September 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

(originally posted on SIOANetwork.com)

Introduction

As the 8^th anniversary of the greatest atrocity against innocent Americans, the most miserable and appalling crime and attack ever to occur on our soil approaches it is important to honor our innocent dead and to come to a greater understanding of that event so that we might comprehend our world and our place in it more effectively.

A Politically Incorrect Definition of 9/11 (The Truth)

The Unpleasant Nature of our World in Clear Logic

9/11 was jihad against the unbelievers of the United States. Every participant in 9/11 was a Muslim, a “devout Muslim”.

Every participant explained his actions of the murder of American innocents in an Islamic doctrinal context.

Islam is at war with all unbelievers (kafirs) everywhere and forever as per the directives of Allah and Mohammed in the Islamic doctrine. All Muslims “submit to” and are “slaves of” Allah and Mohammed, his prophet. Allah and Mohammed are found only in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). The doctrine of Islam commands all Muslims to participate in jihad against the unbeliever until the world is ruled by Islam. This is the purpose of Islam.

The existence of kafirs (unbelievers) is an affront to Allah and Mohammed. All Muslims are commanded to participate in jihad or support those who do. Non-participation is apostasy. Apostasy is not tolerated. Jihad is the central concept of Islamic doctrine other than voluntary and forced submission. Islam means “submission”.

The Koran discusses the kafir more than it discusses how to be a good Muslim. Islam is a totalitarian political ideology at war with the United States and all non-Muslim countries, cultures, and religions.

A Politically Correct Version of 9/11 (A Lie)

A False Fantasy of Reality Now Entirely Discredited

The attacks of 9/11 were perpetrated by people who happened to be Islamic. These criminals and terrorists misunderstood the peaceful nature of the doctrine of Islam. 9/11 began a war against “terror” as we were attacked by “terrorists”. These terrible people “hijacked” the “religion of peace”. Islam and its adherents are fully compatible with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The perpetrators/terrorists of 9/11 have given the “religion of peace” a bad name because they misunderstood the concept of perpetual, universal jihad to mean actual universal, perpetual jihad rather than an inner struggle. (It is not relevant of course that the entire history of Islam from Year One is a history of brutality, conquest, and jihad.)

Islam is a “religion of peace”. The many millions of ultra-violent killers and haters across the world who claim to be Muslim are confused about the doctrine of Islam. Signs, and speeches supporting jihad and violent events jihad are all misunderstood and perpetrated by confused people who happen to be Muslim. Jihad has nothing to do with Islam. 9/11 was a blip, an aberration in a long history of Islamic contributions to America and to liberty and decency.

9/11 and Islam are entirely unrelated.

========================

You must decide the truth of 9/11, and the nature of our current world.

You must decide if the doctrine of Islam is to be believed, the words and commands of Allah and Mohammed that all Muslims are required to follow forever or if the ignorant, multiculturalist, politically correct fools who know nothing of Islam, jihad, or Islam doctrine and history are correct.

You must decide if the Islamic world is driven by the doctrine of Islam which states clearly that Islam is a totalitarian political doctrine of brutality, misogyny, war, barbarism, and intolerance or if it is a misunderstood “religion of peace”. We have clear evidence, attacks, threats, rhetoric, doctrine, and a world of universal jihad war that show that this is all so.

The truth of 9/11 is foundationally about the doctrine of Islam. There is no context without the doctrine of Islam in which 9/11, previous and subsequent terror/jihad attacks against Americans and unbelievers around the world make any sense. The context of 9/11 is Islamic doctrine; the context of universal jihad against the kafir unbelievers is the doctrine of Islam.

More importantly, the criminals and killers who do these atrocities tell us in no uncertain terms that they are committing jihad because they are commanded to do so by Allah and Mohammed (as they are found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith). To the jihadists these actions of cruelty, barbarism and violence are not “atrocities” but are rather “fighting in Allah’s cause” as stated in the Koran over 150 times. This is jihad and it is central to the doctrine of Islam, and because of this it is the central responsibility for all Muslims everywhere forever.

We live in a world of war. If 9/11, London, Beslan, Madrid, Bali, USSCole, Paris, Israel, Iraq, Pakistan, and the tens of the thousands of jihad events of barbarism and brutality since are not enough for you to understand the truth, you are not paying quite enough attention – or, worse, you simply choose not to believe the ugly truth. Perhaps you believe as multiculturalists do that if you prefer the world to be tolerant, and if we ourselves are tolerant and nice, then the world itself will be tolerant and nice. The world has never, ever worked in this way.

This is why multiculturalism is a failed concept and must be destroyed.

Political correctness and multiculturalism encourage Americans to believe the entirely false politically correct explanation of 9/11 and other fake things. We use multiculturalism and politically correct speech and thought to prettify ugly things because we hate ugly things and we don’t want to offend anybody. Saying that Muslims perpetrated 9/11 and thousands of other atrocities is the truth, but it is also offensive to Muslims for some reason, so we avoid saying this – we avoid speaking the truth.

We must abandon multiculturalism and its political correctness ally. These are false concepts bereft of truth and value. They are remnants of a fantasy that 9/11, Madrid, Beslan, London, Paris, Bali, etc., have destroyed.

These are failed concepts that belong in the garbage bin of dialectic and discourse and should never again sully our ability to think about, talk about, and understand what is true.

We must discredit and destroy multiculturalism and political correctness to honor our innocent dead of 9/11 and other Islamic jihad atrocities. We must speak the truth about this existential war that is being waged against us, we must identify the enemy, his ideology and fake religion of peace.

We must honor our innocent dead of 9/11 by opposing the oldest, and now resurgent, totalitarianism in the world, Islam. If we do not do this, our honored dead are forgotten, and our freedoms, culture, and country are all lost.

Mourn the dead of 9/11 and remember why they died; they died because an ideology of brutality and cruelty saw them as less than human, kafirs, and their existence was an affront to Allah and Mohammed.

Multiculturalism and political correctness must be destroyed so that we can discuss the war, and respond. If we do not respond we have turned our backs on our history, our honored dead, and the heroes of the present and past who gave their all so that we could live in freedom, equality and tolerance.

Your email:

 

August 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are three schools of thought and analysis regarding Islam. Two of these schools are complimentary, the third is not, but it is definitive. The first school is Islam as taught by leaders of Islam, the second is academia and the media, the third is the “foundational school” (Warner, Spencer, Bat Ye’or, etc.).

Islamic leaders have one message of Islam for Muslims and another for kafirs (this is the duality of Islam). Western media and academics know nothing of the doctrine of Islam. Apparently, they believe that they have no other place to go for definitive information about Islam; they are wrong. These schools of thought do not discuss Islamic doctrine (Koran, Sira, Hadith), history of Islam, jihad, or the victims of jihad.

The “Foundational School” studies the doctrine of Islam and formulates arguments and counter-arguments based entirely on Islamic doctrine, Islamic history, and current actions of the adherents of Islam as they implement the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed. This school discusses Allah and Mohammed and the victims of jihad and Islamic brutality for the last 1400+ years. The “Foundational School” is a compassion, and truth-driven group; compassion for the past, present and future victims of Islam is at the forefront of all Foundationalist’s work as is the desire for the truth. Western media knows nothing of the victims of Islam and rarely acknowledges the fact that new victims are made every day across the world.

Islamic leaders and adherents pretend that there is no linkage between jihad and the stunning cruelty that we see daily perpetrated by Muslims against Christians, Jews, gays, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, and other Muslims who are seen as not-quite-Islamic-enough. This is taqiyyah, sacred deception of the unbelievers to forward the cause of Islam.

The foundational school is definitive because it studies the core texts of Islam, the same texts to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to as an adherent of Islam. Learning the doctrine of Islam is akin to learning the playbook of the opposing team in a sports event. Our dire situation as non-Muslims in the world and the constant pressure put upon our cultures, religions, political leadership, and general citizenry by Islam is no sports event.

While multiculturalists attest that the violence and cruelty of Islam are anathema to “real” Muslims, we know that the multiculturalist is ignorant and dhimmitized. The dhimmi supports and defends Islam because they know nothing about it. They defend their idea of what Islam should be (what they want it to be), not what it actually is. The only way to know what Islam truly is is to learn the same doctrine to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to, and study the effects of this doctrine in the past and into the present. This is the core of the foundationalist school.

Our dire circumstances vis-a-vis Islam is an existential conflict of civilizations.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis say that there is no conflict – that Islam is “peaceful” even as it wars against, and kills non-believers (kafirs) and applauds those who kill innocents. Saying such doggerel does not mean that there is no conflict, it simply means that we have decided to not defend ourselves against a brutal enemy whose purpose is our destruction. It means we have refused to name our enemy and even worse we have refused to acknowledge the war. This is a position entirely rejected by foundationalists.

We as a culture must reach a point very soon where the multiculturalist position of ignorance and active anti-knowledge is rejected and condemned everywhere. There must come a time soon when anyone making such a self-destructive and baseless argument is heaped with shame and derision for their lack of scholarship, embrace of anti-knowledge, and their defense of the enemy whom they know literally nothing about. Such a day must come quickly if we are to survive as a nation.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis are tools of a brutal totalitarian ideology of cruelty, misogyny, hate, intolerance, and anti-individualism; they are the “useful idiots” spoken of by Lenin during the rise of Communism.

You may recall the Soviet Union. The West waged ideological war against them. The Soviet Union is gone, swept away by us and their own moral, ethical and political corruption into the “dustbin of history” where it belongs. The same must be done now with Islam.

If we are not prepared to fight an ideological war against an ideology even crueler than the Soviet one; if we are not prepared to name the enemy and, even more egregious, that there is no existential conflict – we are truly doomed. Knowledge is the foundation of avoiding this “doom”. Knowledge in this matter is found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith.

Everyone in the West must understand the nature of Allah and Mohammed, and learn their commands that all adherents of this ideology are required to follow. Those who follow the ideology of Islam are good Muslims; those who do not are not good Muslims. Osama Bin Laden is a “good” Muslim. Those who follow Mohammed and Allah are devout believers, those who do not are “apostates” and can be killed by those who are not “apostates” (or who at least believe that they are not). The “religion of peace” is not a “religion” that one can readily leave. Leaving Islam is punishable by death (Hadith, Bukhari).

After the death of Mohammed Islam was plunged into war. It was not attacked by outside forces but rather fought bloody internal “apostate” wars against its own adherents, those who had chosen to leave Islam. Tens of thousands were killed in these “Apostasy Wars” of early Islam under the guidance of the first “Rightly Guided Caliph”, Abu Bakr. No multiculturalist knows anything about these apostasy wars, or that apostasy in present day Islam equals death. If they do know about it, they will excuse it someone, explain it away because their concept of Islam as “the religion of peace” is far more important and attractive to them than the abysmal truth of the cult of death, which is Islam.

Several days ago Abdel Basset al-Megrahi was released from a Scottish prison on humanitarian grounds. It appears that Mr. Megrahi is suffering from cancer and has only a few months to live. The compassionate authorities of Scotland sent him home to Libya to spend his last few months of life with his family and friends. This is true institutional compassion on the part of the authorities of Scotland, but it is also profoundly misplaced and unfortunate. This is “idiot compassion”.

There are many problems with Mr. Megrahi’s release. First and foremost is that he is a convicted mass murderer. As the only person convicted of the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am 103, December 12, 1988, in which 270 innocent people were slaughtered (including 189 Americans), there is a special section of Hell reserved for him.

Mr. Megrahi is a Muslim. When he returned home to Libya he was met with a hero’s welcome. In Islam Mr. Megrahi is seen as a jihadi, a fighter in Allah’s cause against the kafir (the unbelievers). In the umma, the collectivist community of Islam, Mr. Megrahi is viewed as a hero; he will surely have a place by Allah’s side.

The authorities of Scotland and across the West now wringing their hands with frustration at this revolting celebration of death and murder in Tripoli now have a clue that their compassion has been abused. Some American leaders even have the temerity to suggest that Scottish compassion for Megrahi was a “mockery of justice”. Many Western leaders are now having second thoughts about this misplaced compassion.

The “victory” celebrations in Libya upon the arrival of the mass murderer Megrahi are revolting to us in the West, it elicits a deep anger and a deep frustration; even when we show them compassion they still show us that they hate us.

There is deep confusion in the leadership of the West about events in Libya, but there is no such confusion in those who adhere to the foundational school of the study of Islam. Western “compassionate” multicultural fools and dhimmis are stunned at the rejection of their good will and compassion. They may believe that they have been made fools of, but they are not quite certain. They do not know the doctrine of Islam; they do not believe they are in an existential war. Their compassion has certainly been abused, this is the kafir “submitting” again to Islam; another feather in Islam’s cap from the mass murder of innocent Westerners by the vile person Megrahi. In Islam, this means that Megrahi is a hero. It is long past time for non-Muslims to learn the doctrine of Islam.

