Print This Post

Applied Doctrine of Islam: Why the Lockerbie Mass Murderer Received a Hero’s Welcome

August 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are three schools of thought and analysis regarding Islam. Two of these schools are complimentary, the third is not, but it is definitive. The first school is Islam as taught by leaders of Islam, the second is academia and the media, the third is the “foundational school” (Warner, Spencer, Bat Ye’or, etc.).

Islamic leaders have one message of Islam for Muslims and another for kafirs (this is the duality of Islam). Western media and academics know nothing of the doctrine of Islam. Apparently, they believe that they have no other place to go for definitive information about Islam; they are wrong. These schools of thought do not discuss Islamic doctrine (Koran, Sira, Hadith), history of Islam, jihad, or the victims of jihad.

The “Foundational School” studies the doctrine of Islam and formulates arguments and counter-arguments based entirely on Islamic doctrine, Islamic history, and current actions of the adherents of Islam as they implement the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed. This school discusses Allah and Mohammed and the victims of jihad and Islamic brutality for the last 1400+ years. The “Foundational School” is a compassion, and truth-driven group; compassion for the past, present and future victims of Islam is at the forefront of all Foundationalist’s work as is the desire for the truth. Western media knows nothing of the victims of Islam and rarely acknowledges the fact that new victims are made every day across the world.

Islamic leaders and adherents pretend that there is no linkage between jihad and the stunning cruelty that we see daily perpetrated by Muslims against Christians, Jews, gays, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, and other Muslims who are seen as not-quite-Islamic-enough. This is taqiyyah, sacred deception of the unbelievers to forward the cause of Islam.

The foundational school is definitive because it studies the core texts of Islam, the same texts to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to as an adherent of Islam. Learning the doctrine of Islam is akin to learning the playbook of the opposing team in a sports event. Our dire situation as non-Muslims in the world and the constant pressure put upon our cultures, religions, political leadership, and general citizenry by Islam is no sports event.

While multiculturalists attest that the violence and cruelty of Islam are anathema to “real” Muslims, we know that the multiculturalist is ignorant and dhimmitized. The dhimmi supports and defends Islam because they know nothing about it. They defend their idea of what Islam should be (what they want it to be), not what it actually is. The only way to know what Islam truly is is to learn the same doctrine to which every Muslim on this planet “submits” to, and study the effects of this doctrine in the past and into the present. This is the core of the foundationalist school.

Our dire circumstances vis-a-vis Islam is an existential conflict of civilizations.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis say that there is no conflict – that Islam is “peaceful” even as it wars against, and kills non-believers (kafirs) and applauds those who kill innocents. Saying such doggerel does not mean that there is no conflict, it simply means that we have decided to not defend ourselves against a brutal enemy whose purpose is our destruction. It means we have refused to name our enemy and even worse we have refused to acknowledge the war. This is a position entirely rejected by foundationalists.

We as a culture must reach a point very soon where the multiculturalist position of ignorance and active anti-knowledge is rejected and condemned everywhere. There must come a time soon when anyone making such a self-destructive and baseless argument is heaped with shame and derision for their lack of scholarship, embrace of anti-knowledge, and their defense of the enemy whom they know literally nothing about. Such a day must come quickly if we are to survive as a nation.

Multiculturalists and dhimmis are tools of a brutal totalitarian ideology of cruelty, misogyny, hate, intolerance, and anti-individualism; they are the “useful idiots” spoken of by Lenin during the rise of Communism.

You may recall the Soviet Union. The West waged ideological war against them. The Soviet Union is gone, swept away by us and their own moral, ethical and political corruption into the “dustbin of history” where it belongs. The same must be done now with Islam.

If we are not prepared to fight an ideological war against an ideology even crueler than the Soviet one; if we are not prepared to name the enemy and, even more egregious, that there is no existential conflict – we are truly doomed. Knowledge is the foundation of avoiding this “doom”. Knowledge in this matter is found in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith.

Everyone in the West must understand the nature of Allah and Mohammed, and learn their commands that all adherents of this ideology are required to follow. Those who follow the ideology of Islam are good Muslims; those who do not are not good Muslims. Osama Bin Laden is a “good” Muslim. Those who follow Mohammed and Allah are devout believers, those who do not are “apostates” and can be killed by those who are not “apostates” (or who at least believe that they are not). The “religion of peace” is not a “religion” that one can readily leave. Leaving Islam is punishable by death (Hadith, Bukhari).

After the death of Mohammed Islam was plunged into war. It was not attacked by outside forces but rather fought bloody internal “apostate” wars against its own adherents, those who had chosen to leave Islam. Tens of thousands were killed in these “Apostasy Wars” of early Islam under the guidance of the first “Rightly Guided Caliph”, Abu Bakr. No multiculturalist knows anything about these apostasy wars, or that apostasy in present day Islam equals death. If they do know about it, they will excuse it someone, explain it away because their concept of Islam as “the religion of peace” is far more important and attractive to them than the abysmal truth of the cult of death, which is Islam.

Several days ago Abdel Basset al-Megrahi was released from a Scottish prison on humanitarian grounds. It appears that Mr. Megrahi is suffering from cancer and has only a few months to live. The compassionate authorities of Scotland sent him home to Libya to spend his last few months of life with his family and friends. This is true institutional compassion on the part of the authorities of Scotland, but it is also profoundly misplaced and unfortunate. This is “idiot compassion”.

There are many problems with Mr. Megrahi’s release. First and foremost is that he is a convicted mass murderer. As the only person convicted of the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am 103, December 12, 1988, in which 270 innocent people were slaughtered (including 189 Americans), there is a special section of Hell reserved for him.

Mr. Megrahi is a Muslim. When he returned home to Libya he was met with a hero’s welcome. In Islam Mr. Megrahi is seen as a jihadi, a fighter in Allah’s cause against the kafir (the unbelievers). In the umma, the collectivist community of Islam, Mr. Megrahi is viewed as a hero; he will surely have a place by Allah’s side.

The authorities of Scotland and across the West now wringing their hands with frustration at this revolting celebration of death and murder in Tripoli now have a clue that their compassion has been abused. Some American leaders even have the temerity to suggest that Scottish compassion for Megrahi was a “mockery of justice”. Many Western leaders are now having second thoughts about this misplaced compassion.

The “victory” celebrations in Libya upon the arrival of the mass murderer Megrahi are revolting to us in the West, it elicits a deep anger and a deep frustration; even when we show them compassion they still show us that they hate us.

There is deep confusion in the leadership of the West about events in Libya, but there is no such confusion in those who adhere to the foundational school of the study of Islam. Western “compassionate” multicultural fools and dhimmis are stunned at the rejection of their good will and compassion. They may believe that they have been made fools of, but they are not quite certain. They do not know the doctrine of Islam; they do not believe they are in an existential war. Their compassion has certainly been abused, this is the kafir “submitting” again to Islam; another feather in Islam’s cap from the mass murder of innocent Westerners by the vile person Megrahi. In Islam, this means that Megrahi is a hero. It is long past time for non-Muslims to learn the doctrine of Islam.

The Western way is to show compassion to the enemy in hopes that our compassion will make a friend out of an enemy. This approach cannot work with Islam.

The approach is faulty because of the doctrine of Islam which is followed by every adherent of Islam, and of which the judicial leaders in Scotland and across the West are entirely ignorant.

The foundational school approach affords the scholar and student the ability to understand every event occurring in the so-called “Islamic world”. This is so because the driver of the Islamic world is the doctrine of Islam (Koran, Sira, Hadith). When this doctrine is known and understood events in Islam become clear as a bright sunlit day.

The doctrine of Islam is a trilogy doctrine. Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed; Ibn Ishaq), and Hadith (Traditions of Mohammed; Bukhari, Muslim, et al.) are the foundations of Islam. All adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are those who “submit”. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a “Muslim” is “one who submits”. In the Koran it is very clear that one who “fights in Allah’s cause” (jihad) is doing the finest thing an adherent can do. Jihad is mentioned almost 150 times in Koran. In fact, death in jihad is the only assured method to Islamic heaven with its houris, flowing honey rivers, wine without hangovers, and little pleasure boys.

In Islam, what is being submitted to is Allah and Mohammed and their commands. Allah and Mohammed are only found in the doctrine trilogy. For those outside of Islam, we are to submit to… Islam.

By killing all those innocent people on Pan Am 103 in 1988 Mr. Megrahi is considered a hero in Libya and across the Islamic world. He is a hero because he is a fighter in Allah’s cause, a jihadist. Jihadists do not have any qualms about killing innocents because Mohammed had no such qualms.

Mohammed slaughtered the Jews of Khaybar and sat for hours with his prepubescent wife (his favorite, Aisha) watching as each male tribesman was beheaded. The men of Khaybar were slaughtered and the women made into sex slaves for their Muslim conquerors. The children were made into Muslims (this is one of the more effective ways that Islam grows; it happens over several generations).

Mr. Megrahi’s crimes, vile and despicable to decent people around the world, are “Sunna” in Islam. Sunna means doing something that Mohammed did. Anything that Mohammed did is “good”. Because Mohammed is “the Prophet” of Allah, and because Koran says that all adherents must follow the commands of both Allah and his prophet, the example of Mohammed is considered the finest example of humanity for all adherents to follow forever.

Mohammed was a mass murderer; Mr. Megrahi is a mass murderer. Mohammed killed unbelievers and struck them down with terror, Mr. Megrahi did the same with Pan Am 103.

The mass murder perpetrated by Mr. Megrahi is Sunna. He is a jihadi, a “fighter in the cause of Allah.” What we in the West consider an unforgivable, indescribable crime of brutality and inhumanity, Islam considers the finest action of a Muslim in the path of Mohammed and Allah.

Islamic “morality” is founded upon the commands of Allah and Mohammed and the events of Mohammed’s life and his sayings. Mohammed was a mass murderer. Mr. Megrahi followed in Mohammed’s path – he took the middle road of submission to Allah and Mohammed. His murder of hundreds of innocent people on Pan Am 103 is Sunna, it is considered the “best course” in Islam because this was the course of Mohammed.

Mr. Megrahi got a hero’s welcome in Libya because he is a mass murderer of non-believers just as Mohammed was. He struck terror into kafir hearts, just as Mohammed did. When we can begin to see and understand the linkage between Islamic doctrine and current day events we can oppose the spread of this ideology of anti-humanity.

