  Islam: the Koran (word of Allah), the Hadiths (stories of Mohammed told by contemporaries), and the Sunna (the life of Mohammed). The version of Hadith considered most authoritative is Sahih Bukari. It is from Bukari’s Hadiths that an understanding of the cruelty of the PA, the callousness of its leadership, and the miseducation of its people can be found. But this need not be limited to the PA; all of Islam is required to obey the lessons of Mohammed as found in the triumverate doctrine. All of Islam is therefore callous, as this is what the doctrine of Islam commands.

Mohammed commands that women mourning at funerals are not to cry. No crying at funerals. Mohammed was quite clear on this point. When told that the women would not listen to him, he ordered his followers to fill their mouths with dust so that they would obey. No crying at funerals. The followers must never cry, only Mohammed may shed tears at funerals.

Bukhari Hadith
http://www.iiu.edu.my/deed/hadith/bukhari/023_sbt.html
Volume 2, Book 23, Number 386:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
When the Prophet got the news of the death of Ibn Haritha, Ja’far and Ibn Rawaha he sat down and looked sad and I was looking at him through the chink of the door. A man came and told him about the crying of the women of Ja’far. The Prophet ordered him to forbid them. The man went and came back saying that he had told them but they did not listen to him. The Prophet (p.b.u.h) said, “Forbid them.” So again he went and came back for the third time and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! By Allah, they did not listen to us at all.” (’Aisha added): Allah’s Apostle ordered him to go and put dust in their mouths. I said, (to that man) “May Allah stick your nose in the dust (i.e. humiliate you)! You could neither (persuade the women to) fulfill the order of Allah’s Apostle nor did you relieve Allah’s Apostle from fatigue. ”
 
Volume 2, Book 23, Number 390:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
We went with Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) to the blacksmith Abu Saif, and he was the husband of the wet-nurse of Ibrahim (the son of the Prophet). Allah’s Apostle took Ibrahim and kissed him and smelled him and later we entered Abu Saif’s house and at that time Ibrahim was in his last breaths, and the eyes of Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) started shedding tears. ‘Abdur Rahman bin ‘Auf said, “O Allah’s Apostle, even you are weeping!” He said, “O Ibn ‘Auf, this is mercy.” Then he wept more and said, “The eyes are shedding tears and the heart is grieved, and we will not say except what pleases our Lord, O Ibrahim ! Indeed we are grieved by your separation.”

As Mohammed was a military commander, a politician, and a warlord as well as the leader of his disciples rigid discipline, rigid emotional discipline would be very useful. Followers, all obligated to do  jihad, who could suppress their emotions, who could control their sorrow, stop their tears would be excellent fighters for the cause. 

But there is some confusion added by another hadith:

Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Ubaidullah bin Abi Mulaika:

One of the daughters of ‘Uthman died at Mecca. We went to attend her funeral procession. Ibn ‘Umar and Ibn Abbas were also present. I sat in between them (or said, I sat beside one of them. Then a man came and sat beside me.) ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar said to ‘Amr bin ‘Uthman, “Will you not prohibit crying as Allah’s Apostle has said, ‘The dead person is tortured by the crying of his relatives.?” Ibn Abbas said, “Umar used to say so.” Then he added narrating, “I accompanied Umar on a journey from Mecca till we reached Al-Baida. There he saw some travelers in the shade of a Samura (A kind of forest tree). He said (to me), “Go and see who those travelers are.” So I went and saw that one of them was Suhaib. I told this to ‘Umar who then asked me to call him. So I went back to Suhaib and said to him, “Depart and follow the chief of the faithful believers.” Later, when ‘Umar was stabbed, Suhaib came in weeping and saying, “O my brother, O my friend!” (on this ‘Umar said to him, “O Suhaib! Are you weeping for me while the Prophet said, “The dead person is punished by some of the weeping of his relatives?” Ibn Abbas added, “When ‘Umar died I told all this to Aisha and she said, ‘May Allah be merciful to Umar. By Allah, Allah’s Apostle did not say that a believer is punished by the weeping of his relatives. But he said, Allah increases the punishment of a non-believer because of the weeping of his relatives.” Aisha further added, “The Quran is sufficient for you (to clear up this point) as Allah has stated: ‘No burdened soul will bear another’s burden.’ ” (35.18). Ibn Abbas then said, “Only Allah makes one laugh or cry.” Ibn Umar did not say anything after that.