The Western way is to show compassion to the enemy in hopes that our compassion will make a friend out of an enemy. This approach cannot work with Islam.

The approach is faulty because of the doctrine of Islam which is followed by every adherent of Islam, and of which the judicial leaders in Scotland and across the West are entirely ignorant.

The foundational school approach affords the scholar and student the ability to understand every event occurring in the so-called “Islamic world”. This is so because the driver of the Islamic world is the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). When this doctrine is known and understood events in Islam become clear as a bright sunlit day.

The doctrine of Islam is a trilogy doctrine. Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed; Ibn Ishaq), and Hadith (Traditions of Mohammed; Bukhari, Muslim, et al.) are the foundations of Islam. All adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are those who “submit”. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a “Muslim” is “one who submits”. In the Koran it is very clear that one who “fights in Allah’s cause” (jihad) is doing the finest thing an adherent can do. Jihad is mentioned almost 150 times in Koran. In fact, death in jihad is the only assured method to Islamic heaven with its houris, flowing honey rivers, wine without hangovers, and little pleasure boys.

In Islam, what is being submitted to is Allah and Mohammed and their commands. Allah and Mohammed are only found in the doctrine trilogy. For those outside of Islam, we are to submit to… Islam.

By killing all those innocent people on Pan Am 103 in 1988 Mr. Megrahi is considered a hero in Libya and across the Islamic world. He is a hero because he is a fighter in Allah’s cause, a jihadist. Jihadists do not have any qualms about killing innocents because Mohammed had no such qualms.

Mohammed slaughtered the Jews of Khaybar and sat for hours with his prepubescent wife (his favorite, Aisha) watching as each male tribesman was beheaded. The men of Khaybar were slaughtered and the women made into sex slaves for their Muslim conquerors. The children were made into Muslims (this is one of the more effective ways that Islam grows; it happens over several generations).

Mr. Megrahi’s crimes, vile and despicable to decent people around the world, are “Sunna” in Islam. Sunna means doing something that Mohammed did. Anything that Mohammed did is “good”. Because Mohammed is “the Prophet” of Allah, and because Koran says that all adherents must follow the commands of both Allah and his prophet, the example of Mohammed is considered the finest example of humanity for all adherents to follow forever.

Mohammed was a mass murderer; Mr. Megrahi is a mass murderer. Mohammed killed unbelievers and struck them down with terror, Mr. Megrahi did the same with Pan Am 103.

The mass murder perpetrated by Mr. Megrahi is Sunna. He is a jihadi, a “fighter in the cause of Allah.” What we in the West consider an unforgivable, indescribable crime of brutality and inhumanity, Islam considers the finest action of a Muslim in the path of Mohammed and Allah.

Islamic “morality” is founded upon the commands of Allah and Mohammed and the events of Mohammed’s life and his sayings. Mohammed was a mass murderer. Mr. Megrahi followed in Mohammed’s path – he took the middle road of submission to Allah and Mohammed. His murder of hundreds of innocent people on Pan Am 103 is Sunna, it is considered the “best course” in Islam because this was the course of Mohammed.

Mr. Megrahi got a hero’s welcome in Libya because he is a mass murderer of non-believers just as Mohammed was. He struck terror into kafir hearts, just as Mohammed did. When we can begin to see and understand the linkage between Islamic doctrine and current day events we can oppose the spread of this ideology of anti-humanity.

Koran: [60.1] O you who believe! do not take My enemy and your enemy for friends: would you offer them love while they deny what has come to you of the truth, driving out the Apostle and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord? If you go forth struggling hard in My path and seeking My pleasure, would you manifest love to them? And I know what you conceal and what you manifest; and whoever of you does this, he indeed has gone astray from the straight path.

Koran: [60:1] O, you who believe, do not take my enemy and your enemy for friends by showing them kindness. They reject the truth that has come to you. They drive out the messengers and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord. If you continue to fight for Allah’s cause (jihad) and from a desire to please Me, would you show them kindness in private? I know best what you conceal and what you reveal. Whoever does this among you has already strayed from the right path. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Koran: [9:5] When the sacred months (by ancient arab custom there were four months during which there was to be no violence) are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Your email:

 

August 19th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

When the most important book of the twentieth century was released in 1925 while its author sat in prison with his cronies for an attempted coup against the German government, few could foresee its horrific impact. Mein Kampf set out, in rambling hate-based prose, a program of war, hatred, mass murder, and global conquest. Over the years purchases of the book made Adolf Hitler a wealthy man, but few in the country read the book though most households owned at least one copy. Fewer outside of Germany read the book. Those whose lives would be directly affected by the implementation of the plans described in the book did not read it; and those who should have read it who were put most at risk by it did not read it.

The same scenario is repeated with the Sira of Mohammed. Those who most need to read it (non-Muslims), those most at risk from its message will not, in the main, read it; while those who have read it are those who embrace its themes and message of hate, intolerance, war, and conquest.

The most influential book of the 20th century went mainly unread with disastrous consequences. One of the most influential books in human history, the Sira of Mohammed, is widely known among Muslims though the West is almost entirely ignorant of its contents, and its profound importance for both Muslims and non-believers. Worse still most in the west are ignorant of its existence.

We know what a world looks like when the ideology espoused in Mein Kampf is implemented. The Sira of Mohammed, Mohammed’s biography, tells the story of what the world will look like when Islam is triumphant. The differences between a victory of Nazism and a global conquest of Mohammedanism are difficult to determine as the differences are so minuscule.

We know what the world looked like when Nazism was rising, global warfare and unparalleled suffering. We know from the history of Islam what the world looks like when Islam is rising- jihad, barbarism, hatred, war, conquest, enslavement, and a brutal endless war of elimination of all non-Muslim cultures and political systems.

Had the world paid attention to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, as it is not now doing with the Sira of Mohammed, perhaps WW2 could have been avoided. When we know nothing of Mohammed’s life and his ideology of endless jihad against all unbelievers everywhere and forever we cannot defend ourselves against this growing threat. The threat of Islam originates in the doctrine of Islam of which the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) is one part of a trilogy of doctrinal texts which also includes Koran and Hadith. We are as ignorant (and more) as the clueless of 1933.

One who has read both Mein Kampf and the Sira can make a valid comparison. One who knows the history of WW2, and the Holocaust as well as Islamic history and doctrine, can place these books into an historical and political context. With this understanding of history and doctrine one can know with a reasonable certainty what the future will look like. One can know because just as Mein Kampf made certain promises and laid out certain plans, the Sira of Mohammed also makes promises and plans.

The Sira is not difficult to read. Anyone can read it. In fact recently a 12 year old was asked to read it. The child felt compelled to stop reading because “Mohammed was killing too many people”. The message of hate, violence, intolerance, and cruelty is clear to a 12-year-old but somehow eludes our political, academic, and religious leadership across the West. It eludes them most likely because they have not read it and do not know it exists.

Our lack of understanding of Islam and its foundational concepts of conquest and jihad is indicative of a societal-wide moral, intellectual, and ethical failure that for our own survival, must be swiftly reversed.

When one reads the doctrine of Islam the world shifts, changes. Knowledge of the doctrine brings events into focus in a way that previously was impossible. Just as Mein Kampf is the guide to WW2 before WW2 began, the doctrine of Islam is the guide to present day events and into the future. This is not prophecy, this is a firm understanding of the doctrine and guiding principles of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to our existence. We can know the future when we apply the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith) to present and past events involving Islam and adherents of Islam. This is applied theology and political science.

Knowledge of the Sira of Mohammed opens doors. It opens doors to a world of conflict and war and horror that we would prefer did not exist. There is no avoiding this foundational reality of our world.

When one knows Sira, closely held beliefs of the nature of the human world, how people behave and interact, and most importantly our previous understanding of the “religion of peace” are all shattered.

Learning Islamic doctrine forces us to rethink important concepts of the structure of existence, ideas that make life livable and pleasant, and paints a portrait of the ongoing failure and destruction of the human potential of peaceful co-existence and tolerance.

The doctrine of Islam is clear – there is no peaceful co-existence for Islam with unbelievers. Because non-Muslims have the gall and effrontery to not accept Allah and Mohammed, because we are Christian, Jew, Hindu, atheist, Buddhist, etc., we are seen by Allah and Mohammed as having rejected Koran, Sira, and Hadith – for this we are all kafirs and we must be made to submit. If we do not submit there is nothing that Islam will not do to make us do so. There are no taboos for Islam where kafirs are concerned. This is a fundamental lesson of the Sira of Mohammed.

The Sira, like the Koran and Hadith, is a wake up call for all kafirs (unbelievers). We learn from the Sira all about Islam, all about Mohammed, but we also learn about our own cultures. The lessons are painful and they are immutable.

• We are at war.
  Islam is at war with kafirs everywhere and forever until Islam is defeated or triumphant. The triumph of Islam is the defeat of individual freedoms, women’s rights, gay rights, religious tolerance, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc., etc. The triumph of Islam is a total shift of humanity from reaching for freedom and tolerance to an embrace of submission, enslavement, and intellectual and spiritual deadness from which recovery is unfortunately unlikely.
• We do not live in a “post-historical” world.
  In fact, history haunts us like a hunter. It pursues us until we stand and defend or surrender. This is not the world of the “end of history” of Frances Fukiyama, Bill Clinton, and other multiculturalist fantasists. Islam overturns all of these utopian concepts and crushes them under the boot of endless jihad and dhimmitude.
• We are not “post-modern”.
  We are pursued by forces of 7th century Arabia. They are well-trained; their doctrine of war has been successful for them for 1400 years. We are late in responding. Americans consider themselves forward thinking and not “mired” in issues of the past. We think we are above all of “that”. We are wrong. Our arrogance as to the ascension of our concepts is so strong that in foreign policy matters we simply only have to “reset” and we are on a totally new path, a path without a past – a path outside of context. With Islam there is no “reset”. We live outside of context in a bubble, a bubble that is being deflated rapidly by the rise of Islam.
• Our world is a world of conflict.
  War pursues us because the doctrine of Islam commands that it be so. The forces of Islam are flush with oil wealth transferred to them by us to them in our ignorance of their doctrine. We did this because we did not know their doctrine. We have empowered our enemies because we did not know their doctrine and now the time of reckoning approaches. We are not ready. We are not ready because we know nothing of the doctrine of Islam (Sira, Koran, Hadith). If we do not know why and how our enemy fights us, we cannot hope to oppose him successfully. Everything we need to know about Islam is in the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Knowledge of the doctrine of Islam is now a survival imperative; it is the patriotic duty of all lovers of freedom in the West to educate themselves and others about the doctrine of Islam. Ignorance of Islam is a moral, intellectual, ethical, and patriotic failure.
• Multiculturalism is wrong.
  In fact, multiculturalism is used by our enemies to immobilize us, keep us confused and unable to respond. Multiculturalism is wrong because the doctrine of Islam demonstrates that it is wrong. Islam is intolerant, we are tolerant; Islam is misogynist, we embrace equality between the sexes; Islam is about aggressive war, we are not. Islam denies the value of the individual, we believe that the empowered individual is the foundation of a healthy society and culture; Islam believes that only Islam is valid, we believe in religious pluralism and tolerance; Islam will not be analysed, criticized, satirized – we believe in humor, criticism and open debate. We believe that open debate is the foundation of intellectual honesty and truth. In Islam debate is not allowed. We do not believe in slavery, Islam strongly believes in slavery and dhimmitude of the unbeliever. The list is extensive. Multiculturalism’s core idea that all cultures are equal is destroyed by the existence and message of the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). Truth is this: some cultures are superior in relation to others. Not all cultures are the same. This means that multiculturalism is a fraud and a failed utopian concept that must be delegitimized and destroyed. The product of Islam is jihad. The products of Western culture that enhance the value of existence, empower individuals, and create opportunity and wealth are too numerous to mention here. We do not war against others because they do not believe what we believe. Some cultures are better than others. Multiculturalism is dead, the only problem is that few have noticed its demise.

In Islam the model of the life of Mohammed (Sira) and the things that he said and did according  to his friends (Hadith) are the perfect model of behavior for all Muslims to follow in perpetuity. If Mohammed had been a nice fellow this would be a boon for all humanity, but it is not so. Mohammed was not a nice fellow. In Islam it is said that what Mohammed did is considered “Sunna” that means acceptable and good; what Mohammed disallowed is “haram” or forbidden.