Koran: [60.1] O you who believe! do not take My enemy and your enemy for friends: would you offer them love while they deny what has come to you of the truth, driving out the Apostle and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord? If you go forth struggling hard in My path and seeking My pleasure, would you manifest love to them? And I know what you conceal and what you manifest; and whoever of you does this, he indeed has gone astray from the straight path.

Koran: [60:1] O, you who believe, do not take my enemy and your enemy for friends by showing them kindness. They reject the truth that has come to you. They drive out the messengers and yourselves because you believe in Allah, your Lord. If you continue to fight for Allah’s cause (jihad) and from a desire to please Me, would you show them kindness in private? I know best what you conceal and what you reveal. Whoever does this among you has already strayed from the right path. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Koran: [9:5] When the sacred months (by ancient arab custom there were four months during which there was to be no violence) are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful. (Mohammed and the Unbelievers: A Political Life; Center for the Study of Political Islam)

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Two Films of Jihad – Pierre Rehov – Belcourt – August 26 – 6.30

August 16th, 2009 by admin

Two films of Pierre Rehov

First Comes Saturday, Then Comes Sunday
Silent Exodus

Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Belcourt Cinema
2102 Belcourt Ave.
Nashville, TN
6:30 pm – 9:30 pm

Admission: Free, and open to the public
Donations: Accepted (to defray costs)

Please join us at the Belcourt Cinema in downtown Nashville for an important evening of documentary film viewing. Acclaimed director and film-maker Pierre Rehov will be introducing these challenging and timely films.  Two documentaries of importance to all lovers of freedom and justice will be shown. The event is open to the public. No admission will be charged. Donations will be accepted at the door to offset costs.

The great challenge of our time is that of Islam. Across the world Christians and Jews, and all unbelievers (kafirs), are oppressed and worse by the forces of Islamic intolerance and expansionism. Jihad is the duty of all adherents of the “religion of peace”, it is stated as such by both Allah and Mohammed in the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Jihad is violent warfare against all unbelievers everywhere and forever until the entire world is under Islamic dominance and control.

Pierre Rehov has documented the effects of jihad and the suffering of its victims. The information in these films will be new and disturbing for many viewers. When we see the suffering caused by jihad we can learn what jihad truly is. Jihad is warfare against non-believers.

These are important films, we bring them to you out of concern and empathy for our friends across the world and to help educate ourselves and one another as to this existential threat of political Islam and its jihad against all. Ignorance of Islam and jihad is morally and ethically indefensible. These films are a devastating reminder to us all as to the reality of jihad, the brutality of political Islam, and the growing danger that we in the United States face. The suffering of Christians and Jews by political Islam is documented every day, but few take note. (See here, here, here, and here.) It is difficult to ignore the suffering that Mr. Rehov has captured on film. Ignorance of Islam must end, Mr. Rehov’s films are ignorance breakers.

We invite you to learn with us from these films, and from their creator Mr. Pierre Rehov. We invite you to let your  moral outrage, sadness, and horror guide you on a path of compassion for those Christians and Jews whose suffering is so palpable in these films. We hope that with new knowledge more will understand. These are films that cannot and must not be ignored.

-DL Adams

rehov

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Yes, Virginia, there are jihadists

August 11th, 2009 by admin

Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, and PoliticalIslam.com, one of the leading scholars of Islamic history, politics, and doctrine posted this evening a concise and insightful analysis of recent declarations from Obama administration “security” leaders that there is no Jihad, and that there are no Jihadists. The only conflict according to the Obama administration is with al Qaeda. Unfortunately, they are completely wrong.

Their ignorant comments display a shocking lack of knowledge about the nature of Islam and its doctrine, Koran, Sira,  and Hadith. Jihad is very real, and Islam is at war with all unbelievers everywhere. This is the foundational truth of our world because this is what Allah and Mohammed command. Since all Muslims must submit to Allah and Mohammed and the doctrine of Islam (the word “Islam” means “submission) then Islam is at war with unbelievers everywhere.

George Orwell coined the term “doublespeak” in 1984; this is when a lie is a truth and a truth a lie. The Obama administration is engaging in doublespeak, and worse.

-DL Adams

There Are No More Jihadists

(article re-printed with permission from politicalislam.com)

John Brennan, Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counter-terrorism, has come forth and enlightened the world with the news that there are no “jihadists”.

Mr. Brennan/Obama says that jihad is an inner struggle and inner purification-a purely spiritual process, and when we call them jihadists, they obtain a religious legitimacy they don’t deserve. He goes further to say that we are actually at war with al Qaeda and its “extremist” allies.

And who is Brennan’s source for the “truth”? Obama. Hmmm. Obama? Since when is Obama an expert on the foundation of Islam? We have had another president, Bush, make his own declarations about what Islam is and he has no more basis to be a foundation of Islam than Obama. Democrats and Republicans are joined at the ideological hip when it comes to Islam, for both are profoundly ignorant about its political doctrine and history. One is dumb, the other is dumber — and you can argue over which is what.

No matter what Brennan/Obama says, the only foundation of Islam is the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. (The Sunna is composed of the Sira, Mohammed’s biography, and the Hadith, his traditions.) If we wanted to know what a jihadist is, why not go to the Koran, Sira and Hadith? Why listen to second-hand hearsay from a politician when you can listen to Allah and Mohammed? Who would you trust, Brennan/Obama or Mohammed? The answer from 1.2 billion Muslims is-trust Mohammed.

What does Mohammed say about jihad? Is it inner struggle or killing kafirs? All three texts have much to say about jihad. In the Hadith by Bukhari approximately 20% of the text is about jihad. Actually, the Hadith is a textbook about the tactics of jihad. Do we find jihad as the inner struggle in the Hadith? Yes, but we also find jihad as the killing of kafirs. Do some simple math and you will discover that around 97% of the text concerning jihad is about the killing of kafirs and 3% is the jihad of inner struggle, the so-called greater jihad.

The Sira, Mohammed’s biography by Ishaq, devotes a lot of attention to jihad. About 70% of the Sira is about jihad. But there is not a single mention of the inner struggle jihad, only killing kafirs.

The Koran calls jihad “fighting in Allah’s cause” and the jihad is about the killing of kafirs.

Having two kinds of jihad is a part of Islamic dualism. Islam is built on two principles, submission and duality. Dualism is its great strength. It allows Islam to hold two contradictory views at the same time. So while jihadists are killing kafirs, Islam is proclaiming itself to be peaceful. Then ignorant kafirs argue about which is the true nature, completely missing the point that Islamic reasoning allows such contradictions to be true for both sides.

There is a clash here between reasoning systems. Brennan/Obama are about authoritarian reasoning. Brennan/Obama are right because they have power, and they assert their power of truth by declaration. They are right because they are powerful.

The other system of reasoning is critical thinking, also called scientific thinking . Notice how different the two systems are. One of them depends upon acceptance of authority, the other depends upon data that anyone can go and check out for them selves.

Obama gave his vision of Official Islam in Cairo. Official Islam is based upon his authority, but Official Islam is not to be found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Obama declared there were no jihadists in his speech in Cairo and called them extremists. How can a Muslim be an extremist if he doing what Mohammed did? Mohammed defines Islam. Mohammed was a jihadist who killed many kafirs, hence, being a jihadist is an Islamic doctrinal model, not an extremist position.

What difference does the name make? It just depends on what you want — scientific truth or fantasy. Official Islam is a fantasy and a deliberate fraud. Official Islam is a Big Lie.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Ignorance and Multiculturalism Must be Destroyed

August 8th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are two critical impediments that prevent the West from engaging effectively, or at all, in this existential conflict with Islam. Ignorance and multiculturalism (proto-legitimized moral relativism) must be deconstructed and delegitimized.

It is a moral and ethical failure to be ignorant of the purposes and doctrine of political Islam. Ignorance of an existential enemy is shameful and indefensible. Multiculturalism must be exposed for the disastrous pseudo-philosophy of ignorance that it is. Founded upon ignorance and silly utopianist anti-intellectualism, multiculturalism prevents us from responding to political Islam because to do so in our morally bankrupt multicultural world is seen as intolerance. Defending your nation from cultural and literal annihilation is not “intolerance” it is the height of patriotism and rationality.

The fundamental dual concepts of multiculturalism are “tolerance” and “inclusiveness”. These very “nice” concepts are founded upon the idea that all cultures are of equal value and that differences between cultures are to be applauded and “accepted” rather than condemned when such condemnation is appropriate. The idea that a culture can be corrupt or even evil is dismissed as “bigotry” in the multiculturalist’s broken anti-knowledge world. Multiculturalism is the soiled garden in which Islam grows.

People who know the doctrine of political Islam and have the effrontery to discuss it in public are accused of bigotry by multiculturalists and the ignorant. The doctrine of political Islam as found in Sira, Koran, and Hadith is inherently intolerant and exclusive but this does not deter the multiculturalists. There is an unspoken superiority in their world; they believe themselves superior because they are so inclusive, accepting, and “nice”. The forces of evil see this welcoming inclusiveness from the cultures of the West as the actions of fools. These foolish actions are of great value to political Islam because in their false feelings of superiority multiculturalists are the perfect “dhimmis” for Islam, perfect servents of a totalitarian ideology whose purposes are entirely destructive of inclusiveness and tolerance. Multiculturalists are anti-knowledge useful idiots for the forces of cultural and literal annihilation that is Islam.

There has long been a concept very popular in the United States regarding immigration and assimilation which is that if we show new-comers to our shores how nice, welcoming, and good we are, they will all become Americans. This model has worked for generations with European, Asian, South Americans and immigrants from across the world. Islam does not fit this model.

The model has failed because Islam does not assimilate. Islam does not assimilate because Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” translates to “submission”. Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are not interested in assimilation, they are interested only in bringing the entire world under Allah’s “religion”. For adherents of this miserable and cruel political ideology of hate and conquest only one religion, one political system, and one culture is allowed – that of Allah and Mohammed.  All other religions, cultures, and political systems are to be annihilated.

Because multiculturalists are willfully ignorant about the cultures that they defend – to them all cultures (no matter how abysmal they may be) are worthy of defense simply because they are “different” – Islam sees that the cultures of the West cannot defend themselves against them.

In fact, multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam infiltrates our institutions and political systems. Islam is at war with all non-believers everywhere and forever, this is called “jihad” or “fighting in Allah’s cause”. Jihad is so foundational to Islam that it is mentioned over 150 times in the text of the Koran. Because multiculturalists have no need to know anything about any culture (after all, all cultures are “equal” therefore knowledge of any one culture is of little necessity, value, or import) they do not understand that they are under attack.