Reviewing #375, we see that Aisha, Mohammed’s favorite wife, said that the other hadiths on the same subject were incorrect and that Mohammed meant that only unbelievers would be punished by weeping at a relative’s funeral. According to Aisha’s interpretation the unbelievers would be punished by Allah if they weep for a relative. Even in the confusion is callousness, callousness for the kafir (the unbelievers) that they are denied sorrow and mourning for their loved ones. The text is clear, kafirs are punished for their humanity, for their sorrows. The previous hadiths are to control the jihadists, those who submit while the hadith above promises Allah’s wrath for the unbelievers who weep for their losses. Allah controls tears and sorrow and everything else; Islam is “submission”. “Only Allah makes one laugh or cry.” In all events, the kafir is the victim – this is the way of Islam. 

Suppression of emotions is a classic form of group control (and self-control) that has been used for centuries. We see jihadists do the cruelest things; we saw the brutality of the Mumbai attacks during which Allah and Islam were invoked again and again as the cause and purpose of the horror. We know this because the phone conversations between the killers and their jihadist handlers in Pakistan were intercepted and recorded.

“WE HAVE three foreigners, including women from Singapore and China,” a terrorist says into his mobile phone. “Kill them,” is the reply.

Doctrinal Callousness

People everywhere are entitled to their religious beliefs, this is the idea of God and the worship of God. Islam is a political system as well as a religion and that is the issue. Islam’s relationship with unbelievers is endless warfare, endless conflict and jihad. Jihad for Islam is commanded to all Muslims everywhere, forever. This is the doctrine of Islam.

After several generations of indoctrination by the authorities of the PA in the West Bank and Gaza we see the results. The results are not good for those who value civilization and freedom, but they are very good for those who do jihad for Islam. Followers of this extreme and cruel ideology know their purpose, and act.

Islam has become a set of fundamentals which preach social segregation, hatred of non-Muslims and elimination of dissenters through dominance, death and destruction. These conclusions, no matter how true, cannot be palatable to the Muslims and therefore rank as fabrications, from their standpoint. I can do no better than quote from the Koran to decide the issue. Examine the following for yourself:

1. “Do not let non-Muslims enter mosques. They will go to hell.” ( Repentance: 17 )
2. “O ye who believe! The non-Muslims are unclean. So let them not come near the Inviolable Place of Worship.” (Repentance: 28)
3. “O ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers …. and let them find harshness in you.” (Repentance: 123)
4. “Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute.” (Repentance: 29)
5. “O believers, do not treat your fathers and brothers as your friends, if they prefer unbelief to belief, whosoever of you takes them for friends, they are evil-doers.” (Repentance: 20)
6. “Certainly, God is an enemy to the unbelievers.” ( The Cow: 90 )
7. “God has cursed the unbelievers, and prepared for them a blazing hell.” ( The Confederates 60 )
8. “Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends…. whoso does that belongs not to God.” (The House of Imram: 60)
9. “O believers, do not make friends with the Jews and Christians; ..whoso of you makes them his friend is one of them.” (The Table: 55)
10. “The believers indeed are brothers.” ( Apa rtments: 10 )
11. “Moslems are hard against the unbelievers, merciful to one another.” (Victory: 25) (Source)

People who have Islams’s doctrine as their guide who believe it is their duty to kill unbelievers and treat them with a callousness that is unimaginable in our culture are the perfect soldiers of jihad and the expansion of Islam.

• A terrorist on Thursday (April 2) infiltrated Bat Ayin in the Gush Etzion region of the West Bank and killed Shlomo Nativ, a 13-year-old Israeli boy, by striking him in the head with an axe. [1] (Source)

The cruelty and callousness of adherents to Islam who do their ideology’s jihad as they are commanded knows no bounds and continues to bring us fresh assaults daily.  Only today an apparent American is shown on an Islamist video posted on the internet fighting with an alqaeda group in Somalia, jihad. People do horrible things because the doctrine of Islamic tells them to.