Had Mohammed been a humanitarian this article would not be so lengthy. The Sira and Hadith dictate what is Sunna. Foundationally, jihad is Sunna. This means that anything done to the kafir if it advances the cause of Allah/Islam is Sunna. This includes every negative thing one can imagine. There are no taboos for the kafir.

When one reads the Sira one sees that we in the West are in serious trouble. It is interesting to note that “year one” of the Islamic calendar is not the year in which Mohammed received his first “revelations” from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Rather, it is the year in which Mohammed emigrated from Mecca to Medina. In Mecca Mohammed was an argumentative and disruptive but non-violent “preacher” – he got 150 converts in 9 years. When he went to Medina as an immigrant Mohammed became a warlord. When he was finished there were no enemies left, he was the ruler of all Arabia. All of his opponents had been slaughtered in battle or by assassination or had converted (submitted) to the “religion of peace”.

“Year one” of the Islamic calendar shows definitively that Islam is not a religion only, but a political ideology of conquest and barbarism, totalitarianism and cruelty fronted by a fake “religion of peace”.

“Year one” is a designation of a political event in Mohammed’s life not a religious one. The so-called “religion of peace” is a clever front for a political totalitarian ideology of control, control of Muslims and non-Muslims. Islam’s understanding of control of humans is without peer.

The world’s great cycles of history turn on knowledge, ignorance, and anti-knowledge. Our culture of multicultural ignorance is one of anti-knowledge. Ignorance empowers Islam. Islam is our enemy, it says so in the Sira of Mohammed.

Multiculturalism says that Islam is equal in value and import to our Western cultures of freedom and tolerance and inclusiveness. Multiculturalism empowers our existential enemy.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed so that we can discuss, debate, and condemn evil where necessary. We refuse to learn from doctrine and we ignore the history of jihad at our peril.

The fate of humanity will be decided upon our understanding of the doctrine of our enemies. They know us well, we know little to nothing of them. The old saying, “You may not believe in the devil, but he believes in you” is applicable here. You may not care about Islamic doctrine but it cares very much about you. The majority of Islamic doctrine is about the kafir, us.

Islam is a doctrine whose purpose is the conquest and annihilation of the unbeliever everywhere. We ignore it because we have difficulty accepting that it can be real; we have difficulty letting go of our concepts that we live outside of war and outside of history. We are all too enlightened for all that.

Our enemies do not see the world as we do.

Some in the multicultural West are so ignorant of history that they find the concept of “enemy” excessive and difficult to accept. Such people are outside of history because they are ignorant of history and of human nature. Such people believe that if we are “tolerant” and show how “nice” we are to our enemies that they will love us, and stop hating us.

Our enemies are pleased that we are “tolerant” and “nice” because this makes their mission of conquest all the easier.

These are the bubble people, those who live on  wishful thinking and ignorance. This ideology of ignorance has infected our leadership and institutions to such an extent that when scholars quote the Sira of Mohammed they are excoriated as “bigots”. This discussion of Islamic doctrine is not a matter of opinion. If you do not like the discussion you must take the matter up with Mohammed and make your complaints to him as the messengers (those who discuss doctrine) are only repeating his lines and his example to show the dire nature of our situation. The scholars of the doctrine of Islam bring a message of dire warning.

The fate of humanity turns on the pages of unread books. Mein Kampf was on most every shelf in Germany but few read it; few abroad read it. In the pages of that book was laid out the plan for conquest and murder that would become the 2nd World War.

The Sira of Mohammed is unread widely in the West. It is not difficult to read. The Sira is a plan for domination of all unbelievers everywhere. It is a book of cruelty and violence that often surpasses Mein Kampf in horrors as the stories are (supposedly) an historical record of atrocities while Mein Kampf was essentially a twisted “wish list” of domination and barbarism.

We in the West must study the doctrine of Islam – it is not difficult. We must acknowledge the truth about the “religion of peace” and we must accept unpleasant realities though they shatter our illusions. We must acknowledge that we are at war.

Mohammed’s life is not the kind of life that any decent person anywhere on this planet would want to emulate. His life and actions are the model for all Muslims to aspire to forever. This model of cruelty, hate, intolerance, rape, torture, murder, war, pedophilia, theft, deceit, enslavement, conquest, and misogyny is the model for all Islam forever. “We have a litttle problem” is the most profound  understatement of the millennium.

Your email:

 

August 16th, 2009 by admin

Two films of Pierre Rehov

First Comes Saturday, Then Comes Sunday
Silent Exodus

Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Belcourt Cinema
2102 Belcourt Ave.
Nashville, TN
6:30 pm – 9:30 pm

Admission: Free, and open to the public
Donations: Accepted (to defray costs)

Please join us at the Belcourt Cinema in downtown Nashville for an important evening of documentary film viewing. Acclaimed director and film-maker Pierre Rehov will be introducing these challenging and timely films.  Two documentaries of importance to all lovers of freedom and justice will be shown. The event is open to the public. No admission will be charged. Donations will be accepted at the door to offset costs.

The great challenge of our time is that of Islam. Across the world Christians and Jews, and all unbelievers (kafirs), are oppressed and worse by the forces of Islamic intolerance and expansionism. Jihad is the duty of all adherents of the “religion of peace”, it is stated as such by both Allah and Mohammed in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Jihad is violent warfare against all unbelievers everywhere and forever until the entire world is under Islamic dominance and control.

Pierre Rehov has documented the effects of jihad and the suffering of its victims. The information in these films will be new and disturbing for many viewers. When we see the suffering caused by jihad we can learn what jihad truly is. Jihad is warfare against non-believers.

These are important films, we bring them to you out of concern and empathy for our friends across the world and to help educate ourselves and one another as to this existential threat of political Islam and its jihad against all. Ignorance of Islam and jihad is morally and ethically indefensible. These films are a devastating reminder to us all as to the reality of jihad, the brutality of political Islam, and the growing danger that we in the United States face. The suffering of Christians and Jews by political Islam is documented every day, but few take note. (See here, here, here, and here.) It is difficult to ignore the suffering that Mr. Rehov has captured on film. Ignorance of Islam must end, Mr. Rehov’s films are ignorance breakers.

We invite you to learn with us from these films, and from their creator Mr. Pierre Rehov. We invite you to let your  moral outrage, sadness, and horror guide you on a path of compassion for those Christians and Jews whose suffering is so palpable in these films. We hope that with new knowledge more will understand. These are films that cannot and must not be ignored.

-DL Adams

Your email:

 

August 11th, 2009 by admin

Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, and PoliticalIslam.com, one of the leading scholars of Islamic history, politics, and doctrine posted this evening a concise and insightful analysis of recent declarations from Obama administration “security” leaders that there is no Jihad, and that there are no Jihadists. The only conflict according to the Obama administration is with al Qaeda. Unfortunately, they are completely wrong.

Their ignorant comments display a shocking lack of knowledge about the nature of Islam and its doctrine, Koran, Sira,  and Hadith. Jihad is very real, and Islam is at war with all unbelievers everywhere. This is the foundational truth of our world because this is what Allah and Mohammed command. Since all Muslims must submit to Allah and Mohammed and the doctrine of Islam (the word “Islam” means “submission) then Islam is at war with unbelievers everywhere.

George Orwell coined the term “doublespeak” in 1984; this is when a lie is a truth and a truth a lie. The Obama administration is engaging in doublespeak, and worse.

-DL Adams

There Are No More Jihadists

(article re-printed with permission from politicalislam.com)

John Brennan, Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counter-terrorism, has come forth and enlightened the world with the news that there are no “jihadists”.

Mr. Brennan/Obama says that jihad is an inner struggle and inner purification-a purely spiritual process, and when we call them jihadists, they obtain a religious legitimacy they don’t deserve. He goes further to say that we are actually at war with al Qaeda and its “extremist” allies.

And who is Brennan’s source for the “truth”? Obama. Hmmm. Obama? Since when is Obama an expert on the foundation of Islam? We have had another president, Bush, make his own declarations about what Islam is and he has no more basis to be a foundation of Islam than Obama. Democrats and Republicans are joined at the ideological hip when it comes to Islam, for both are profoundly ignorant about its political doctrine and history. One is dumb, the other is dumber — and you can argue over which is what.

No matter what Brennan/Obama says, the only foundation of Islam is the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. (The Sunna is composed of the Sira, Mohammed’s biography, and the Hadith, his traditions.) If we wanted to know what a jihadist is, why not go to the Koran, Sira and Hadith? Why listen to second-hand hearsay from a politician when you can listen to Allah and Mohammed? Who would you trust, Brennan/Obama or Mohammed? The answer from 1.2 billion Muslims is-trust Mohammed.

What does Mohammed say about jihad? Is it inner struggle or killing kafirs? All three texts have much to say about jihad. In the Hadith by Bukhari approximately 20% of the text is about jihad. Actually, the Hadith is a textbook about the tactics of jihad. Do we find jihad as the inner struggle in the Hadith? Yes, but we also find jihad as the killing of kafirs. Do some simple math and you will discover that around 97% of the text concerning jihad is about the killing of kafirs and 3% is the jihad of inner struggle, the so-called greater jihad.

The Sira, Mohammed’s biography by Ishaq, devotes a lot of attention to jihad. About 70% of the Sira is about jihad. But there is not a single mention of the inner struggle jihad, only killing kafirs.

The Koran calls jihad “fighting in Allah’s cause” and the jihad is about the killing of kafirs.

Having two kinds of jihad is a part of Islamic dualism. Islam is built on two principles, submission and duality. Dualism is its great strength. It allows Islam to hold two contradictory views at the same time. So while jihadists are killing kafirs, Islam is proclaiming itself to be peaceful. Then ignorant kafirs argue about which is the true nature, completely missing the point that Islamic reasoning allows such contradictions to be true for both sides.

There is a clash here between reasoning systems. Brennan/Obama are about authoritarian reasoning. Brennan/Obama are right because they have power, and they assert their power of truth by declaration. They are right because they are powerful.

The other system of reasoning is critical thinking, also called scientific thinking . Notice how different the two systems are. One of them depends upon acceptance of authority, the other depends upon data that anyone can go and check out for them selves.

Obama gave his vision of Official Islam in Cairo. Official Islam is based upon his authority, but Official Islam is not to be found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Obama declared there were no jihadists in his speech in Cairo and called them extremists. How can a Muslim be an extremist if he doing what Mohammed did? Mohammed defines Islam. Mohammed was a jihadist who killed many kafirs, hence, being a jihadist is an Islamic doctrinal model, not an extremist position.

What difference does the name make? It just depends on what you want — scientific truth or fantasy. Official Islam is a fantasy and a deliberate fraud. Official Islam is a Big Lie.

Your email:

 

August 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are two critical impediments that prevent the West from engaging effectively, or at all, in this existential conflict with Islam. Ignorance and multiculturalism (proto-legitimized moral relativism) must be deconstructed and delegitimized.

It is a moral and ethical failure to be ignorant of the purposes and doctrine of political Islam. Ignorance of an existential enemy is shameful and indefensible. Multiculturalism must be exposed for the disastrous pseudo-philosophy of ignorance that it is. Founded upon ignorance and silly utopianist anti-intellectualism, multiculturalism prevents us from responding to political Islam because to do so in our morally bankrupt multicultural world is seen as intolerance. Defending your nation from cultural and literal annihilation is not “intolerance” it is the height of patriotism and rationality.

The fundamental dual concepts of multiculturalism are “tolerance” and “inclusiveness”. These very “nice” concepts are founded upon the idea that all cultures are of equal value and that differences between cultures are to be applauded and “accepted” rather than condemned when such condemnation is appropriate. The idea that a culture can be corrupt or even evil is dismissed as “bigotry” in the multiculturalist’s broken anti-knowledge world. Multiculturalism is the soiled garden in which Islam grows.

People who know the doctrine of political Islam and have the effrontery to discuss it in public are accused of bigotry by multiculturalists and the ignorant. The doctrine of political Islam as found in Sira, Koran, and Hadith is inherently intolerant and exclusive but this does not deter the multiculturalists. There is an unspoken superiority in their world; they believe themselves superior because they are so inclusive, accepting, and “nice”. The forces of evil see this welcoming inclusiveness from the cultures of the West as the actions of fools. These foolish actions are of great value to political Islam because in their false feelings of superiority multiculturalists are the perfect “dhimmis” for Islam, perfect servents of a totalitarian ideology whose purposes are entirely destructive of inclusiveness and tolerance. Multiculturalists are anti-knowledge useful idiots for the forces of cultural and literal annihilation that is Islam.