Multiculturalism and ignorance, the two walk hand in hand together, are the greatest weaknesses of the cultures of the West.

The model of assimilation has failed. It has failed because resurgent Islam and its jihad has no interest in assimilation. Multiculturalists do not know this, and when they are told the truth, they refuse obstinately to believe it. Acceptance of the truth of Islam is to accept the failure of the fundamental concepts of multiculturalism.

We in the West must judge cultures and adherents to such cultures when we make immigration decisions. We must accept the literal truth that some cultures are unpleasant and have belief systems that are contrary to ours. The idea that everyone loves freedom is a broken and confused concept. It is a ruined shell because in Islam the only freedom that is considered of value is the complete submission to Allah and Mohammed (and the doctrine of Islam). Islam sees freedom in total submission to the doctrine of Islam.

When we open our doors to Islam, we open ourselves and our nations to forces that reject our concepts of tolerance and inclusiveness. This is the absurdity and horror of multiculturalism- it is a failed philosophy of self-destruction.

We must learn the doctrine of Islam. Knowledge of the doctrine is akin to having the “playbook” of the opposing team in a sporting match. But this is not sport for us, it is about nothing less than our existential survival as non-Islamic countries and cultures. We must learn the doctrine of Islam to dispel our ignorance of Islam. Without knowledge of Islam we cannot oppose it; without knowledge some do not even realize that they are at war with us and therefore we are at war with them.

The banishment of ignorance through knowledge is critically important if we are to survive as freedom-loving, tolerant, and “nice” cultures. It is a patriotic duty to learn the doctrine of Islam and educate others about it.

We must destroy multiculturalism; deconstruct it, delegitimize it, and acknowledge it as the utopian self-destructive fantasy that it is. All cultures are not equivalent. Some cultures are better than others, and some are our enemies and some our friends. This is reasonable, rational thinking. The foundational concept of multiculturalism is that all cultures are of equal value and worth. This is inclusiveness, tolerance, and “niceness” taken to the extreme. This is anti-intellectualism and irrational thinking that will result in the entire loss of our civilizations. Multiculturalism must be destroyed and swept into the dustbin of absurdity where it belongs.

Failure to destroy multiculturalism, delegitimize it and its adherents as the intellectual imposters and fools that they are is a national failure whose consequences are beyond unpleasant. Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam gains access to our countries for the purpose of the destruction of the host culture.

The doctrine of Islam is clear on these points as are the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”. Jihad is a responsibility for all Muslims. It is the command of both Allah and Mohammed. Mulsims who do Jihad are “good” Muslims because they follow the commands of Allah and Mohammed; those who do not do jihad are “extremists” because they reject the commands of the doctrine of Islam. Those who reject jihad are perfect fodder for jihadists because they are not “good” Muslims. This concept must be understood clearly. Our conceptions of good/evil, right/wrong do not apply in the Islamic worldview.

Multiculturalism must be destroyed. Multiculturalists must be mocked and criticised for the self-destructive fools that they are. Their philosophy is used by our enemies to gain entree and power in our institutions and cultures. Multiculturalists, in their utopian ignorance, are tools of the enemy – their philosophy must be rejected, repudiated, and deconstructed so that rational thought can again be the dominant mode of thought across the West. To do any less is failure.

When we know nothing of Islam, we lose. When we say that all cultures are equivalent and we can no longer identify good and evil, right and wrong, we lose. Ignorance of Islam is not acceptable, it is a moral and ethical failure.

Multiculturalism is a tool of Islam; it is a disastrous ideology of false “nice” that is used to stifle critical thought and open debate. Multiculturalism is a complete failure as it is used by our enemies to destroy us. It is a failed fake intellectual concept for “nice” people to abjure their responsibilities to themselves, their cultures and countries. Multiculturalism must be destroyed.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Foundational Concepts for Ideological War – Opposing Anti-Knowledge

August 4th, 2009 by admin

 by D. L. Adams

Knowledge of Islamic Doctrine is Foundational in Ideological War

Islam is so strong because we are so weak. Islam is so strong because Islam knows us; we are weak because we do not know Islam. Islam knows our history, our doctrine, our government and laws; we are almost entirely ignorant of Islam except the false claim of the “religion of peace”.

Understanding our opponent’s purposes and motives in this ideological war cannot be overstated. We kafirs have always viewed our government, religions, and core beliefs of freedom and elevation of the individual over the collective in our society as positives. The totalitarian collectivist ideology of Islam, its adherents and apologists,  understands the essential concepts of our culture and society and uses this knowledge against us.

Because Islam understands us so well and we know so little about it – lovers of freedom are confused to such a degree in this conflict that we are paralyzed into inaction. The solution for us is knowledge. We cannot respond to this threat to our freedoms if we know nothing of Islam. It is a patriotic imperative to study Islam.

In ideological war the battleground is intellectual; it is a war of ideas and convictions, it is a conflict of knowledge versus ignorance. We cannot defend ourselves if we are ignorant.

Everything we had previously thought was true about the future and our place in it is now at risk because of the resurgence of a millennia old cult of death, war, violence, and hatred called Islam. It is much more than a religion; it is a unified totalitarian ideology. The “religion of peace” is a facade for the totalitarian purposes of the Ideology of Islam. Conquest and control are the foundations of this ideology.

The core of Islam is Allah and the Prophet Mohammed. All Muslims are required to follow the example of Mohammed as described in the doctrine, Sira, Hadith, and Koran. Mohammed is considered the perfect example for all adherents to follow forever. Unfortunately for us, Mohammed was a killer, pedophile, rapist, slaver, war-monger, misogynist, conqueror, warlord, thief, and an intolerant hater of all who are not Muslim. This means that all Muslims must follow this example. You will hear the term “Moderate Muslim” often in this ideological war; the moderate Muslim is Osama Bin Laden. He is moderate because he follows the middle way of the commands of the doctrine. He is a devout Muslim. The terms “moderate” and “extremist” are western terms that do not apply in Islam. When you see Islam as adherents understand it, through the doctrine, the extremist is the one who does notfollow commands of Allah and Mohammed; the extremist is what we would consider “peaceful”.

Islam is not about peace; Islam is about submission. Those adherents who force unbelievers to submit to Islam (this process is called “jihad”) are devout Muslims, and are completely within the doctrine. Those who refuse the responsibility of jihad are extremists. Do not let these terms confuse you.

When you see Islam as Islam sees itself, everything becomes clear in this ideological war.

If you view Islam through a western inclusive tolerant “lens” you can never understand Islam.

If you have had the misfortune to attend a “bridge building” event or an “interfaith dialogue” you would likely have seen Rabbis who knew their own doctrine but not that of Islam; Pastors and Priests who knew Old and New Testament but know nothing of Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Most disheartening of all you would have seen Imams who know Torah, New Testament, and their own doctrine. Islam is prepared for this war because they have been fighting it for 1400 years. We must eliminate this knowledge gap if we are to prevail against this very old, but now resurgent force of  totalitarianism,  brutality, barbarism, and destruction of the individual.

Islam is an ideology that is steeped in history, in fact their goal is to return to history. In the West, we are disconnected from history and most are ignorant of it. Because of this ignorance few can place this ideological war, and the actions of Islam and its adherents, into any historical or understandable context. Again, our ignorance is our downfall.

Those who do not know history and are ignorant of the doctrine of Islam are easily swayed, easily manipulated to believe what they want to believe.

Those who cannot place this conflict into any reality that they can  comprehend, a reality based on history and understanding of the doctrine of Islam, want to believe that the war is not real, that everything they hold dear is not at risk. They want to believe that Islam will “go away” on its own accord. We know from history that once Islam is in control, it never goes away. Those who do not want to see reality for reality are denialists, anti-knowledge people.

These are the attendees of “interfaith events” who support Islam and remain entirely ignorant of it. These are the useful idiots of Islam, dhimmis.

This wishful thinking is the foundation of multiculturalism which is the idea that if we are nice enough, our enemies will come to love us.  Multiculturalists do not know nor understand history, and they cannot begin to conceive that a book written in the desert of Arabia over a thousand years ago could be the origin and guide of a war of annihilation against us today. It is simply impossible for such people, encased in ignorance, to comprehend.

We do not want war and, when war is waged upon us by reactionary forces whose brightest spark petered out over a millenia ago, it is difficult for many to comprehend. Multiculturalists believe that if they wish hard enough the hatred that Islam has for the kafir will go away; if enough concessions are given, Islam will “calm down” and integrate or assimilate into the host cultures. They are wrong.

Islam does not assimilate, Islam’s purpose is to make the kafir submit. This is done through jihad. Multiculturalsts are the “useful idiots” for the adherents of political Islam.

The forces of darkness count on our ignorance.  When non-Muslim cultures are conquered the vanquished peoples (dhimmis) are banned from study of Koran. It is easy to understand why this is so. The Koran is clear in its motives and its goals relating to the kafir. “Kafir” is the greatest insult perhaps in the world. Ordinary insults do not have the weight of law behind them as does the term “kafir”; anything can be done to the kafir; there are no taboos.

The existence of non-Muslims is an affront to Allah. Therefore all Muslims are commanded to “fight in Allah’s   cause” (jihad) to eliminate this affront to the deity. Jihad is entirely about eliminating the affront that is the
existence of those who do not accept Allah and Mohammed and Koran.

A reasonable person would never describe an ideology that believed such things as “tolerant” or “peaceful”. The dhimmis of the West defend Islam because they know nothing about it. They may claim to have read the doctrine and maybe even have a passage to share to prove their points. The responsibility to validate their defense of Islam resides with them; you will quickly see that they are ignorant of Islam and know far less than you. These are the useful idiots Lenin spoke of but remade for our generation and beyond. Dhimmis are as dangerous as Islam in their ignorance.

Islam is not an intellectual ideology – to Islam all knowledge of value is found in the doctrine. Everything else is extraneous.

Knowledge is Power – Doctrinal Knowledge in Debate

This total belief in the complete comprehensive and divine truth of the doctrine lends adherents of Islam an incredibly powerful sense of purpose. There is a downside to this – Islam is stunningly stunted, insular, self-referential, and ignorant of the wider world (information from sources outside of Islamic doctrine are considered of little value except insofar as how ideas and concepts created by others can be put to use by the umma; this is anti-creativity). This is a strength and weakness of Islam.