Another English speaker does not appear on the tape but raps over a track of Islamic devotional songs.

“Bomb by bomb, blast by blast, only going to bring back the glorious past,” the man chants atonally. “Mortar by mortar, shell by shell, I’m only gonna stop when I send them to hell.”

Ben Venzke, director of IntelCenter, the U.S. contractor that tracks extremist propaganda, told the AP that the video appears to be authentic.

Recognition of this threat is critically important to the survival of the west and of freedom everywhere. Jihad is the core principal of the expansion of Islam across the world at the expense of kafirs everywhere. The doctrine is clear, the followers are following. Learn the doctrine, knowledge is power.

March 31st, 2009 by admin

Syrian actress Amal ‘Arafa hates Israel. She says that hatred of Israel is in “her genes”. She says it’s part of her Syrian upbringing.  She says that she will pass this hatred of Israel down to future generations. This assertion and public display of hatred is a shocking thing for us, but part of the doctrine of Islam for her and her countrymen.

Ms. Arafa says that hatred of Israel is in her genes. But she is not being literal here, rather she is referencing her Islamic upbringing which preaches a particular hatred against Jews, Christians and all non-believers. This kind of public display of intolerance is shocking to American ears. We live in a country of tolerance and openness, we accept the difference’s of others and welcome them, even haters like Ms. Arafa into our fold. We hope that our concepts of freedom, tolerance, and acceptance will be so attractive that even folks like Ms. Arafa, filled with hate confident in her hate will be converted to our ways of acceptance and openness.

Americans can barely conceive that this level of hatred, this cold calculated hate can be so common and so encouraged in other cultures. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides us all with a foundation of tolerance for others and encourages us to be accepting and considerate to everyone, not just fellow Christians and Jews. This is why the United States has been a haven for those persecuted for religious reasons for generations.

However, the ideology of Islam does not share this concept of kindness and acceptance. Islam is a dualistic ideology with kindness, charity and goodness reserved only for Muslims, and warfare and violence for the non-believers, the kafirs, everywhere and forever.

Understanding the concept of Islamic duality is the key to understanding the brutality of terrorists, the cruelty of Sharia, the horror of the dhimmi and the fate that awaits all kafir states and cultures that come under the authority of Mohammed’s ideology.  When you understand that the ideals of charity and goodwill that we in the West hold in such high esteem are reserved only for Muslims to each other in the ideology of Islam the horrific actions of terrorists and the falsehoods and cruelty of jihadists quickly come into focus. Even the Islamic doctrine itself is dualistic and this is where duality originates.

The Meccan koran was written during a period of unsuccessful religious expansion for Mohammed. Few accepted Islam. When Mohammed moved to Mecca the koran changed along with Mohammed. Instead of a prophet spreading a peaceful religion, Mohammed became a warlord and with warfare and violence spread Islam across Arabia.

Unfortunately for every non-believer the violent koran was written after the peaceful koran. In koranic study the  later verses abrogate the previous verses, but all are considered true.

This means that the violent verses are considered more “powerful” than the earlier more peaceful verses written during Mohammed’s Meccan period. So, in Islamic ideology one can be violent and peaceful at the same time, and one can be good and bad at the same time, both contrary conditions are “true”, but the later verses are “more true” due to abrogation. 

This apparent contrary concept that is so foreign to most westerners is the foundation of jihad and Islamism as it is the unification of opposites. In western unitarian thinking/logic a positive assertion has a negative opposite, one is true and the other false; both cannot be true. However, in Islamic epistemology one can be both good and evil, true and false, violent and peaceful. The koran is clear on this point. This is a new way of thinking for most Americans and the key to understanding jihad, and political Islam altogether.

This brings us back to our unhappy camper, the Syrian actress. She appears to be a professional, articulate, even pleasant and attractive, but she is full of hate. One could make the case that perhaps she hates Israel because of some event or some policy of the state of Israel, but what is more important to understand is that any people living in Israel, Hindu, Christian, Buddist, Zoroastrian, etc., any non-believer people would be the subject of her bile. Why? This is because the lessons that are now in “her genes” come directly from the doctrine of political Islam as found in the koran, hadith, and suna. This doctrine is the foundation of political Islam.