There has long been a concept very popular in the United States regarding immigration and assimilation which is that if we show new-comers to our shores how nice, welcoming, and good we are, they will all become Americans. This model has worked for generations with European, Asian, South Americans and immigrants from across the world. Islam does not fit this model.

The model has failed because Islam does not assimilate. Islam does not assimilate because Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” translates to “submission”. Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are not interested in assimilation, they are interested only in bringing the entire world under Allah’s “religion”. For adherents of this miserable and cruel political ideology of hate and conquest only one religion, one political system, and one culture is allowed – that of Allah and Mohammed.  All other religions, cultures, and political systems are to be annihilated.

Because multiculturalists are willfully ignorant about the cultures that they defend – to them all cultures (no matter how abysmal they may be) are worthy of defense simply because they are “different” – Islam sees that the cultures of the West cannot defend themselves against them.

In fact, multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam infiltrates our institutions and political systems. Islam is at war with all non-believers everywhere and forever, this is called “jihad” or “fighting in Allah’s cause”. Jihad is so foundational to Islam that it is mentioned over 150 times in the text of the Koran. Because multiculturalists have no need to know anything about any culture (after all, all cultures are “equal” therefore knowledge of any one culture is of little necessity, value, or import) they do not understand that they are under attack.

Multiculturalism and ignorance, the two walk hand in hand together, are the greatest weaknesses of the cultures of the West.

The model of assimilation has failed. It has failed because resurgent Islam and its jihad has no interest in assimilation. Multiculturalists do not know this, and when they are told the truth, they refuse obstinately to believe it. Acceptance of the truth of Islam is to accept the failure of the fundamental concepts of multiculturalism.

We in the West must judge cultures and adherents to such cultures when we make immigration decisions. We must accept the literal truth that some cultures are unpleasant and have belief systems that are contrary to ours. The idea that everyone loves freedom is a broken and confused concept. It is a ruined shell because in Islam the only freedom that is considered of value is the complete submission to Allah and Mohammed (and the doctrine of Islam). Islam sees freedom in total submission to the doctrine of Islam.

When we open our doors to Islam, we open ourselves and our nations to forces that reject our concepts of tolerance and inclusiveness. This is the absurdity and horror of multiculturalism- it is a failed philosophy of self-destruction.

We must learn the doctrine of Islam. Knowledge of the doctrine is akin to having the “playbook” of the opposing team in a sporting match. But this is not sport for us, it is about nothing less than our existential survival as non-Islamic countries and cultures. We must learn the doctrine of Islam to dispel our ignorance of Islam. Without knowledge of Islam we cannot oppose it; without knowledge some do not even realize that they are at war with us and therefore we are at war with them.

The banishment of ignorance through knowledge is critically important if we are to survive as freedom-loving, tolerant, and “nice” cultures. It is a patriotic duty to learn the doctrine of Islam and educate others about it.

We must destroy multiculturalism; deconstruct it, delegitimize it, and acknowledge it as the utopian self-destructive fantasy that it is. All cultures are not equivalent. Some cultures are better than others, and some are our enemies and some our friends. This is reasonable, rational thinking. The foundational concept of multiculturalism is that all cultures are of equal value and worth. This is inclusiveness, tolerance, and “niceness” taken to the extreme. This is anti-intellectualism and irrational thinking that will result in the entire loss of our civilizations. Multiculturalism must be destroyed and swept into the dustbin of absurdity where it belongs.

Failure to destroy multiculturalism, delegitimize it and its adherents as the intellectual imposters and fools that they are is a national failure whose consequences are beyond unpleasant. Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam gains access to our countries for the purpose of the destruction of the host culture.

The doctrine of Islam is clear on these points as are the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”. Jihad is a responsibility for all Muslims. It is the command of both Allah and Mohammed. Mulsims who do Jihad are “good” Muslims because they follow the commands of Allah and Mohammed; those who do not do jihad are “extremists” because they reject the commands of the doctrine of Islam. Those who reject jihad are perfect fodder for jihadists because they are not “good” Muslims. This concept must be understood clearly. Our conceptions of good/evil, right/wrong do not apply in the Islamic worldview.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed. Multiculturalists must be mocked and criticised for the self-destructive fools that they are. Their philosophy is used by our enemies to gain entree and power in our institutions and cultures. Multiculturalists, in their utopian ignorance, are tools of the enemy – their philosophy must be rejected, repudiated, and deconstructed so that rational thought can again be the dominant mode of thought across the West. To do any less is failure.

When we know nothing of Islam, we lose. When we say that all cultures are equivalent and we can no longer identify good and evil, right and wrong, we lose. Ignorance of Islam is not acceptable, it is a moral and ethical failure.

Multiculturalism is a tool of Islam; it is a disastrous ideology of false “nice” that is used to stifle critical thought and open debate. Multiculturalism is a complete failure as it is used by our enemies to destroy us. It is a failed fake intellectual concept for “nice” people to abjure their responsibilities to themselves, their cultures and countries. Multiculturalism must be destroyed.

Your email:

 

August 6th, 2009 by admin

An Israeli suddenly realizes that the so-called “Palestinian-Israeli problem” is not about politics at all, it’s about jihad. When a difficult enemy is understood to be an intractable one, the world becomes a very menacing place.

This heartfelt article is by an Israeli friend of ACT West Nashville.

-Admin

The undeniable truth of Israel and the lie of fundamentalist Islam

by Golan Shlomi

Growing up in Israel during the 1990s was a very special experience for me that involved hopes for a better future.

As a teenager I remember seeing Palestinians everywhere working and having fun among the Jewish population but it was still not enough for them. They wanted more; they said they want their own land, they wanted independence which sounded very legit to me back then , “Why can’t they have their own country?” I asked myself.

I always thought they deserved their own country like any other nation in the world.

Give them their country, I said, so they won’t need to go through the bureaucracy involved in getting the staying and working permits in Israel.

But lo and behold, in 1994 after the Oslo agreements, it happened!!! Or at least started to happen, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) led by Yasser Arafat became the legal government of the Palestinian authority which was destined to become an independent Palestinian country after the negotiation would end… Oh my, a dream come true, in the streets of Israel people started to plan future trades and tourism with the new Palestinian state, I remember even talks about turning the mandatory service of 3 years in the Israeli army to a fully volunteered service.

But everything collapsed in 2000. In the final talks at Camp David between the Israeli prime minister , Ehud Barak, and Yasser Arafat, with mediation of Bill Clinton, Israel had agreed to give the Palestinian 96% of the territories they demanded plus 4% alternative territories plus sovereignty in the Arab neighborhood in Eastern Jerusalem and in the Temple mount.

In other words, Arafat was offered 100% of his claims with only minor changes due to security arrangements Israel could not afford to give. This was a more than fair agreement to the Palestinians; Israel offerered more to them than any other country in the world would ever agree to. (Let me just mention that a similar package was offered by the former Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, to the current Fatah leader, Mahmud Abbas, several years ago.)

But guess what? Arafat rejected the offer!

After years of armed conflict between the Jews and Arabs the Jews agreed to withdraw from their own lands out of their own free will but still the Palestinian people refused this treasure which was handed to them as if on a silver tray!!! Instead they choose “armed resistance”, jihad, with weapons that were supplied to them by the Israeli government- perhaps we are fools?

A pure truth was revealed then – the truth is that the state of Israel belongs to the Jews and all the Palestinian demands were nothing more than a lie that was a cover for something else, for something bigger, jihad. A lot has happened since that moment in Camp David- the Israeli dreams for peace have been shattered, our hopes were destroyed and my question was why? If the Palestinians wanted a state so badly why did they say no?

But now I have come to a realization that there was one dream that didn’t shatter, an old dream of the Muslim world, a dream of the annihilation of Israel and the Jews.They knew that by saying “yes” to the Israeli offer they would simply destroy their own dream and of course nobody wants to shoot himself in the leg.

They wanted Israel to give them everything including the its self-destruction by trying to force on Israel draconian demands like the absorption of millions of refugees. These are refugees who fled their homes 60 years ago because of a war they initiated themselves against Israel, a demand to which no sane living organism on planet Earth would ever agree.

Such a concession from Israel would prepare the groundwork for the disappearance of Israel as a Jewish state.

All of the above is just a simple truth of the unfounded hatred that has existed for thousands of years. After WWII, Anti-Semitism has become a vulgar term among the world’s nations including Iran which is now the most dangerous enemy of Israel.

Instead, anti-Semites have routed their hatred toward Zionism and the state of Israel. It’s an obvious fact that I can say with confidence – if Israel, Jews and the rest of the world would disappear from the maps the Muslims would be left alone to kill each other.

Any novice psychologist would tell us that when you hate someone you actually hate yourself and hating yourself can only result in self destruction.

The Muslim world appears to be motivated by hate. Hate is destructive and dreams are creative. The sad part is that the Western world is standing in a limbo between hate and vision.

Perhaps the current economic crises has happened for a reason, maybe the US, Europe and even Israel needs this economic downturn to make the switch from economical growth, which is no longer viable at this time, to focusing on real dangers in the world like the growth of fundamentalist Islam for example.

Your email:

 

August 4th, 2009 by admin

 by D. L. Adams

Knowledge of Islamic Doctrine is Foundational in Ideological War

Islam is so strong because we are so weak. Islam is so strong because Islam knows us; we are weak because we do not know Islam. Islam knows our history, our doctrine, our government and laws; we are almost entirely ignorant of Islam except the false claim of the “religion of peace”.

Understanding our opponent’s purposes and motives in this ideological war cannot be overstated. We kafirs have always viewed our government, religions, and core beliefs of freedom and elevation of the individual over the collective in our society as positives. The totalitarian collectivist ideology of Islam, its adherents and apologists,  understands the essential concepts of our culture and society and uses this knowledge against us.

Because Islam understands us so well and we know so little about it – lovers of freedom are confused to such a degree in this conflict that we are paralyzed into inaction. The solution for us is knowledge. We cannot respond to this threat to our freedoms if we know nothing of Islam. It is a patriotic imperative to study Islam.

In ideological war the battleground is intellectual; it is a war of ideas and convictions, it is a conflict of knowledge versus ignorance. We cannot defend ourselves if we are ignorant.

Everything we had previously thought was true about the future and our place in it is now at risk because of the resurgence of a millennia old cult of death, war, violence, and hatred called Islam. It is much more than a religion; it is a unified totalitarian ideology. The “religion of peace” is a facade for the totalitarian purposes of the Ideology of Islam. Conquest and control are the foundations of this ideology.

The core of Islam is Allah and the Prophet Mohammed. All Muslims are required to follow the example of Mohammed as described in the doctrine, Sira, Hadith, and Koran. Mohammed is considered the perfect example for all adherents to follow forever. Unfortunately for us, Mohammed was a killer, pedophile, rapist, slaver, war-monger, misogynist, conqueror, warlord, thief, and an intolerant hater of all who are not Muslim. This means that all Muslims must follow this example. You will hear the term “Moderate Muslim” often in this ideological war; the moderate Muslim is Osama Bin Laden. He is moderate because he follows the middle way of the commands of the doctrine. He is a devout Muslim. The terms “moderate” and “extremist” are western terms that do not apply in Islam. When you see Islam as adherents understand it, through the doctrine, the extremist is the one who does notfollow commands of Allah and Mohammed; the extremist is what we would consider “peaceful”.

Islam is not about peace; Islam is about submission. Those adherents who force unbelievers to submit to Islam (this process is called “jihad”) are devout Muslims, and are completely within the doctrine. Those who refuse the responsibility of jihad are extremists. Do not let these terms confuse you.

When you see Islam as Islam sees itself, everything becomes clear in this ideological war.

If you view Islam through a western inclusive tolerant “lens” you can never understand Islam.

If you have had the misfortune to attend a “bridge building” event or an “interfaith dialogue” you would likely have seen Rabbis who knew their own doctrine but not that of Islam; Pastors and Priests who knew Old and New Testament but know nothing of Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Most disheartening of all you would have seen Imams who know Torah, New Testament, and their own doctrine. Islam is prepared for this war because they have been fighting it for 1400 years. We must eliminate this knowledge gap if we are to prevail against this very old, but now resurgent force of  totalitarianism,  brutality, barbarism, and destruction of the individual.

Islam is an ideology that is steeped in history, in fact their goal is to return to history. In the West, we are disconnected from history and most are ignorant of it. Because of this ignorance few can place this ideological war, and the actions of Islam and its adherents, into any historical or understandable context. Again, our ignorance is our downfall.

Those who do not know history and are ignorant of the doctrine of Islam are easily swayed, easily manipulated to believe what they want to believe.