In fact, this is the foundation for ideological warriors to wage their fight for freedom against the greatest force of totalitarianism and cruelty and barbarism in human history. Understanding the doctrine of Islam is the foundation  of our defense. If we do not know whythey hate us and fight us, if we do not know what motivates them, we can never hope to prevail. If we understand their motivations and purposes, their views of themselves and of the less-than-human “other” (the kafir, all those who are not Muslim), we have a slight advantage.

Wielding knowledge is a powerful weapon; truth is more powerful than ignorance. This is the battleground of ideological war – truth versus ignorance and lies.

The forces of Islam have come to expect that we are multicultural, politically correct, and ignorant of Islam. When you have knowledge of the doctrine of Islam the battleground of ideological war is levelled. Everything done in the name of Islam comes from the doctrine. Knowledge of doctrine is the greatest weapon that we in the West can possess in our existential war against this evil and powerful retrogressive barbaric force.

You may be surprised to learn that learning doctrine is not difficult; the research is done, the books are available and are readily accessible intellectually. (Please see below.) The doctrine is a trilogy, the Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam), and the Hadith (the traditions of the Prophet). When you have read these three books, you are fully armed for ideological combat.

Once armed with this doctrinal foundational knowledge what is to be done with it? Since ideological war is about ideas and debate, one engages in debates; foundational knowledge of doctrine is your weapon and your greatest shield.

The bulk of the doctrine is about Mohammed, not Allah. Discussion of Mohammed then is critical because the actions and life of Mohammed are so contrary to any accepted norms of civilized behavior in the West.

Your knowledgeable discourse of Mohammed and his crimes will make a profound impression on the adherents of Islam and their dhimmi multicultural defenders (who know nothing of doctrine, Islamic history, etc.). Mohammed’s story is the “great path” for all adherents to follow, it’s horrific. When you share the story of Mohammed, and the fact that all Muslims must follow his example you will see immediately why cruelty against the kafir by Muslims across the world occurs. The doctrine opens every window, every closed door of why things in the world of Islam happen.

One must always remember that Islam is about submission. The word “Islam” means “submission”; a Muslim is “one who submits”. Adherents submit to the commands of Allah and Mohammed as found in the trilogy doctrine. If you know the doctrine, you know why the adherents of Islam do what they do. This is the power of understanding doctrine.

When one knows the doctrine it is as if one has the playbook of the opposing team in a football game. But this is not football – this is existential war.

Knowledge of Mohammed’s history and commands are the keys to ideological war against the forces of darkness that is Islam.

No Muslim or dhimmi multiculturalist can argue the “truth” of the doctrine of Islam. Mohammed is the key example for all Muslims. Lay out a case against Mohammed by discussing his life and actions, his crimes and abhorrent, perverse behavior you will have shaken those who oppose you.

It has been suggested that there is only one Muslim, Mohammed. There is truth in this. This is both a strength and a deep weakness in the ideology of hate and intolerance that is Islam.

Authoritarian systems like Islam do not like exposure of the truth. If you know the truth, and it can only be found in the doctrine, you have an advantage in the ideological war.

The battleground in this ideological war is often fought on the internet in chat rooms, forums, blogs, websites, and via email. This is a form of text-based debate. When you know the doctrine of Islam you will be able to refute any lie, divert any takiya and deconstruct any falsehoodthrown at you by adherents of this barbaric ideology and their dhimmi apologists and sycophants.

Multiculturalism is Anti-Knowledge

There has always been an attraction to power for those whose character is weak. This is the nature of the support for Islam among western elites. But there is also ignorance that empowers the dhimmis, an ignorance that can be displaced by knowledge, your knowledge of doctrine.

In this ideological war the ignorant believe that their lack of knowledge gives them the moral high ground. They believe this because they never are required to “offend” anyone by telling the truth about the doctrine of Islam.  Multiculturalists do not want to offend, that is the core of their existence.

Ignorance is not the high ground of morality. In this existential war it is unethical and immoral to be ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. Because you (the knowledgable ideological warrior) speak from a position of knowledge, not of opinion, you have the high moral ground.

Truth is infinitely more moral than anti-knowledge.

It is a patriotic imperative to learn the truth about Islam (through study of the doctrine, then applying that knowledge to today’s events).

Denial of the individual, of themselves, is a strong undercurrent in the multiculturalists of the West. Surrender and submission is attractive to many dhimmis but not to the ideological warrior. Multiculturalists are blindly  and totally inclusive and have lost their moral foundation; their moral compass is smashed. They cannot identify friend from foe, good from evil; these are the true relativists of our times. They are very confused, very convinced, and very dangerous. Shattering the drug-like ignorance and relativism of multiculturalist thinking is one of the battlegrounds in this thought war, this war of civilizations.

For those who have read Koran, Sira, Hadith it is impossible to support Islam.

Islam is clear about its cruelty and hate. If an opponent tells you that they have read the Koran you must ask them to explain their defense of it in light of the cruelty and violence that forms the foundations of the texts. This is an easy way to catch the ignorant in a lie; most who say that they know Islamic doctrine actually know little or nothing. Their support of Islam is based upon opinion and not knowledge. These are anti-knowledgewarriors; you will always vanquish such dhimmis with your knowledge of the doctrine of Islam.

A favorite tactic of the dhimmi defenders of Islam will be to try to take you off your foundationalist course. They will never want to discuss doctrine with you because the doctrine is clearly cruel, hateful, totalitarian, warmongering, brutal, etc. Don’t let them do it. You can discuss the murder of the Khaybar Jews by Mohammed; the rape of captured Christian and Jewish women by Mohammed; Mohammed’s pedophilia (he married a 6 year old named Aisha, his favorite, then “consummated” the “marriage” at age 9); you can discuss the kafir. Allah and Mohammed hate the kafir. They hate the kafir because the kafir is not Muslim.

In Islam only Islam is acceptable, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, everything else is considered bad and must be destroyed.

The massive Buddhas of Afghanistan were destroyed by the Taliban because they were vestiges of a culture previous to Islam (a non-Islamic culture); their iconography, books, art, religions, must be destroyed so that Islam can be the only ideology in existence. You may also recall the total silence from the West about the Taliban and their brutal regime until the destruction of the Buddhas.

For many kafir multiculturalists art is more important than life and defense of innocent victims. Showing multiculturalists their own hypocrisy is an important ideological warfare strategy.

Dhimmis will say, “Well, there is violence in the New Testament and Torah, too!”  They will formulate a shallow, relativist argument that “all religions are equally bad and violent”. There are several problems with this approach that you must explain to these deluded folks.

Violence in Koran is permanent and universal, violence in the doctrinal texts of Judaism and Christianity is temporary and localized, it always comes to an end and life goes on. In Koran and Sira and Hadith the violence never ends, because violence is existence itself.

Islam is not a doctrine that reveres life. Islam reveres death because only through death in jihad is an adherent promised a place in paradise with honey rivers, virgins and little boys. In Islam the active pursuit of death while doing jihad (fighting and killing kafirs) is the highest “calling” in the “religion of peace”.

Waging Ideological Conflict – Adhere to Doctrine as Islam Adheres to Doctrine

Your opponents will try to shake you out of doctrine. When it is clear to them that you have the powerful weapon of knowledge of Islamic doctrine they will do their best to take you down a tangential path. Do not let them take you into a tangent – stick to doctrine, stick to Mohammed and Allah and Koran, Sira, Hadith. They will do this because they are afraid and frustrated.

Your oppenent will know that you cannot be vanquished in ideological conflict because you know Islamic doctrine better than he/she does.

Keep the discussion about doctrine, Islamic history and how Islam commits atrocities every day across the world because this is the command of Allah and Mohammed.

Applying doctrine to daily events is a powerful tool as it illustrates how the doctrine is the cause of events of cruelty. Because you know the doctrine of Islam you can build a direct relationship case between doctrine and violence by the adherents of Islam. This is a powerful ideological warfare tool. This is “applied doctrine”; you will shake many ignorant people out of their ignorance with this approach.

It is important that you know about abrogation. Because the Koran is believed by adherents of Islam to be the perfect word of Allah, perfect and unchangeable, the contradictions in the text must be explained in some way. For example, early in the Koran the Jews are described as “people of the book” who do not understand that Mohammed is the true final prophet of god, whereas later in the Koran the Jews are apes and pigs to be killed on sight for having committed the crime of not accepting Allah, Mohammed and Koran.

The “peaceful” verses are almost entirely found in the early parts of the Koran and are universally abrogated (that is, cancelled) by the violent, hateful message of the later Koran.

The method that Islamic doctrine uses to negate contradictions and rescue the perfection of Allah is “abrogation”. This means that later verses are considered “more powerful” than earlier verses, but both the later and earlier verses are true even if they directly contradict each other. This is the perfect illustration of the concept of “duality” within Islam; two opposing positions in a contradiction are both true. This is impossible in western concepts of unitary logic.

In Islam, when Allah contradicts himself he hasn’t really made a mistake or changed his mind because Allah is considered infallible. What has happened in Koran is that Allah has added a “better” verse which does not negate the previous contrary one logically though the later verse is considered in force and the earlier minimized (or cancelled). This is an important concept for ideological warriors for freedom to understand.

Islam accepts the unification of opposites which western logic denies. Duality is foundational in Islam, as is  abrogation. When you master these concepts you can command most any debate on this issue.

Understanding the concept of abrogation is best done with a Koran that is chronological. The Koran is not  traditionally structured chronologically rather it is organized by largest chapter to smallest. This means that the Koran doesn’t make any sense, in fact some scholars have used the term “incomprehensible” to describe it.

When the Koran is presented in the traditional manner abrogation is difficult to see. However, when the Koran is organized chronologically one can see abrogation clearly, the later verses abrogate (cancel) the earlier verses.

Unfortunately for the kafir (every non-Muslim culture), all the peaceful verses in Koran are early and all the later ones are violent and hateful and warmongering. This means that because of abrogation Islam is an ideology of war, hate, intolerance, cruelty, misogyny, and barbarism. The proof of this assertion is demonstrated every day across the world by the adherents of the so-called “religion of peace”.

When the dhimmis and the adherents of the cult of death tell you otherwise you can educate them with their own doctrine. In any debate, you are the master with this technique.

Knowledge is Power – Fighting the Forces of Anti-Knowledge and Barbarism with Doctrinal Scholarship

What is at stake here is nothing less than the future of the West.

We who know that this war exists, that it is real, are on the front lines.