Every non-believer is a kafir, Islam is at war with kafirs everywhere and forever. Bringing the entire world under Islamic rule is the purpose of Islam as commanded by Mohammed, this is the only path to dar al Islam, the “House of Peace”. As a dualist in a dualistic philosophy the unhappy hateful actress can be both a hater and a professional, a peaceful Muslim to other Muslims full of charity and courtesy but a jihadist to all non-believers. This is commanded in the koran. To do otherwise would not be fulfilment of the wishes of Allah and the command of his prophet Mohammed, the finest example of humanity that all Muslims everywhere are to emulate.

Jihad Against the Kafirs… Everywhere, Forever

March 30th, 2009 by admin

On January 27, 2009,  the President signed a Presidential Determination outlining the multimillions of dollars that the United States will spend to repatriate Palestinians to the United States. As a Gateway city, Nashville is sure to see an influx of Palestinians running from the violence and squalor of their failed Palestinian Authority and the destruction of Gaza that they themselves caused through their endless rocket fire against Israel (and murder of its people). One can hardly blame them.

But there is a potential problem; a serious problem for folks in Nashville and across the US. We know that Hamas is a terrorist organization. We know this because our own Department of State lists them as a terror organization and we know from their statements and their so-called “constitution” that they are cruel and hyper-violent terrorists; but more importantly we know from their actions of killing innocents indiscriminately across Israel (including Americans) that they are a terror organization. This is their path, and their purpose.

Sections of Hamas “Constitution” (source):

4. Regarding peace, its Article 13 is totally negative: “Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement. Abusing any part of Palestine is abuse against part of religion. Nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its religion. Its members have been fed on that. (.) There is no solution to the Palestinian question except by Jihad. All initiatives, proposals, and International Conferences are a waste of time and vain endeavours.”

5. Religious hatred of Jews (not only of Israel) is expressed by a hadith or ’saying’ that concludes Article 7: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews) when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say: O Muslims (.) there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. “Only the gharkad tree [evidently a certain kind of tree] would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.” (this hadith, quoted from al-Bukhari and Muslim, both considered as highly reliable sources for the hadith or ’sayings’ of the Prophet Muhammad).

6. Article 8, the slogan of the Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas (widely quoted by clerics and others) is a blueprint for jihadist terrorism: “Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its Constitution; Jihad is its path, and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.”

 The text of the Presidential Order is as follows (see the document: presidential_documents_c2bb_federal_register_fr_doc_e9-2488_sun_mar_29_2009):

DOCID: fr04fe09-106
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
[[Page 6115]]
Presidential Determination No. 2009-15 of January 27, 2009
Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related To Gaza

Memorandum for the Secretary of State
By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the “Act”), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not to exceed $20.3 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.
You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, January 27, 2009

Plans are in place, monies are to be spent not to exceed “20.3 million” to help with the “urgent and unexpected refugee and migration needs” of the Palestinians of Gaza. Now, the first question is why don’t the Palestinians from Gaza relocate to the West Bank? If they prefer not to live so close to Israel, why not relocate to any number of Arab states? This is something of a conundrum and we’ve not the space to cover such weighty matters in this post.

What is important is this: Hamas won their democratic election to govern Gaza by a landslide. While it is true that Palestinian voters had the difficult choice between one corrupt terrorist group and another corrupt terrorist group, they chose the corrupt terrorist group with no interest in peace with Israel and that supports active violent jihad against the US. The election of Hamas was a mandate for endless jihad against Jews, and all-unbelievers – especially if they happened to live in Israel.

As Hamas came to power in a landslide electoral victory, most Palestinians supported them, worked for and with them, voted for them, or are Hamas members. How will US government immigration authorities vet Palestinian “refugees” from Gaza so that no Hamas members are allowed into the country, and anyone with Hamas and jihadist sympathies is excluded from coming to the United States? What safeguards will be put in place to protect the people of Nashville or any other American city or town in which Palestinians are to settle when the millions of our tax dollars are spent rescuing them from their own self-destructive course of warfare, terrorism, violence, hatred, jihad, and murder? What assurances will the Obama Administration give to host state and local authorities that newly arrived Palestinian “refuges” are not jihadist terrorists, Hamas members and Islamist supremicists whose goal is the undermining of the United States, its government, religious freedom and tolerance, and culture? There is no language in the document above funding Palestinian relocation to the US that could provide any answers, but these are the answers that must be provided to authorities in Nashville and other cities who will host these new-comers to our shores.