Those who cannot place this conflict into any reality that they can  comprehend, a reality based on history and understanding of the doctrine of Islam, want to believe that the war is not real, that everything they hold dear is not at risk. They want to believe that Islam will “go away” on its own accord. We know from history that once Islam is in control, it never goes away. Those who do not want to see reality for reality are denialists, anti-knowledge people.

These are the attendees of “interfaith events” who support Islam and remain entirely ignorant of it. These are the useful idiots of Islam, dhimmis.

This wishful thinking is the foundation of multiculturalism which is the idea that if we are nice enough, our enemies will come to love us.  Multiculturalists do not know nor understand history, and they cannot begin to conceive that a book written in the desert of Arabia over a thousand years ago could be the origin and guide of a war of annihilation against us today. It is simply impossible for such people, encased in ignorance, to comprehend.

We do not want war and, when war is waged upon us by reactionary forces whose brightest spark petered out over a millenia ago, it is difficult for many to comprehend. Multiculturalists believe that if they wish hard enough the hatred that Islam has for the kafir will go away; if enough concessions are given, Islam will “calm down” and integrate or assimilate into the host cultures. They are wrong.

Islam does not assimilate, Islam’s purpose is to make the kafir submit. This is done through jihad. Multiculturalsts are the “useful idiots” for the adherents of political Islam.

The forces of darkness count on our ignorance.  When non-Muslim cultures are conquered the vanquished peoples (dhimmis) are banned from study of Koran. It is easy to understand why this is so. The Koran is clear in its motives and its goals relating to the kafir. “Kafir” is the greatest insult perhaps in the world. Ordinary insults do not have the weight of law behind them as does the term “kafir”; anything can be done to the kafir; there are no taboos.

The existence of non-Muslims is an affront to Allah. Therefore all Muslims are commanded to “fight in Allah’s   cause” (jihad) to eliminate this affront to the deity. Jihad is entirely about eliminating the affront that is the
existence of those who do not accept Allah and Mohammed and Koran.

A reasonable person would never describe an ideology that believed such things as “tolerant” or “peaceful”. The dhimmis of the West defend Islam because they know nothing about it. They may claim to have read the doctrine and maybe even have a passage to share to prove their points. The responsibility to validate their defense of Islam resides with them; you will quickly see that they are ignorant of Islam and know far less than you. These are the useful idiots Lenin spoke of but remade for our generation and beyond. Dhimmis are as dangerous as Islam in their ignorance.

Islam is not an intellectual ideology – to Islam all knowledge of value is found in the doctrine. Everything else is extraneous.

Knowledge is Power – Doctrinal Knowledge in Debate

This total belief in the complete comprehensive and divine truth of the doctrine lends adherents of Islam an incredibly powerful sense of purpose. There is a downside to this – Islam is stunningly stunted, insular, self-referential, and ignorant of the wider world (information from sources outside of Islamic doctrine are considered of little value except insofar as how ideas and concepts created by others can be put to use by the umma; this is anti-creativity). This is a strength and weakness of Islam.

In fact, this is the foundation for ideological warriors to wage their fight for freedom against the greatest force of totalitarianism and cruelty and barbarism in human history. Understanding the doctrine of Islam is the foundation  of our defense. If we do not know whythey hate us and fight us, if we do not know what motivates them, we can never hope to prevail. If we understand their motivations and purposes, their views of themselves and of the less-than-human “other” (the kafir, all those who are not Muslim), we have a slight advantage.

Wielding knowledge is a powerful weapon; truth is more powerful than ignorance. This is the battleground of ideological war – truth versus ignorance and lies.

The forces of Islam have come to expect that we are multicultural, politically correct, and ignorant of Islam. When you have knowledge of the doctrine of Islam the battleground of ideological war is levelled. Everything done in the name of Islam comes from the doctrine. Knowledge of doctrine is the greatest weapon that we in the West can possess in our existential war against this evil and powerful retrogressive barbaric force.

You may be surprised to learn that learning doctrine is not difficult; the research is done, the books are available and are readily accessible intellectually. (Please see below.) The doctrine is a trilogy, the Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam), and the Hadith (the traditions of the Prophet). When you have read these three books, you are fully armed for ideological combat.

Once armed with this doctrinal foundational knowledge what is to be done with it? Since ideological war is about ideas and debate, one engages in debates; foundational knowledge of doctrine is your weapon and your greatest shield.

The bulk of the doctrine is about Mohammed, not Allah. Discussion of Mohammed then is critical because the actions and life of Mohammed are so contrary to any accepted norms of civilized behavior in the West.

Your knowledgeable discourse of Mohammed and his crimes will make a profound impression on the adherents of Islam and their dhimmi multicultural defenders (who know nothing of doctrine, Islamic history, etc.). Mohammed’s story is the “great path” for all adherents to follow, it’s horrific. When you share the story of Mohammed, and the fact that all Muslims must follow his example you will see immediately why cruelty against the kafir by Muslims across the world occurs. The doctrine opens every window, every closed door of why things in the world of Islam happen.

One must always remember that Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a Muslim is “one who submits”. Adherents submit to the commands of Allah and Mohammed as found in the trilogy doctrine. If you know the doctrine, you know why the adherents of Islam do what they do. This is the power of understanding doctrine.

When one knows the doctrine it is as if one has the playbook of the opposing team in a football game. But this is not football – this is existential war.

Knowledge of Mohammed’s history and commands are the keys to ideological war against the forces of darkness that is Islam.

No Muslim or dhimmi multiculturalist can argue the “truth” of the doctrine of Islam. Mohammed is the key example for all Muslims. Lay out a case against Mohammed by discussing his life and actions, his crimes and abhorrent, perverse behavior you will have shaken those who oppose you.

It has been suggested that there is only one Muslim, Mohammed. There is truth in this. This is both a strength and a deep weakness in the ideology of hate and intolerance that is Islam.

Authoritarian systems like Islam do not like exposure of the truth. If you know the truth, and it can only be found in the doctrine, you have an advantage in the ideological war.

The battleground in this ideological war is often fought on the internet in chat rooms, forums, blogs, websites, and via email. This is a form of text-based debate. When you know the doctrine of Islam you will be able to refute any lie, divert any takiya and deconstruct any falsehoodthrown at you by adherents of this barbaric ideology and their dhimmi apologists and sycophants.

Multiculturalism is Anti-Knowledge

There has always been an attraction to power for those whose character is weak. This is the nature of the support for Islam among western elites. But there is also ignorance that empowers the dhimmis, an ignorance that can be displaced by knowledge, your knowledge of doctrine.

In this ideological war the ignorant believe that their lack of knowledge gives them the moral high ground. They believe this because they never are required to “offend” anyone by telling the truth about the doctrine of Islam.  Multiculturalists do not want to offend, that is the core of their existence.

Ignorance is not the high ground of morality. In this existential war it is unethical and immoral to be ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. Because you (the knowledgable ideological warrior) speak from a position of knowledge, not of opinion, you have the high moral ground.

Truth is infinitely more moral than anti-knowledge.

It is a patriotic imperative to learn the truth about Islam (through study of the doctrine, then applying that knowledge to today’s events).

Denial of the individual, of themselves, is a strong undercurrent in the multiculturalists of the West. Surrender and submission is attractive to many dhimmis but not to the ideological warrior. Multiculturalists are blindly  and totally inclusive and have lost their moral foundation; their moral compass is smashed. They cannot identify friend from foe, good from evil; these are the true relativists of our times. They are very confused, very convinced, and very dangerous. Shattering the drug-like ignorance and relativism of multiculturalist thinking is one of the battlegrounds in this thought war, this war of civilizations.

For those who have read Koran, Sira, Hadith it is impossible to support Islam.

Islam is clear about its cruelty and hate. If an opponent tells you that they have read the Koran you must ask them to explain their defense of it in light of the cruelty and violence that forms the foundations of the texts. This is an easy way to catch the ignorant in a lie; most who say that they know Islamic doctrine actually know little or nothing. Their support of Islam is based upon opinion and not knowledge. These are anti-knowledgewarriors; you will always vanquish such dhimmis with your knowledge of the doctrine of Islam.

A favorite tactic of the dhimmi defenders of Islam will be to try to take you off your foundationalist course. They will never want to discuss doctrine with you because the doctrine is clearly cruel, hateful, totalitarian, warmongering, brutal, etc. Don’t let them do it. You can discuss the murder of the Khaybar Jews by Mohammed; the rape of captured Christian and Jewish women by Mohammed; Mohammed’s pedophilia (he married a 6 year old named Aisha, his favorite, then “consummated” the “marriage” at age 9); you can discuss the kafir. Allah and Mohammed hate the kafir. They hate the kafir because the kafir is not Muslim.

In Islam only Islam is acceptable, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, everything else is considered bad and must be destroyed.

The massive Buddhas of Afghanistan were destroyed by the Taliban because they were vestiges of a culture previous to Islam (a non-Islamic culture); their iconography, books, art, religions, must be destroyed so that Islam can be the only ideology in existence. You may also recall the total silence from the West about the Taliban and their brutal regime until the destruction of the Buddhas.

For many kafir multiculturalists art is more important than life and defense of innocent victims. Showing multiculturalists their own hypocrisy is an important ideological warfare strategy.

Dhimmis will say, “Well, there is violence in the New Testament and Torah, too!”  They will formulate a shallow, relativist argument that “all religions are equally bad and violent”. There are several problems with this approach that you must explain to these deluded folks.

Violence in Koran is permanent and universal, violence in the doctrinal texts of Judaism and Christianity is temporary and localized, it always comes to an end and life goes on. In Koran and Sira and Hadith the violence never ends, because violence is existence itself.

Islam is not a doctrine that reveres life. Islam reveres death because only through death in jihad is an adherent promised a place in paradise with honey rivers, virgins and little boys. In Islam the active pursuit of death while doing jihad (fighting and killing kafirs) is the highest “calling” in the “religion of peace”.

Waging Ideological Conflict – Adhere to Doctrine as Islam Adheres to Doctrine

Your opponents will try to shake you out of doctrine. When it is clear to them that you have the powerful weapon of knowledge of Islamic doctrine they will do their best to take you down a tangential path. Do not let them take you into a tangent – stick to doctrine, stick to Mohammed and Allah and Koran, Sira, Hadith. They will do this because they are afraid and frustrated.

Your oppenent will know that you cannot be vanquished in ideological conflict because you know Islamic doctrine better than he/she does.

Keep the discussion about doctrine, Islamic history and how Islam commits atrocities every day across the world because this is the command of Allah and Mohammed.

Applying doctrine to daily events is a powerful tool as it illustrates how the doctrine is the cause of events of cruelty. Because you know the doctrine of Islam you can build a direct relationship case between doctrine and violence by the adherents of Islam. This is a powerful ideological warfare tool. This is “applied doctrine”; you will shake many ignorant people out of their ignorance with this approach.

It is important that you know about abrogation. Because the Koran is believed by adherents of Islam to be the perfect word of Allah, perfect and unchangeable, the contradictions in the text must be explained in some way. For example, early in the Koran the Jews are described as “people of the book” who do not understand that Mohammed is the true final prophet of god, whereas later in the Koran the Jews are apes and pigs to be killed on sight for having committed the crime of not accepting Allah, Mohammed and Koran.

The “peaceful” verses are almost entirely found in the early parts of the Koran and are universally abrogated (that is, cancelled) by the violent, hateful message of the later Koran.

The method that Islamic doctrine uses to negate contradictions and rescue the perfection of Allah is “abrogation”. This means that later verses are considered “more powerful” than earlier verses, but both the later and earlier verses are true even if they directly contradict each other. This is the perfect illustration of the concept of “duality” within Islam; two opposing positions in a contradiction are both true. This is impossible in western concepts of unitary logic.

In Islam, when Allah contradicts himself he hasn’t really made a mistake or changed his mind because Allah is considered infallible. What has happened in Koran is that Allah has added a “better” verse which does not negate the previous contrary one logically though the later verse is considered in force and the earlier minimized (or cancelled). This is an important concept for ideological warriors for freedom to understand.

Islam accepts the unification of opposites which western logic denies. Duality is foundational in Islam, as is  abrogation. When you master these concepts you can command most any debate on this issue.

Understanding the concept of abrogation is best done with a Koran that is chronological. The Koran is not  traditionally structured chronologically rather it is organized by largest chapter to smallest. This means that the Koran doesn’t make any sense, in fact some scholars have used the term “incomprehensible” to describe it.

When the Koran is presented in the traditional manner abrogation is difficult to see. However, when the Koran is organized chronologically one can see abrogation clearly, the later verses abrogate (cancel) the earlier verses.