Our weapon is knowledge, knowledge of the foundational texts of the enemy. Surprisingly, many adherents of Islam do not know their own doctrine. This is a powerful truth. Talking about Islam to adherents about their own doctrine may cause them to get upset, but it may also cause them to think. Individual thought is the very thing that totalitarian ideologies like Islam hate the most. Islam is about submission and control, there is no room for the individual because Islam is the apotheosis of the “collective” ideology.

This is an intellectual and spiritual war that we fight in the shadows and in the plain clear light of day while the dhimmis go about their lives pretending it is not real and that you – the defender of freedom – are a villain. Do not believe it.

As you struggle for your cultures and freedoms remember that you are the front line in this as yet undeclared ideological war. There is no doubt that it will one day be declared and you will be a leader in the battles to come if you so choose.

The greatest weapon we have is knowledge. We must be scholar warriors. Without this warrior caste of scholars everything we hold dear, all of democracy’s central concepts of freedom, tolerance, individual worth, and  opportunity will forever be lost under the black pall of Islamic totalitarianism.

Rarely is a country once under Islam ever in a post-Islamic period. The adherents of Islam know their purposes and methods, they use our ignorance against us. They cannot do this when you know doctrine.

So, what of debate? Ad hominem is a popular tool used by the forces of darkness. They will insult you and call you the very things that they are. They will say that your knowledge makes you a bigot, an “Islamophobe”. You won’t care because you know doctrine, which means you know why they say what they say, and do what they do.

Knowledge is truth, knowledge cannot be hate.

The Socratic Method is very important.; use it when debating online. Simply ask a question; “What is a kafir?” and “Why do Allah and Mohammed hate kafirs?” This is a good start.

“Why do Islamic terrorists quote Koran when they commit atrocities?” is another excellent question.

Terrorists are doing what they are told to do in doctrine and are following the example of Mohammed, the finest human being ever to live. Mohammed raped; so do they.  Mohammed killed innocents; so do they. Mohammed tortured people and cut off their heads; they do this and post the film on youtube to horrify and terrorize the kafir. This is called “Sunna” the way of Mohammed and it is considered the finest path for all Muslims everywhere to follow.

Islam is self-referential. If you know the foundational texts which are referenced (doctrine: Koran, Sira, Hadith) you can fight and win in debate against any dhimmi, multiculturalist, or ignorant sycophant person.

It is very important to know this: the ideological warrior must understand Islam as adherents and their defenders do. They must know doctrine and they must understand that it is considered the literal divine truth. Koran is considered the literal word of Allah; it cannot be criticized, revised, rewritten, reformed, changed, mocked, or altered. This is why rote learning of Koran occurs in madrassas around the world. There can be no discussion around Koran, no debate – education on Koran is via memory alone. This is a culture founded upon anti-intellectualism.

Understand Islam as Islam Understands Itself

There is no “Radical” Islam no “extremists”, there is only Islam.

“Radical” is a western kafir term. In Islam it is considered normal and good to kill innocents, attack them and take their goods and women and children;  it is good to rape women slaves; it is good to steal the property of jihad victims; it is good to destroy cultures and forcibly convert people to Islam; it is good to kill people who do not believe in Allah and Mohammed and the so-called “last day”. In Islam these are all good because they are all in the doctrine. Allah said it, and/or Mohammed did it, so it’s all good.

The terrorist who kills an unbeliever on YouTube while quoting Allah is a good Muslim, while the Muslim who is enjoying a beer with you and chatting about work is a failed one. We must always look at Islam through the lens of Islam and not through our western lens. There is no radical Islam, there is only Islam.

What we in the West consider radical is described in doctrine as normal and good, in fact jihad is an obligation for all Muslims everywhere and forever. Adherents of the “religion of peace” who do not participate in jihad against the kafirs are hypocrites and radical Muslims.

Perhaps in no other war in memory has understanding the enemy been as important as in this current civilizational conflict. We cannot engage with Islam and defeat it if we do not know why Islam does what it does. Everything to know about Islam is in the doctrine.

No adherent or dhimmi can defeat you in ideological battle if you know the doctrine of Islam. When you know their doctrine they will not want to engage; if they engage you will win because you know why they do what they do. This is a disarming tactic.

Islam sees the West as weak. The umma sees the West as not valuing its own cultures enough to defend them, so they continue to press and push for concessions until those cultures crack and break. They have been very successful up to now.

The future of Europe, the US and the entire West is at stake.

Adherents of the so-called “religion of peace” are warriors for Allah, Allah’s slaves. All of Allah’s commands, all of Mohammed’s examples and his own commands (just as important as Allah’s) are in the doctrine. The command is war against the unbeliever until the entire world is under the dominion of Islam, under a Caliph and Sharia law.

Ideological war is a knowledge war. Islam is so strong because we are so weak, but we are learning and fighting back in defense of our countries, cultures, religions, and freedoms. This is a civilizational conflict. The roots of the conflict are in the doctrine of Islam. It is a unified civilizational ideology that includes a fake “religion of peace”.

Don’t be fooled by the facade of Islam’s fake “peace”.

In ideological war a winning strategy is knowing the enemy. We cannot oppose Islam if we do not know and understand it. Understanding Islam begins with knowledge of doctrine. When we have knowledge, we are
well-armed.

Know the Battleground; Know the Opponent; Know Why You Fight

It is important to articulate that our  civilization is of value and is worthy of defense. The great military theorists of the past agree on this point: know your opponent and what motivates them, and know yourself and what motivates you.

Knowledge is the foundation of ideological war.

Fundamental knowledge of Islam is found in the doctrine of Islam. There is no greater weapon in this ideological conflict than knowledge of the doctrine of Islam. No Muslim, no dhimmi can argue with Allah, or with Mohammed. The message of Islam is clear, and indefensible.

Educate, speak the truth, read, study. Defend the West with your knowledge.

Resources:

Chronological Koran (abrogation readily visible, all repetition removed):
abridged:
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/an-abridged-Koran/

Complete  Koran (abrogation easily visible, repetition retained):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/A_Simple_Koran.htm

Sira (the biography of Muslim):
http://www.politicalislam.com/store/primary-doctrine-books/product/mohammed-and-the-unbelievers/

Hadith(the traditions of Mohammed):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/The_Political_Traditions_Of_Mohammed.htm

In addition to the doctrine:
Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic
http://www.amazon.com/Sword-Prophet-History-Theology-Impact/dp/1928653111/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1249016225&sr=8-1

Lectures about Political Islam by Bill Warner:
These are foundational lectures about Islam. When you’ve heard these lectures you will be ready to engage in ideological battle. You will know more than most leaders in the western world after you listen. All lectures for free.
http://actwestnashville.com/?page_id=544

History of Jihad:

M. A. Khan,
Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery
http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/

Andrew Bostom;
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Islamic-Antisemitism-Sacred-History/dp/1591025540/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062159&sr=1-1

The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims
http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Jihad-Islamic-Holy-Non-Muslims/dp/1591026024/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1249062219&sr=1-1

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Democracy is Not a Process

July 22nd, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

There are foundational issues that must be understood. Islam is at war with all democratic countries, and all countries that are not Islamic. This is commanded by both Allah and Mohammed in Koran. It is an obligation upon all Muslims to “fight in Allah’s cause”; this is the term for jihad in Koran. Fighting in Allah’s cause means endless war everywhere against the kafir, the unbeliever. The worst thing in Islam is not murder or rape, or violation of the innocents, it is being an unbeliever or an apostate.

The doctrine of Islam states that anyone who leaves (or changes) their Islamic religion is to be killed (Bukhari Hadith). Islam is a dualistic political ideology of war and conquest. All unbelievers must be brought under the control of Islam until the entire world is under Islam. The kafir can be raped, murdered, enslaved, beheaded, tortured, etc. There are no boundaries, no taboos, where treatment of the kafir by Islam is concerned.

Islam is a unified civilization of which religion is a part, a small part. The majority of the Koran is about how Muslims are to interact with the unbeliever, well over 60% of the text. This means that the Koran is a political document. One cannot know how to be a Muslim just from Koran alone. The central idea in Koran is jihad. Jihad is timeless and universal. Islam is at war with all non-believers forever.

The mosque is the center of Muslim life in any community in which Muslims reside. The case has been made that non-violent Muslims do not know their doctrine. Some even suggest that non-violence means “moderation” – the non-violent Muslim is shown as proof of the non-violence of Islam itself. But this is not so. Because the doctrine is clear that aggressive violence against the kafir is mandated, therefore violent jihadists are observant devout Muslims, they are the moderates. They are moderate because they follow the doctrine, and commands of Allah and Mohammed. The extremists are those who do not participate in Jihad. These are hypocrites and apostates. Such people who do not fight the unbelievers can be killed by jihadists as being outside the family, Umma, of Islam.

When adherents do not know the doctrine of Islam, they learn it from their Imams. All Imams know the doctrine quite well. What happens when the non-violent adherent hears, from the pulpit of the mosque, the commands of Allah to do jihad and kill the unbelievers where ever they are found? They must act. Few will leave Islam, because leaving the religion of peace is a death sentence offense. Most will participate in jihad war against the unbeliever (kafir) with money and with words, some will do violence. Those who die in jihad are guaranteed a direct trip to paradise and access to beautiful girls and little boys forever. The non-violent adherent must act if they are to remain Muslim. Allah says in the Koran that he knows that some will not want to do jihad, but the obligation remains, Allah knows what is best people do not.

Because democracies are tolerant and open societies, in the main, they are welcoming to Islam. They are welcoming to Islam because their peoples do not understand that Islam is at war with them; they do not understand that Islam does not assimilate; they do not understand that the purpose of Islam is to overturn the host culture and change the host culture to an Islamic state. No Muslim can give allegience to any country other than a caliphate, no Muslim can give allegience to a system of law other than the law of Allah and Mohammed, Sharia.  This is clearly stated in doctrine. Muslims who give such allegience may be good citizens but they are not good Muslims. This is a fine point that many find difficult to understand.

Muslims are forbidden to have friendships with Christians or Jews. This is clearly stated in Koran. In addition, Muslims are commanded to kill Jews; this is also clearly stated in doctrine. When the Muslims are actually friends with kafirs, to Islam they are hypocrites (bad Muslims) or apostates. Being a good Muslim and being a good citizen of a democratic state is doctrinally impossible for a Muslim who follows his “religion”.