We must be assured, there must be surity, and certain proof provided that these new-comers come in peace –  prepared to accept our laws and our religions, and culture. If no such proofs are provided this program is another step in our self-hating program of pretending that political Islam and its adherents are not a great and existential threat to our country and our people and democratic way of life.

Such a course is nothing less than national insanity, and national suicide.

March 29th, 2009 by admin

The creator of this graphic is on the right track. Irony and geography are effective illustrators.

When viewed in context many of the complaints of the Islamic world against Israel take on a certain absurd quality. The image would be more accurate by replacing the term “Arab” with “Islamic” (Iran is not an Arab country, for example, it is Persian).

Israel is not much bigger than Rhode Island, it is the only democracy in a sea of petty dictatorships and totalitarian regimes. It is surrounded on all sides by enemies that hate Israel only because it exists, and the sea. Israel is the only Jewish state on the planet. Islam is fundamentally anti-Jew. The existence of a Jewish state in the heart of the Muslim world is seen by political Islam as an affront. The so called “Israeli-Palestinian Conflict” and “cycle of violence” is nothing more than permanent jihad against Israel. As the front line against jihad in the world, our only democratic ally in the Middle East, and the homeland of the Jews, all Americans should support Israel.

Clerics across the Islamic world place the war against Israel in jihad contexts.

Part V – ‘The Palestinian Struggle Must be An Islamic Jihad’
In Saudi sermons, preachers place special emphasis on the Islamic nature of the Palestinian cause. The national Arab movement is often ridiculed and condemned by Saudi preachers, who insist that the only way to liberate Palestine is through Jihad.

Sheikh ‘Abd Al-’Aziz Qari expanded on this issue in a sermon at the Qabaa mosque in Al-Madina: “What has the national Pan-Arab movement been doing for the past 40 years? What has it done in the conflict with the Jewish nation? The national movement [based on] land, and the racist pan-Arab movement, have been defeated by the apes and pigs [referring to the Jews]. Furthermore, the repeated defeats of the past 40 years have become the trademark of the national land movement and the movement of Pan-Arab racism. They go on fighting in the name of the olive and orange groves and the watermelon [fields]. The nationalist men of the soil and of the Pan-Arab racism have been wandering for the past 40 years, refusing to return to their religion, to their Islam. They are reluctant [to consider] the battle between them and the nation of the Torah, the nation of Israel – an Islamic battle. The Jews are fleeing to their religion, seeking [roots] for unity and power, while the Arabs flee from their religion, from their Islam…”

“They feed their nation and their people’s false, useless slogans that will never give them the power to confront the Jews who wave the banners of Torah and Israel. The war between us and the Jews is, in truth, a religious war, and only Islam can wage it in the path of truth… It is a divine decree, a military-political decree, a religious decree, but it is not directed at those who still fight in the name of the olives, the oranges, and the watermelon. It is a divine decree directed at the nation of Jihad, the Islamic nation, the Muslims… “

Israel is the front-line of the permanent jihad war against the kafirs, the never-ending war of Islam against unbelievers everywhere.  The enmity of political Islam is not reserved for the Jews by any means; every non-believer religion and culture is considered kafir by Islam. To bring the world into peace (dar-al Islam) according to Islam, all the world must be ruled by Islam. No other religions and no other political systems are permitted to exist. Mohammed’s doctrine is quite clear on this point.

In fact, consider this: if every Jew in Israel were replaced by a Christian, a Bhuddist, or a Hindu so that no Jews remained there Israel would continue to be the front line of Jihad in the world. This is so because jihad is not reserved for the Jews jihad applies to all non-believers, all kafirs everywhere and forever.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw (”Dagblad de Verdieping Trouw”), published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, this is what he said. (Reference from WND.)

The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.