Unfortunately for the kafir (every non-Muslim culture), all the peaceful verses in Koran are early and all the later ones are violent and hateful and warmongering. This means that because of abrogation Islam is an ideology of war, hate, intolerance, cruelty, misogyny, and barbarism. The proof of this assertion is demonstrated every day across the world by the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”.

When the dhimmis and the adherents of the cult of death tell you otherwise you can educate them with their own doctrine. In any debate, you are the master with this technique.

Knowledge is Power – Fighting the Forces of Anti-Knowledge and Barbarism with Doctrinal Scholarship

What is at stake here is nothing less than the future of the West.

We who know that this war exists, that it is real, are on the front lines.

Our weapon is knowledge, knowledge of the foundational texts of the enemy. Surprisingly, many adherents of Islam do not know their own doctrine. This is a powerful truth. Talking about Islam to adherents about their own doctrine may cause them to get upset, but it may also cause them to think. Individual thought is the very thing that totalitarian ideologies like Islam hate the most. Islam is about submission and control, there is no room for the individual because Islam is the apotheosis of the “collective” ideology.

This is an intellectual and spiritual war that we fight in the shadows and in the plain clear light of day while the dhimmis go about their lives pretending it is not real and that you – the defender of freedom – are a villain. Do not believe it.

As you struggle for your cultures and freedoms remember that you are the front line in this as yet undeclared ideological war. There is no doubt that it will one day be declared and you will be a leader in the battles to come if you so choose.

The greatest weapon we have is knowledge. We must be scholar warriors. Without this warrior caste of scholars everything we hold dear, all of democracy’s central concepts of freedom, tolerance, individual worth, and  opportunity will forever be lost under the black pall of Islamic totalitarianism.

Rarely is a country once under Islam ever in a post-Islamic period. The adherents of Islam know their purposes and methods, they use our ignorance against us. They cannot do this when you know doctrine.

So, what of debate? Ad hominem is a popular tool used by the forces of darkness. They will insult you and call you the very things that they are. They will say that your knowledge makes you a bigot, an “Islamophobe”. You won’t care because you know doctrine, which means you know why they say what they say, and do what they do.

Knowledge is truth, knowledge cannot be hate.

The Socratic Method is very important.; use it when debating online. Simply ask a question; “What is a kafir?” and “Why do Allah and Mohammed hate kafirs?” This is a good start.

“Why do Islamic terrorists quote Koran when they commit atrocities?” is another excellent question.

Terrorists are doing what they are told to do in doctrine and are following the example of Mohammed, the finest human being ever to live. Mohammed raped; so do they.  Mohammed killed innocents; so do they. Mohammed tortured people and cut off their heads; they do this and post the film on youtube to horrify and terrorize the kafir. This is called “Sunna” the way of Mohammed and it is considered the finest path for all Muslims everywhere to follow.

Islam is self-referential. If you know the foundational texts which are referenced (doctrine: Koran, Sira, Hadith) you can fight and win in debate against any dhimmi, multiculturalist, or ignorant sycophant person.

It is very important to know this: the ideological warrior must understand Islam as adherents and their defenders do. They must know doctrine and they must understand that it is considered the literal divine truth. Koran is considered the literal word of Allah; it cannot be criticized, revised, rewritten, reformed, changed, mocked, or altered. This is why rote learning of Koran occurs in madrassas around the world. There can be no discussion around Koran, no debate – education on Koran is via memory alone. This is a culture founded upon anti-intellectualism.

Understand Islam as Islam Understands Itself

There is no “Radical” Islam no “extremists”, there is only Islam.

“Radical” is a western kafir term. In Islam it is considered normal and good to kill innocents, attack them and take their goods and women and children;  it is good to rape women slaves; it is good to steal the property of jihad victims; it is good to destroy cultures and forcibly convert people to Islam; it is good to kill people who do not believe in Allah and Mohammed and the so-called “last day”. In Islam these are all good because they are all in the doctrine. Allah said it, and/or Mohammed did it, so it’s all good.

The terrorist who kills an unbeliever on YouTube while quoting Allah is a good Muslim, while the Muslim who is enjoying a beer with you and chatting about work is a failed one. We must always look at Islam through the lens of Islam and not through our western lens. There is no radical Islam, there is only Islam.

What we in the West consider radical is described in doctrine as normal and good, in fact jihad is an obligation for all Muslims everywhere and forever. Adherents of the “religion of peace” who do not participate in jihad against the kafirs are hypocrites and radical Muslims.

Perhaps in no other war in memory has understanding the enemy been as important as in this current civilizational conflict. We cannot engage with Islam and defeat it if we do not know why Islam does what it does. Everything to know about Islam is in the doctrine.

No adherent or dhimmi can defeat you in ideological battle if you know the doctrine of Islam. When you know their doctrine they will not want to engage; if they engage you will win because you know why they do what they do. This is a disarming tactic.

Islam sees the West as weak. The umma sees the West as not valuing its own cultures enough to defend them, so they continue to press and push for concessions until those cultures crack and break. They have been very successful up to now.

The future of Europe, the US and the entire West is at stake.

Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are warriors for Allah, Allah’s slaves. All of Allah’s commands, all of Mohammed’s examples and his own commands (just as important as Allah’s) are in the doctrine. The command is war against the unbeliever until the entire world is under the dominion of Islam, under a Caliph and Sharia law.

Ideological war is a knowledge war. Islam is so strong because we are so weak, but we are learning and fighting back in defense of our countries, cultures, religions, and freedoms. This is a civilizational conflict. The roots of the conflict are in the doctrine of Islam. It is a unified civilizational ideology that includes a fake “religion of peace”.

Don’t be fooled by the facade of Islam’s fake “peace”.

In ideological war a winning strategy is knowing the enemy. We cannot oppose Islam if we do not know and understand it. Understanding Islam begins with knowledge of doctrine. When we have knowledge, we are
well-armed.

Know the Battleground; Know the Opponent; Know Why You Fight

It is important to articulate that our  civilization is of value and is worthy of defense. The great military theorists of the past agree on this point: know your opponent and what motivates them, and know yourself and what motivates you.

Knowledge is the foundation of ideological war.

Fundamental knowledge of Islam is found in the doctrine of Islam. There is no greater weapon in this ideological conflict than knowledge of the doctrine of Islam. No Muslim, no dhimmi can argue with Allah, or with Mohammed. The message of Islam is clear, and indefensible.

Educate, speak the truth, read, study. Defend the West with your knowledge.

Resources:

Chronological Koran (abrogation readily visible, all repetition removed):
abridged:
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/an-abridged-Koran/

Complete  Koran (abrogation easily visible, repetition retained):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/A_Simple_Koran.htm

Sira (the biography of Muslim):
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/mohammed-and-the-unbelievers/

Hadith(the traditions of Mohammed):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/The_Political_Traditions_Of_Mohammed.htm

In addition to the doctrine:
Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic
http://www.amazon.com/Sword-Prophet-History-Theology-Impact/dp/1928653111/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1249016225&sr=8-1

Lectures about Political Islam by Bill Warner:
These are foundational lectures about Islam. When you’ve heard these lectures you will be ready to engage in ideological battle. You will know more than most leaders in the western world after you listen. All lectures for free.
http://actwestnashville.com/?page_id=544

History of Jihad:

M. A. Khan,
Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery
http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/

Andrew Bostom;
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Islamic-Antisemitism-Sacred-History/dp/1591025540/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062159&sr=1-1

The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Jihad-Islamic-Holy-Non-Muslims/dp/1591026024/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062219&sr=1-1

Your email:

 

July 27th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

It has been observed that humor stops at Mohammed’s door. 

It is Sunna to kill those who mock Islam, and its leaders. Sunna means that this is an example set by Mohammed for all adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” to follow forever. Beheading, brutality, pedophilia, and murder are also “Sunna”.

While the life of Mohammed does give us examples of humor from the perspective of the prophet, the finest example of humanity that all adherents of the “religion of peace” are to emulate, we have seen that anything deviating from these pious examples is frowned upon. 

This lack of humor inclusiveness was discovered by the Danish cartoonists much to their horror and that of millions of other funny people (i.e., people who love liberty and freedom). Now, the comedian Sasha Baron Cohen has discovered it as well.

The mystery of the recent threat against “Borat” is not that it has been issued but rather that it seems so late in coming.

Generally, a humor assault on the sacred concepts of Islam results in immediate street demonstrations, fatwas, and overt acts of violence against the humorist (and his/her supporters). Not in this case. The response from the terrorist adherents of the “religion of peace” appears tardy.

The Times of London is reporting today (July 28, 2009) that Sasha Baron Cohen, the aggressive humorist behind the “Borat” character, is under threat by terrorists. His crime: he played a joke on them. (Click on the link to see the video, it’s quite short and funny.)

Sacha Baron Cohen has stepped up his security after being threatened by a militant Palestinian group angered at its portrayal in the film Brüno.

The al-AqsaMartyrs’ Brigades, a coalition of Palestinian militias in the West Bank, said in a statement released to a Jerusalem-based journalist that it was “very upset” that it featured in the film starring Baron Cohen’s homosexual fashionista alter ego.

“We reserve the right to respond in the way we find suitable against this man,” it said. “The movie was part of a conspiracy against the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades.” (Times of London)

Cultures that are modern and inclusive understand and embrace humor. Cultures that are reactionary and pre-modern as is Islam cannot countenance satire and humor. Humor and satire are consistent with free-thinking, freedom of thought and speech, and intellectualism. People who think freely find humor in one another and in the world. In totalitarian systems like Islam humor is not allowed; only authoritarian thinking is allowed,that is one can only think what the theocratic dictatorship clicque want you to think. They get these directives directly from the doctrine of Islam. In Islam it is considered pious to kill people who tell jokes. Mohammed did it, so it is sunna.

Let us examine Islamic humor for a moment. Mohammed had a sense of humor. It is somewhat different from ours. Allah also likes humor. Unfortunately, what is funny to them means death to us.

‘Asim b. ‘Umar b. Qatada told me that ‘Auf b. Harith-his mother was ‘Afra’-said ‘O apostle of God, what makes the Lord laugh with joy at His servant?’ He answered, ‘When he plunges into the midst of the enemy without mail.’ ‘Auf drew off the mail-coat that was on him and threw it away: then he seized his sword and fought the enemy till he was slain. (Sira, Ishaq, 446)

=======

I said (to myself), ‘You will soon know!’ and as soon as the /badu/ was asleep and snoring I got up and killed him in a more horrible way than any man has been killed. I put the end of my bow in his sound eye, then I bore down on it until I forced it out at the back of his neck. Then I came out like a beast of prey and took the highroad like an eagle hastening until I came out at a village which, (said the narrator), he described; then to Rakuba and al-Naqi’ where suddenly there appeared two Meccans whom Quraysh had sent to spy on the apostle. I recognized them and called on them to surrender, and when they refused I shot one and killed him, and the other surrendered. I bound him and took him to the apostle.

Ibn Ishaq from Sulayman b. Wardan from his father from ‘Amr b.

Umayya: ‘When I got to Medina I passed some shaykhs of the Ansar and, when they exclaimed at me some young men heard my name and ran to tell the apostle. Now I had bound my prisoner’s thumbs with my bow­string, and when the apostle looked at him he laughed so that one could see his back teeth. He asked my news and when I told him what had happened he
blessed me’) (Sira, Tabari, 914).

Consider the annoyance that the terrorists must have felt when they realized that a kafir jew pretending to be a kafir gay man had a laugh at their expense. The insult could not have been deeper. Response must be made; Mohammed killed those who mocked him, it is sunna!

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “Allah welcomes two men with a smile; one of whom kills the other and both of them enter Paradise. One fights in Allah’s Cause and gets killed. Later on Allah forgives the ‘killer who also gets
martyred (In Allah’s Cause).” (Bukhari, Hadith, 4:52:80)

In Islam Jews and gays are the worst kinds of kafir, the unbeliever; Allah and Mohammed hate the Jews with a passion. The gays, well, they don’t fair much better. In fact, in Baghdad, Iraq, the new Islamic Sharia state built by American military power and profound ignorance and self-destructiveness, gay men are being systematically tortured and murdered in the most brutal ways imaginable.

Remember, Islam is the “religion of peace”; Islam has been hijacked by “extremists” who don’t understand their doctrine and when they quote Koran, Hadith, and Sira as they commit atrocities the killers are really merely confused people who are just trying to get Islam some bad press. This is all a lie.

Islam is a brutal ideology of totalitarianism, cruelty, hatred, intolerance, and endless war against those who are not Muslim. There can be no greater force for cruelty and hate on this planet than this fake “religion of peace”.

Humor has power, it is a weapon. Societies that embrace the individual, that revel in intellectual discourse all have the ability to poke fun at themselves. In Islam this is not the case. Authoritarians hate humor.