Islam is at war with the kafir, everywhere and forever. It does not matter if you believe this or not; your opinion on the matter is irrelevent. This is the truth and the command of the Koran, and the Sira of Mohammed as well as Hadith – the doctrine of Islam. If Islam is at war with all kafirs everywhere and the purpose of this endless warfare is the literal end of all non-believers (Koran is clear that no other religion is allowed anywhere on the planet other than Islam) and their cultures; one must come to some conclusion about the value of his/her culture and whether or not it is worthy of defending.

Because democracies are based upon openness and tolerance and individual freedoms, democracies are open to Islam. Islam builds mosques – these are the centers of Muslim culture, politics, religious practice, everything in the Muslim community. While we are aware that many if not most of all new mosques built in Europe, the US and around the world are supported by Saudi oil money this is not the most important point. The critical factor is that every mosque has the doctrine of Islam, Koran, Sira, Hadith as its central intellectual/spiritual/political core. The doctrine itself is hostile to democracies and is a doctrine of warfare, violence, intolerance, hatred, cruelty and brutality that is as yet unsurpassed in human history.

When the doctrine is known, and the history of Islam and the appalling things that have been done by adherents because of its commands, it is difficult (that is, impossible) to defend Islam or any aspect of it.

Islam is a political ideology fundamentally hostile to democracy. It is intolerant and brutal in the extreme. It is often said that terrorists and jihadists have hijacked the “religion of peace” and “misinterpret” the doctrine of Islam. This is a lie. This kind of lie, about the nature and true character and history of Islam, is called “taqiyyah”, sacred deception. It is an obligation (as stated in the doctrine) for all Muslims to falsify the truth of Islam to kafirs everywhere. This results in the kafir being confused and unable to effectively respond in defense of their cultures and lands, countries and people. It is extremely effective. Koran is a blueprint for war. The effectiveness of jihad is seen by the success of Islam in spreading across the world and annihilating cultures and civilizations as it goes. The body count of jihad since Mohammed started his endless war is conservatively estimated at 270 million murdered victims.

What of democracy then as it faces the challenge of advancing and emboldened and oilwealth rich Islam? What of democracy as new mosques are built daily and the demands of Islam increase at the same pace?

Democracy is the condition of freedom, tolerance, and equality. This condition was passed down to us by our founders and secured for us over generations by our brave warriors who fought to sustain these ideals and this condition of freedom. Many who know little of democracy, history, politics, and know nothing whatever of Islam believe that democracy is a process and not a condition.

These ill-informed ill-educated people believe that democracy is ever changing and if a minority desires concessions that are inherently anti-democratic, reactionary, intolerant, and cruel it is all perfectly acceptable if these forces use the processes and structures of democracy to enact their anti-freedom desires. Those who seek our destruction know our ways, our systems, our doctrine, our legal system as we know nothing of theirs. We are at a disadvantage to these aggressive forces of hate and intolerance and anti-freedom because we are almost entirely ignorant of their purposes and their foundational doctrine, Koran, Sira, Hadith – the doctrine of Islam.

The process of democracy is that process which protects the freedoms and structures of equality and tolerance that were passed down to us and secured for us by our forebears. Democracy is a condition of freedom that we must defend, it is not a process by which we surrender those same freedoms that others gave their lives to secure for us and future generations. Our role as lovers of freedom is to sustain democracy again so that our children can enjoy its freedoms, tolerance, and appreciation for the individual.

Democracy is not a process, it is a condition.

If democracy is a condition of freedom and tolerance and equality and not a process, then what must our response be to forces whose purpose is the destruction of democracy? The response must be to oppose such forces.

When the new mosque comes to town, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to spread the word of the greatness of Islam, the fake religion of peace. Its purpose is to be the center of a community of believers whose goal is, according to their deity and prophet, the destruction and/or conversion of the unbelievers in whose midst they have chosen to live.

Immigrants are very important in Islam. The Islamic calendar does not begin with the first revelation from Allah received by Mohammed as one might suppose for a “religion”, rather it begins when Mohammed arrived in Medina from Mecca and began his career as a warlord and killer. This is the real beginning of the power of Islam; not the revelations, but the change of Mohammed’s career from prophet/debater/missionary in Mecca to prophet/warlord/hyperviolent killer in Mecca.

The immigrant is the leading edge of the sword of Islam.

If those who love democracy know nothing of Islam, its doctrine and history – the construction of a new mosque is but a footnote. If those who love democracy know the doctrine and history of Mohammed and of Islam the new mosque is a dangerous threat to their culture, and country.

Islam is a political ideology. The mosque is its party headquarters. Muslim demonstrators on the streets of Europe and America are not shy about their purposes – the destruction of all kafir states and religions and the conquest of Islam. Jihadists are not shy about their motives – they quote Koran as they kill. Yet we say that they are misinterpreting their doctrine. This is a lie we say to one another based on wishful thinking and ignorance. It is not based on knowledge of the doctrine itself.

The Koran is the literal word of Allah, the word of god to adherents of Islam. Mohammed is the prophet, the greatest example of humanity for all to emulate. Jihad, war, murder, violence, misogyny, torture, cruelty, intolerance are the commands. The commands are in the doctrine of Islam. The doctrine is taught at mosques. You connect the dots. 

dominate

Your email:

 

Print This Post

“Secular Islam” is a Contradiction in Terms – Response to Tennessean

July 18th, 2009 by admin

A recent article in the Tennessean newspaper, based in Nashville, about a recent trip to Turkey by a local Christian religious leader earned attention for what was not said. The author of the original article was favorable to Turkey and demonstrated a disturbing lack of knowledge about Islam in general, and Islam in Turkey in particular. Mr. Vijay Kumar, candidate for Congress, 5th District in the 2008 election sets him on the path to knowledge in the following response.

The original article is posted here. There is a lively comments section. Please post a comment to the Tennessean if you support Mr. Kumar’s position.


By Vijay Kumar
Tennessee Voices/The Tennessean, July 18, 2009

I have read with interest the Rev. Kenneth Locke’s article, “Trip to Turkey illuminates Islam,” The Tennessean, July 13. The good reverend chose to tell one feel-good side of the story while ignoring enough to fill an encyclopedia. Here is just a glimpse of “the rest of the story.”

Turkey is secular in spite of Islam, not because of it. Turkey’s powerful military is what keeps it secular.

“Secular Islam” is an irreconcilable contradiction in terms.

The modern secular Turkish Republic was founded by the great Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (Great Turk), who despised everything Arabic and Islamic. He wanted Turkey to be Western, secular, European and democratic. It was Ataturk who conceived of gender equality and secularism for Turkey, in direct contravention to its Islamic leaders.

It was Ataturk who issued the order to change the Turkish language alphabet from Arabic to Latin, in order to distance his people from Arabic culture as much as possible. He banned traditional Turkish/Arabic attire and encouraged his fellow countrymen and women to wear Western clothing.

  • Locke’s article studiously avoids Islamic Turkish atrocities in Cyprus and Greece, and the destruction of Orthodox Christian states in Eastern Europe.
  • Why doesn’t Locke ask Christian Armenians, Serbs, Greeks and Hungarians, or Muslim Kurds, about Islamic Turkish “tolerance?”
  • If Islam is so tolerant of other religions, why is it that 99 percent of Turkey’s population is still Muslim, even long after sweeping political and social secularization?
  • Why does Turkey fail to acknowledge the Armenian holocaust?
  • What happened to Greek, Armenian and Russian minorities in Turkey?
  • Does Locke know how Constantinople became Istanbul? Has he done even a minimal amount of homework concerning how Islamic Turks destroyed the entire Orthodox Christian church in the Near East?

Turkey wants to be secular now because it benefits its people. It wants full membership in the European Union so that it can export surplus Turkish population to Europe and the Americas.

If the Rev. Locke wants to know about true Islam in action, I strongly recommend that he visit Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Somalia or Saudi Arabia, then come back and write a balanced and comprehensive report.

The hard fact that Locke attempts to waltz around is that Islam cannot assimilate into American society for the very simple reason that the Quran is the antithesis of the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. Constitution is of the people, by the people and for the people. Americans delegate power to the government to manage their affairs. In stark contrast, the Quran is considered by its adherents to be the literal world of Allah, the Arabic God, and the final arbiter of the law and the affairs of man. Muslims are slaves of Allah, whereas America was founded as a haven and harbor for free and independent people.

The Quran is simply incompatible with the Constitution; therefore, the assimilation of Islam into American society, in the long run, is highly unlikely if not categorically impossible.

I don’t know why Locke wanted to spend his vacation time in his hotel room watching American sports or daytime shows while visiting a foreign land, but if he is going to assay to write about Islam, I suggest he get out more.

Your email:

 

Print This Post

Understanding Islamic Doctrine in Context – Taqiya, Duality, and Jihad

July 12th, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

Taqiya and Duality are two of the most important concepts for all unbelievers, kafirs, to understand about the doctrine of Islam and the inconceivably horrible atrocities that are commited in its name.

The concept of duality is foundationally important to understanding Islam. Islam has a dual code of ethics and logic. This is diametrically opposed to our unitary logic. In unitary logic, which is the logic of the West, in a scenario of a contradiction only one side of the contradiction can be true. So, in symbolic logic, you would say that A and NOT A are contradictory and both cannot be true; either A is true or NOT A is true; both cannot be true.

This is unitary logic. Unitary logic is the foundation of the scientific method and rational thinking. This is not however the logic of political Islam.

Islamic logic is dualistic. In symbolic logic, you would illustrate duality by saying that both A and its opposite, NOT A, are both TRUE. This is impossible in a unitary logic understanding of reality. It is also contrary to the fundamentals of reason and science.

For example, in Islam adherents of the doctrine (those who submit to Allah and Mohammed) can say that Islam is a “religion of peace”  because, in their concept of the term “peace”, insofar as it is laid out in the doctrine, Islam can be described as a religion of peace. The important point that such an assertion neglects is that “peace” in the Islamic concept of the term can be arrived at ONLY through the nonexistence of the kafir, or unbeliever. This means that Islam is at war with every nonbeliever everywhere on this planet forever until everyone is either a dhimmi or a believer (or dead). This means that both statements in dualistic Islamic logic– Islam is a religion of peace, and Islam is a religion of conquest, warfare, violence, and intolerance, are BOTH true.

When we see horrible atrocities committed in the name of Islam; when we see jihadists quoting doctrine as they behead a kafir; when we see churches burned in Iraq and Christians being driven out of that country by the thousands; when we see brutal torture of gays in Baghdad; this is all jihad. Jihad is the obligation of all adherents of the “religion of peace”. Jihad is the violent opposition to all those who do not accept Allah and Muhammad. The Koran calls Jihad “fighting in Allah’s cause”. This phrase  occurs over 150 times in the Koran. It is one of the central concepts of Islam. Death in Jihad is the ONLY promise of a direct route to paradise with all its promised virgins (rivers of honey, and young boys, too) in the doctrine.