Reactionary, retrogressive ideologies cannot countenance satire; you see, they are far too serious – the revealed truthof reality is far too serious for humor, even if that ”truth” is about hate, violence, intolerance, pedophilia, war-mongering, misogyny, and totalitarian universal supremacism. How funny was 7th century Arabia, after all?

Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun or joy in whatever is serious. (Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini, radio sermon, 1979.)

For Islam no other religion, no other culture, no other political system is acceptable. In fact, no religion other than Allah’s is permitted to exist. This is why Islam is at war with the kafirs everywhere – it is not because of anything that the non-believer has done; it is not because of any “crime” or real “offense” that the unbelievers have committed. The war against the unbeliever is waged for one reason only. The crime of the kafir is that they exist.

The existence of anyone who is not Muslim is an offense to Allah, Mohammed and the Umma of Islam. Islam is at war with the unbelievers because unbelievers exist. The existence of non-Muslims is why they are at war with us and why we must defend ourselves. But we must give credit where credit is due, Mohammed and Allah have a sense of humor. Allah and Mohammed laugh at the pain and suffering of those they conquer, those they enslave, those they wish to dominate.

“Verily our Lord laughs at the despair that His servants feel, even though His Help is so close!” So Laqit bin Saburah said “O Messenger of Allah – may my mother and father be given as your ransom – and does our Lord laugh?” The prophet replied, “Yes!” Laqit said, “In that case, we will never give up hope of receiving good from a Lord that laughs!” (Hadith, Ibn Majah)

There is humor in the doctrine of Islam. Mohammed and Allah enjoy a good laugh here and there, but for the kafir it’s all not very funny at all.

(See previous post here on this matter.)

Your email:

 

July 16th, 2009 by admin

The Bulletins published by the indefatigable editors and staff of PoliticalIslam.com are like a moral slap in the head, an ethical gauntlet thrown to the ground. They say every week, “How can you stay silent in the face of this suffering caused by the adherents of the barbaric totalitarian ideology of Islam?” But silence is the only response.

These bulletins are stunning in what they uncover and perhaps even more stunning in the groundswell of horror and revulsion and anger that they do not produce.

The lack of a reasonable anger and justifiable horror, and a strong resultant effort to assist those suffering under Islam in too many countries to name is a moral failure on the part of our culture and country. Where is our moral outrage? How can these bulletins produce a whisper of anger rather than a massive revulsion and a promise from all reasonable people to address this great threat to civilization?

Our ignorance of the motivations of jihad, of the foundational principles that motivate Muslims everywhere to commit the most heinous acts of cruelty and barbarity are at the core of our non-response to these weekly stories of horror and Islamic barbarism. All non-Muslims are threatened by Islam. Yet where are our religious and political leaders, screaming defiance in the face of these attacks on individuals, Christians, Jews, Hindus and non-believers around the world? There is a great silence. Where are the feminists to defend the women forced to wear hijab and burkha and live as chattel across the world as slaves to Allah and slaves to their husbands? Where are our leaders preparing our defense so that America is secured from this ever growing jihad against us? The answers to why these events occur are in the doctrine of Islam. We as yet have no answer  for the silence of our leadership.

During the ideological war against Communism most all Americans knew the Communist Manifesto, knew the brutality of Stalin and his helpers and the moral and ethical evil of the Soviet Union, this was the hub of the “axis of evil” until 1989 when the Soviet Union imploded; today our leaders know nothing but the lies of Islam as “the religion of peace” even as the violent events continue apace daily which prove beyond any doubt that Islam is not peaceful but hateful, intolerant and extremely violent and cruel. Today we have a new global evil reinvigorated with oil wealth that we stupidly gave to them. Empowered with unearned oil wealth supplied by the dhimmis and commanded by their doctrine of cruelty and conquest and control, Islam is the evil of today reborn.  We are in civilizational war a term that most people without any historical knowledge cannot begin to conceive. Those who know history, and the history of Islam know jihad, the central theme of the doctrine of Islam. In the main, we pretend none of it is real; we do so at our peril.

Our silence on these outrages upon non-Muslims is intellectual and moral cowardice. It is morally indefensible to be ignorant of the events described in this bulletin; It is morally and ethically indefensible to know nothing about Islam.  Most importantly it is indefensible to do nothing.

It is said that the truth will set you free. This is so. But it will also impel you to, and demand of you, action. People of decency cannot stand quiet while the forces of totalitarian Islam wreck havoc and murder on Jews and Christians across the world. Even in Iraq, Christians are driven out, murdered, their churches burned all under the noses of American soldiers – the very same soldiers that Islamists characterize as “Crusaders”. The irony and insanity of the situation in Iraq could not be more obvious or more absurd and disturbing.

Iraq is a sharia law Islamic totalitarian state, we should not be suprised but we should not assist them in their crimes. Our presence in propping up totalitarian Iraq is a serious error in policy; we should never prop up totalitarian states whose doctrine is fundamentally opposed to our existence. This is a collective insanity from which we must soon awaken or face a dark future. Moral indignation is a reasonable response to these atrocities and cruelties, silence and indifference is not.

-D. L. Adams

 

 

Bulletin of Christian Persecution July 16, 2009

Facts without comments– We Collect the Dots; You Connect Them

Please spread this bulletin and send us events that you find.

 

 

---

North America

June 8, 2009
San Diego, CA, USA
A Muslim man shot a Christian five times after an argument over religion.

June 12, 2009
Adams, NY, USA
A Muslim forced a Harley-Davidson dealer to take down a sign saying that America is a Christian nation.

June 13, 2009
USA
US companies quietly lobby on an Armenian genocide bill as they do business with Turkey.

June 19, 2009
USA
The Refugee Admissions Program is failing at-risk Iraqi Christian refugees.

June 21, 2009
Dearborn, MI, USA
An Arab Christian group was stopped by security from asking questions of people manning an “Islam: Got Questions?” booth at Arabfest.  The Christians were then assaulted by security.  (Video.)  The group was also prohibited from handing out leaflets and filed a lawsuit against the city, before being denied a restraining order preventing them from being restricted.

June 25, 2009
Maine, USA
The state of Maine fined the Christian Action Network and tried to coerce them into signing away all rights to appeal and to fundraising over their “inflammatory anti-Muslim message” after they sent out a mailer advertising Homegrown Jihad.

June 27, 2009
USA
NGOs and religious leaders call on the US to halt the deportation of a Copt to Egypt, where he will likely be tortured or worse.

June 28, 2009
USA
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) is concerned at reports of attacks targeting Coptic Orthodox Christians in the small Egyptian village of Ezbet Boshra-East.

July 3, 2009
PA, USA
A Pennsylvania pastor was asked to pray before the state’s House of Representatives, but his prayer was rejected because it contained an offensive word: “Jesus.”

July 3, 2009
USA
The Pentagon denied the flyover of the God and Country Rally for the first time in 42 years because of its “Christian nature.”

July 7, 2009
Newton Square, PA, USA
A Christian mother was forbidden from reading King David’s Psalms at her son’s kindergarten.  The case may go before the Supreme Court.

July 7, 2009
USA
The US is to take on 1,350 Iraqi Palestinians who were former guests of Saddam Hussein.  Christians, both Iraqi and Palestinian, are stuck being massacred in the Middle East.

South America

July 5, 2009
Brazil
FIFA, the worldwide soccer organization, sent an official admonishment to the Brazilian Federation because its players prayed and thanked God in the middle of the field after their win.  The Egyptian team performed an Islamic prayer in the middle of the field after their win against Italy but were not similarly admonished.

Africa

June 4, 2009
Eritrea
Four Christians died in an underground dungeon, where they were kept for almost six years.  Four others went blind after exposure to “piercing sunlight” following months in darkness.

June 8, 2009
Giza, Egypt
Two policemen who were convicted of murder for pushing a Coptic man out of a window were sentenced to only five years.

June 8, 2009
Egypt
A report by the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada’s Religious Liberty Commission details the oppression of and discrimination against Christians in Egypt, both modern and historical.

June 9, 2009
Cairo, Egypt
A mob of 150, armed with clubs and swords, assaulted the family of a Coptic girl who was abducted and then recovered the same day.  The police then arrested 11 Copts, including the assaulted family.

June 10, 2009
Banjul, Gambia
A British missionary jailed on trumped-up sedition charges has been delayed because prosecutors failed to attend his hearing.  His wife is also jailed and Christian Solidarity Worldwide is worried for their health.

June 14, 2009
Deir Abu Hennis, Egypt
The cultural genocide of Egypt’s Copts continues as the Egyptian government changes the name of a village whose inhabitants are 100% Coptic.

June 16, 2009
Cairo, Egypt
A judge denied a second Christian convert identity documents stating his religion, effectively denying him the right to convert.

June 17, 2009
Toma, Egypt
Two Christians have been detained for nearly a month after riots broke out following the abduction and retrieval of a Coptic girl.  Reuters’ version, issued by the Egyptian government, was a little different.

June 17, 2009
Nigeria
A pregnant Christian woman lost most of her family, got shot, and lost her unborn baby in attacks by Muslim militants.  (Video.)

June 18, 2009
Sudan
232 Sudanese slaves who were abducted during the North-South Civil War (1983-2005) were finally liberated.  They had been subjected to “a clear pattern of physical and psychological abuse.”

June 20, 2009
Cairo, Egypt
Twin Coptic boys who have been caught in a custody dispute for five years were finally given to their Coptic mother but were forced to remain Muslims despite declarations that they are Christians.

June 22, 2009
Egypt
A Muslim mob attacked a church and assaulted Copts with clubs, instigated by State Security.  A village priest was charged with sedition.

June 22, 2009
Ezbat Bsharreh, Egypt
18 were wounded in Muslim-Christian clashes when Muslims threw rocks at Copts to prevent them from going into the home of a priest to join the Mass in progress.

June 22, 2009
Zanzibar
Government officials evicted a congregation from the building they were renting, ostensibly for renovations.  No renovations were performed but the building now houses a business.

June 24, 2009
Ezbet Boshra, Egypt
Copts were placed under curfew and confined them to their homes, in fear of an impending massacre following mob attacks two days earlier.  Security forces destroyed crops for three consecutive days, but charges were dropped against the reverend who was charged on 6/22/2009. Update 6/29: Authorities released all suspects who had been arrested.

June 26, 2009
Noaukchott, Mauritania
An American aid worker was killed by Al-Qaeda militants for “spreading Christianity.”  Update 7/01: Christians in the town have fled to Europe in fear, escorted by police.

June 26, 2009
Uganda
A woman’s parents threw her out when she converted to Christianity.  She married a Christian man and fled with him after her family threatened to kidnap her, but they were thrown out of their new home.  Muslims have threatened to harm her family.

June 30, 2009
Zanzibar
Muslims burned down two church buildings following services “as a fierce warning,” before threatening to burn down the houses of the congregants.

June 30, 2009
Mogadishu, Somalia
“I’m telling the people that it’s time we attacked Ethiopia, who are our Christian neighbours.”

July 1, 2009
Meet El-Korashy, Egypt
After a young man died in a fight with a Coptic shopkeeper mobs attacked, torched, and looted Christian homes and businesses.

July 1, 2009
Egypt
“[I]mpunity fuels persecution – the terrible consequence of forced ‘reconciliation’ in the absence of truth or justice.” Copts are denied the right to practice their faith and are subject to “Muslim mob justice.”

July 1, 2009
Dessie, Ethiopia
Police shot two people who were building a church, killing them both.  Another “fell off a cliff.”

July 1, 2009
Somalia
Militants beheaded two young boys because their Christian father refused to give up information about a church leader.  They are still looking for the pastor in refugee camps in Kenya.

July 3, 2009
Guirgis Bey, Egypt
Copts appealed to Mubarak for protection after two houses were burned down and mobs tried to burn a priest and two cars.

July 7, 2009
Asmara, Eritrea
Fifteen monks were detained for allegedly planning actions against the “government’s interference.”  2,800 Christians are believed to be imprisoned in Eritrea.

July 8, 2009
Egypt
Security forces are in collusion with Muslim mobs in carrying out acts of violence and forced displacement all over the country. “The Coptic persecution issue has become a permanent source of livelihood for them…”

July 8, 2009
Egypt
A Dubai imam has called upon the Egyptian government to give Christians more land to build churches and to allow them to do so with the same ease with which Muslims build mosques.

July 9, 2009
Algiers, Algeria
A GIA founder admitted to killing 7 monks in 1996.

July 10, 2009
Mogadishu, Somalia
Islamist rebels beheaded seven “Christians” and “spies.”