Taqiya, or sacred deception, is often used to portray a false vision of what Islam is. It is always practiced in Interfaith dialogue sessions which are always dawa sessions (conversion sessions) for adherents of Islam. Taqiya allows adherents to give a false perception of Islam to the kafir by not giving the full story and by withholding information, and by twisting the reality of Islam so that the Kafir is fooled. Adherents are commanded by Allah to falsify the doctrine of Islam to the Kafir. When the kafir does not understand the reality of Islam, the kafir cannot mount a defense or respond. This is why conquered peoples, the dhimmis, are not allowed to study the Koran. The lies of taqiya, backed by the duality of Islamic logic, has the effect of paralyzing those who would oppose Islam. Taqiya allows the adherent to say, essentially, anything they wish to a kafir on any subject. But most importantly, adherents deceive kafirs about the truth of Islam, its history, and its purpose which is jihad and the destruction of kafirs (and their conversion to Islam).

No treaty, no obligation, is binding to an adherent when it is made with a Kafir. This is Sunna of Muhammad.

Taqiya allows the adherent to hide the fact that the peaceful facade of Islam is truly a mask which hides the reality of Islam which is worldwide conquest until the entire world is under Islam.

You will never hear this truth of Islam from an adherent except from a Jihadist. Jihadis know that Islam is on the rise and that the west is weak, etc. When they hold their signs in Europe that say, “Islam will dominate the World”, they are telling the truth of their intentions; when their signs say, “We love Hitler”, or “The Holocaust is coming Jews!” believe them. They know their doctrine and believe themselves to be good Muslims. When the doctrine of Islam is known and understood it is clear that they (jihadists) are in fact good, observant Muslims – faithful adherents to the doctrine and commands of Allah and Mohammed.

War, according to Muhammad, is deception. (Jihad is war against the unbeliever.) Taqiya, because it allows the adherent to deceive the unbeliever, is a form of Jihad. The purpose of Jihad is to conquer and convert the kafirs everywhere until all the world accepts Allah as the only god, Islam as the only religion and political system, and Mohammed as his prophet.

Our western judaeo-christian concepts of morality are diametrically contrary to Islamic doctrine. We reject the concept of dualistic logic and ethics. We believe in the idea of the family of humanity. Islam does not believe in a family of humanity. In Islam, there is the Umma and there is the Kafir. The Kafir is outside the Umma (the community of believers anywhere in the world) therefore, the kafir is the enemy. The doctrine is clear on these points.

There is no peace with Islam. There is only a pause between battles (hudna). There are no treaties of peace that are worth anything with Islam. A treaty is a tool of war to jihad; not a tool of peace.

The idea of engaging with Islam in the Western rationalist unitary way in which the concepts of Right and Wrong are the foundations of the debate is a failure. There are no moral concepts in the Islamic doctrine (in the way that westerners understand morality)– there is only what is allowed by Allah and Muhammad and that which is forbidden. There is no morality associated - in any way that we understand morality to be – with these injunctions or commands. Essentially, in Islam, what is allowed is moral, and what is forbidden is immoral.

Taqiya (sacred deception of the unbeliever) is both allowed and commanded, and is therefore in the internal logic of Islamic doctrine moral. Because Allah and Mohammad command all adherents to be involved in Jihad forever war against the kafir is considered, in Islam, a moral absolute good. Unfortunately for the non-believer, there are no taboos in Jihad. So, when you see jihadists killing, beheading, torturing, and doing all manner of cruelty to Christians, Jews, Hindus, or any non-believer (and simultanteously quoting doctrine) the jihadist firmly believes that he/she is a moral, upstanding, devout muslim surely on his way to paradise. According to his own doctrine of Koran, Sira, and Hadith he is on the correct path. This path has an end point. Jihad ends only with our destruction.

Nazis followed Sunna in killing kafir Jews

Nazis followed Sunna in killing kafir Jews

Hijab is a symbol of the subjugation of women - it is not freedom but its opposite. This is taqiyyah.

Hijab is a symbol of the subjugation of women - it is not freedom but its opposite. This is taqiya.

Jews are unbelievers - Allah and Mohammed hate the Jews - It is written in the Koran. This is Jihad.

Jews are unbelievers - Allah and Mohammed hate the Jews - It is written in the Koran. This is Jihad.

"Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51); Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'” Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 52, Num. 177 also 179 and 180.

"Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51); Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'” Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 52, Num. 177 also 179 and 180.

Taqiyyah - Islam is the "religion of peace"; Truth - It isn't. The great sin of Islam is not murder it is being an unbeliever, or leaving Islam, 'Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him' Hadith - Sahih Al-Bukhari (9:57)
Taqiya – Islam is the “religion of peace”; Truth – It isn’t. The great sin of Islam is not murder it is being an unbeliever, or leaving Islam, ‘Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him’ Hadith – Sahih Al-Bukhari (9:57)

 

Your email:

 

Print This Post

If Islam is “the religion of peace”, Why is FGM “part of the Sunna of the Prophet”?

July 8th, 2009 by admin

For those brave students of “the religion of peace” who have a strong stomach, read on.  For those who can’t deal with this kind of barbarism and vicious cruelty, pass.

Interviewer: So you think all women should be circumcised to protect their honor.

Female villager: The Prophet said that the men go and wage Jihad for a year. He said that girls should be circumcised so they can bear it for a whole year until the men return. [...]

And “Al-Azhar Cleric Farahat Sa’id Al-Munji Justifies Female Circumcision: It Replaces the Chastity Belts of Ancient Times”:

Please see Winds of Jihad for a thorough article on this horrific practice of those who are not “ignorant”.

Print This Post

Reading the Koran – No Tolerance or Peace Found

July 1st, 2009 by admin

by D. L. Adams

I finished reading the Koran on Sunday afternoon, no “beauty” was found.

I read Abridged Koran (from the Center for the Study of Political Islam). The Koran is organized non-chronologically; it goes from largest chapter to the smallest. The result of this “organization” is that everything in the Koran is without context; events come and go, people come and go without any contextual logic. In addition, there is extensive repetition so that stories are told again and again, with slight variations. This means that the Koran in its original form is almost impossible to understand; not so with the Abridged Koran.

Muslim clerics often assert that the Koran cannot be understood except in the original classical Arabic, but Dr. Puin [a noted German Koranic scholar] maintains that much of the book is unclear, even to Arabic scholars:

“The Koran claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen,’ or ‘clear,’“ [Puin] says. “But if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense. Many Muslims — and Orientalists — will tell you otherwise, of course, but the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible — if it can’t even be understood in Arabic — then it’s not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not — as even speakers of Arabic will tell you — there is a contradiction. Something else must be going on.” (Source: Gates of Vienna)

koran_abridged

The Abridged Koran is the only Koran that has eliminated the extensive repetition of stories and linked the text with the biography of Mohammed, the Sira. Most importantly, this Koran is in chronological order. This means that the Koran is understandable from a chronological perspective and is easy to read; this is not to say that reading the Koran is a pleasurable experience; it wasn’t.

Defenders of Islam must read the Koran and build their defenses of Islam around the Koran and the two other books of the Islamic doctrine trilogy, the Hadith and the Sira. There is no other foundation upon which to discuss Islam other than the doctrine and the things that Muslims do on account of it. Most defenders have not read the Koran. If they had read the Koran they would find it difficult to defend because it is such a shattering book to read. For a non-believer there is nothing in the Koran that is defensible.

I could only read it in segments of an hour or less. For a kafir the Koran is mentally and emotionally exhausting.

Understanding that this document is the core of the doctrine of over one billion people is an astounding and deeply disturbing revelation. Reading the Koran is as shattering an experience as learning that the earth is not flat, or that some deeply held foundational beliefs about the world are wrong.

When I reached the end of the Koran I realized that everything that occurs in the world of Islam is because of the Koran and the doctrine trilogy. What this means for unbelievers is deeply disturbing as it means that we are at war with an ideology that is a diabolical as Nazism and even more cruel. The Nazis planned destruction for the Jews and were clear on this point in their own foundational document, Mein Kampf. The Koran does not limit itself to Jews alone, though there is a special deep hatred for Jews in the Koran; rather the Koran and Islam is at war with all unbelievers (the kafir) everywhere and forever. War against the kafir is described in the Koran as “fighting in Allah’s cause”. All Muslims are obligated to do Jihad, even if they do not want to participate.

Murder of innocents is not the greatest sin of the Koran; unbelief and apostasy (leaving Islam) are far worse. Because unbelievers are guilty through their lack of acceptance of Allah and Islam, anything can be done to them by Muslims.

Islam is at war with kafirs because kafirs do not believe. The fact that kafirs in the west pretend that the war is not real is irrelevent only to the dreaming kafirs, nothing about Islam is relevant; to Islam it is an ally in jihad.

Islam’s purpose is to bring the unbelievers into Islam, out of their criminal “ignorance” as the Koran puts it. If kafirs refuse to accept Islam they can be killed or enslaved to live as dhimmis as their cultures, countries, and religions are destroyed by Islam. Osama bin Laden specifically called the west to Islam before and after 9/11 just for this ideological purpose – when the west refuses or ignores the call to Islam anything, even mass murder, can be done to them because they are unbelievers, the worst kind of sinners in Islam. An “invitation” from Islam cannot be whimsically ignored; this is akin to the “offer that one cannot refuse” from the “mob”.

In Islamic doctrine one is a slave of Allah and of Mohammed. Mohammed is Allah’s Prophet but he has a special role. Mohammed is not just a prophet of Allah, rather he is The Prophet. The Koran puts Mohammed in a position of authority over Muslims equivalent with Allah. This is why all Muslims everywhere emulate Mohammed as the perfect human being to be modeled. Mohammed is the model for all humanity forever in the Islamic worldview.

When you see terrorists beheading kafir captives and quoting the Koran, they do this because Mohammed did this; when you see Islamists torture and kill the innocent they do this because Mohammed did; when you see Islamists kill thousands of kafirs, torture them, burn their churches and temples, and rape their women, they do this because Mohammed the perfect example for all Muslims forever did these things.