July 10, 2009
Egypt
“Many Muslim scholars issued a fatwa, saying I must be killed,” says a convert from Islam to Christianity.

July 12, 2009
Ezbet Bassilious, Egypt
Muslims burned down a church and State Security, who watched the church burn down but did nothing, charged a Copt for the act of arson.

July 14, 2009
Cairo, Egypt
Coptic church security thwarted an attempted attack by a veiled woman carrying several weapons, rope, and anaesthetics just after children’s religion classes ended.

July 15, 2009
Khartoum, Sudan
Police flogged and fined 10 girls for wearing pants because it violates Sharia, to which Christians are supposedly not subject.

Asia

June 4, 2009
Middle East
The War on Christianity in the Middle East.   Christians suffer horribly under radical Islam and the perpetrators get a free pass.

June 8, 2009
Punjab, Pakistan
A Christian man was raped and murdered for refusing to convert to Islam after he was caught with a Muslim girl.

June 8, 2009
Iran
Iran has been severely persecuting Christians, particularly converts from Islam, who are often imprisoned for apostasy.  Ordinances which have existed for 30 years are now more strictly enforced than ever.

June 9, 2009
Gaza
Christians found at least 70 graves and several religious symbols vandalized at their 200-year-old church

June 11, 2009
Dhaka, Bangladesh
A Catholic chef “has a really rough time” in jail after being picked up for allegedly possessing illegal alcoholic beverages.

June 11, 2009
Punjab, Pakistan
Authorities attacked a Christian cemetery and seized a church, after Railway authorities confiscated a church building.  They are reportedly trying obtain permission to demolish it.

June 11, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
A church center was threatened with a bomb attack if Christians did not convert to Islam and pay a ransom.

June 12, 2009
Punjab, Pakistan
A Christian man was beaten and stabbed to death for drinking from a “Muslim cup.”

June 12, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
After a traffic accident, assailants attacked a pastor’s home, beat his mother and sister-in-law with rifle butts, and threatened more violence if they did not drop assault charges.

June 12, 2009
Singapore
A Protestant couple was found guilty of sedition for mailing religiously offensive material to Muslims and has been sentenced to 8 weeks of jail time.

June 12, 2009
Philippines
The President announced that the Malaysian government was working to “reopen talks [with Muslim separatist guerrillas] that stalled after rebel commanders attacked Christian communities.”

June 13, 2009
Hasilpur, Pakistan
A parcel bomb injured at least 10 Christians.

June 14, 2009
Manila, Philippines
A bomb placed in front of a school exploded, but nobody was injured, and another, also placed in front of a school, was safely detonated.

June 14, 2009
Tiasar Town, Pakistan
Taliban militants shot an 11-year-old boy in the head during an attack on a church.

June 15, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
Taliban factions threatened to rape, kill, and enslave non-Muslims unless they paid the jizya.

June 15, 2009
Istanbul, Turkey
An Iranian Christian refugee was beaten for his faith.

June 15, 2009
Yemen
Seven of nine foreign hostages from an international relief group were found murdered.

June 16, 2009
Sana’a, Yemen
Christian expats “review[ed] their arrangements” following the kidnapping and murder of foreigners.  The foreigners, it was later learned, were Christian aid workers.  Update 7/20: The murders seem to be the work of a former Gitmo detainee.

June 16, 2009
Middle East
Islamic extremism is diminishing the presence of Christians in several Middle Eastern countries.

June 17, 2009
Mianwali, Pakistan
A talented Christian student was denied admission to study science at a high school for being “too ugly.”

June 18, 2009
Gaza, Judea and Samaria
Muslims harm Palestinian Christian Arabs, then blame Israeli Jews, as do the media.

June 18, 2009
Pakistan
Muslims have tried to stop the construction of a wall around their church because Muslims use the church’s land for livestock.

June 19, 2009
Kharian, Pakistan
Muslims accused a mentally challenged girl of blasphemy and interrogated her for 16 hours.

June 21, 2009
Mindanao, Philippines
Separatist guerrillas killed one and injured 32 with grenades at a festival.

June 22, 2009
Bangladesh
A woman who converted to Christianity from Islam has been subject to “a climate of exclusion” and pressured to divorce.

June 23, 2009
Maldives
Migrant workers, like natives, may only practice Sunni Islam, to the exclusion of other faiths.  They are subject to search and seizure of religious materials.

June 23, 2009
Sialkot, Pakistan
A Christian man is languishing in jail on false charges after police broke his backbone and they refuse to admit him to a hospital.

June 23, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
Co-workers beat a man after learning that he was a Christian.

June 24, 2009
Dushanbe, Tajikistan
A 12-year-old Protestant church was told that it must remove the extensions it added onto it and vacate within 7 days.  Minimal compensation was “offered.”  Another church was bulldozed 10 months prior and the promised compensation has not been paid.

June 24, 2009
Midyat, Turkey
Mor Gabriel Syriac Monastery lost its “forestry” case against the State.  Video backstory here.

June 25, 2009
Mosul, Iraq
Christian families left a building belonging to a church where some had lived for 20 years due to fear of it being bombed because police are using it as a guarding point.

June 25, 2009
Islamabad, Pakistan
Two Christians were beaten and detained on charges of blasphemy.

June 25, 2009
Manila, Philippines
Abu Sayyaf militants who continue to hold a Red Cross worker demanded a “ridiculous amount” for his ransom.

June 25, 2009
Malatya, Turkey
The state failed to set aside funds to transport a key witness in the trial over three stabbings of Christians.  The man is one of two alleged masterminds connecting the murders to a “deep-state” conspiracy.

June 26, 2009
Baku, Azerbaijan
Police warned Jehovah’s Witnesses that their church would be shut down if children were allowed to attend.  Two women complained of being forcibly converted during police interrogations.

June 27, 2009
Karachi, Pakistan
All five suspects apprehended for the murder of a Christian leader were acquitted for the second time after the court ruled that there was a lack of evidence.

June 30, 2009
Baghdad, Iraq
Iraq witnesses the withdrawal of US troops.  “Christian families did not send their children to catechism classes for first communion, nor will they in the coming days. They are waiting to see what will happen, they have little confidence.”

July 1, 2009
Iran
The growing Church will likely face persecution, but believers are uniting under mounting pressure.

July 1, 2009
Karachi, Pakistan
A Presbyterian pastor was attacked and kidnapped at gunpoint.  His family was reported to still be in danger.

July 2, 2009
Kasur, Pakistan
100 Christian families fled after angry mobs attacked and threatened to burn their homes, accusing them of blasphemy.  The mob then petrol-bombed their homes and the nearby utilities.  9 women and 4 children were sent to Lahore for treatment after being burned with acid — and it still says so at Persecution.org.  Update 7/03: 8 Christians were charged for the rampage.

July 2, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
Police allegedly tortured a 16-year-old Christian boy to death.  The police are denying both the torture and any role in his death, claiming that he probably died of cardiac arrest.

July 3, 2009
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
An American missionary was deported without cause.

July 3, 2009
Faisalabad, Pakistan
A Christian was tortured extensively and then detained on false blasphemy charges.

July 4, 2009
Iraq
Christians face grave security concerns as US troops withdraw.

July 4, 2009
East Java, Indonesia
Muslims blocked the construction of a home for disabled children by a prominent secular charity out of fears that it would be a “front for proselytizing.”

July 4, 2009
Jerusalem, Israel
A poll showed that PA Arabs are unwilling to grant land rights to Jews or Christians in Jerusalem.

July 5, 2009
Cotabato, Philippines
A bomb blast by the Moro Liberation Front killed 5 and injured 35 at a Catholic church.  Video here.

July 7, 2009
Jakarta, Indonesia
Christians fight discrimination as they protest the revocation of their church’s permit and demand that the promise of a new seminary school’s campus be fulfilled.

July 7, 2009
Tehran, Iran
Two Iranian women continue to be held in Evin prison because of their faith, unfairly labeled as “anti-government activists.”  They have been jailed since early March and fear execution for apostasy.

July 7, 2009
Kasur, Pakistan
A Christian man who was jailed for blasphemy is suffering due to harsh treatment in prison and is not receiving medical care for heart disease.

July 7, 2009
Jolo, Philippines
Four explosions rocked Mindanao, killing at least 6 and wounding 56.  The terrorist acts are believed to be the work of Abu Sayyaf.

July 7, 2009
Iligan City, Philippines
A car bomb went off, injuring 9, including 3 soldiers.  Undetonated bombs similar to those used in Jolo the same day were found strapped to the National Grid Corp tower.

July 7, 2009
Uzbekistan
A Baptist man has been banned from meeting fellow believers and his books and audio tapes were confiscated.  A Protestant family was also punished for worshipping and threatened with jail if they protested because “You are Forum 18 and I am Barack Obama.”

July 9, 2009
Malaysia
Muslims have been spying on Catholic churches in order to determine if Christians are trying to convert Muslims.

July 10, 2009
Aktau, Kazakhstan
State security and the justice system are targeting a Pentecostal church and its members.

July 10, 2009
Cotobato, Philippines
Christians are organizing into militias after waves of terror attacks and the their abandonment by UN, who suspended all aid to the local population and withdrew its troops.

July 11, 2009
Swat, Pakistan
A prominent Islamic leader has threatened a “bloody revolution” if Sharia is not implemented.

July 12, 2009
Baghdad, Iraq
Six churches were bombed on Sunday, killing 4 and inuring 32.  Video here.  Update: Make that seven.

July 12, 2009
Kirkuk, Iraq
A Christian municipal leader was assassinated in a predominantly Christian neighborhood.

July 13, 2009
Mosul, Iraq
A car bomb exploded near a church, seriously damaging the building.  Some areas imposed curfews as the wave of bombings stretched into its third day.

July 14, 2009
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Nine Christians were arrested for allegedly trying to convert Muslims.

July 14, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
Despite threats from the Taliban, Pakistani Catholics continue to work for the good of the country.

July 14, 2009
Lahore, Pakistan
A prominent minority rights leader and two others were jailed on false assault charges against a woman whose parents had brought her in to explain the consequences of converting to Islam.

Europe

June 4, 2009
Milan, Italy
A terror cell which planned attacks against a subway system and the San Petronio Cathedral in Bologna was apprehended.

June 4, 2009
Kosovo
“In Kosovo, a Muslim state has been allowed to spring up in the heart of Europe,” says the Prime Minister of Republika Srpska.  (Video.)

June 9, 2009
Moldova
A new administrative code punishes “unregistered religious activity,” making life difficult for Protestants.  Update 6/16: The European Court of Human Rights judged that Moldova must provide more religious freedom, but registration applications continue to be denied.

June 18, 2009
Bologna, Italy
A MP and women’s rights activist has had a death fatwa issued against her after she was “exposed as a Christian.”

June 18, 2009
Netherlands
“Christians face submission or persecution,” says a pastor.

June 18, 2009
Södertälje, Sweden
Assyrian refugees suffer at the hands of neighboring Muslims.

June 20, 2009
UK
The Church of England will confront the BBC over its treatment of Christianity.

June 21, 2009
Birmingham, UK
Muslim prisoners complained about sharing cells with and eating near infidels, so now they get their own cells.

June 22, 2009
UK
“The BBC supports Islam and attacks Christianity, claims Radio 2 stalwart Don Maclean.”

June 26, 2009
London, UK
British Parliament discusses the humanitarian disaster affecting the Christians of Iraq.  (Video; Part II: Discussion of Kurds stealing Assyrians’ land.)

June 29, 2009
Gnjilane, Kosovo
Ethnic Albanians bulldozed and razed a monument dedicated to the Christian saint Lazarus and his knights.

July 4, 2009
Sussex, UK
A Coptic family who suffers persecution back in Egypt is being deported after receiving inadequate representation.  Petition at link.

July 11, 2009
UK
Church leaders accuse the government of favoring Muslims and starving them of state funds, making smaller churches’ continued existence difficult in poorer parts of the country.

July 13, 2009
UK
“Why is Britain deporting persecuted Christians?”

Everywhere

July 2, 2009
Q: “How is a [Muslim] woman to be punished if she marries a Christian? How often is it carried out and in what countries is it most common?”

July 7, 2009
“[W]ith regard to non-Muslims who are at war with the Muslims and do not have a peace treaty with the Muslims or are not living under Muslim rule, then Muslims are commanded to kill them, because Allaah says…”

 

---

If you wish to get a direct subscription, go to politicalislam.com and sign up for our newsletters.

Produced bypoliticalislam.com
Publisher: Bill Warner; Edited by Justin Elizabeth Tabler
Permalink
This material is not copyrighted. Please forward. You may remove the header and the by-line, if that suits your purposes.