“We have prepared a blazing fire for these unbelievers who do not believe in Allah and his Messenger.” (Koran, 48:13)

As an example of moral and ethical behavior most decent people in the west would reject Mohammed as someone worhty of emulation. Not so in Islam. Mohammed is the perfect example; Mohammed killed the kafir, so today and since the inception of Islam, Muslims have done the same thing.

Koran is alive. While it lives, kafirs die.

Mohammed is the example for all Muslims to follow.

“Those who obey the Messenger, obey Allah.”
(4:79, 4:80)

“And it is not the place of a believer, either man or woman, to have a choice in his or her affairs when Allah and his Messenger have decided on a matter. Those who disobey Allah and his Messenger are clearly on the wrong path.” (33:36)

All Muslims are obligated to participate in Jihad. This is the conquest of kafirs and bringing them into Islam, very often by force. If they do not come to Islam, they are destroyed. Because the majority of the Koran is reserved for how Islam treats kafirs it is a political document. Because conquest, conversion, or death are the only options for kafirs the Koran is exceedingly dangerous for any unbeliever.

There are “five pillars” of Islam, these are religious and community-oriented (the Muslim community, not the human community). But there is much more to being a Muslim than the five pillars. The core of Koran is “fighting in Allah’s cause”.

Anyone who fights and dies in Allah’s cause will live forever in paradise with Allah. The temporal world is not the focus of the Koran, rather it is the world to come. The only assured way to get to paradise in Islam is by doing jihad (and ideally, dying in the process). Jihad is killing and enslaving kafirs. This means that Islam is in an existential war with all unbelievers wherever they may be, forever. It also means that Islam is an ideology of anti-life, death; the world to come is superior to the world we live in and the best way to get there is by killing unbelievers in jihad.

“Existential” means that our existence as individuals and as part of nations or religions or anything external to, other than, Islam is at stake. If Islam is successful, there is nothing in the world but Islam. Nothing.

“Let those who would sell the life of this world for the world to come fight for Allah’s cause. Whoever fights for Allah’s cause, whether he is killed or is victorious, We will grant him a great reward. How could you not fight for Allah’s cause?” (4:74)

“The believers fight for Allah’s cause, and the unbelievers fight for Satan. Therefore, fight against the friends of Satan. Truly Satan’s strategy is weak.” (4:76)

In Islam, all non-believers are evil and  ignorant, and must be brought under Islam, enslaved or killed. The history of Islam shows that this is believed, literally. The events of today show that this ideology of war and cruelty is very much alive.

The defenders of Islam speak of the “beauty” of the Koran. I found none. There is some poetics, but it is reserved for the descriptions of unbelievers burning in hell.

“If only you could witness the angels carrying off the unbelievers’ souls!They slash their faces and backs saying, ‘Taste the torment of the fire!’” (8:49)

The real “beauty” of the koran is for the jihadists. Koran is not about our world, it is about the next, and how to get there. Unfortunately, for those who are not Muslim, the best path to paradise is by jihad, war against the kafir. We see jihad every day. Jihad is the murder of kafirs, wherever they are.

“The forgiveness and mercy they, who die or are killed for Allah’s cause, will receive from Allah will be far better than anything they could have gained. If you die or are killed, then surely you will all be gathered before Allah.” (3:157)

If the reader is, like me, a non-Muslim the Koran is not a friendly book. There is little tolerance in the Koran. The only tolerance is for Muslims, there is none for the kafir. If you are a Jew or Christian, reading the Koran is particularly unpleasant.

“Oh, believer, do not take the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you take them for his friends, he surely is one of them. Allah will not guide the evil doers.” (5:51)

One could quote the Koran for hundreds of pages to illustrate the actual message of the Koran. There is no need for this as the Koran is quite clear about its message. We in the kafir world simply choose to ignore it. This doctrine of pretending, this immature view of the world in which we pretend that the world is something other than what it is is the foundation of political correctness and multiculturalism. These two absurd concepts further the purposes of jihad. Politically correct people who prevent the truth of Islam to be disseminated are self-destructive fools, the useful idiots of jihad. 

Muslims are not allowed to be friends with Christians or Jews or any unbeliever. The fate for unbelievers is hellfire, death, or conquest/conversion. So, why bother befriending such people, I suppose. But more importantly, the kafir is considered evil, ignorant, and less than human as they are outside of Islam. Anything outside of Islam is considered evil in the doctrine. This is the opposite of inclusiveness and tolerance. Those apologists and defenders of Islam who say that it is tolerant are lying or are ignorant of the doctrine, or both.

“The unbelievers among the People of the Book (Jews & Christians) and the idolators will burn for eternity in the fire of Hell. Of all the created beings, they are the most despicable.” (98:6)

The Koran is a diabolical political document that lays out a plan for the conquest of the entire world by Islam. One could put this ideology into a movie and make quite a thriller out of it, but nobody would believe it. Suspension of disbelief would not be possible as the plot would be seen as impossible, completely unrealistic. But this is exactly what is happening now in the west, total disbelief and no suspension of it. Our ignorance of Islamic doctrine furthers the cause of jihad, and undermines our ability to exist. This is cultural insanity and suicide. We do not defend ourselves against jihad because we prefer to pretend that it is not real.

This reluctance to accept the truth of the Koran and of Islam is entirely based upon ignorance of Islam and its very clear doctrine, and ignorance of jihad. The time for wishful thinking is long over.

Defense of Islam is not based upon knowledge, experience, learning, or understanding of the motivations of Islam which come entirely and without exception from the doctrine trilogy of Koran, Hadith and Sira. The Koran is diabolical because it justifies and demands death for untold millions and more. Defense of such an ideology can only be explained in two ways, ignorance or active support. In this case, ignorance of Islam and it doctrine is support of jihad and the destruction of kafirs.

Mohammed said that war is deception. Jihad is war and one of its weapons is deception. We are told that Islam is the “religion of peace” but we see in Koran that it is a religion and ideology and political system of war. It is much more than religion, it is an entire civilizational system dedicated to the destruction of all non-believers everywhere and forever.

We are told that Islam has been “hijacked” by “extremists” and that Islam is peaceful and tolerant. The only tolerance in Koran is for believers, there is no tolerance for kafirs. 

The word “extremist” and “moderate” are western concepts, they are not Islamic. In the Islamic context these concepts are completely different in meaning. In Islam someone who follows Koran and participates in Jihad as commanded by Allah and Mohammed are actually moderate because they are following the law of Islam as dictated to Mohammed by Allah through the angel Gabriel.

Those non-jihadist Muslims sought out by western apologists and wishful thinker fantasists as proof that there is tolerance in Islam are outside the religion/ideology as they deny their obligation to do jihad. Failure to do jihad is antithetical to Islam; it is a sin. Jihad is required.

Non-jihadist Muslims are in apostasy and are extremists. The moderate Muslim is Osama bin Laden because he follows the doctrine; the Taliban are moderate because they follow the doctrine (in the extreme). These are the true pious followers of Mohammed.

The fact that so many millions of Pakistanis are fleeing the Taliban shows that many Muslims do not want to be jihadists. Many Muslims do not accept their doctrine. The response to the Taliban in Pakistan is cause for hope because it shows that many Muslims reject their doctrine, it also means that Muslims are victims of Islam, too, in many ways.

What are we kafirs who have read the Koran to do? Koran is the word of Allah delivered to Mohammed by the angel Gabriel, according to Islam. Criticism of the doctrine is forbidden, debate is forbidden. This is why we see rote learning of Koran and Hadith and Sira in Madrassahs all over the world because rote learning is the only way to learn the word of Allah. Can such a doctrine founded upon the word of Allah that cannot be debated or criticized be reformed? This is a great question of the moment, and the answer would appear to be “No”.

We kafirs must accept the world in which we live; accept the Koran for what it says, and take the jihadists at their word when they say they are killing unbelievers because their doctrine (Allah and Mohammed) tells them to do so. They are not lying. We just pretend that they are, or that they have misinterpreted their doctrine. They haven’t. We are unwilling to face the truth. This reluctance to learn and to know and to teach empowers jihad.

This is the ugly truth of our times – murderers and conquerors are motivated by this book to do appalling inhuman things. They believe that they are doing “God’s work”. When you read the Koran you will see that this is not possible. The work of God as we understand him is peace not wholesale cruelty, hatred, intolerance, violence, brutality, and war.

All the mysteries of terror attacks; all the warfare in the middle east; all the conflicts with Islamic states; all the brutality against Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, against all non-believers by Muslims around the world will become clear when you read the Koran.

The most important and widely discussed but rarely read book of the 1920s and 30s was Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Its sales made Hitler a wealthy man, but few who purchased the book read it though many chose (incorrectly) to defend Hitler as the “rescuer” of Germany in spite of not having read it. Had the book been widely read at home and abroad the plans of the lunatic Fuehrer for world war and for the destruction of the Jews would have been known because they were all discussed in detail in the unread Mein Kampf. Could Chamberlain have gone to Berlin and declare “peace in our time” had the majority of those in Europe read Mein Kampf?

Now, with the rise of Islamism and global jihad across the world another profoundly important book goes almost entirely unread but is widely discussed regardless, the Koran. Most discuss Islam and Koran from ignorance and wishful thinking and condemn those who have read it, understand it and ring the bell of warning about it.

There can be little confusion as to the message of the Koran. In the Koran you will find no good news.

There is no more important book in the world at this time than the Koran. It is fitting that Mein Kampf and the Koran are juxtaposed; both lay out a grand plan of global conquest and war, both involve violence, intolerance, and hatred; both are ideological political documents that present a plan for world-wide totalitarianism. The high cost of Mein Kampf is now known – in the tens of millions of victims. The ongoing cost of jihad is almost too painful to consider; the cost of Jihad since the publication of the Koran is in the hundreds of millions.

Everyday in the persecution of unbelievers across the world we see a resurgent Islam. This is the great struggle, the great jihad. They are fighting heart and soul to bring the world to Islam by any means – while we pretend it is not so. Jihadists are obeying their god and their messenger, while we ignore both and pretend that both are peaceful and tolerant. They are not.

The events of violence, hate and war coming from the Islamic world are not “hijackings” of a peaceful tolerant religion, they are the thrashings of a great beast of war. Read the Koran, you will see. When you see, you must teach others. There is nothing of more import than learning the motives of the cruelest ideology on the planet earth. An ideology whose purpose is our destruction.

Ignorance is not an option. Read the Koran. The guidebook of the world as we know it now is the Koran. It is a book without beauty, it is a book of war and horrors. We had better read it. All of us.

Your email:

 

« Previous Entries